banner
banner

03 May 2025, 17:58 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 193 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 13  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Is the overhead break an illegal maneuver?
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2023, 18:50 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/27/13
Posts: 665
Post Likes: +492
Location: ABQ/ANE/PTK and beyond
Aircraft: Eclipse 500
Username Protected wrote:
I always thought we could operate in the Class C at 250 KIAS if we had their permission. However, a prior post in this thread has me reconsidering that. Too bad.

Yeah, unfortunately ATC on the fly cannot give permission to violate the speed regulations. They themselves don’t always realize you’re somewhere that 200 kts applies, and not 250. Happens to me about once a month on downwind at KPTK. Detroit approach will ask me (or other pilots being vectored) to “maintain 250 kts”, or “maintain 200 kts or greater” while at 3,000 ft, below the DTW bravo shelf.

_________________
Brent


Top

 Post subject: Re: Is the overhead break an illegal maneuver?
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2023, 18:55 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/25/10
Posts: 13113
Post Likes: +21013
Company: Summerland Key Airport
Location: FD51
Aircraft: P35, GC1B
Username Protected wrote:
Back to the original question…. Is the overhead break illegal?


Clearly, it is not. That said, it is certainly possible to perform an "overhead" that IS illegal.

_________________
Being right too soon is socially unacceptable.
— Heinlein


Top

 Post subject: Re: Is the overhead break an illegal maneuver?
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2023, 18:58 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/04/13
Posts: 4716
Post Likes: +3709
Location: Hampton, VA
Username Protected wrote:
Back to the original question…. Is the overhead break illegal?

I hope not. Otherwise I’ve got some ‘splainin’ to do.

Any time I’m flying something fun (T-6, Marchetti 260, or L39) the tower at our Class C airport prompts us and they ask us if we want it.

I always thought we could operate in the Class C at 250 KIAS if we had their permission. However, a prior post in this thread has me reconsidering that. Too bad.

Z.



Depends on who the inspector is, is the most correct answer


Top

 Post subject: Re: Is the overhead break an illegal maneuver?
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2023, 19:11 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/25/10
Posts: 13113
Post Likes: +21013
Company: Summerland Key Airport
Location: FD51
Aircraft: P35, GC1B
Username Protected wrote:
Back to the original question…. Is the overhead break illegal?

I hope not. Otherwise I’ve got some ‘splainin’ to do.

Any time I’m flying something fun (T-6, Marchetti 260, or L39) the tower at our Class C airport prompts us and they ask us if we want it.

I always thought we could operate in the Class C at 250 KIAS if we had their permission. However, a prior post in this thread has me reconsidering that. Too bad.

Z.



Depends on who the inspector is, is the most correct answer


No, it does not. There is no world where any inspector is going to hassle anyone performing a normal overhead break. Now, if you perform it at 250+ KIAS without a waiver and/or make your upwind pass at 10' over the runway or something, you open yourself up to hassling because you are breaking OTHER rules and are NOT flying a normal overhead pattern.
_________________
Being right too soon is socially unacceptable.
— Heinlein


Top

 Post subject: Re: Is the overhead break an illegal maneuver?
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2023, 19:44 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/04/13
Posts: 4716
Post Likes: +3709
Location: Hampton, VA
Username Protected wrote:
No, it does not. There is no world where any inspector is going to hassle anyone performing a normal overhead break. Now, if you perform it at 250+ KIAS without a waiver and/or make your upwind pass at 10' over the runway or something, you open yourself up to hassling because you are breaking OTHER rules and are NOT flying a normal overhead pattern.


My sweet summer child


I had a ASI try to play games with me for far less, and he even had paperwork on his desk (if he had his work priorities in line) for exactly what I was doing.

[insert vader voice] I find your faith in government….disturbing


Last edited on 01 Dec 2023, 19:58, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Is the overhead break an illegal maneuver?
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2023, 19:51 
Online


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/23/11
Posts: 14223
Post Likes: +6466
Location: Frederick, MD
Aircraft: V35A TC
I could be wrong....but there was a group of Grumman guys who would fly formation and do the overhead breaks when landing....one of which was a former FAA director (AFS-800). So, I guess this was all legal.

_________________
Views represented here are my own.....and do not in anyway reflect my employer's position.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Is the overhead break an illegal maneuver?
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2023, 19:54 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/25/10
Posts: 13113
Post Likes: +21013
Company: Summerland Key Airport
Location: FD51
Aircraft: P35, GC1B
Username Protected wrote:
No, it does not. There is no world where any inspector is going to hassle anyone performing a normal overhead break. Now, if you perform it at 250+ KIAS without a waiver and/or make your upwind pass at 10' over the runway or something, you open yourself up to hassling because you are breaking OTHER rules and are NOT flying a normal overhead pattern.


