22 Nov 2025, 17:39 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Favorite Military Bomber/Fighter? Posted: 07 Sep 2016, 22:19 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/07/09 Posts: 1402 Post Likes: +844 Location: North Florida
|
|
...let's not forget the transport aircraft...hands down best in that category is the C-130...indeed, imho--perhaps the best overall aircraft in our history... ...on topic, gotta love the Skyraider...and numeral uno the Hog...and, a very close second--the F-15... ...on a related topic, despite spirited discussions that may ensue otherwise between everyone in this virtual hangar--I've always considered it a privilege to discuss various military topics of the day with all of our high speed resident military aviators--past and present...you guys are the best 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Favorite Military Bomber/Fighter? Posted: 08 Sep 2016, 08:21 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/02/13 Posts: 3161 Post Likes: +3090 Location: Stamping Ground, Ky
Aircraft: twin bonanza
|
|
|
F104/F105 Lead over Hanoi "two, where are ya?" Two "ah don't know, but ah'm going somewhere at a thousand knots..."
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Favorite Military Bomber/Fighter? Posted: 08 Sep 2016, 09:29 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/02/16 Posts: 50 Post Likes: +15 Company: Baker Aviation
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Favourite fighters: Faith, Hope and Charity. Three Gladiators vs two air forces. Yes they lost 2/3'rds of them, but they put up a hell of a fight. Faith survived, and is in a museum in Malta.
Favourite bomber: Having just read "A Thousand Shall Fall" by Murray Peden, I'll vote for the Shorts Stirling. A solid, reliable load carrier - the fatal flaw was the cruise altitude making them flak magnets. Great historical choices. Given differences between their performance at the time and the state of the art....they were literally the "Chariots of the damned". (The Stirling in particular. A result of the Air Ministry restricting the wingspan to 99 feet.) )
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Favorite Military Bomber/Fighter? Posted: 08 Sep 2016, 10:29 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 10/25/10 Posts: 2771 Post Likes: +510 Location: E06-Lovington NM
Aircraft: Debonair C33-IO550
|
|
I love the "mid-wing" B25. Attachment: image.jpeg
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Ray Bishop '65 Deb now in Oil country - E06
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Favorite Military Bomber/Fighter? Posted: 08 Sep 2016, 17:42 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/07/12 Posts: 224 Post Likes: +114
Aircraft: Cessna 185
|
|
|
Easy enough, B-17
Fighters, not so easy P-51, Bent wing, Jug and Bear Cat and the P-38, Yea, I know you ask for one
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Favorite Military Bomber/Fighter? Posted: 08 Sep 2016, 19:45 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/16/11 Posts: 6463 Post Likes: +8892 Company: Buddy's Best Bargains Location: Burlington, NC
Aircraft: V35B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Easy enough, B-17
Fighters, not so easy P-51, Bent wing, Jug and Bear Cat and the P-38, Yea, I know you ask for one There are NO rules in this thread, other than the ones listed in the TOS, that the Jeffs put together. You can list a Quintillion or more planes if you want, and you have the time.
_________________ Matt 336-266-3105
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Favorite Military Bomber/Fighter? Posted: 08 Sep 2016, 20:01 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/04/14 Posts: 1930 Post Likes: +1445 Location: Southern California
Aircraft: C 210
|
|
Fighter: I dont think I can call it my favorite but he Grumman F3F has always interested me. Open cockpit biplane with retracts, whats not to like? Bomber: The B-36 has got to be on the list. "Two turning, two burning, two smoking, two choking, and two more unaccounted for" 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Favorite Military Bomber/Fighter? Posted: 08 Sep 2016, 23:26 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/12/15 Posts: 72 Post Likes: +26 Location: KMDD
Aircraft: Cessna T182T
|
|
|
I'm currently obsessed with the Martin Mauler. Fighter? Bomber? Saw an example at the Naval Air Museum in Pensacola. An interesting design that uses a single R-4360 corncob engine.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Favorite Military Bomber/Fighter? Posted: 09 Sep 2016, 09:36 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/02/16 Posts: 50 Post Likes: +15 Company: Baker Aviation
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm currently obsessed with the Martin Mauler. Fighter? Bomber? Saw an example at the Naval Air Museum in Pensacola. An interesting design that uses a single R-4360 corncob engine. Excellent monograph and other than an article in Wings/Airpower magazine about 20 years ago, probably the best reference extant on the aircraft. New from $13.00 plus shipping. https://www.amazon.com/Martin-AM-1-Maul ... g=btalk-20
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Favorite Military Bomber/Fighter? Posted: 09 Sep 2016, 12:46 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/20/08 Posts: 1739 Post Likes: +382 Location: KFOK Westhampton, NY
Aircraft: 1978 V35B, Navy N3N
|
|
|
No contest ......... the Spitfire .
