01 Feb 2026, 18:55 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 19 Apr 2017, 14:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/24/11 Posts: 76 Post Likes: +33
Aircraft: Mitsubishi Solitaire
|
|
|
Which choices are better given a budget of $2MM? There are no new turbine aircraft at that price point (as far as I know). Based on a quick perusal of Controller, here's what $2MM can buy you:
2016 Piper Meridian M500 2011 Cessna Mustang 2010 TBM 850 2010 Embraer Phenom 100 2009 King Air C90GTi 2009 Hawker 400XP 2008 Piaggio Avanti II 2007 Beechcraft Premier IA 2000 Citation 560 1999 Pilatus PC-12 2 Cessna 441s 1.5 very nice Commanders 3 nice MU-2s 4 Merlin IIIs
I find many of those to be much more desirable than the SF50. The only advantage I can see of the Cirrus is the "new airplane smell" and potentially lower operating cost.
Nathan
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 19 Apr 2017, 14:57 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5193 Post Likes: +3038 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Thought that this would be a good time to tally things up on the ol SF50 thread... Being 309 pages and 4624 or so posts.... People that Mike C. has convinced not to buy the Vision Jet.... 0 Number of people that have convinced Mike C. that the SF50 is a viable Jet... 0 Can't wait for the next 300 pages and 4600 posts...  How many posters have skin in the game and a deposit on a SF50? 0? Lots of tire kickers and spec sheet aviators around.
_________________ Allen
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 19 Apr 2017, 15:18 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11068 Post Likes: +7099 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Which choices are better given a budget of $2MM? There are no new turbine aircraft at that price point (as far as I know). Based on a quick perusal of Controller, here's what $2MM can buy you:
2016 Piper Meridian M500 2011 Cessna Mustang 2010 TBM 850 2010 Embraer Phenom 100 2009 King Air C90GTi 2009 Hawker 400XP 2008 Piaggio Avanti II 2007 Beechcraft Premier IA 2000 Citation 560 1999 Pilatus PC-12 2 Cessna 441s 1.5 very nice Commanders 3 nice MU-2s 4 Merlin IIIs
I find many of those to be much more desirable than the SF50. The only advantage I can see of the Cirrus is the "new airplane smell" and potentially lower operating cost.
Nathan I'll take the PC12 for 2mm Nate 
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 19 Apr 2017, 16:30 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/23/12 Posts: 2424 Post Likes: +3032 Company: CSRA Document Solutions Location: Aiken, SC KAIK
|
|
Username Protected wrote:
It isn't a better small jet... it's a better SR22.
Let's look at it as a logical step up from the other airplane they build... how does it perform compared to the SR22? 310 pages and this is one of the better statements. Peace, Don
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 19 Apr 2017, 16:39 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/07/16 Posts: 567 Post Likes: +162 Location: KPMP, KHPN, LFPB
Aircraft: Work Falcon Fun Duke
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I can't say that I am a huge fan of the Cirrus Jet... but to compare it to a business jet or even the much aggrandized MU2 is really not at all fair.
It isn't a better small jet... it's a better SR22.
Let's look at it as a logical step up from the other airplane they build... how does it perform compared to the SR22? That is probably the best comment of this thread... Thank you.
_________________ JetSpeed Solutions, FA7X, DA2EASy, DA2000, CL600, CL604, HS125, CE500 and the Duke!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 19 Apr 2017, 17:41 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/09/13 Posts: 1910 Post Likes: +927 Location: KCMA
Aircraft: Aero Commander 980
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It is the internet! What else would you expect?
Tim Decorum on BT. Respectful discourse. Open dialogue.
Like this?
Quote: .
That isn't impressive to you? What % market share would be? This is a relatively new aircraft manufacturer and they now own a third of the market. In 2015 they were behind and now they are on top. All this while Textron gobbled up Beech...they still can't hold down number one.
Did you or someone close to you have a bad experience with Cirrus? You have never said a positive thing about them and stretch to make negative comments about anything and everything Cirrus.