My sweet summer child


I have probably done more overhead patterns at both military and civilian fields in fighters and in civilian aircraft than you have hours hand-flying airplanes. I've done them in front of FAA inspectors and with FAA inspectors in the plane and FAA inspectors in the formation.

Quote:
I had a ASI try to play games with me for far less, and he even had paperwork on his desk (if he has his priorities in line) for exactly what I was doing.

[insert vader voice] I find your faith in government….disturbing


This isn't about faith in government. This is about a standard maneuver that is described in the AIM and does not require aerobatic maneuvers or exceeding airspace speed restrictions.
_________________
Being right too soon is socially unacceptable.
— Heinlein


Top

 Post subject: Re: Is the overhead break an illegal maneuver?
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2023, 20:01 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/04/13
Posts: 4716
Post Likes: +3709
Location: Hampton, VA
Username Protected wrote:
I could be wrong....but there was a group of Grumman guys who would fly formation and do the overhead breaks when landing....one of which was a former FAA director (AFS-800). So, I guess this was all legal.


I guess

“FAA Administrator Babbitt Arrested for DUI; Takes Leave of Absence”

https://www.flyingmag.com/news-faa-admi ... e-absence/

I’m sure it was 110% legal when he does it though, laws for thee and all that


Top

 Post subject: Re: Is the overhead break an illegal maneuver?
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2023, 22:21 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/22/07
Posts: 14238
Post Likes: +16095
Company: Midwest Chemtrails, LLC
Location: KPTK (SE Michigan)
Aircraft: C205
Username Protected wrote:
I could be wrong....but there was a group of Grumman guys who would fly formation and do the overhead breaks when landing....one of which was a former FAA director (AFS-800). So, I guess this was all legal.


I guess

“FAA Administrator Babbitt Arrested for DUI; Takes Leave of Absence”

https://www.flyingmag.com/news-faa-admi ... e-absence/

I’m sure it was 110% legal when he does it though, laws for thee and all that


Dismissed:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/cr ... story.html
_________________
Holoholo …


Top

 Post subject: Re: Is the overhead break an illegal maneuver?
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2023, 22:23 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/22/07
Posts: 14238
Post Likes: +16095
Company: Midwest Chemtrails, LLC
Location: KPTK (SE Michigan)
Aircraft: C205
Username Protected wrote:
I could be wrong....but there was a group of Grumman guys who would fly formation and do the overhead breaks when landing....one of which was a former FAA director (AFS-800). So, I guess this was all legal.


I guess

“FAA Administrator Babbitt Arrested for DUI; Takes Leave of Absence”

https://www.flyingmag.com/news-faa-admi ... e-absence/

I’m sure it was 110% legal when he does it though, laws for thee and all that


Dismissed: Officer lied about the reason for the stop.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/cr ... story.html
_________________
Holoholo …


Top

 Post subject: Re: Is the overhead break an illegal maneuver?
PostPosted: 02 Dec 2023, 09:07 
Online


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/05/09
Posts: 4323
Post Likes: +3108
Location: Raleigh, NC
Aircraft: L-39
let's do it this way:

How are you doing your overheads?

800', climbing left turn (45' AOB) to 1000' for the downwind CTL sounds good so far.

or-

800', level turn for the 800' downwind CTL.

others?

_________________
"Find worthy causes in your life."


Top

 Post subject: Re: Is the overhead break an illegal maneuver?
PostPosted: 02 Dec 2023, 09:23 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/25/10
Posts: 13113
Post Likes: +21013
Company: Summerland Key Airport
Location: FD51
Aircraft: P35, GC1B
Username Protected wrote:
let's do it this way:

How are you doing your overheads?

800', climbing left turn (45' AOB) to 1000' for the downwind CTL sounds good so far.

or-

800', level turn for the 800' downwind CTL.

others?


Descend from Initial to pattern altitude somewhere close to Vne. Level break at my intended pattern altitude. Usually requires no more than 45 deg AOB.

