banner
banner

29 Jan 2026, 11:53 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 989 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 ... 66  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 30 Oct 2023, 17:53 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21169
Post Likes: +26658
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
P180 cabin is definitely nicer than a Citation.

A Winnebago is definitely more comfortable than a Citation, too. But the travel time, well...

Piaggio is a nice airplane, definitely shows what can be done if your design a purpose made turboprop and not just adding turboprop engines to a piston heritage airframe.

Quote:
FBO fees, definitely, jets are higher than TPs "just because."

I have run into many places where jets are less than TPs. Not the majority, but also not exceedingly rare.

Quote:
Maintenance on the older Citations are really simple and economical for low utilization. Having a factory LUMP to extend the intervals is awesome and I am thrilled that Cessna is still supporting these old birds.

Huge factor in lower costs of a Citation Having phase 5 out to 6 years and the phase 1-4 out to 3 years means vastly less wear and tear taking the plane apart and a lot less money. It also means more uptime!

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 30 Oct 2023, 17:58 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 11/30/12
Posts: 4952
Post Likes: +5635
Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
Username Protected wrote:
Huge factor in lower costs of a Citation Having phase 5 out to 6 years and the phase 1-4 out to 3 years means vastly less wear and tear taking the plane apart and a lot less money. It also means more uptime!

Mike C.

Can the LUMP schedule be published?

Do any other phases get extended or just those 5?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 30 Oct 2023, 18:06 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21169
Post Likes: +26658
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Can the LUMP schedule be published?

Textron sends a letter wit the schedule for each individual request.

I've attached mine for reference.

Quote:
Do any other phases get extended or just those 5?

Basically just those 5 (plus phase B).

Phase 18 is a safety inspection every year, takes ~3-4 hours.

Phase 20 is transponder and RVSM every 2 years, takes 1 day.

Battery cap check is ~6 months.

There is really not that much to do between the phase 1-5 major inspections.

Mike C.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 30 Oct 2023, 20:20 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 11/30/12
Posts: 4952
Post Likes: +5635
Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
If I read the docs right, you just went through phase 15,16 and 17 (all due at 10k hours.) Can you share the costs for the inspections and for addressing the discrepancies found?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 30 Oct 2023, 20:24 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/05/16
Posts: 3151
Post Likes: +2295
Company: Tack Mobile
Location: KBJC
Aircraft: C441
Username Protected wrote:
Quote:
FBO fees, definitely, jets are higher than TPs "just because."

I have run into many places where jets are less than TPs. Not the majority, but also not exceedingly rare.
Mike C.


Out of curiosity where?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 31 Oct 2023, 00:11 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21169
Post Likes: +26658
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
If I read the docs right, you just went through phase 15,16 and 17 (all due at 10k hours.) Can you share the costs for the inspections and for addressing the discrepancies found?

Phase 15, 16, 17 and 67 are 10,000 hour inspections.

Phase 16 (cabin door and engine mounts) and 17 (cabin structure) don't require specialized equipment (just visual observation) and were performed slightly early when I did my phase 1-4 last year and done by my local shop. Doing it will the plane was open saved money despite doing it about 100 hours early. No findings.

Phase 15 is eddy current checking of fin spar bolt holes. This was done earlier this year by a tech who came to my shop. My shop pulled the bolts, the tech did the check, the bolts were reinstalled. No findings.
Attachment:
ndt-eddy-bolt-hole.png

Phase 67 is ultrasound check of the main wing spar knuckles. That was done this year by the same tech on the same trip. Access is through panels in the wing. No findings.
Attachment:
ndt-main-lugs-test.png

The tech says they do hundreds of these checks and have never found any issues. I would not be anxious about any of these inspections.

I scheduled my tasks on the same day the tech was coming up to inspect another plane, which saved travel costs. They inspected a Cessna 210 spar carry through on the same day.

The total cost for all 10,000 hour inspections was just over $5K for all four of them, which included the local shop labor, the labor and my part of the travel costs for the tech, and the rental of the go, no go samples from Textron for the wing lugs.

The next intervals for this batch of inspections are:

Phase 15 (fin spar eddy): 4000 hours
Phase 16 (cabin door and engine mounts): 5000 hours
Phase 17 (cabin structure): 10,000 hours
Phase 67 (wing lug ultrasound): 1200 hours

The shortest one is the wing lug ultrasound, but that is now 8 to 10 years away at my current flying rate. I am unlikely to reach the others during my ownership. Even if I do, the effort is low and the likelihood of a serious issue is very small.

I will note that other models of Citations, like 501 and 550, may have different sets of inspections and those may be more onerous than mine, but for me, the 10,000 hour inspections were no big deal.

Mike C.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 31 Oct 2023, 00:29 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21169
Post Likes: +26658
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
I have run into many places where jets are less than TPs. Not the majority, but also not exceedingly rare.
Out of curiosity where?

I mentioned one on page 3 of this thread:

"For example, at KSAT Millionaire, Beechjet 400 is $120 per day, King Air 200 is $150 per day. Even weirder, the Beechjet minimum to waive a ramp fee is 120 gallons, King Air 200 is 150 gallons. Go figure."

It actually makes some sense. The Citation is going to buy more fuel and make more money for the FBO than the turboprop, and the jet is easier and less dangerous to handle on the ramp.

This is not common, but not rare either. I've maybe seen a dozen places like this so far, but I didn't keep a list. I usually notice this when reviewing the fee schedule during my evaluation of the CAA bids. In most cases, the small cabin Citations are similar or maybe a little bit more than the twin turboprops.

