31 Jan 2026, 06:14 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 15 Nov 2016, 19:03 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/09/13 Posts: 1910 Post Likes: +927 Location: KCMA
Aircraft: Aero Commander 980
|
|
|
I wonder if people who buy into this normalize hourly cost with the speed differential.
Couple of different ways to define a day.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Nov 2016, 09:32 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: But there will always be the day when you want the plane to be somewhere and someone else booked it. For that annoyance you just paid $525K...  There is more than 1. I think he has 3 right now. But yeah, that's the downside to fractional ownership. How much is a new Eclipse? $525K ain't bad. Does this really need to be explained?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Nov 2016, 10:41 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6692 Post Likes: +6005 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: But yeah, that's the downside to fractional ownership. How much is a new Eclipse? $525K ain't bad. Does this really need to be explained?
Let's just say I don't understand fractional ownership. It's exactly like renting a plane at a flight school, except the planes are a little nicer. No difference whatsoever. I can not think of anything worse at this stage of my life then to have to submit myself to club policy, club overlords, recurrent checkouts, rules, vacuuming plane out after use, returning it filled up, restock the wet wipes, wipe the leading edges off for the next guy to the tune of $525K... What's the point of being financially better off if it's exactly like being a kid again and having to be told to clean my room? But I'm glad some people do. More power to them.
_________________ "Either we heal now as a team, or we will die as individuals."
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Nov 2016, 10:46 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I can not think of anything worse at this stage of my life then to have to submit myself to club policy, club overlords, recurrent checkouts, rules, vacuuming plane out after use, returning it filled up, restock the wet wipes, wipe the leading edges off for the next guy to the tune of $525K... What's the point of being financially better off if it's exactly like being a kid again and having to be told to clean my room?
How long you been restoring that Commander?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Nov 2016, 10:49 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6692 Post Likes: +6005 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: How long you been restoring that Commander? Told you I was slumming it, but at least my integrity is intact! 
_________________ "Either we heal now as a team, or we will die as individuals."
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Nov 2016, 10:53 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6692 Post Likes: +6005 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The $525K to buy in is not gone. You get back what's left when they sell the plane in 4 years and buy another. So do you with the renters deposit at the flight school... 
_________________ "Either we heal now as a team, or we will die as individuals."
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Nov 2016, 15:42 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 02/14/09 Posts: 6068 Post Likes: +3329 Company: tomdrew.lawyer Location: Des Moines, IA (KDSM)
Aircraft: 1973 Baron E55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: But yeah, that's the downside to fractional ownership. How much is a new Eclipse? $525K ain't bad. Does this really need to be explained?
Let's just say I don't understand fractional ownership. It's exactly like renting a plane at a flight school, except the planes are a little nicer. No difference whatsoever. I can not think of anything worse at this stage of my life then to have to submit myself to club policy, club overlords, recurrent checkouts, rules, vacuuming plane out after use, returning it filled up, restock the wet wipes, wipe the leading edges off for the next guy to the tune of $525K... What's the point of being financially better off if it's exactly like being a kid again and having to be told to clean my room? But I'm glad some people do. More power to them.
At some point the luster of managing an aircraft wears off. If you are still having fun, then knock yourself out. I understand the pilot that just wants to fly and not mess with managing an aircraft, I totally get it. Plus, they are flying something they probably would never buck up for on their own. The actual cost of maintaining a vintage aircraft AND managing it is way up in the stratosphere.
_________________ C340A/8KCAB/T182T F33C/E55/B58 PA 28/32 Currency 12 M: IPC/BFR, CFII Renewal
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Nov 2016, 16:29 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/09/09 Posts: 4438 Post Likes: +3306
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: At some point the luster of managing an aircraft wears off. If you are still having fun, then knock yourself out. I understand the pilot that just wants to fly and not mess with managing an aircraft, I totally get it. Plus, they are flying something they probably would never buck up for on their own. The actual cost of maintaining a vintage aircraft AND managing it is way up in the stratosphere.
Heck, I understand the pilot that simply wants to sit in the back and relax as well.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Nov 2016, 18:16 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6065 Post Likes: +719 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
The point I don't get is filling full fuel all the time when you bring it back. What do you do when you want to bring a full cabin of passenger 1-2 hrs away and the plane as full fuel? Then you pay ramp fees because you don't want to takeoff heavy again at destination? I fuel my plane when I know where im going and what payload I have. Username Protected wrote: But yeah, that's the downside to fractional ownership. How much is a new Eclipse? $525K ain't bad. Does this really need to be explained?
Let's just say I don't understand fractional ownership. It's exactly like renting a plane at a flight school, except the planes are a little nicer. No difference whatsoever. I can not think of anything worse at this stage of my life then to have to submit myself to club policy, club overlords, recurrent checkouts, rules, vacuuming plane out after use, returning it filled up, restock the wet wipes, wipe the leading edges off for the next guy to the tune of $525K... What's the point of being financially better off if it's exactly like being a kid again and having to be told to clean my room? But I'm glad some people do. More power to them.
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Nov 2016, 18:20 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13087 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The point I don't get is filling full fuel all the time when you bring it back. What do you do when you want to bring a full cabin of passenger 1-2 hrs away and the plane as full fuel? Then you pay ramp fees because you don't want to takeoff heavy again at destination? I fuel my plane when I know where im going and what payload I have.
When does any of this happen?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 16 Nov 2016, 18:21 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6692 Post Likes: +6005 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The point I don't get is filling full fuel all the time when you bring it back. What do you do when you want to bring a full cabin of passenger 1-2 hrs away and the plane as full fuel? Then you pay ramp fees because you don't want to takeoff heavy again at destination? I fuel my plane when I know where im going and what payload I have.
I'm not sure they want you to do that, I was just making a point of inconvenience.
_________________ "Either we heal now as a team, or we will die as individuals."
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026
|
|
|
|