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Favorite Military Bomber/Fighter? Posted: 09 Sep 2016, 22:49 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/08/15 Posts: 256 Post Likes: +170 Location: Prescott, AZ
|
|
|
In my opinion, the Spitfire is the best looking fighter of the bunch. Tiny, lethal, powerful and efficient. Not a straight line anywhere, just like a beautiful woman. No big protrusions sticking out underneath, not good on airplanes or women.
Early Spits were about the same size and weight as a B58 Baron but with 400 more horsepower and a cleaner airframe. COOL!
I believe the Mustang was a dud until the Brits put a Spitfire engine in it's snout.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Favorite Military Bomber/Fighter? Posted: 09 Sep 2016, 22:57 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/16/11 Posts: 6463 Post Likes: +8892 Company: Buddy's Best Bargains Location: Burlington, NC
Aircraft: V35B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: In my opinion, the Spitfire is the best looking fighter of the bunch. Tiny, lethal, powerful and efficient. Not a straight line anywhere, just like a beautiful woman. No big protrusions sticking out underneath, not good on airplanes or women.
I believe the Mustang was a dud until the Brits put a Spitfire engine in it's snout. As I understand it, North American outfitted the P-51 with an Allison engine, initially. The Allison engine was good for low-level flight, but did not meet the mission of bomber escort deep into enemy territory. So, Rolls-Royce dropped a Merlin engine in the P-51, and created a lethal, high-altitude, long-range bomber escort, and thus saving many bombers and bomber crews lives.
_________________ Matt 336-266-3105
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Favorite Military Bomber/Fighter? Posted: 10 Sep 2016, 23:23 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/06/11 Posts: 9674 Post Likes: +5136
Aircraft: Warbirds
|
|
Username Protected wrote: In my opinion, the Spitfire is the best looking fighter of the bunch. Tiny, lethal, powerful and efficient. Not a straight line anywhere, just like a beautiful woman. No big protrusions sticking out underneath, not good on airplanes or women.
I believe the Mustang was a dud until the Brits put a Spitfire engine in it's snout. As I understand it, North American outfitted the P-51 with an Allison engine, initially. The Allison engine was good for low-level flight, but did not meet the mission of bomber escort deep into enemy territory. So, Rolls-Royce dropped a Merlin engine in the P-51, and created a lethal, high-altitude, long-range bomber escort, and thus saving many bombers and bomber crews lives. Packard had been building the Merlin under License since before the US entered WWII. Production would've started soon except Ford, who originally signed the production contract with the British by Edsal Ford, backed out when Henry Ford threw a fit. Packard was then offered the contract. The original modifications to install a Merlin with a 2 stage, 2 speed supercharger happened in both England and the US about the same time. So the install was largely an American led project. The War Dept had Packard gear up to produce the V-1650-3 2 stage motor even before NAA had completed the design of the -B. As for being a Dud, don't know about that. At low altitude the Allison powered A was faster than the Merlin powered follow up. The RAF used Allison powered Mk Is from 42 till the end of the war for ground attack. 22 Squadrons at the high point. 1 still in action on VE Day. Shot down a FW190 in 42. Some had 20mm cannons in the wings. War isn't about getting what you want but using what you have. P-51 was a marvel and the Merlin added to it's abilities. I maintain 2 of them and have worked on Warbirds for 30+ years.
_________________ Be careful what you ask for, your mechanic wants to sleep at night.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|