10 Jun 2025, 11:45 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: C337 skymaster Posted: 24 May 2015, 18:13 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/03/08 Posts: 16246 Post Likes: +27293 Location: Peachtree City GA / Stoke-On-Trent UK
Aircraft: A33
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I you want to burn lots of gas while going slow, the 337 can't be beat. 180 KTAS on 10.6 GPH per engine is burning a lot of gas to go slow. But since this is a Beech crowd, 182 KTAS on 12.5 GPH per engine (some can get that down to 11 GPH per engine) in my previous Baron was hauling ass. Interesting perspective. yes, it is interesting that you continue to pretend that your pressurized turbucharged version is representative of the commonly asked question about these as cheap alternatives to a baron 55
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: C337 skymaster Posted: 24 May 2015, 18:24 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/21/09 Posts: 12265 Post Likes: +16548 Location: Albany, TX
Aircraft: Prior SR22T,V35B,182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: yes, it is interesting that you continue to pretend that your pressurized turbucharged version is representative of the commonly asked question about these as cheap alternatives to a baron 55 You realize this thread is titled 337, right? In addition, the OP said he was mainly interested in the n/a, but WAS interested in the other versions.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: C337 skymaster Posted: 24 May 2015, 19:29 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 02/11/09 Posts: 1377 Post Likes: +490 Company: UNLV Location: Tucson, AZ (57AZ)
Aircraft: 1960 Bonanza M35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: yes, it is interesting that you continue to pretend that your pressurized turbucharged version is representative of the commonly asked question about these as cheap alternatives to a baron 55 Where did the OP say that he was looking for a cheap alternative to a B55 ? HINT: He didn't. Where did the OP limit his question to a normally aspirated 337 ? HINT: He didn't. We get it, Jeff you don't like 337s. My suggestion is to not buy one then. But let's look at data again, shall we ? I paid less than 70% for my P337 as I sold my B55 for and I have much better (tens of thousands of dollars) avionics and P&I in the P337 than I had in the B55. My P337 is newer and with less airframe time too. I paid $2,500 more for my P337 than John recently sold his N/A 337 for, and I got many times that in avionics value in my airplane versus his so maybe Todd is correct that you can buy a P337 for no additional premium over a N/A one today. I had Paul McCracken do the pre-buy, then annual on my B55. The annual was almost half of what I paid to buy the P337. I have not see a single B55 listed on BT with similar avionics as my P337 for the same or less money. The average B55 on BT is listed at more than twice what I paid for my P337. I've fully admitted that a B55 does some things better than a P337 and a 58P does some things better than a P337. There's no question of that. The P337 is far from a perfect airplane, but for some people, me as an example, it is a better choice. I know you can't understand that but it is true. Comparing a P337 to a B55, purchase price is much less, it lives in the same hangar, insurance (based on equivalent hull value) is the same, fuel burn for a given trip is the same. Just about every 58P (or P210) owner will tell you that the pressurization system costs very little to nothing to maintain. The P337 has a little more expense in a turbocharger than a B55. It would take more than lifetime of normal flight to make up the difference in purchase price so yes, even though the OP did not ask the question, a P337 can be a cheaper alternative than a B55. And you get turbochargers and pressurization and in my case intercoolers and air conditioning too. You can buy a good P337 for the price of a good 172 today.
_________________ Ken Reed 57AZ
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: C337 skymaster Posted: 24 May 2015, 19:57 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/02/08 Posts: 7799 Post Likes: +5820 Company: Rusnak Auto Group Location: Newport Coast, CA
Aircraft: Baron B55 N7123N
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Making things up? The last time I was in one was 1991 and my ears are still ringing.
What's really dishonest is pushing a plane like his to the initiated as a "value". It's not a value, you get what you pay for. Just present it as what it is, an odd all plane that can be bought cheap because of its inefficient operation. Jeff - uncork a bottle of wine or take chill pill. We are talking about airplanes - fun stuff- not debating right to life here.
