banner
banner

31 Jan 2026, 12:23 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240 ... 512  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2016, 20:54 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/13/10
Posts: 20441
Post Likes: +25711
Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
Username Protected wrote:
They keep advertising high speed cruise 300 kts.



Curiously, economy cruise (240kts) in the SF50 is about as fast as my high-speed cruise (235kts) (Columbia 400) at the same altitude.

The SF50 is bigger, more comfortable, pressurized, has better avionics, has a parachute, and it sounds much cooler. Oh, and it costs more.
_________________
Arlen
Get your motor runnin'
Head out on the highway
- Mars Bonfire


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 22 Dec 2016, 20:59 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 05/22/09
Posts: 5643
Post Likes: +1121
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Aircraft: 1977 A36
Don't forget the chick factor....much higher on a Vtail JET!

_________________
It is possible to fly without motors, but not without knowledge and skill.WW


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 23 Dec 2016, 17:37 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 09/02/09
Posts: 8740
Post Likes: +9490
Company: OAA
Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
Username Protected wrote:
Don't forget the chick factor....much higher on a Vtail JET!


I've seen a lot of the guys on the waiting list. A v tail anything ain't gonna help...


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 23 Dec 2016, 18:39 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 07/15/12
Posts: 152
Post Likes: +134
The Type Certificate finally showed up online. Looks like it did get certified to 28,000' after all.

This seems interesting

"Exemption No. 11092 dated October 23, 2014, §23.177(b), use of electric roll trim for static lateral
stability"

What happens in a complete electrical failure?

http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_an ... H_Rev1.pdf


Last edited on 23 Dec 2016, 18:50, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 23 Dec 2016, 18:46 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 05/22/09
Posts: 5643
Post Likes: +1121
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Aircraft: 1977 A36
Username Protected wrote:
Don't forget the chick factor....much higher on a Vtail JET!


I've seen a lot of the guys on the waiting list. A v tail anything ain't gonna help...


:coffee:
_________________
It is possible to fly without motors, but not without knowledge and skill.WW


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 23 Dec 2016, 19:58 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/03/11
Posts: 2103
Post Likes: +2216
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Username Protected wrote:
The Type Certificate finally showed up online. Looks like it did get certified to 28,000' after all.

This seems interesting

"Exemption No. 11092 dated October 23, 2014, §23.177(b), use of electric roll trim for static lateral
stability"

What happens in a complete electrical failure?

http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_an ... H_Rev1.pdf


Aren't there a bunch of planes that don't have manual roll trim as a backup?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 23 Dec 2016, 20:14 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/12/14
Posts: 276
Post Likes: +201
Location: KISP Long Island
Aircraft: Cirrussr20
Username Protected wrote:
They keep advertising high speed cruise 300 kts.



Curiously, economy cruise (240kts) in the SF50 is about as fast as my high-speed cruise (235kts) (Columbia 400) at the same altitude.




Go to Flight Aware, look under KDLH for SR50. I see numerous flights filed for 280-296 kt at 28,000. Seems to me Cirrus jet performs as planned.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 23 Dec 2016, 21:01 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/01/10
Posts: 3503
Post Likes: +2477
Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
Username Protected wrote:
Aren't there a bunch of planes that don't have manual roll trim as a backup?

Yes, there are. For example, the Mustang's aileron and rudder trim are electric only. Electric-only trim isn't a problem, especially for a plane like the SF50. Falcon jets have electric trim as well.

_________________
Previous A36TN owner


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 24 Dec 2016, 00:23 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 07/15/12
Posts: 152
Post Likes: +134
It's not the fact that it's electric trim thats of interest, it's the fact that it's the exemption for "use of electric roll trim for static lateral stability".
implies without electric roll trim working,the aircraft becomes static laterally unstable.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2017, 02:07 
Online


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21202
Post Likes: +26696
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
The request was for objective data, something I have been looking for also.

It has oddly been lacking. Must exist since you have to have an AFM to give a plane to a customer.

