banner
banner

09 Dec 2025, 04:33 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 561 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 ... 38  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 27 Aug 2019, 21:21 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 01/24/10
Posts: 7446
Post Likes: +5135
Location: Concord , CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1967 Baron B55
Username Protected wrote:
Our 441 has had 99.9% dispatch reliability. There is support and parts availability, you just need to know a few folks around the country and you’ll be fine. It’s a hell of a bird and we’re in our 5th year year of owning it.

Our 421C was way worse, and if we did get to go, we usually had our eye on something that wasn’t quite right. I’m biased against the 421 as i lost and engine on takeoff. For those who never had that issue, your mileage may vary. There’s a lot of pilots who lost an engine on a 421, I don’t know anyone who had it happen to them in a 441.



I do it has happened more than once. They are nicknamed Garrett Grenades for a reason.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 27 Aug 2019, 21:23 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/27/10
Posts: 10790
Post Likes: +6894
Location: Cambridge, MA (KLWM)
Aircraft: 1997 A36TN
Username Protected wrote:
Well, that part was subjected to a lifetime of vibration on the GTSIO (greater amounts than would be typical of a TPE331 or PT-6 for instance), so maybe the correlation isn't 0.0.


GTSIO vibrates? Why don’t I feel it?
Every piston engine vibrates when running. It's why they have counterweights in the crank to partially dampen it.

Piston engines (aka "reciprocating" engines) have a whole lot of inherent monkey motion to make things go. That causes vibration and vibration causes fatigue (of aluminum and of people).

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 27 Aug 2019, 21:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 05/17/11
Posts: 1878
Post Likes: +1322
Location: KFRG
Aircraft: 421C
Username Protected wrote:
Every piston engine vibrates when running. It's why they have counterweights in the crank to partially dampen it.

Piston engines (aka "reciprocating" engines) have a whole lot of inherent monkey motion to make things go. That causes vibration and vibration causes fatigue (of aluminum and of people).


Correct. I have seen nothing specific to the GTSIO as some have implied.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 27 Aug 2019, 21:33 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/27/10
Posts: 10790
Post Likes: +6894
Location: Cambridge, MA (KLWM)
Aircraft: 1997 A36TN
I certainly didn't mean to imply that.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 27 Aug 2019, 21:43 
Offline




User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/09/09
Posts: 6551
Post Likes: +3252
Company: RNP Aviation Services
Location: Owosso, MI (KRNP)
Aircraft: 1969 Bonanza V35A
Three years ago, a customer of mine made the transition from a C-421C to a 441. I don't have the number directly available, but operating cost are only slightly higher in the 441 only because we use an outside shop for the larger maintenance items. I have flown two 800NM trips exactly the same, one in the 441 and one in my Superstar 700 Aerostar, and fuel burn was $60 more for the 441.

I can count the items on one hand that we have had to take care of between 100/200 hour inspections in the 350 hours that we have had it. The airplane has only been out of service once during that two and a half years, and that was due to a lightning strike at an unknown time. We have had zero parts availability issues, and the shop that maintains it has said that parts availability is not an issue (they maintain four of them total).

The Cessna Phase inspection program is intimidating for the 425/441, but once you dig into it you will find that it's not really that difficult to comply with if you are savvy with Excel, etc. You need someone that knows the inspection programs to do the prebuy or you can get into trouble. Ours had records kept by WestStar, and WestStar missed approximately 15 inspections that our preferred shop caught before the airplane arrived (and ended up being ferried to the prebuy).

If you don't fly much, I'd give a lot of consideration to the Bacon LLIP program.

In my opinion, the C-441 is the perfect personal airplane. I can't personally afford to purchase one. I love my Aerostar, but I would take another C-421C in a heartbeat only because of the comfort for the charity flights that I fly.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 27 Aug 2019, 23:17 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/19/15
Posts: 1676
Post Likes: +1552
Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis
Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
So how does the LAV work on a early 421C? It looks like a bucket with a bag? If so how do you dispose of it? If someone goes #2 I can’t imagine you just throw the bag in the garage? But maybe it’s like Diapers and It’s just what’s done?

Can anyone shed some light on the process of a dry LAV?

Mike


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 27 Aug 2019, 23:42 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/21/14
Posts: 293
Post Likes: +90
Location: KPDK
Aircraft: C421B MU2-40 Solitai
[quote="Michael Pyle"]So how does the LAV work on a early 421C? It looks like a bucket with a bag? If so how do you dispose of it? If someone goes #2 I can’t imagine you just throw the bag in the garage? But maybe it’s like Diapers and It’s just what’s done?

