02 May 2025, 01:05 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 15 Sep 2024, 21:38 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/15/17 Posts: 1049 Post Likes: +544 Company: Cessna (retired)
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Don’t know about the plane but this sorry has gone 271 pages on BS. Maybe it's time to begin discussing the BD-5 again.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 05:31 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/12/20 Posts: 311 Post Likes: +157
|
|
I kinda feel like the VELOCE 600 could be the next aircraft to take the mantle from the raptor.
Over promised performance in a pressurized tube with a new airframe design built by a guy who has more time on Facebook than engineering classes.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 06:38 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/11/10 Posts: 13002 Post Likes: +12601 Location: Indiana
Aircraft: Cessna 185, RV-7
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I kinda feel like the VELOCE 600 could be the next aircraft to take the mantle from the raptor.
Over promised performance in a pressurized tube with a new airframe design built by a guy who has more time on Facebook than engineering classes. I feel like you can safely stop listening any time some new company says “pressurized.” And what is it about these people and canards and pushers?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 07:11 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 04/26/13 Posts: 21580 Post Likes: +22095 Location: Columbus , IN (KBAK)
Aircraft: 1968 Baron D55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I feel like you can safely stop listening any time some new company says “pressurized.”
And what is it about these people and canards and pushers? It’s all marketing. Rutan showed us how good the canard design can be, and so it has become the poster child for efficiency. Pressurization is comfort and performance. If Lancair can do it so can I. Combine the two and your incredible claims might just be believable enough to get some investor capital.
_________________ My last name rhymes with 'geese'.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 11:56 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 10/05/11 Posts: 9991 Post Likes: +7038 Company: Hausch LLC, rep. Power/mation Location: Milwaukee, WI (KMKE)
Aircraft: 1963 Debonair B33
|
|
Username Protected wrote: this was a wild ride. I got into it a few times with the right seat captain "engineer" guy haha good times.
Everyone has moved to electric planes to scam investors. How many stories do you hear about the next game changing electric plane that will never fly but has millions invested.
I do follow Hill Helicopters now to take place of this drama. But that guy a much smarter and has a lot more money. So it's less entertaining. Actually even lost of love for that project as its taking too long and not sure it will ever fly before they run out of money.
Whats Peter doing these days?
Mike I look forward to seeing/learning how the Hill engine performs.
_________________ Be Nice
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 12:00 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/17/09 Posts: 1916 Post Likes: +2151 Location: N Idaho! Not off the grid, but at the very end of it...
Aircraft: F33A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Maybe it's time to begin discussing the BD-5 again. In my opinion, Jim Bede was a great salesman, a mediocre engineer, and a poor businessman. Those that have flown a completed BD-5 all say it has great flying characteristics and performance. While the original performance calculations were overly optimistic, they were at least derived from engineering calculations. Jim Bede was at least using known physics, whereas the Raptor appears to have been designed in dreamland.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 12:15 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/06/14 Posts: 3693 Post Likes: +2555 Location: MA
Aircraft: Cessna 340A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Everyone has moved to electric planes to scam investors. How many stories do you hear about the next game changing electric plane that will never fly but has millions invested. ... Whats Peter doing these days?
The next-gen raptor was a hybrid, driven by electric ducted fan motors, with the rotor / stator on the outside rim of the fan. He had a prototype motor built up which of course showed the superior design operating at a fraction of the required RPM. I think he might have also had a fan in the nose, I forget if he was on the VTOL/STOL bandwagon. He had a box-style main wing. No update on that project for a while now.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 13:34 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/30/12 Posts: 4699 Post Likes: +5296 Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I kinda feel like the VELOCE 600 could be the next aircraft to take the mantle from the raptor.
Over promised performance in a pressurized tube with a new airframe design built by a guy who has more time on Facebook than engineering classes. "The prototype is expected to be flying by September 2024" *checks calendar* They haven't finished mounting the engines yet. Sounds about right.
Last edited on 17 Sep 2024, 12:25, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 13:57 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 06/30/11 Posts: 1884 Post Likes: +2030 Company: Promech Location: Brisbane, Qld
Aircraft: Deplaned
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Jim Bede was at least using known physics, whereas the Raptor appears to have been designed in dreamland. Peter had modelled the Raptor in the CFD module of Solidworks, but running a few basic calcs indicated it was well disconnected from reality. I suspect he had a poor grasp of the need for accuracy of the input parameters, such as fluid properties, across the entire operating range. The lift/drag polar of the airfoil section in CFD was likely based on the flow being laminar for a long way from the leading edge. The actual transition to turbulent would have been further forward. I often run into that issue my young engineers who blindly use engineering software. They usually fail to understand that the softare defaults need to be understood, rather than ignoring and hoping for the best. I hope Phil C. has some views he could share on this.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 17 Sep 2024, 15:54 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/15/17 Posts: 1049 Post Likes: +544 Company: Cessna (retired)
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Maybe it's time to begin discussing the BD-5 again. In my opinion, Jim Bede was a great salesman, a mediocre engineer, and a poor businessman. Those that have flown a completed BD-5 all say it has great flying characteristics and performance. While the original performance calculations were overly optimistic, they were at least derived from engineering calculations. Jim Bede was at least using known physics, whereas the Raptor appears to have been designed in dreamland.
I once went to an open house at the Bede facility in Newton, Ks., where they flew both the prop and the jet. It was pretty impressive.
I asked why the jet didn't use the Williams turbofan as used in cruise missiles. Answer was it cost way too much.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 17 Sep 2024, 15:58 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/25/22 Posts: 362 Post Likes: +556 Location: KLFT
Aircraft: 1981 T210N
|
|
All new aircraft designs should be named 'Theory'....because everything works in theory.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|