31 Jan 2026, 01:48 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Jan 2017, 15:07 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16157 Post Likes: +8880 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I don't think this thing was designed to compete with a CJ... but compare it to a Meridian M600 and you get a tubojet engine, more spacious cabin, faster cruise, better avionics and it costs a million less. I doubt it'll be a million less by the time the fixed price option orders are delivered. It'll probably cost right around the same as a M600 and a million less than a TBM900. And yes, that's the market the SF50 is competing for.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Jan 2017, 15:26 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 06/28/09 Posts: 14465 Post Likes: +9596 Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I don't think this thing was designed to compete with a CJ... but compare it to a Meridian M600 and you get a tubojet engine, more spacious cabin, faster cruise, better avionics and it costs a million less. I doubt it'll be a million less by the time the fixed price option orders are delivered. It'll probably cost right around the same as a M600 and a million less than a TBM900. And yes, that's the market the SF50 is competing for.
Yeah but don't they both have options? List for the SF50 is 1.97m and the M600 is 2.82.
_________________ http://calipilot.com atp/cfii
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Jan 2017, 15:52 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3838 Post Likes: +5705 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I don't think this thing was designed to compete with a CJ... but compare it to a Meridian M600 and you get a tubojet engine, more spacious cabin, faster cruise, better avionics and it costs a million less. Better avionics??? The M600 has the 3 screen G3000 with a fully glass backup with the Aspen PFD, as well as a dedicated pilots PFD, compared to the 2 screen G3000 and a touchscreen that can be turned on to act as a backup? Plus in addition to the full envelope protection, blue level button, and all the latest Garmin bells and whistles present on the SF50, the M600 has automatic autopilot engagement that will take over and level the plane if it detects that the pilot is out of control. You compare the 2, and tell me which one looks like a turbine class aircraft? M600 Attachment: M600.jpg SF50 Attachment: SF50.jpg
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Jan 2017, 16:08 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16157 Post Likes: +8880 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yeah but don't they both have options? List for the SF50 is 1.97m and the M600 is 2.82. 'Options' as in the current position holders who have a fixed (or CPI adjusted) price because they made a high-risk investment in the projects viability early on. After those positions are delivered, the street price will be higher.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Jan 2017, 16:09 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16157 Post Likes: +8880 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You compare the 2, and tell me which one looks like a turbine class aircraft? M600 Attachment: M600.jpg SF50 Attachment: SF50.jpg Simpler is better.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Jan 2017, 16:18 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3838 Post Likes: +5705 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You compare the 2, and tell me which one looks like a turbine class aircraft? M600 Attachment: M600.jpg SF50 Attachment: SF50.jpg Simpler is better.
Until stuff starts going dark in IMC
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Jan 2017, 16:39 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You compare the 2, and tell me which one looks like a turbine class aircraft? Both look awesome. The plus with the SF50 for a lot of buyers over the M600 is CAPS. I know, I know, CAPS is for pussies. But it sure sold a lot of SR22's over TTx.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Jan 2017, 16:46 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/29/10 Posts: 2854 Post Likes: +2817 Location: Dallas, TX (KADS & KJWY)
Aircraft: T28B,7GCBC,E90,B206
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I don't think this thing was designed to compete with a CJ... but compare it to a Meridian M600 and you get a tubojet engine, more spacious cabin, faster cruise, better avionics and it costs a million less. Chuckle... Couldn't agree with you more Adam, but we've been saying that for 200+ pages and we're still going in circles! Some people appear to get it, some don't. Oh well. The SF50 will put a dent in the sales of new TBM and M500/600s. It won't touch the CJ sales at all. It also won't have much impact on guys looking to by 30 year old sub $1m turboprops (and hey, I'm in that category!) - It's a different market segment entirely. I suspect that Cirrus is a lot smarter than many people are giving them credit for (Tom's post about how they educated the insurance market is a great example). Robert
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Jan 2017, 17:12 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11068 Post Likes: +7099 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I know, I know, CAPS is for pussies. But it sure sold a lot of SR22's over TTx. Could you expound on that comment a little more please 
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Jan 2017, 17:31 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3838 Post Likes: +5705 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I suspect that Cirrus is a lot smarter than many people are giving them credit for (Tom's post about how they educated the insurance market is a great example).
Robert
Moving up to a twin jet like a CJ is handful. Very complex systems, and avionics, rattling speed. The bandwidth of a single pilot is limited. The bandwidth of your average GA single pilot with the money to buy these kind of planes, maybe more limited on average than your single pro-pilot. The poor chap that went swimming with his CJ4, would most likely be at home having dinner with his family tonight if he were in a M500/600, SF50 or even his Mustang. Easier to fly and more forgiving airframes. The CJ4 is a handful, even for a single pro-pilot. As planes get faster and more complex, they are harder to fly, especially with any unexpected distraction. I see the SF50 like the Meridian, M600, Eclipse, Mustang, designed from the ground up to be the simplest in their class to fly, even at the expense of performance and other specs. That is value to some.
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Jan 2017, 19:50 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/13/13 Posts: 362 Post Likes: +221
Aircraft: M20R
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I wish Cirrus would buy eclipse and put Garmin in it.
Mike Project Canada: http://www.oneaviation.aero/canada.html"Another significant change is that the Garmin G3000 cockpit suite will be standard on the new model. The current IS&S cockpit will be an option. “We’ll let the market decide,” said Klapmeier. The unusual IS&S suite, while capable, is quite different in operating philosophy than most other integrated avionics systems, which has been off-putting to some customers, especially those moving up from Garmin-equipped models." (From: https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all ... -announced)
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Jan 2017, 20:18 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It's really nice. 1400NM. Due beginning of 2018 according to the July 2016 article. I've always wondered why they didn't build it like this in the first place. I remember looking at the Eclipse back in the day and thinking "I hate the avionics". ha
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Jan 2017, 20:34 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/16/15 Posts: 3838 Post Likes: +5705 Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I could never get past the sidestick. Another reason Cirrii are cold to me. But I wish them all success.  Like the Cirrus, I believe it is a side yoke, not a side stick. The aileron forces are pretty heavy in the Eclipse, need to work out those forearms if you want to hand fly it.
_________________ Chuck Ivester Piper M600 Ogden UT
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026
|
|
|
|