banner
banner

24 Nov 2025, 03:54 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 162 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 11  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2018, 21:55 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/12/14
Posts: 873
Post Likes: +526
Location: KCRQ
Aircraft: OP's, 414A, RV6
Westwind


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2018, 21:57 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 09/17/12
Posts: 145
Post Likes: +97
Location: Central TX
Aircraft: 2022 TF60
Arrive in style with your entourage:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_DC-3

Not pressurized but I think it will meet or exceed the other requirements. :D


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2018, 22:06 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6653
Post Likes: +5963
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
Username Protected wrote:
Can you really get a Citation II for 500-600K

Yes, 14 Citation II are advertised on controller.com for $600K or less.

They mostly don't seem like derelicts.

Example right at $600K:

https://www.controller.com/listings/air ... itation-ii

One engine 0 SMOH, other 0 HSI, on JSSI program. Seems configured for max passengers (9, two 4 club, one belted lav).

Mike C.


And you're going to get that thing into 2000ft? Maybe you mean meters?

:beechslap:
_________________
Without love, where would you be now?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2018, 22:08 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/29/13
Posts: 1084
Post Likes: +405
Location: KRMN
Aircraft: Baron 58P
Username Protected wrote:
Can you really get a Citation II for 500-600K

Yes, 14 Citation II are advertised on controller.com for $600K or less.

They mostly don't seem like derelicts.

Example right at $600K:

https://www.controller.com/listings/air ... itation-ii

One engine 0 SMOH, other 0 HSI, on JSSI program. Seems configured for max passengers (9, two 4 club, one belted lav).

Mike C.



Cool---Learn something new everyday and something to keep in mind for down the road.......Thanks

Matt

Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2018, 22:31 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 07/08/12
Posts: 103
Post Likes: +7
Aircraft: Citation Encore
Lear 31A, you can find older ones for like $650,000 on MSP gold with not that much hours on the airframe.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2018, 23:45 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/20/09
Posts: 2661
Post Likes: +2241
Company: Jcrane, Inc.
Location: KVES Greenville, OH
Aircraft: C441, RV7A
Username Protected wrote:
he doesn't want a fancy jet

I took this as "he doesn't want a jet". Maybe I misunderstood...

_________________
Jack
N441M N107XX


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2018, 23:48 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 05/05/09
Posts: 5308
Post Likes: +5297
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
An old citation is not a fancy jet. It's a safe and reliable business tool. Definitely should throw this into the mix.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 03 Feb 2018, 00:06 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20768
Post Likes: +26274
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
And you're going to get that thing into 2000ft?

The spec was 2500-3000 ft, preference, not a requirement.

Why? To reduce ground time driving by using smaller airports.

But the 501SP reduces air time, so makes up for that.

It also fits into pretty small airports. You can get it into 2000 ft, but not comfortably out with any load.

You aren't getting a Commander out of 2000 ft either, with runway to allow for an engine failure.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 03 Feb 2018, 00:07 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20768
Post Likes: +26274
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
he doesn't want a fancy jet

I took this as "he doesn't want a jet". Maybe I misunderstood...

I'd suggest a 501SP is the least fancy of jets.

Mike C.
_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 03 Feb 2018, 00:11 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6653
Post Likes: +5963
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
Username Protected wrote:

You aren't getting a Commander out of 2000 ft either, with runway to allow for an engine failure.


Nobody gets an 8 pax twin out if you have to take that into account. An 840 has 1833ft takeoff to 50ft in altitude at MTOW.

_________________
Without love, where would you be now?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 03 Feb 2018, 11:00 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8579
Post Likes: +11131
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
My suggestion is an airplane that won't do any of the originally stated criteria, but makes sense, and allows him to move into an aircraft that will.

He should get a King Air C90, it's easy to find well qualified pilots, makes a lot of sense for a non-pilot owner and he can easily transition into a B200 or even a 300 in the future. King Airs dominate teh turboprop world in this price range because they are simple, straightforward and predictable.

You can poor boy a Citation II and make it make sense, but that is with someone who knows what they're doing staying on top of it. Otherwise he'll spend $150k plus at his next big inspection and be done with aviation.

_________________
Recent acquisitions - 2019 King Air 350i - 2025 Citation M2Gen2 - 2015 Citation CJ3+


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 03 Feb 2018, 11:48 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 12835
Post Likes: +5276
Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
Or a 58P and a planesense 1/16 pc12 share


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 03 Feb 2018, 12:15 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20768
Post Likes: +26274
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
He should get a King Air C90

Costs as much per mile as the 501SP.

Especially when you factor extra miles for headwinds and weather.

Quote:
King Airs dominate teh turboprop world in this price range because they are simple, straightforward and predictable.

And because most use them on short flights where the speed limitations are not so exposed. The stated use case is a fairly large territory where there are some long legs. The Citation opens up perhaps more territory for business, too.

Quote:
You can poor boy a Citation II and make it make sense, but that is with someone who knows what they're doing staying on top of it. Otherwise he'll spend $150k plus at his next big inspection and be done with aviation.

You can spend $150K on a King Air, too. The difference is that the jet is worth it.

If you consider safety at all, the King Air loses bad to the Citation.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 03 Feb 2018, 12:30 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20768
Post Likes: +26274
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Nobody gets an 8 pax twin out if you have to take that into account.

When flying around 8 people, I'd take that into account.

Engine failure safety is baked into the jet numbers, not so generally with the turboprops.

If you knew an engine would fail on the next flight, would you take the turboprop or the jet?

That's no contest, the jet wins.

One would have to analyze the destinations to see how compelling the short runway capability is. My guess is that it isn't that compelling. For one thing, short airport are more likely not to have jet fuel, so the turboprop isn't going there anyway.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options
PostPosted: 03 Feb 2018, 13:55 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/08/14
Posts: 101
Post Likes: +118
Company: Innovation Two
Aircraft: Piper PA 60
Message to the contractor:

1) I want you to build me an 8,000 sq ft house
2) Indoor pool and squash courts
3) 6 bedroom - each with an ensuite
4) Heated floors, heated driveway so no shovelling
5) 7 car garage, heated and AC
6) Built in AV, home theatre
7) Gourmet kitchen
8) Less than $300K on a lot of my choosing
9) Must be finished on time (3 months) without add-ons

Somebody needs to help him round out his expectations. Examples include "all weather" - and 2,500 ft. Is there likely to be an ILS / GPS / Lighting on that airport?

We all have dreams I guess. Turbo Commander looks like the closest

Bob


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 162 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 11  Next



PWI, Inc. (Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.AAI.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.SCA.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.sarasota.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.