_________________
Being right too soon is socially unacceptable.
— Heinlein


Top

 Post subject: Re: Is the overhead break an illegal maneuver?
PostPosted: 02 Dec 2023, 09:59 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 07/13/19
Posts: 582
Post Likes: +704
Company: USAF and Polaris Program
Location: FL
Aircraft: F-35A A-JET L39 A36
Usually a 3-5nm initial (if not already defined) at or above pattern altitude with good energy, if in a turbine aircraft descend to 1500AGL or whatever the turbine pattern altitude is. Level break to follow any downwind traffic. Usually ~60 deg of bank to keep a reasonably tight downwind (typically wing tip on the runway for most jets that I fly). Check below gear speed, gear/flaps down, 3 green prior to perching -usually perch slightly downwind of the numbers. Continuous base to final ~60 deg bank until level about 300' on final - land on the center to downwind half of the runway depending on the winds and number in formation, clear to the cold side after good brakes and mirror check. Generally have wingmen use 5" spacing for the break.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Is the overhead break an illegal maneuver?
PostPosted: 02 Dec 2023, 13:24 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/30/10
Posts: 4403
Post Likes: +3974
The Airplane Flying Handbook, while not "Regulatory" does list the OA in Chapter 7.

Not all airports have a single TPA. Some segregate HP and Turbine AC in a higher pattern. Prescott (KPRC) is one and lists their patterns in the AFD. https://aeronav.faa.gov/afd/30nov2023/s ... OV2023.pdf

Quote:
TPA
for light acft all rwys 6045(1000). TPA for large acft, all turbo prop/jet and high perf acft all rwys 6545(1500).


Lots of traffic and sometimes the OA is recommended to reach the opposite side of the field for landing. I had this "oral" question on my ME rating and the DPE prompted me for it even though it wasn't regulatory.**

I'd bet there are a lot of airports with this configuration; see your AFD in your area for some.

=====

Some planes are slicker than others. the 310 is and if I'm west of our field I use the OA to enter the Downwind 18. Our field is at 6800, with a TPA of 7800. I use a TPA of 8300. This normally results in 500fpm descents and 30 AOB everywhere. Its a wider pattern for faster planes so dont be surprised by 1.5 - 2 mile offsets.

Usually, I'm 10.5kft and 15 miles out for the approach. I keep altitude hold, reduce throttles to 15" RPM to 2400 and mixtures to 8000' setting. If I were to just trim the nose down, I would soon be in the yellow arc and approach Vne, so Mike's comment isn't out of line. I use the OA to both reduce speed and altitude smoothly. There are other benefits like reducing CHTs slower and giving you a clear view of the windsock and pattern circle.

When I've slowed to 160 I can add the first notch of flaps and turn off altitude hold (~10miles out). This gives me a 500fpm descent. I'm still 160 at the Airport boundary.

Leveling off at 8300, I break midfield to 45 AOB. This results in pattern altitude and 140kts, my Vle abeam the numbers. I can either square up the pattern or continue the turn. Rolling out on final results in 100kts.

And just to set off all the internet experts, To an uncontrolled airport, I make calls at 5 mile intervals and overhead before the break. At my field, its; "Clark Traffic: Twin Cessna 3034L, xx mile west, Overhead Approach, midfield break, left downwind RW18...Clark". It just doesn't make sense to approach fast, unannounced into a quiet field. You never know whose there and not listening.

We have a new RNAV GPS 18 approach: https://aeronav.faa.gov/d-tpp/2312/10608R18.PDF So I expect more traffic from the west. This is a new approach so they are some special alternate minimums, and we hope to get these lowered soon.

=====

** I must say that my DPE was also the best CFI I have ever had. Tough, knowledgeable, fair and willing to speak plainly. He explained that attempting a Multi Instrument rating at my age fell into the Old-Bold-Pilot category. I consider myself a Poster Child for this and treat my flying accordingly.

_________________
An Engineer's job is to say No. Until the check clears, then make a mountain from a molehill.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Is the overhead break an illegal maneuver?
PostPosted: 02 Dec 2023, 22:04 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/10/17
Posts: 2123
Post Likes: +1547
Company: Skyhaven Airport Inc
Aircraft: various mid century
Non military or ex military Warbird is there any consideration to VA speed in all these level 45-60 degree banks? Especially since it is typically end of flight and light on fuel. (below gross)

It's interesting to read what others do. I try to be as close to 1G and not rolling into or out of a turn when I put the gear down in any airplane. Especially in an airplane with mechanical electric gear. Lots of moving parts that are never checked for function with G on them.

Uncontrolled field your rolling belly up to cut into or across downwind traffic in 45-60 degree bank? If others are in the pattern say one on downwind the other on crosswind climbing after takeoff how do you time the break?

Does a normal average pilot know what you're talking about when announcing "initial for the overhead". Overhead approach for midfield break? Is that taught in any civilian school?


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 193 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 13  Next



Aviation Fabricators (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.SCA.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.bkool-85x50-2014-08-04.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.