28 Jan 2026, 15:49 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 13 Apr 2017, 20:33 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6065 Post Likes: +719 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
Maybe he called himself Low&Slow Jet. Username Protected wrote: Was rolling along at 280 today and what do I hear on frequency, a Vision Jet!
Anthony, how did you know? Did he call himself "Vision Jet" on the radio? Or "Cirrus Jet" or ??
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Apr 2017, 00:05 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21167 Post Likes: +26654 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Was rolling along at 280 today and what do I hear on frequency, a Vision Jet! http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N994 ... /KAPA/KSANQuote: At fl280, he was trueing out at 315kts burning 65gph. I'll look up the winds aloft and see if that checks out. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Apr 2017, 01:04 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21167 Post Likes: +26654 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Quote: At fl280, he was trueing out at 315kts burning 65gph. Passing Flagstaff, his groundspeed was 262 knots average per the Flightaware log. He passed there about Apr 13 2045Z. The Apr 13 1200Z soundings at Flagstaff were: Pressure alt (hPa), temp(C), wind(deg), wind (knots) 344.0, -35.1, 235, 25 (reading) 323.0, -39.3, 232, 24 (reading) 329.3, -38.0, 233, 24 (interpolating to FL280) Apr 14 0000Z soundings: 388.8, -27.0, 245, 38 (reading) 312.6, -40.0, 255, 31 (reading) 329.3, -37.2, 253, 33 (interpolating to FL280) Interpolating for time (1200Z - 2045Z - 0000Z): 329.3, -37.4, 249, 31 It was essentially all headwind (Cirrus heading 241, wind 249, headwind component 99% of wind speed)). True airspeed = ground speed of 262 + headwind of 31 = 293 knots. He wasn't doing 315, that appears to be about a 20+ knot exaggeration. Temperature at that point in the flight was ISA+3 (ISA would be -40.5C at FL280). Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Apr 2017, 01:22 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21167 Post Likes: +26654 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Was rolling along at 280 today and what do I hear on frequency, a Vision Jet! N219MA (MU2 out of KBJC headed east) took off 1821Z, reached FL280 at 1843Z. N9943H (SF50 out of KAPA headed west) took off at 1858Z, reached FL280 at 1921Z. At 1921Z, when both planes reached FL280, you guys were about 300 nm apart. He was well into the CO mountains, you are well into KS. There's no way you two were in the same ATC sector when both of you were FL280, and you certainly could not have talked to each other directly. This suggests the conversation happened when the SF50 was very early in the flight, not at altitude. The pilot of the SF50 wasn't reporting a speed he was getting right then, but a brag number. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Apr 2017, 07:58 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16157 Post Likes: +8879 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm seeing more and more HondaJets. We'll see if I start seeing more and more Cirrus Jets. I guess they're out there. Before you know it, they'll be 'darkening the sky'. The VLJ revolution 10 years delayed.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Apr 2017, 09:49 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21167 Post Likes: +26654 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Looks like the climb performance on the Vision is better than some here expected. Over 1,000fpm avg up to 280. That would put it decidedly in the "lame" category for a jet. The Eclipse, with LESS thrust to weight ratio, climbs twice as fast as that. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Apr 2017, 10:11 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21167 Post Likes: +26654 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Not the same vision jet. Got a tail number? It seemed like the only choice was the one I found. During your flight: #0002, N250CV, local flight around KDLH #0003, N251CV, at KDLH #0004, N252CV, three 20+ minute flights at KDLH #0005, N253CV, KUGN to KDLH #0006, N1WA, not flying, near Arkansas last seen #0007, N9943H, the one out of KAPA I analyzed #0008, N730FA, was in TN, but only to FL250 #0009, N17CX, tracking blocked #0010, N52CV, at KDLH That's all of them in the registry. Where are the 3 more they delivered? N730FA is the best fit. You were both in KY around 2135, close enough to be in the same sector. You at FL270, he at FL250. But that's not FL280 as reported. Quote: I had been at the wrong alt heading east and I can't remember if I saw him right before or right after atc mad me step down (so I may have been at 270 when I spoke to him). I am thinking I was somewhere over TN. Your step down was 2036Z to 2040Z, about 50 nm west of STL. Quote: As he checked in with ATC at fl280, I will assume he was in fact at 280. If u can find him on FlightAware let me know. I couldn't. Nothing fits that is trackable. N730FA wrong altitude. N17CX tracking blocked. Nothing else on the registry. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Apr 2017, 10:15 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21167 Post Likes: +26654 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: "Lame" argument. Can you imagine if someone built a competitor to the Bonanza that had the same engine power, same gross weight, but climbed half as fast? Yup, that would be lame. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 14 Apr 2017, 10:17 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/10 Posts: 13719 Post Likes: +7898 Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Can you imagine if someone built a competitor to the Bonanza that had the same engine power, same gross weight, but climbed half as fast?
Yup, that would be lame.
Mike C. Define competitor. I define that by price, which negates and reverses your argument.
_________________ Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026
|
|
|
|