10 Jun 2025, 04:54 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Pilatus understands supply and demand Posted: 25 Jul 2014, 17:11 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/05/11 Posts: 284 Post Likes: +47 Location: TX, GA
Aircraft: F33A Phenom 300E CJ4
|
|
Username Protected wrote: How much easier can "DIRECT-> Enter Enter" be?
Select airport, select approach, ENTER.
I'm not sure what you're talking about?
If what you say is true, how come nobody is building anything with Proline anymore? Where's SVT on Proline?
Back up your comments with more than just opinion. Look at the marketplace. I haven't flown any IFR lately where all I had to do is fly direct to an airport and then just load up an approach. The G1000 is fine if that's all you do. Now if I'm flying IFR in a jet and get a clearance to climb/descend via a complicated SID/STAR or a unpublished hold, all I have to do is push a button or two and go back to sleep while you are knob twisting on the Garmin. But yeah the proline doesn't do the really useful stuff like tell you the name of the lakes and roads you're flying over or make you more comfortable busting mins in the fog with SVT. If those things are important to you then the garmin is best. The purpose of my previous post was just to explain why the pro pilots who do nothing but fly IFR procedures in a jet every day prefer it over garmin, not argue that one is superior in every way. If you are gonna go VFR at 17.5 everywhere and pick up a clearance for an approach occasionally then you may like the Garmin better. Nobody ever built any real airplanes with G1000 except for the Phenom 300 and it didn't last too long there before it was upgraded to the newer G3000 type system with touch screen FMS. You only see it in the cheaper planes like the mustang that are 99% owner flown and would be too expensive if they had used proline in it. Like I said earlier, the new G3000/5000 is probably way better which is why they are just now beginning to replace the Proline with it in the more expensive airframes. I still don't understand why pilatus chose the honeywell for your plane, never made sense to me but I haven't flown one so I don't know much about it. Might be a great system, I doubt I'll ever get to try it.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Pilatus understands supply and demand Posted: 25 Jul 2014, 18:38 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13080 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Knob twisting? I haven't twisted a knob in years. The Garmin will load up all the waypoints on an airway just like any other FMS. This isn't a big deal. I said "GARMIN". I never differentiated between the 1000 or 3000. But the G1000 in the Phenom and Cirrus are light years ahead of PL21. If I'm wrong then why doesn't anyone use PL21 anymore? Nobody seems to want to answer that question. 
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Pilatus understands supply and demand Posted: 25 Jul 2014, 20:28 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/17/11 Posts: 2474 Post Likes: +1152 Location: Dallas, TX
Aircraft: Airbus, King Air 350
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Or better yet, 300 hour a year in a Pilatus costs about as much as 150 a year in Netjets, which takes you about the same distance. Without the "headache" of programming that terrible Honeywell system. The guys upfront in Netjets actually know how to use ProLine 21, which still blows away Garmin 1000/3000/5000 and all Honeywell systems in what it can do as long as you're willing to spend 3 evenings reading a manual  William ! Now now, we have folks in the audience who are happy to remind us how Proline 21 is "old" and "dated". So what if it will turn a VOR approach into a Cat-3 VNAV to a full stop in zero/zero conditions. Remember ! It is "old" - signed a happy Proline 21 guy 
_________________ ATP CFI/II B350, B1900, A-320 USC Aviation Safety & Security Program Certificate
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Pilatus understands supply and demand Posted: 25 Jul 2014, 20:37 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/17/11 Posts: 2474 Post Likes: +1152 Location: Dallas, TX
Aircraft: Airbus, King Air 350
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Knob twisting? I haven't twisted a knob in years. The Garmin will load up all the waypoints on an airway just like any other FMS. This isn't a big deal. I said "GARMIN". I never differentiated between the 1000 or 3000. But the G1000 in the Phenom and Cirrus are light years ahead of PL21. If I'm wrong then why doesn't anyone use PL21 anymore? Nobody seems to want to answer that question.  Who said "nobody is using P21" ? Now suddenly nobody is using P21 ? You might give that hot tidbit to Warren Buffet and Flightsafety, probably 50% + of their Level-D sim fleet are Proline 21. Yes, Garmin is great. if you want to go hiking 
_________________ ATP CFI/II B350, B1900, A-320 USC Aviation Safety & Security Program Certificate
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Pilatus understands supply and demand Posted: 25 Jul 2014, 22:54 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/08/11 Posts: 399 Post Likes: +53 Location: Valentine,NE
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Looks great.
What's "reprinted to red" mean? The tan colored stripe will be repainted to red.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Pilatus understands supply and demand Posted: 25 Jul 2014, 23:26 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6060 Post Likes: +710 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
Very nice, you need a 5 blade on this puppy.
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Pilatus understands supply and demand Posted: 25 Jul 2014, 23:34 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/08/11 Posts: 399 Post Likes: +53 Location: Valentine,NE
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Very nice, you need a 5 blade on this puppy. I would consider a 5 blade hartzell if it was available. I don't like the 5 blade MT because if it needs work it has to go to Germany. To much downtime.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Pilatus understands supply and demand Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 06:49 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 06/08/12 Posts: 12581 Post Likes: +5188 Company: Mayo Clinic Location: Rochester, MN
Aircraft: Planeless in RST
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Picture of the new bird. The tan color will be reprinted to red. All Nebraska planes must contain red.  Very cool! And red is good! Saw a red Nebraska Helo at the convention in Anaheim earlier this year. Looked cool.
_________________ BFR 8/18; IPC 8/18
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Pilatus understands supply and demand Posted: 26 Jul 2014, 08:18 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13080 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Very nice, you need a 5 blade on this puppy. I would consider a 5 blade hartzell if it was available. I don't like the 5 blade MT because if it needs work it has to go to Germany. To much downtime. Yeah, I want that Hartzell on the TBM900. Wonder if they'll ever make that happen?
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|