banner
banner

01 Feb 2026, 18:55 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313 ... 512  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 19 Apr 2017, 14:53 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/24/11
Posts: 76
Post Likes: +33
Aircraft: Mitsubishi Solitaire
Which choices are better given a budget of $2MM? There are no new turbine aircraft at that price point (as far as I know). Based on a quick perusal of Controller, here's what $2MM can buy you:

2016 Piper Meridian M500
2011 Cessna Mustang
2010 TBM 850
2010 Embraer Phenom 100
2009 King Air C90GTi
2009 Hawker 400XP
2008 Piaggio Avanti II
2007 Beechcraft Premier IA
2000 Citation 560
1999 Pilatus PC-12
2 Cessna 441s
1.5 very nice Commanders
3 nice MU-2s
4 Merlin IIIs

I find many of those to be much more desirable than the SF50. The only advantage I can see of the Cirrus is the "new airplane smell" and potentially lower operating cost.

Nathan


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 19 Apr 2017, 14:57 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5193
Post Likes: +3038
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:
Thought that this would be a good time to tally things up on the ol SF50 thread...
Being 309 pages and 4624 or so posts....

People that Mike C. has convinced not to buy the Vision Jet.... 0

Number of people that have convinced Mike C. that the SF50 is a viable Jet... 0


Can't wait for the next 300 pages and 4600 posts... :doh: :bang: :hammer: :deadhorse:


How many posters have skin in the game and a deposit on a SF50? 0?

Lots of tire kickers and spec sheet aviators around.

_________________
Allen


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 19 Apr 2017, 15:18 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 11068
Post Likes: +7099
Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
Username Protected wrote:
Which choices are better given a budget of $2MM? There are no new turbine aircraft at that price point (as far as I know). Based on a quick perusal of Controller, here's what $2MM can buy you:

2016 Piper Meridian M500
2011 Cessna Mustang
2010 TBM 850
2010 Embraer Phenom 100
2009 King Air C90GTi
2009 Hawker 400XP
2008 Piaggio Avanti II
2007 Beechcraft Premier IA
2000 Citation 560
1999 Pilatus PC-12
2 Cessna 441s
1.5 very nice Commanders
3 nice MU-2s
4 Merlin IIIs

I find many of those to be much more desirable than the SF50. The only advantage I can see of the Cirrus is the "new airplane smell" and potentially lower operating cost.

Nathan


I'll take the PC12 for 2mm Nate :duck:

_________________
---Rusty Shoe Keeper---


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 19 Apr 2017, 16:24 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8887
Post Likes: +11636
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
I can't say that I am a huge fan of the Cirrus Jet... but to compare it to a business jet or even the much aggrandized MU2 is really not at all fair.

It isn't a better small jet... it's a better SR22.

Let's look at it as a logical step up from the other airplane they build... how does it perform compared to the SR22?

_________________
Be kind. You never know what someone is going through.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 19 Apr 2017, 16:30 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/23/12
Posts: 2424
Post Likes: +3032
Company: CSRA Document Solutions
Location: Aiken, SC KAIK
Username Protected wrote:


It isn't a better small jet... it's a better SR22.

Let's look at it as a logical step up from the other airplane they build... how does it perform compared to the SR22?



310 pages and this is one of the better statements.


Peace,
Don


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 19 Apr 2017, 16:39 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/07/16
Posts: 567
Post Likes: +162
Location: KPMP, KHPN, LFPB
Aircraft: Work Falcon Fun Duke
Username Protected wrote:
I can't say that I am a huge fan of the Cirrus Jet... but to compare it to a business jet or even the much aggrandized MU2 is really not at all fair.

It isn't a better small jet... it's a better SR22.

Let's look at it as a logical step up from the other airplane they build... how does it perform compared to the SR22?


That is probably the best comment of this thread... Thank you.

_________________
JetSpeed Solutions, FA7X, DA2EASy, DA2000, CL600, CL604, HS125, CE500 and the Duke!


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 19 Apr 2017, 17:41 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/09/13
Posts: 1910
Post Likes: +927
Location: KCMA
Aircraft: Aero Commander 980
Username Protected wrote:
It is the internet! What else would you expect?

Tim


Decorum on BT. Respectful discourse. Open dialogue.


Like this?

Quote:
.

That isn't impressive to you? What % market share would be? This is a relatively new aircraft manufacturer and they now own a third of the market. In 2015 they were behind and now they are on top. All this while Textron gobbled up Beech...they still can't hold down number one.

Did you or someone close to you have a bad experience with Cirrus? You have never said a positive thing about them and stretch to make negative comments about anything and everything Cirrus.

What is driving this? There is good in all things.

_________________
Past 12: 2 ratings



Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 19 Apr 2017, 18:22 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/31/10
Posts: 13719
Post Likes: +7900
Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
Yes, exactly like that. That was a real question.