What is driving this? There is good in all things.
_________________ Past 12: 2 ratings
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 19 Apr 2017, 18:43 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/31/14 Posts: 564 Post Likes: +271
Aircraft: eclipse
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Which choices are better given a budget of $2MM? There are no new turbine aircraft at that price point (as far as I know). Based on a quick perusal of Controller, here's what $2MM can buy you:
2016 Piper Meridian M500 2011 Cessna Mustang 2010 TBM 850 2010 Embraer Phenom 100 2009 King Air C90GTi 2009 Hawker 400XP 2008 Piaggio Avanti II 2007 Beechcraft Premier IA 2000 Citation 560 1999 Pilatus PC-12 2 Cessna 441s 1.5 very nice Commanders 3 nice MU-2s 4 Merlin IIIs
I find many of those to be much more desirable than the SF50. The only advantage I can see of the Cirrus is the "new airplane smell" and potentially lower operating cost.
Nathan 2008 Eclipse SE new paint and interior with 3yrs warranty and maintenance included And as a bonus you get the new airplane smell
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 19 Apr 2017, 18:53 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 2008 Eclipse SE new paint and interior with 3yrs warranty and maintenance included And as a bonus you get the new airplane smell 10 years old
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 19 Apr 2017, 19:31 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12210 Post Likes: +3090 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Jason has said it for years, and he is right.
You can only compare new to new. Almost nobody on BT buys new. That shows you BT is not really representative of the marketplace. Cirrus doesn't advertise here for a reason. Go back and read the threads on Cirrus sales expierence; even when buying used. The company wants a thriving used marketplace. Cirrus attends events for Beech, Piper, Cessna... Cirrus does not seem to advertize or go where they would cause a rucus. I can just imagine the hard core BT brotherhood complain to the Jeffs if Cirrus ran ads here. Tim
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 19 Apr 2017, 20:02 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16157 Post Likes: +8880 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Jason has said it for years, and he is right.
You can only compare new to new. Almost nobody on BT buys new. That shows you BT is not really representative of the marketplace. Cirrus doesn't advertise here for a reason. When Cirrus offered to bring a SR22 Max BBQ, a couple of people got all huffed up about it.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 19 Apr 2017, 20:39 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/30/15 Posts: 797 Post Likes: +843 Location: NH; KLEB
Aircraft: M2, erstwhile G58
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Almost nobody on BT buys new. That shows you BT is not really representative of the marketplace. Unsure about this one.... Wonder if one did an analysis of average annual plane purchases what percentage of transactions would be new and what percentage of transactions would be used. Would be willing to bet that the total inventory of used aircraft dwarfs the number of new frames entering the market each year. While I don't have the facts at hand, I would bet that if one were to analyze number of annual transactions (buy/sell) of airplanes in the US, particularly, GA type/BeechTalk type planes, that the pre-owned transactions outnumber the new by a fair margin. So not sure that BeechTalk is that unrepresentative of the market.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 19 Apr 2017, 21:14 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21217 Post Likes: +26733 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: PC-12 has a pusher Came about due to bad stall characteristics discovered late in the design stage, so instead of redesigning the wing, they added a stick pusher. http://pilatusowners.org/wp-content/upl ... 04fall.pdf"Flight tests were supported in parallel by a further series of wind tunnel tests in an attempt to find aerodynamic solutions, many of which were successfully tested in flight but were considered unacceptable at the relatively late stage in the program. Finally it was decided to prevent the aircraft from reaching the aerodynamic stall by introducing a stall protection system (stick shaker/pusher)." Basically, at high power and low speed, the stall break was sharp and undesirable. This was caused by the airfoil chosen, mostly, having a sharp break at max lift. The SF50, with the high thrust line, should be relatively immune to this problem. More power creates more nose down. But something else obviously forced the inclusion of a stick pusher and its complexity (as the article above details for the PC-12). Quote: so does the HondaJet. Not as surprising for a 420 knot airplane. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026
|
|
|
|