It doesn't usually matter because I very rarely pay facility/ramp fees since I usually take the minimum fuel to waive or more. Occasionally, the fuel price is so high that the facility fee is the better choice and tanker fuel.

The fee I mostly pay is daily parking. Varies for $0 to as much as $300 per day. Obviously, I avoid the $300 places, or use them only for day trips or drop and go.

Some places have landing fees for over 12,500 lbs. These fees are usually pretty small, like $40, so not a significant factor in my operating cost.

The "jet tax", extra fees, is not a big factor for my mission mix so far and I don't expect that to change.

Mike C.
_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 31 Oct 2023, 00:35 
Online


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 7891
Post Likes: +5224
Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Username Protected wrote:
… Obviously, I avoid the $300 places, or use them only for day trips or drop and go.

The "jet tax", extra fees, is not a big factor for my mission mix so far and I don't expect that to change.

Seems to me the biggest fee places end up as “opportunity cost”, in that we tend to avoid them rather than using perhaps the most convenient place for a trip, or perhaps making a different trip altogether.

_________________
-Jon C.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 31 Oct 2023, 20:00 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/19/15
Posts: 1806
Post Likes: +1713
Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis
Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
We for sure change where we land based on fees.

My wife and I were going to go somewhere for our anniversary. Thought hey let’s go to Jackson hole. Looked at the fees and we decided against it.

Wasn’t that we couldn’t afford it but just don’t want to feel ripped off.

Funny thing is we love to go to Cabo and the fees are pretty crazy. But the service and convenience is the best.

Mike


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 31 Oct 2023, 20:22 
Online


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 7891
Post Likes: +5224
Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Username Protected wrote:
Wasn’t that we couldn’t afford it but just don’t want to feel ripped off.

Yeah, that's a good way to put it.

The irritating thing is the increasing number of places where there are both high fees and silly high fuel prices. C'mon, decide which way you want to rip me off, but pick only one!

_________________
-Jon C.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 31 Oct 2023, 20:31 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/16/10
Posts: 9072
Post Likes: +2097
Username Protected wrote:
just don’t want to feel ripped off.


I see this more and more. People can easily afford something, but they can't afford it or stomach it emotionally. Happens to me more and more as I am getting more cantankerous.

_________________
Education cuts, don't heal.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 31 Oct 2023, 21:16 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6688
Post Likes: +5999
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
Username Protected wrote:
just don’t want to feel ripped off.


I see this more and more. People can easily afford something, but they can't afford it or stomach it emotionally. Happens to me more and more as I am getting more cantankerous.


I can spend $100 on a bottle of wine or $400 in a nice steakhouse with friends without batting an eyelid, but will go ballistic over kitchen towels increasing from $12 to $18...

And filling up the car is also really grating me these days. Our little Volvo S60 (not even the big SUV) is $100 to fill up each time here in CA. Insane.
_________________
"Either we heal now as a team, or we will die as individuals."


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 31 Oct 2023, 21:43 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/19/15
Posts: 1806
Post Likes: +1713
Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis
Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
I think most of us are ok with paying a premium for premium services or experiences. But paying a premium for basic services is a rip off.

Most airports like Jackson hole are owned by the government. I should be able to use that airport without paying 4x what others charge for landing fees. Crazy how that even became a thing.

It’s like the new tipping thing. Everywhere I go they want a tip. Was in Nashville this last week and all the bands only pay request because that’s how they get more tips. Half the songs that get requested the band does not know. So we sit there and watch then learn on the job. Was way better when the bands just played their favorite songs that they knew everyone loved. Then we would tip because they were amazing. Tips and outrageous pricing are ruining the service industry. Tipflation

Mike


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 31 Oct 2023, 22:00 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8873
Post Likes: +11624
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:

I see this more and more. People can easily afford something, but they can't afford it or stomach it emotionally. Happens to me more and more as I am getting more cantankerous.


I can spend $100 on a bottle of wine or $400 in a nice steakhouse with friends without batting an eyelid, but will go ballistic over kitchen towels increasing from $12 to $18...

And filling up the car is also really grating me these days. Our little Volvo S60 (not even the big SUV) is $100 to fill up each time here in CA. Insane.


I had a pilot call a while back, he was upset with his boss (my client) for giving him a hard time about a $200 hotel room. He said “he spends $200 on a bottle of wine”

My reply was “yeah, but it’s his $200!”

The biggest part of this is choice, we went to a steakhouse with another couple and my wife picked out a really great bottle of wine, and a third… when I got the bill I figured out why it was so good. But… she chose it and it was an experience.

Paying $8 for a gallon of Jet A is not a choice or a good experience.
_________________
Be kind. You never know what someone is going through.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop
PostPosted: 01 Nov 2023, 02:01 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/05/16
Posts: 3151
Post Likes: +2295
Company: Tack Mobile
Location: KBJC
Aircraft: C441
The tipping situation has just turned into everyone effectively putting a 20% discount on the menu, and then putting a small math problem on the bill for you to add it back in.

It always makes me laugh when I see a “4% living wage supplement” or some guilt trip on the bill. You’re the one setting their pay! It has somehow become the customer’s responsibility to run payroll for the establishment at the point of sale. What’s next, “3% new pizza oven addendum”? Put prices on the menu that allow you to operate your business and pay people fairly, what a concept.

And can we stop with the “ok and it’s going to ask you a question”. No, it’s going to ask for a tip. It used to be bad form for a waiter to watch you write the tip on the bill. Now it’s expected at the drive through at Starbucks.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 989 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 ... 66  Next



Electroair (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026

.avnav.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.ElectroairTile.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.midwest2.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.Plane Salon Beechtalk.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.