24 Nov 2025, 03:54 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 02 Feb 2018, 22:06 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6653 Post Likes: +5963 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Can you really get a Citation II for 500-600K Yes, 14 Citation II are advertised on controller.com for $600K or less. They mostly don't seem like derelicts. Example right at $600K: https://www.controller.com/listings/air ... itation-iiOne engine 0 SMOH, other 0 HSI, on JSSI program. Seems configured for max passengers (9, two 4 club, one belted lav). Mike C.
And you're going to get that thing into 2000ft? Maybe you mean meters?
_________________ Without love, where would you be now?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 02 Feb 2018, 22:08 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/29/13 Posts: 1084 Post Likes: +405 Location: KRMN
Aircraft: Baron 58P
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Can you really get a Citation II for 500-600K Yes, 14 Citation II are advertised on controller.com for $600K or less. They mostly don't seem like derelicts. Example right at $600K: https://www.controller.com/listings/air ... itation-iiOne engine 0 SMOH, other 0 HSI, on JSSI program. Seems configured for max passengers (9, two 4 club, one belted lav). Mike C.
Cool---Learn something new everyday and something to keep in mind for down the road.......Thanks
Matt
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 02 Feb 2018, 22:31 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/08/12 Posts: 103 Post Likes: +7
Aircraft: Citation Encore
|
|
|
Lear 31A, you can find older ones for like $650,000 on MSP gold with not that much hours on the airframe.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 02 Feb 2018, 23:45 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/20/09 Posts: 2661 Post Likes: +2241 Company: Jcrane, Inc. Location: KVES Greenville, OH
Aircraft: C441, RV7A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: he doesn't want a fancy jet I took this as "he doesn't want a jet". Maybe I misunderstood...
_________________ Jack N441M N107XX
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 02 Feb 2018, 23:48 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 5308 Post Likes: +5297
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
|
|
|
An old citation is not a fancy jet. It's a safe and reliable business tool. Definitely should throw this into the mix.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 03 Feb 2018, 00:06 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20768 Post Likes: +26274 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: And you're going to get that thing into 2000ft? The spec was 2500-3000 ft, preference, not a requirement. Why? To reduce ground time driving by using smaller airports. But the 501SP reduces air time, so makes up for that. It also fits into pretty small airports. You can get it into 2000 ft, but not comfortably out with any load. You aren't getting a Commander out of 2000 ft either, with runway to allow for an engine failure. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 03 Feb 2018, 00:07 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20768 Post Likes: +26274 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: he doesn't want a fancy jet I took this as "he doesn't want a jet". Maybe I misunderstood... I'd suggest a 501SP is the least fancy of jets.
Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 03 Feb 2018, 00:11 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6653 Post Likes: +5963 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You aren't getting a Commander out of 2000 ft either, with runway to allow for an engine failure.
Nobody gets an 8 pax twin out if you have to take that into account. An 840 has 1833ft takeoff to 50ft in altitude at MTOW.
_________________ Without love, where would you be now?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 03 Feb 2018, 12:15 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20768 Post Likes: +26274 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: He should get a King Air C90 Costs as much per mile as the 501SP. Especially when you factor extra miles for headwinds and weather. Quote: King Airs dominate teh turboprop world in this price range because they are simple, straightforward and predictable. And because most use them on short flights where the speed limitations are not so exposed. The stated use case is a fairly large territory where there are some long legs. The Citation opens up perhaps more territory for business, too. Quote: You can poor boy a Citation II and make it make sense, but that is with someone who knows what they're doing staying on top of it. Otherwise he'll spend $150k plus at his next big inspection and be done with aviation. You can spend $150K on a King Air, too. The difference is that the jet is worth it. If you consider safety at all, the King Air loses bad to the Citation. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 03 Feb 2018, 12:30 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20768 Post Likes: +26274 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Nobody gets an 8 pax twin out if you have to take that into account. When flying around 8 people, I'd take that into account. Engine failure safety is baked into the jet numbers, not so generally with the turboprops. If you knew an engine would fail on the next flight, would you take the turboprop or the jet? That's no contest, the jet wins. One would have to analyze the destinations to see how compelling the short runway capability is. My guess is that it isn't that compelling. For one thing, short airport are more likely not to have jet fuel, so the turboprop isn't going there anyway. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Airplane Purchase Research: Pressurized Twin Options Posted: 03 Feb 2018, 13:55 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/08/14 Posts: 101 Post Likes: +118 Company: Innovation Two
Aircraft: Piper PA 60
|
|
|
Message to the contractor:
1) I want you to build me an 8,000 sq ft house 2) Indoor pool and squash courts 3) 6 bedroom - each with an ensuite 4) Heated floors, heated driveway so no shovelling 5) 7 car garage, heated and AC 6) Built in AV, home theatre 7) Gourmet kitchen 8) Less than $300K on a lot of my choosing 9) Must be finished on time (3 months) without add-ons
Somebody needs to help him round out his expectations. Examples include "all weather" - and 2,500 ft. Is there likely to be an ILS / GPS / Lighting on that airport?
We all have dreams I guess. Turbo Commander looks like the closest
Bob
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|