banner
banner

31 Oct 2025, 02:46 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 423 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 ... 29  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope
PostPosted: 19 Jul 2022, 14:42 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/14/13
Posts: 6410
Post Likes: +5147
Username Protected wrote:
The "real issues" in this world are often unaffected by having money thrown at them, but if you were to allocate ten times the NASA budget to any of them it wouldn't move the needle.


I don't know that I would use a pandemic year as representative


Top

 Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope
PostPosted: 19 Jul 2022, 14:48 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/06/08
Posts: 5289
Post Likes: +3044
Aircraft: B55 P2
Space is hard Very hard. But we used to do hard things. SpaceX is really trying - and doing a good job, but I fear that is entirely driven by one man, and he won't live forever.

I don't know if interstellar travel will ever be possible, but we are also a bit like paleolithic people deciding if its worth paddling a log across a river because obviously we will never be able to paddle that log across an ocean.

But if we don't try to cross the river we will never learn how to do more.


Top

 Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope
PostPosted: 19 Jul 2022, 15:09 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 04/30/09
Posts: 1486
Post Likes: +861
Username Protected wrote:
Space is hard Very hard. But we used to do hard things. SpaceX is really trying - and doing a good job, but I fear that is entirely driven by one man, and he won't live forever.

I don't know if interstellar travel will ever be possible, but we are also a bit like paleolithic people deciding if its worth paddling a log across a river because obviously we will never be able to paddle that log across an ocean.

But if we don't try to cross the river we will never learn how to do more.


So true. We don’t know what we don’t know, which is why we need to get the knowledge, even if tiny step by tiny step.

Sadly, I think Mr. Musk is going to self implode, much like Howard Hughes.

_________________
Former Taco Chef
Now - Battery Salesman
No Engineering Skills
I don’t know what I don’t know


Top

 Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope
PostPosted: 19 Jul 2022, 16:02 
Offline


User avatar
 ICQ  Profile




Joined: 11/09/14
Posts: 2673
Post Likes: +3613
Location: KOMN
Aircraft: Bonanza V35
Username Protected wrote:

So interesting that we spend so much resources on projects like this, and not address real issues in our own backyard...

Everyone has something different in mind when they say or hear this.
My take is that only a few tons of metal and other elements go into space. ALL of the money is spent right here on earth. It goes to the salaries of the scientists and engineers, as well as the doctors and technicians, and the miners and truck drivers and factory workers. It all goes to PEOPLE, right here on earth. And the benefits of the research are a benefit everyone on the planet in some way. NASA is one of the premier agencies that are helping to keep an eye on our climate. We are all much better off for the money we "send into space".


Top

 Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope
PostPosted: 19 Jul 2022, 17:14 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/06/08
Posts: 5289
Post Likes: +3044
Aircraft: B55 P2
I've heard the argument that we should face urgent problems on Earth, but there are always urgent problems. War, hunger disease, poverty - they may always be with us.

I think its OK to spend some of our money on fantastic things. Some of it is because doing those things will help us on earth, but to me some of those things are the goal.

Even if going to the moon didn't benefit mankind in a direct way, still we did it. A bunch of hairless apes left their planet and crossed over a hundred thousand miles of hard vacuum to get to that big light in the sky. That light had taunted us for hundreds of thousands of years. Our ancestors probably climbed trees and mountains to try to touch it - and we finally did.





Username Protected wrote:

So interesting that we spend so much resources on projects like this, and not address real issues in our own backyard...

Everyone has something different in mind when they say or hear this.
My take is that only a few tons of metal and other elements go into space. ALL of the money is spent right here on earth. It goes to the salaries of the scientists and engineers, as well as the doctors and technicians, and the miners and truck drivers and factory workers. It all goes to PEOPLE, right here on earth. And the benefits of the research are a benefit everyone on the planet in some way. NASA is one of the premier agencies that are helping to keep an eye on our climate. We are all much better off for the money we "send into space".


Top

 Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope
PostPosted: 19 Jul 2022, 17:17 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 04/26/13
Posts: 21871
Post Likes: +22515
Location: Columbus , IN (KBAK)
Aircraft: 1968 Baron D55
Username Protected wrote:
The "real issues" in this world are often unaffected by having money thrown at them, but if you were to allocate ten times the NASA budget to any of them it wouldn't move the needle.


