18 Jan 2026, 03:40 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 09 May 2017, 12:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/11/10 Posts: 3833 Post Likes: +4140 Location: (KADS) Dallas, TX
|
|
The whole problem with being a "well rounded" aviator is time and money. Not everyone can invest 10,000 plus hours of flight time to gain a certain skill set. In fact I would say that this notion is antiquated if you think that even at $100 an hour that's $1M! more like two or three if we want to get real about cost. Who has that kind of money? The ONLY chance for new aviators is alternative training like sims, etc. Look at the quality of flight sims for the home user today, they should be certified so that a person can log the hours if they meet a certain standard. Sims also allow other more experienced pilots to comment and help without lives being risked. http://gizmodo.com/312735/man-builds-30 ... is-bedroomThat sim for a 747-400 is ~$100 an hour! In addition to sims there are plenty of specialty devices like a crosswind trainer. I used one and to my surprise it was very productive. In an afternoon you can do several hundred crosswind landing simulations where you only focus on the basic flight controls. In real life this might take 10,000 hours to accomplish spread over many years. Coming out of the sim and ever since then I have been supremely confident in any crosswind situation. 20+ knot direct cross went from making me nervous to waiting for the bus. All for a couple hundred dollars. http://simulators.redbirdflight.com/products/xwindAnyway, we need to start thinking different if we want aviation to survive.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 09 May 2017, 15:02 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/22/10 Posts: 997 Post Likes: +1554 Location: Milwaukee WI
Aircraft: Ex J35, Onex
|
|
Username Protected wrote:
I call BS. Spatial disorientation or black hole effect has nothing to do with flying a 172 or flying slow. If you get vertigo, I do not care if you have been flying the space shuttle, or have 10K hours in a 182 or the SR71 blackbird. Your only hope is the mental capacity to be able to focus on the instruments, ignore all sensation and fly the fricking plane.
Let’s say you recreate that accident, except you were in a 172 instead of the jet. You turn toward the lake at 1000 or whatever feet and get disoriented due to the lack of visual cues. Let’s say it takes you 5 seconds to realize you are disoriented, get on the instruments and get the airplane under control. In those 5 seconds, in a 172, maybe you lose 800 feet, recover and level off and start a climb. In those 5 seconds in the jet, you are in the water. You can make all kinds of mistakes in a slower airplane and learn from them, building experience that can be applied to faster airplanes.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 09 May 2017, 15:27 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12201 Post Likes: +3086 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote:
I call BS. Spatial disorientation or black hole effect has nothing to do with flying a 172 or flying slow. If you get vertigo, I do not care if you have been flying the space shuttle, or have 10K hours in a 182 or the SR71 blackbird. Your only hope is the mental capacity to be able to focus on the instruments, ignore all sensation and fly the fricking plane.
Let’s say you recreate that accident, except you were in a 172 instead of the jet. You turn toward the lake at 1000 or whatever feet and get disoriented due to the lack of visual cues. Let’s say it takes you 5 seconds to realize you are disoriented, get on the instruments and get the airplane under control. In those 5 seconds, in a 172, maybe you lose 800 feet, recover and level off and start a climb. In those 5 seconds in the jet, you are in the water. You can make all kinds of mistakes in a slower airplane and learn from them, building experience that can be applied to faster airplanes.
In five seconds that C172 is in the water. Look again at the speeds involved, you are not going to recover. Like Florian stated, the crash will just be closer to shore.
Unless your spatial disorientation is so minor, it really is not worth mentioning, you are FUBAR and should trust the equipment.
Tim
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 10 May 2017, 15:23 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/01/14 Posts: 2301 Post Likes: +2087 Location: 0TX0 Granbury TX
Aircraft: T-210M Aeronca 7AC
|
|
|
I went from a Champ to a Lear. The Champ taught me more about flying the Lear than the other way around. I believe that the SF would be an easy transition for someone who has fair to good pilot skills. I believe that there are more fair than good pilots out there across the board. The good ones I know fly little airplanes because they enjoy honing their skills. I also believe there are more people who would rather spend their money on a new airplane rather than obtaining the skills to fly what they have. I don't have an AOA but I do have a stall warning horn. I want to hear that horn go off before my wheels touch the ground. I'd like to see better pilots across the board rather than the race to the next step up.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 10 May 2017, 15:37 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/09/09 Posts: 4438 Post Likes: +3306
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I went from a Champ to a Lear. The Champ taught me more about flying the Lear than the other way around. I believe that the SF would be an easy transition for someone who has fair to good pilot skills. I believe that there are more fair than good pilots out there across the board. The good ones I know fly little airplanes because they enjoy honing their skills. I also believe there are more people who would rather spend their money on a new airplane rather than obtaining the skills to fly what they have. I don't have an AOA but I do have a stall warning horn. I want to hear that horn go off before my wheels touch the ground. I'd like to see better pilots across the board rather than the race to the next step up. Mark, you waiting for the stall horn in the Lear as well when landing?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 10 May 2017, 15:42 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/01/14 Posts: 2301 Post Likes: +2087 Location: 0TX0 Granbury TX
Aircraft: T-210M Aeronca 7AC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Mark, you waiting for the stall horn in the Lear as well when landing? Na, we had a stick shaker. Aren't we done with all that lift stuff when the tires touch?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 10 May 2017, 21:16 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/06/14 Posts: 983 Post Likes: +606 Location: Everywhere
Aircraft: TP/Jet
|
|
Username Protected wrote: When I can afford it, I'll give Chip a call.
You know he isn't a pilot, right?
_________________ tREX terSteeg, aka PEE-TAH, aka :deadhorse:, Mr 007
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 10 May 2017, 21:24 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/27/12 Posts: 291 Post Likes: +113 Location: Phoenix, AZ (KPHX)
Aircraft: King Air 350
|
|
Username Protected wrote: When I can afford it, I'll give Chip a call.
You know he isn't a pilot, right?
Who cares if he's a pilot or not?
_________________ Josh Lubbers ATP King Air 350
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 10 May 2017, 21:29 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/06/14 Posts: 983 Post Likes: +606 Location: Everywhere
Aircraft: TP/Jet
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You know he isn't a pilot, right? Who cares if he's a pilot or not?
Josh - It was a joke, I promise. Ask Chip.
_________________ tREX terSteeg, aka PEE-TAH, aka :deadhorse:, Mr 007
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 12 May 2017, 15:10 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/23/12 Posts: 2423 Post Likes: +3032 Company: CSRA Document Solutions Location: Aiken, SC KAIK
|
|
Looks like deliveries are beginning... May 8th registration....124MW Attachment: Cirrus SF50.JPG according to flightaware it jumped the pond and made it to Switzerland! http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N124MWPeace, Don
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 12 May 2017, 15:56 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/27/12 Posts: 291 Post Likes: +113 Location: Phoenix, AZ (KPHX)
Aircraft: King Air 350
|
|
Who cares if he's a pilot or not?[/quote] Josh - It was a joke, I promise. Ask Chip.[/quote] Haha...sorry Peter!!  Just sticking up for my buddy!! 
_________________ Josh Lubbers ATP King Air 350
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026
|
|
|
|