_________________ STAND UP FOR YOUR COUNTRY
Sven
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: C337 skymaster Posted: 24 May 2015, 20:31 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/27/10 Posts: 2130 Post Likes: +1022 Location: Phoenix (KDVT) & Grand Rapids (KGRR)
Aircraft: BE36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Making things up? The last time I was in one was 1991 and my ears are still ringing.
What's really dishonest is pushing a plane like his to the initiated as a "value". It's not a value, you get what you pay for. Just present it as what it is, an odd all plane that can be bought cheap because of its inefficient operation. Jeff - uncork a bottle of wine or take chill pill. We are talking about airplanes - fun stuff- not debating right to life here.
Bingo.
_________________ Since Retirement: CL65 type rating, flew 121, CE680, CE525S, and CE500 type ratings.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: C337 skymaster Posted: 26 May 2015, 20:27 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/06/13 Posts: 422 Post Likes: +260 Location: KFTW-Fort Worth Meacham
Aircraft: C208B, AL18-115
|
|
Anybody have experience with Riley Super Skyrocket with the TSIO-520's?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: C337 skymaster Posted: 26 May 2015, 20:41 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/19/08 Posts: 12160 Post Likes: +3541
Aircraft: C55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Anybody have experience with Riley Super Skyrocket with the TSIO-520's? Now, that would be an interesting airplane! A baggage pod underneath would be nice also!
_________________ The kid gets it all. Just plant us in the damn garden, next to the stupid lion.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: C337 skymaster Posted: 27 May 2015, 16:27 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/06/13 Posts: 422 Post Likes: +260 Location: KFTW-Fort Worth Meacham
Aircraft: C208B, AL18-115
|
|
I remember when the 520's were put on the P337 and Riley claimed amazing speeds of near 300 mph. I have heard that normal 337 engine compartments were like 10 lbs of sh1t stuffed in a 5 lb bag. It's hard to imagine how they shoe-horned TSIO-520's under the cowling.
I have re-read some articles about the mod from several years ago. I haven't seen anything recent on the airplane. There are two on the market.
Still, 250 knots for around $200k (plus pressurization) sounds great if true. I doubt that it really can go that fast.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: C337 skymaster Posted: 27 May 2015, 16:35 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 02/11/09 Posts: 1377 Post Likes: +490 Company: UNLV Location: Tucson, AZ (57AZ)
Aircraft: 1960 Bonanza M35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 250 knots for around $200k (plus pressurization) sounds great if true. I doubt that it really can go that fast. If you push the TSIO-360 version of the P337 hard at altitude you can see over 200 KTAS so 250 KTAS might be possible with the TSIO-520s.
_________________ Ken Reed 57AZ
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: C337 skymaster Posted: 27 May 2015, 19:59 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 08/10/13 Posts: 771 Post Likes: +289 Company: Woodrow Corp Location: Springfield, OH (I54)
Aircraft: 1952 Bonanza C35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Anybody have experience with Riley Super Skyrocket with the TSIO-520's? We had a P337 with the Riley Rocket conversion. It was years ago and I don't remember the performance numbers but do remember it as serious performer and all around good plane. I never did get used to it's appearance. It wasn't pretty but it was easy to get in and out of, fast and it would haul a load. We usually flew it in the upper teens altitude wise. It was a nice slice of sky. Unpressurized folks below and the big boys above.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: C337 skymaster Posted: 28 May 2015, 00:08 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20308 Post Likes: +25445 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: If you push the TSIO-360 version of the P337 hard at altitude you can see over 200 KTAS so 250 KTAS might be possible with the TSIO-520s. Not possible. Physics says you need double the power to go from 200 knots to 250 knots. Assuming 285 HP TSIO-520 and 200 HP TSIO-360, the speed increase from power alone would be 12.5%, or 200 increase to 225 knots. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|