Now that it is out there, do have some FA tracks. Here is a flight:

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N1WA ... /KSRQ/KTYS

2 hours to go 540 nm, 27 minutes to climb to FL280. Winds at that time were 250 degrees at 14 knots, effectively net zero wind for the direction of flight, so the cruise speed appears to achieve 300 +/- knots. Previous flight was 24 minutes to FL270.

Climb rate, in *January*, sucks. Wait until the hot weather of summer. Compare:

Cirrus SF50, 6000 lbs MGTOW, total thrust 1846 lbf, climb rate ~1700 FPM.

Eclipse EA550, 6000 lbs MGTOW, total thrust 1800 lbf, climb rate 3424 FPM.

EA550 has less thrust, same weight, and makes twice the climb rate.

This means the SF50 has a lot of drag, most likely due to the V tail and the engine arrangement.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2017, 02:15 
Online


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21202
Post Likes: +26696
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
It's not the fact that it's electric trim thats of interest, it's the fact that it's the exemption for "use of electric roll trim for static lateral stability".
implies without electric roll trim working,the aircraft becomes static laterally unstable.

No, it isn't for that reason. It is that the regs require the ability to turn the airplane with either aileron *OR* rudder. Cirrus didn't want to put in an aileron rudder interconnect (which kind of defeats the redundancy anyway and ruins control system feel, too), and that's harder with a V tail in any case, so they argued you could "fly" the airplane with the electric roll trim.

Here is the text of the exemption:

http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guida ... /11092.pdf

Flight test results show the level of safety provided by § 23.177(b) remains satisfactory. Cirrus has demonstrated the use of the electric roll trim control system, as part of the approved type design, for lateral control in the event the primary roll controls system becomes disconnected

The Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Limitations must show that the electric roll trim system must be operational for flight.


So if your aileron control system fails, you cannot fly the airplane laterally on rudder (or at least, not well enough to meet the reg), so you have to use the electric aileron roll trim to fly the plane. Thus the electric roll trim is a no go item if it fails.

I'd like to see a video of a landing done using solely electric roll trim on gusty day. Could be very interesting!

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2017, 07:00 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/13/10
Posts: 20441
Post Likes: +25711
Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
A year ago, Cirrus stated the got climb to max in 20 minutes...

Outside conditions are sea level ISA with no wind. The profile shows a takeoff ground roll of 2,036 feet, followed by a climb to the maximum altitude of FL280 in 20 minutes. The climb burns 32 gallons/214 pounds of fuel and covers 64 nm.
http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/ ... ce-numbers

_________________
Arlen
Get your motor runnin'
Head out on the highway
- Mars Bonfire


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2017, 07:18 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/31/14
Posts: 564
Post Likes: +271
Aircraft: eclipse
Username Protected wrote:
A year ago, Cirrus stated the got climb to max in 20 minutes...

Outside conditions are sea level ISA with no wind. The profile shows a takeoff ground roll of 2,036 feet, followed by a climb to the maximum altitude of FL280 in 20 minutes. The climb burns 32 gallons/214 pounds of fuel and covers 64 nm.
http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/ ... ce-numbers


And for the Eclipse a climb to 28,000 takes 13 minutes and burns 23 gallons/149 lbs and covers 50 nm

More performance less fuel I love it :thumbup:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2017, 08:13 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/23/12
Posts: 2423
Post Likes: +3032
Company: CSRA Document Solutions
Location: Aiken, SC KAIK
Welcome back Mike C. I still like the Cirrus Jet, you clearly still don't. What innovative new planes do you think will change the face of GA?

Happy New Year,
Don


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2017, 09:10 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
If Cirrus delivers the fifth SF-50 to a customer (to avoid any shenanigans with fake early deliveries, an industry tradition) by Jan 1st, 2018, 3+ years from now and more than 10 years after the program was started, then I will never post again on this forum. If they fail to, you will never post again on this forum.

Have we got a deal? :-)

If you start arguing that 3 years isn't enough time, then you are basically saying the SF-50 really is vaporware right now.

Mike C.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240 ... 512  Next



Electroair (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026

.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.ElectroairTile.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.BT Ad.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.camguard.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.avfab-85x50-2018-12-04.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.Plane Salon Beechtalk.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.