Can anyone shed some light on the process of a dry LAV?

That's exactly what you do. I used to line the plastic bag with a Depends. Frankly, my rule was if you needed to do #2 you had to step outside into the smoking section. In all my years that never was needed. I guess if you have small kids that might be a real issue.

On another note, if you carry more than 2 people, a 421 is the best Piston twin out there. I must say my MU2 is the best, most reliable plane that I have ever owned and other than my prop overhauls and batteries the operating cost difference is marginal.

_________________
Sandy


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 28 Aug 2019, 00:08 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20807
Post Likes: +26310
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
As for the actual failure, I think it's safe to say it didn't really have anything to do with the GTSIO engine other than that's what the fuel line was connected to.

Parts, even those not connected to the engine system in anyway, simply last longer on turbine aircraft. You can see this when you compare 414/421 to 425/441. More clearly, the folks who flew a Malibu/Mirage and then converted to JetProp also say part failures are way down even though they are the same part for both the piston and now turbine versions.

The most logical explanation for this is that a piston engine induces a lot of vibration in the airframe, even small ones you can't feel at frequencies you don't perceive. This microshaking of everything wears out connectors, wires, mechanical doodads, hardware, pipes, etc. It can even break electronic parts on circuit boards.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 28 Aug 2019, 00:11 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 01/24/10
Posts: 7446
Post Likes: +5135
Location: Concord , CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1967 Baron B55
I use plastic bags with a draw string and put kitty litter in the bottom .
If someone goes #2 just close the draw string and tie a knot.
The line personnel know how to dispose of the bag.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 28 Aug 2019, 06:24 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 12835
Post Likes: +5276
Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
You can also purchase commercial camp toilet bags for about $10 at Walmart. Heavy plastic full of some sort of kitty litter with a double or triple Ziploc at the top.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 28 Aug 2019, 08:18 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/20/09
Posts: 2666
Post Likes: +2245
Company: Jcrane, Inc.
Location: KVES Greenville, OH
Aircraft: C441, RV7A
Username Protected wrote:
So how does the LAV work on a early 421C? It looks like a bucket with a bag? If so how do you dispose of it? If someone goes #2 I can’t imagine you just throw the bag in the garage? But maybe it’s like Diapers and It’s just what’s done?

Can anyone shed some light on the process of a dry LAV?

Mike

Here you go Michael. This makes it really easy. No mess, no smell.
On a long flight with four kids I'll sometimes add a depends to the bag also.

https://www.amazon.com/Reliance-Product ... g=btalk-20

_________________
Jack
N441M N107XX


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 28 Aug 2019, 08:21 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/29/10
Posts: 2824
Post Likes: +2746
Location: Dallas, TX (KADS & KJWY)
Aircraft: T28B,7GCBC,E90
For #1 there’s a relief tube. Just vents the pee overboard onto unsuspecting civilians on the ground. Works great.

Robert


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 28 Aug 2019, 08:32 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20807
Post Likes: +26310
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Just vents the pee overboard onto unsuspecting civilians on the ground.

It evaporates long before it hits the ground.

Relief tubes are bad ideas for airplane corrosion. Travel Johns are a better solution.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 28 Aug 2019, 13:11 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/19/15
Posts: 1676
Post Likes: +1552
Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis
Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
My Mirage had a relief tube and I never used it. For one reason I didn’t want to flush it all the time and clean the bottom of the fuselage. But mostly with the suction I was worried I would like too much. Hehe.

The travel johns are great. Just make sure you have one on standby if
You over fill the first one. Learned that the hard way. LOL.

Mike


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cessna 340 vs 414 vs the 421
PostPosted: 28 Aug 2019, 13:27 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/18/10
Posts: 458
Post Likes: +114
Location: Chicago
Aircraft: C441, C310N
I had similar, though not quite as drastic, experiences as Marti with the 421 and 441. I loved flying a 421 but it is not possible to operate one well without good mx, preferably on field. The 441 needs good mx too, just much less of it, and I don't mind flying it across the country when it needs it.

I still miss how quiet the 421 was though. I can't imagine a more comfy piston exists.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 561 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 ... 38  Next



8Flight Bottom Banner

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.AeroMach85x100.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.