banner
banner

31 Jan 2026, 01:48 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246 ... 512  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2017, 15:07 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16157
Post Likes: +8880
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
Username Protected wrote:
I don't think this thing was designed to compete with a CJ... but compare it to a Meridian M600 and you get a tubojet engine, more spacious cabin, faster cruise, better avionics and it costs a million less.


I doubt it'll be a million less by the time the fixed price option orders are delivered. It'll probably cost right around the same as a M600 and a million less than a TBM900. And yes, that's the market the SF50 is competing for.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2017, 15:26 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/09
Posts: 14465
Post Likes: +9596
Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
Username Protected wrote:
I don't think this thing was designed to compete with a CJ... but compare it to a Meridian M600 and you get a tubojet engine, more spacious cabin, faster cruise, better avionics and it costs a million less.


I doubt it'll be a million less by the time the fixed price option orders are delivered. It'll probably cost right around the same as a M600 and a million less than a TBM900. And yes, that's the market the SF50 is competing for.


Yeah but don't they both have options? List for the SF50 is 1.97m and the M600 is 2.82.
_________________
http://calipilot.com
atp/cfii


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2017, 15:52 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/16/15
Posts: 3838
Post Likes: +5705
Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
Username Protected wrote:
I don't think this thing was designed to compete with a CJ... but compare it to a Meridian M600 and you get a tubojet engine, more spacious cabin, faster cruise, better avionics and it costs a million less.


Better avionics??? The M600 has the 3 screen G3000 with a fully glass backup with the Aspen PFD, as well as a dedicated pilots PFD, compared to the 2 screen G3000 and a touchscreen that can be turned on to act as a backup? Plus in addition to the full envelope protection, blue level button, and all the latest Garmin bells and whistles present on the SF50, the M600 has automatic autopilot engagement that will take over and level the plane if it detects that the pilot is out of control. You compare the 2, and tell me which one looks like a turbine class aircraft? :D

M600

Attachment:
M600.jpg


SF50

Attachment:
SF50.jpg


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Chuck Ivester
Piper M600
Ogden UT


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2017, 16:08 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16157
Post Likes: +8880
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
Username Protected wrote:
Yeah but don't they both have options? List for the SF50 is 1.97m and the M600 is 2.82.


'Options' as in the current position holders who have a fixed (or CPI adjusted) price because they made a high-risk investment in the projects viability early on. After those positions are delivered, the street price will be higher.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2017, 16:09 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16157
Post Likes: +8880
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
Username Protected wrote:
You compare the 2, and tell me which one looks like a turbine class aircraft? :D

M600

Attachment:
M600.jpg


SF50

Attachment:
SF50.jpg


Simpler is better.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2017, 16:18 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/16/15
Posts: 3838
Post Likes: +5705
Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
Username Protected wrote:
You compare the 2, and tell me which one looks like a turbine class aircraft? :D

M600

Attachment:
M600.jpg


SF50

Attachment:
SF50.jpg


Simpler is better.


Until stuff starts going dark in IMC :D
_________________
Chuck Ivester
Piper M600
Ogden UT


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2017, 16:39 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
You compare the 2, and tell me which one looks like a turbine class aircraft? :D

Both look awesome.

The plus with the SF50 for a lot of buyers over the M600 is CAPS. I know, I know, CAPS is for pussies. But it sure sold a lot of SR22's over TTx.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2017, 16:46 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/29/10
Posts: 2854
Post Likes: +2817
Location: Dallas, TX (KADS & KJWY)
Aircraft: T28B,7GCBC,E90,B206
Username Protected wrote:
I don't think this thing was designed to compete with a CJ... but compare it to a Meridian M600 and you get a tubojet engine, more spacious cabin, faster cruise, better avionics and it costs a million less.


Chuckle... Couldn't agree with you more Adam, but we've been saying that for 200+ pages and we're still going in circles! Some people appear to get it, some don't. Oh well.

The SF50 will put a dent in the sales of new TBM and M500/600s. It won't touch the CJ sales at all. It also won't have much impact on guys looking to by 30 year old sub $1m turboprops (and hey, I'm in that category!) - It's a different market segment entirely.

I suspect that Cirrus is a lot smarter than many people are giving them credit for (Tom's post about how they educated the insurance market is a great example).

Robert


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2017, 17:12 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 11068
Post Likes: +7099
Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
Username Protected wrote:
I know, I know, CAPS is for pussies. But it sure sold a lot of SR22's over TTx.


Could you expound on that comment a little more please :peace:

_________________
---Rusty Shoe Keeper---


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2017, 17:31 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/16/15
Posts: 3838
Post Likes: +5705
Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
Username Protected wrote:

I suspect that Cirrus is a lot smarter than many people are giving them credit for (Tom's post about how they educated the insurance market is a great example).

Robert


Moving up to a twin jet like a CJ is handful. Very complex systems, and avionics, rattling speed. The bandwidth of a single pilot is limited. The bandwidth of your average GA single pilot with the money to buy these kind of planes, maybe more limited on average than your single pro-pilot. The poor chap that went swimming with his CJ4, would most likely be at home having dinner with his family tonight if he were in a M500/600, SF50 or even his Mustang. Easier to fly and more forgiving airframes. The CJ4 is a handful, even for a single pro-pilot. As planes get faster and more complex, they are harder to fly, especially with any unexpected distraction. I see the SF50 like the Meridian, M600, Eclipse, Mustang, designed from the ground up to be the simplest in their class to fly, even at the expense of performance and other specs. That is value to some.

_________________
Chuck Ivester
Piper M600
Ogden UT


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2017, 18:48 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/21/09
Posts: 12596
Post Likes: +17395
Location: Albany, TX
Aircraft: Prior SR22T,V35B,182
That is an excellent post, Chuck. And one of the very few that hasn't been said over and over and over.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2017, 19:50 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 09/13/13
Posts: 362
Post Likes: +221
Aircraft: M20R
Username Protected wrote:
I wish Cirrus would buy eclipse and put Garmin in it.

Mike
Project Canada: http://www.oneaviation.aero/canada.html

"Another significant change is that the Garmin G3000 cockpit suite will be standard on the new model. The current IS&S cockpit will be an option. “We’ll let the market decide,” said Klapmeier. The unusual IS&S suite, while capable, is quite different in operating philosophy than most other integrated avionics systems, which has been off-putting to some customers, especially those moving up from Garmin-equipped models."
(From: https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all ... -announced)


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2017, 20:18 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:

It's really nice. 1400NM. Due beginning of 2018 according to the July 2016 article.

I've always wondered why they didn't build it like this in the first place. I remember looking at the Eclipse back in the day and thinking "I hate the avionics". ha


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2017, 20:29 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6692
Post Likes: +6005
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
I could never get past the idea of sidestick. Another reason Cirrii are cold to me. But I wish them all success. :thumbup:

_________________
"Either we heal now as a team, or we will die as individuals."


Last edited on 16 Jan 2017, 20:35, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2017, 20:34 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/16/15
Posts: 3838
Post Likes: +5705
Location: Ogden UT
Aircraft: Piper M600
Username Protected wrote:
I could never get past the sidestick. Another reason Cirrii are cold to me. But I wish them all success. :thumbup:


Like the Cirrus, I believe it is a side yoke, not a side stick. The aileron forces are pretty heavy in the Eclipse, need to work out those forearms if you want to hand fly it.

_________________
Chuck Ivester
Piper M600
Ogden UT


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246 ... 512  Next



Electroair (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026

.Elite-85x50.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.avnav.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.BT Ad.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.ElectroairTile.png.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.Plane Salon Beechtalk.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.