07 Dec 2025, 06:48 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Meridian Posted: 06 Oct 2015, 14:47 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/19/11 Posts: 3308 Post Likes: +1434 Company: Bottom Line Experts Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: We put over 500 hours on the Pilatus last year and 150 on the G36. We need 2 planes so I'm looking for a turbine replacement for the Bonanza. Yeah, that's a lot of flying. I'd spend the $1MM+ on a Mustang before I'd buy a Meridien.
If you're talking about a ~$1.3M+ Meridian vs. a $1.5M+ Mustang, I would say the overall total cost of ownership are close enough (within 20%) to cause one to seriously consider a Mustang, if you can make the stretch.
However, if you're talking a scenario of taking a Meggitt Meridian and dropping in a G600 / GTN750s, you're now comparing an ~$800K Meridian vs. at least a $1.5M Mustang. The total cost of ownership in that case is now a much bigger spread (~1.5X) and if the mission was a fit, the Meridian could be a good choice.
Both have very good cost per mile. For many, the acquisition cost is the biggest barrier and $500K or more difference in price can play a huge role.
_________________ Don Coburn Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist 2004 SR22 G2
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Meridian Posted: 06 Oct 2015, 15:13 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13086 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Going to resurrect this thread. Two years later I'm seeing 80 meridians on controller. Looks like a late model G1000 machine can be had for 1.3ish. Staring to look like a good value to me. G1000 TBM at least 1 million more.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Meridian Posted: 06 Oct 2015, 16:10 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/02/09 Posts: 8730 Post Likes: +9457 Company: OAA Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Personally I think the G600 and GTNs is a better setup than the G1000 Curious why you think that Adam?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Meridian Posted: 06 Oct 2015, 16:30 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 12835 Post Likes: +5276 Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Personally I think the G600 and GTNs is a better setup than the G1000 Curious why you think that Adam?
Easily ugrade to latest technology. Not beholden to airframe mfr for every software update.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Meridian Posted: 06 Oct 2015, 17:19 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13086 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Personally I think the G600 and GTNs is a better setup than the G1000 No way. No GFC700 and that's the number 1 reason to do any of it. A sub $1.5MM Mustang is by far the most bang for the buck and the plane that will hold it's value the most. It's worth the stretch. The touch screen is nice though.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Meridian Posted: 06 Oct 2015, 17:43 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13086 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yeah the GFC700 is the best autopilot for sure. It's not a big thing for me though, even my old C-IV will fly a perfectly coupled LPV or ILS and most of the time I hand fly it anyway. If Garmin offered a retrofit autopilot there really would be no reason to get a G1000 anymore, it's 10 year old tech. I don't understand why they still sell new planes with it when the G3000 is available. You have to take the market and resale into consideration. "What you can live with" isn't where the market is going. A factory Garmin integrated jet with low hours and Cessna support is a no brainer over a retrofit older turboprop airframe. It's worth spending an extra $500K. It's a jet. I don't think Mustang pricing will ever go lower than where it is. You ever try to squeeze in the front seat of a Merdien? It looks ridiculous.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Meridian Posted: 06 Oct 2015, 18:14 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 06/28/09 Posts: 14436 Post Likes: +9562 Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You have to take the market and resale into consideration. "What you can live with" isn't where the market is going. A factory Garmin integrated jet with low hours and Cessna support is a no brainer over a retrofit older turboprop airframe. It's worth spending an extra $500K. It's a jet. I don't think Mustang pricing will ever go lower than where it is.
You ever try to squeeze in the front seat of a Merdien? It looks ridiculous. When they finally do update to the g3000 though those g1000's will take a big hit because they're basically not upgradable, there goes your 500k. The Meridian is going to be much closer to Bonanza operating costs than the twin engine jet ...
_________________ http://calipilot.com atp/cfii
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Meridian Posted: 06 Oct 2015, 18:22 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13086 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: When they finally do update to the g3000 though those g1000's will take a big hit because they're basically not upgradable, there goes your 500k. The Meridian is going to be much closer to Bonanza operating costs than the twin engine jet ... G3000 has been out and G3000 equipped planes have a higher new sales price than the G1000 predecessors. G3000 is awesome but it's a different and much more expensive airplane. All new planes since about 2005 have fully integrated avionics and are not upgradable so it's not like you're really having to compete with that option. "Choice of avionics" is not available and "integrated" is the standard in the industry. Yes the Mustang will have higher opex but it's also going a lot faster. But yes, no doubt more expensive to run. But I'd still take it.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|