04 May 2025, 09:06 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 340A Cessna-Speed Wagon? Posted: 22 Nov 2013, 12:03 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 01/24/10 Posts: 7337 Post Likes: +4999 Location: Concord , CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1967 Baron B55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My original statement was that they (twin Cessnas) need, as in are improved by, RAM modifications. That is a true statement. A stock 340A with enough fuel to be usable won't carry more than me (200lbs.).
Got to defend my bird here... While I don't disagree that the 340 and 414 can benefit greatly from RAM horsepower increases, there are no engine upgrades available for the 421.
Cessna got it right with the 421 and GTSIO combination. 375hp a side, smooth and quiet. No, they aren't PT-6s, but I think it's the best turbocharged piston engine Continental produced.
Please don't lump all "Twin Cessnas" into the same group. Robert
Robert they are right, a 421C is not a Beechcraft and will only provide "EIGHTY PERCENT" of a C90's performance at "1/2" the cost. A 421C provides great transportation and is cost effective.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 340A Cessna-Speed Wagon? Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 10:42 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/25/10 Posts: 85 Post Likes: +69
Aircraft: TBM7 C510
|
|
Looks like I'll have motivation to get back to Beechcraft after this student pilot incident on Thursday. Anyone know of a nice King Air? I'm not sure on posting pics. My 340 was parked and got tagged on the port side, with the airplane swinging around the back side, taking the tail with the prop as it went by and finally the Cherokee ended up halfway through the starboard wing between the tip and the engine nacelle. No one injured but the student pilot now has a story and I'm grounded. Attachment: image.jpg
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 340A Cessna-Speed Wagon? Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 10:45 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/25/10 Posts: 85 Post Likes: +69
Aircraft: TBM7 C510
|
|
This is not what you want to see.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 340A Cessna-Speed Wagon? Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 10:50 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 02/27/08 Posts: 3364 Post Likes: +1419 Location: Galveston, TX
Aircraft: Malibu PA46-310P
|
|
Username Protected wrote: This is not what you want to see. Scott, Ouch! How did the student pilot explain that? Hope you get back in the air soon. Kevin
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 340A Cessna-Speed Wagon? Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 10:53 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/11/11 Posts: 2336 Post Likes: +2506 Location: Woodlands TX
Aircraft: C525 D1K Waco PT17
|
|
Ouch! That's not going to buff out that easily. Hope you're able to work it out. Look at the bright side - time for a King Air!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 340A Cessna-Speed Wagon? Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 11:32 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/25/10 Posts: 85 Post Likes: +69
Aircraft: TBM7 C510
|
|
I wasn't there and have only talked to insurance carriers which tells me this isn't going to get finalized for several weeks, at best. If you depend on airplanes for your business as I do, the most expensive and troubling part of this equation is lack of use as I utilized the 340, 30+\- a month. I just got a quote for charter for my needs next week, $9,500 for a C90! They quoted me a 350 too and it was only a $180 higher because of speed and distance. I thought that was interesting.
I'm going to be forced to own two airplanes as I don't see any chance for settlement for a minimum of a couple months. That of course is assuming they total the airplane and cash me out. If they require me to fix it then we'll end up going down a whole different path as I'm not flying that again nor will I wait around for the months it's going to take to get it airworthy. Besides the economic impact of loss of use and the no longer "no damage" airframe.
I'm not optimistic and not looking forward to the next few weeks and my travel problems. I took having an airplane for granted and realizing how they change your life for the better. Now I get to live the other side for a while.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 340A Cessna-Speed Wagon? Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 15:08 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/10 Posts: 13357 Post Likes: +7438 Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC, E-55, 195
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm fairly certain they will total that one. Sorry for the loss. Stephen, Which model King Air do you own/use for training? Best,
_________________ Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients My E55 : https://tinyurl.com/4dvxhwxu
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: 340A Cessna-Speed Wagon? Posted: 23 Nov 2013, 18:20 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 06/07/10 Posts: 8215 Post Likes: +7278 Location: Boise, ID (S78)
Aircraft: 1964 Bonanza S35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Scott, Wow, sorry for your loss.
For the insurance guys: If the plane is deemed repairable it will be down a long time. If so, how difficult will it be for Scott to be compensated by the insurance company for loss of use? If Scott's airplane is a total, in theory there's no loss of use because he can take his hull payment and buy another airplane. Then his carrier would subrogate against the student's carrier. If Scott's airplane is repaired, and he has a good policy, he should have coverage for renting a substitute aircraft while his is down. Sometimes that coverage is limited to the "extra expense" over and above the hourly cost of operating his own airplane. It may also be limited in time, such as 60 or 90 days after the accident. Good like finding something like a 340 to rent. Ultimately it is the student's responsibility to make Scott whole, including loss of use, but student/renter pilot liability coverage often has low limits, like $100,000, which probably won't even cover the repairs. Can the student afford to make up the difference out of his own pocket? Probably not. Hopefully Scott has enough hull coverage to replace his airplane, and hopefully it's a total. It is not likely that he will be fully compensated under any other scenario.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|