I like Mike for the record. His approach on BT is not my favorite. I'm not the hall monitor so he can do as he likes. I can also ask what is driving it.

I enjoy BT most for the friendships. Friendships... as in real live people who I have met through BT. My perspective changed when most of the folks I interact with became known to me in person.

Best,

_________________
Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients
My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 19 Apr 2017, 18:43 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/31/14
Posts: 564
Post Likes: +271
Aircraft: eclipse
Username Protected wrote:
Which choices are better given a budget of $2MM? There are no new turbine aircraft at that price point (as far as I know). Based on a quick perusal of Controller, here's what $2MM can buy you:

2016 Piper Meridian M500
2011 Cessna Mustang
2010 TBM 850
2010 Embraer Phenom 100
2009 King Air C90GTi
2009 Hawker 400XP
2008 Piaggio Avanti II
2007 Beechcraft Premier IA
2000 Citation 560
1999 Pilatus PC-12
2 Cessna 441s
1.5 very nice Commanders
3 nice MU-2s
4 Merlin IIIs

I find many of those to be much more desirable than the SF50. The only advantage I can see of the Cirrus is the "new airplane smell" and potentially lower operating cost.

Nathan


2008 Eclipse SE new paint and interior with 3yrs warranty and maintenance included
And as a bonus you get the new airplane smell


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 19 Apr 2017, 18:53 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
2008 Eclipse SE new paint and interior with 3yrs warranty and maintenance included
And as a bonus you get the new airplane smell

10 years old


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 19 Apr 2017, 18:57 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/31/10
Posts: 13719
Post Likes: +7900
Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
Jason has said it for years, and he is right.

You can only compare new to new. Almost nobody on BT buys new. That shows you BT is not really representative of the marketplace. Cirrus doesn't advertise here for a reason.

_________________
Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients
My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 19 Apr 2017, 19:31 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/06/10
Posts: 12210
Post Likes: +3090
Company: Looking
Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
Username Protected wrote:
Jason has said it for years, and he is right.

You can only compare new to new. Almost nobody on BT buys new. That shows you BT is not really representative of the marketplace. Cirrus doesn't advertise here for a reason.


Go back and read the threads on Cirrus sales expierence; even when buying used. The company wants a thriving used marketplace.
Cirrus attends events for Beech, Piper, Cessna... Cirrus does not seem to advertize or go where they would cause a rucus. I can just imagine the hard core BT brotherhood complain to the Jeffs if Cirrus ran ads here.

Tim


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 19 Apr 2017, 20:02 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16157
Post Likes: +8880
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
Username Protected wrote:
Jason has said it for years, and he is right.

You can only compare new to new. Almost nobody on BT buys new. That shows you BT is not really representative of the marketplace. Cirrus doesn't advertise here for a reason.


When Cirrus offered to bring a SR22 Max BBQ, a couple of people got all huffed up about it.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 19 Apr 2017, 20:39 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 12/30/15
Posts: 797
Post Likes: +843
Location: NH; KLEB
Aircraft: M2, erstwhile G58
Username Protected wrote:
Almost nobody on BT buys new. That shows you BT is not really representative of the marketplace.


Unsure about this one....

Wonder if one did an analysis of average annual plane purchases what percentage of transactions would be new and what percentage of transactions would be used.

Would be willing to bet that the total inventory of used aircraft dwarfs the number of new frames entering the market each year.

While I don't have the facts at hand, I would bet that if one were to analyze number of annual transactions (buy/sell) of airplanes in the US, particularly, GA type/BeechTalk type planes, that the pre-owned transactions outnumber the new by a fair margin. So not sure that BeechTalk is that unrepresentative of the market.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 19 Apr 2017, 21:14 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21217
Post Likes: +26733
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
PC-12 has a pusher

Came about due to bad stall characteristics discovered late in the design stage, so instead of redesigning the wing, they added a stick pusher.

http://pilatusowners.org/wp-content/upl ... 04fall.pdf

"Flight tests were supported in parallel by a further series of wind tunnel tests in an attempt to find aerodynamic solutions, many of which were successfully tested in flight but were considered unacceptable at the relatively late stage in the program. Finally it was decided to prevent the aircraft from reaching the aerodynamic stall by introducing a stall protection system (stick shaker/pusher)."

Basically, at high power and low speed, the stall break was sharp and undesirable. This was caused by the airfoil chosen, mostly, having a sharp break at max lift.

The SF50, with the high thrust line, should be relatively immune to this problem. More power creates more nose down. But something else obviously forced the inclusion of a stick pusher and its complexity (as the article above details for the PC-12).

Quote:
so does the HondaJet.

Not as surprising for a 420 knot airplane.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313 ... 512  Next



Electroair (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026

.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.BT Ad.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.ElectroairTile.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.Plane Salon Beechtalk.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.