22 May 2025, 19:20 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II Posted: 05 Apr 2019, 10:38 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/07/17 Posts: 6976 Post Likes: +5868 Company: Malco Power Design Location: KLVJ
Aircraft: 1976 Baron 58
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What is the benifit to not having a relay right after the battery before any power gets distributed out? 800A DC relays are massive.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II Posted: 05 Apr 2019, 12:05 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/10 Posts: 13413 Post Likes: +7494 Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC, E-55, 195
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What is the benifit to not having a relay right after the battery before any power gets distributed out? 800A DC relays are massive.
Plus you always want power on the hot bus and only one relay for the EMER.
_________________ Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients My E55 : https://tinyurl.com/4dvxhwxu
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II Posted: 05 Apr 2019, 14:39 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5193 Post Likes: +3032 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What is the benifit to not having a relay right after the battery before any power gets distributed out? That is effectively what you have with the Battery Relay. The problem is you can't use that path to power the starter since you have 225 Amp current limiters in that circuit. So you need to bypass the current limiters with the Start Relay. It carries 800 amps from the battery bus to the starter. Carrying 800 amps is why the start relay fusing closed is a failure mode trained for. Here is the electrical schematic for the CJ2+. Much of Cessna's approach has not changed. You will see the Battery Disconnect Relay on the ground side of the battery. That is what lets you fully disconnect the battery from the cockpit, if necessary for a few different failure situations. Attachment: 2019-04-05_1432.png
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Allen
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II Posted: 19 Apr 2019, 00:31 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/07/17 Posts: 6976 Post Likes: +5868 Company: Malco Power Design Location: KLVJ
Aircraft: 1976 Baron 58
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Riddle me this Batman: When is it possible to have a V1 that is higher than Vr? If so what do you do if you lose an engine before V1? On an extremely long runway V1 could exceed Vr. It has to do with the somewhat strange definition of V1 (which I’m sure you know). To me in an aircraft that is capable of routinely flying away from an engine failure once I’ve rotated we’re committed to fly. In my plane I don’t have a single V1 (or V1 point since a piston twin really has no true V1). I have three decision points. First Vstop. It’s the highest speed at which there is no chance of an overrun even if the brakes don’t work. On a normal 4000’ runway length in my plane it’s about 80. Anything at all unusual that happens before this speed and we’re going to stop. Second is Vr. Same meaning as it normally has. Rotation speed. Third is Vgo. It’s the lowest speed that I can be sure I’ll have directional control and be able to fly away from any failure. For me this is blue line with the gear up. After that speed I’m taking any problems into the air to deal with there. In a piston twin the sequence is 0-Vstop were gonna stop for anything. Vstop-Vgo were only gonna stop for a major problem. Engine failure, engine fire, loss of control, notion the airplane won’t fly. After Vgo we’re taking it into the air to deal with in flight. As you can see these are in the wrong order in a piston plane (or a jet on a short runway) and there is a time where you can’t be sure you can stop but you also probably can’t go. For me the answer is usually to try to stop and accept the overrun and crash at 30-40-50 off the departure end of the runway. The only caveat is if there is something really bad on the departure end that makes and overrun unsurvivable (think KSEZ) then it’ll get briefed before entering the runway and we’re taking any problem after Vstop into the air. In a jet you’ll generally hit Vgo (the speed where accelerate go can work in the full runway distance available) before you hit Vstop (the speed at which it’s no longer possible to stop in the full runway distance). If it were me in my own jet it’d go as follows 0-Vgo were gonna stop for anything Vgo - Vstop / Vr whichever is lower we’re gonna stop for major things Above Vr /Vstop we’re flying To me the idea of a single V1 balanced field speed has never made sense. It only works on one length of field and will have you stopping when you can go on fields that are shorter than that and going when you should stop on ones that are longer.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II Posted: 19 Apr 2019, 00:54 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/09/13 Posts: 923 Post Likes: +466 Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Riddle me this Batman: When is it possible to have a V1 that is higher than Vr? If so what do you do if you lose an engine before V1? I always thought that Cessna reduced the V1 to match Vr so we didn’t have to think in this situation Andrew
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II Posted: 19 Apr 2019, 22:52 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/10 Posts: 13413 Post Likes: +7494 Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC, E-55, 195
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I flew a V this week (borrowed) for 6.5 hours. It burns so much gas compared to a II that it's not really a practical airplane (for me) for personal usage. It's 50kts faster for an extra 50GPH. OUCH. Awesome airplane but the II really is a sweet spot in the Citation range. At what altitude?
_________________ Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients My E55 : https://tinyurl.com/4dvxhwxu
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II Posted: 19 Apr 2019, 23:47 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/29/13 Posts: 14283 Post Likes: +11982 Company: Easy Ice, LLC Location: Marquette, Michigan; Scottsdale, AZ, Telluride
Aircraft: C510,C185,C310,R66
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I flew a V this week (borrowed) for 6.5 hours. It burns so much gas compared to a II that it's not really a practical airplane (for me) for personal usage. It's 50kts faster for an extra 50GPH. OUCH. Awesome airplane but the II really is a sweet spot in the Citation range. Curious...how do you “borrow” a jet for 6.5 hours? Truth in Lending, LOA’s, insurance etc. Seems impractical.
_________________ Mark Hangen Deputy Minister of Ice (aka FlyingIceperson) Power of the Turbine "Jet Elite"
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II Posted: 20 Apr 2019, 09:28 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 5183 Post Likes: +5176
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I flew a V this week (borrowed) for 6.5 hours. It burns so much gas compared to a II that it's not really a practical airplane (for me) for personal usage. It's 50kts faster for an extra 50GPH. OUCH. Awesome airplane but the II really is a sweet spot in the Citation range. At what altitude?
Fuel spread seemed to be true at 280, 370 and 430. V Seemed to burn an extra 400PPH consistently over a II. Perhaps 50GPH was generous, maybe the spread is more like 60.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II Posted: 20 Apr 2019, 09:34 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 5183 Post Likes: +5176
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I flew a V this week (borrowed) for 6.5 hours. It burns so much gas compared to a II that it's not really a practical airplane (for me) for personal usage. It's 50kts faster for an extra 50GPH. OUCH. Awesome airplane but the II really is a sweet spot in the Citation range. Curious...how do you “borrow” a jet for 6.5 hours? Truth in Lending, LOA’s, insurance etc. Seems impractical.
Rent is a better word than borrow, owner is a great friend, went non RVSM (280 and 430), great insurance agent, totally practical (for me). I had to google truth in lending act, what on earth does that have to do with borrowing someone's airplane?
If someone wants to check out the performance of the V, see below. It goes 425 at 280, 420 at 370 (I stopped there briefly on the way down yesterday), 385 at 430. I think the flow was 900 a side at 280 and 700 a side at 430 (it might have been 650).
https://flightaware.com/live/flight/N567F
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|