I don't know that I would use a pandemic year as representative

We're not talking about airline tickets, this is the government budget. Have a look at the categories. The NASA budget didn't shrink, so if overall spending was down, that 0.3% is higher than usual. In any case, what "real issue" would you like to address with the NASA budget? The lowest hanging fruit is VA benefits, which we could increase from 2% to 2.3%. Or maybe we could toss that 0.3% at the national debt and reduce it not at all.

NASA's budget is literally nothing in comparison to the federal budget. Pick your cause and tell me how that 23 Billion will fix whatever problem it is. Then tell me why it needs to come out of science and exploration instead of the 801 Billion that we spend on toys to blow stuff up.

You didn't like my 2020 graph, so here's a pre-COVID graph from 2013. NASA is included in the "Science" slice along with all other scientific spending.

Image
_________________
My last name rhymes with 'geese'.


Top

 Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope
PostPosted: 19 Jul 2022, 17:22 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 04/30/09
Posts: 1486
Post Likes: +861
Username Protected wrote:

So interesting that we spend so much resources on projects like this, and not address real issues in our own backyard...

Everyone has something different in mind when they say or hear this.
My take is that only a few tons of metal and other elements go into space. ALL of the money is spent right here on earth. It goes to the salaries of the scientists and engineers, as well as the doctors and technicians, and the miners and truck drivers and factory workers. It all goes to PEOPLE, right here on earth. And the benefits of the research are a benefit everyone on the planet in some way. NASA is one of the premier agencies that are helping to keep an eye on our climate. We are all much better off for the money we "send into space".


Very, very well said. Thanks for putting things into perspective so well.
_________________
Former Taco Chef
Now - Battery Salesman
No Engineering Skills
I don’t know what I don’t know


Top

 Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope
PostPosted: 19 Jul 2022, 17:25 
Offline




User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/10/07
Posts: 35675
Post Likes: +14139
Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
Username Protected wrote:
Another planet's life may be hostile - but history suggests that you do a lot better if you are on the ships, rather than waving from the shore when the ships arrive.

:coffee:

_________________
-lance

It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.


Top

 Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope
PostPosted: 19 Jul 2022, 18:31 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/11/10
Posts: 9429
Post Likes: +13521
Company: ? Most always. I like people.
Location: KFIN Flagler, FL
Aircraft: 1991 Bonanza A36
Username Protected wrote:
I've heard the argument that we should face urgent problems on Earth, but there are always urgent problems. War, hunger disease, poverty - they may always be with us.

I think its OK to spend some of our money on fantastic things. Some of it is because doing those things will help us on earth, but to me some of those things are the goal.

Even if going to the moon didn't benefit mankind in a direct way, still we did it. A bunch of hairless apes left their planet and crossed over a hundred thousand miles of hard vacuum to get to that big light in the sky. That light had taunted us for hundreds of thousands of years. Our ancestors probably climbed trees and mountains to try to touch it - and we finally did.


There is something about conquering the "barely possible" that is so satisfying that it offsets all inconvenience, pain and expense. My brother and I have climbed a dozen 14,000' mountains just to do it. It is often painful and taxing with a bit of danger thrown in at times, but the exhilaration must be kin to holding a baby after childbirth. (I've held the babies, but only watched the the births.)

In two days my wife, youngest son and I will begin six weeks of hiking the Appalachian Trail. We will be hot, wet, muddy, and visited by bugs and bears. Much will be steep both up and down. Walking in rain, sleeping on the ground, carrying forty pounds of gear and food mile after mile...doesn't sound so romantic, but the challenge drives us, like the moon drove our nation.

Sometimes the value is in the achievement rather than the product. So space exploration gives our nation and world an experience and an achievement we can be proud of and learn from. I can truly say after 70 years on this earth and 7 children, it is not the things I have given my children that are most precious to them, it is the experiences. They forget the things. They revel to my grandchildren about the experiences.

Press on...

_________________
Bible In Poems
BibleInPoems.com

BNice


Top

 Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope
PostPosted: 19 Jul 2022, 19:00 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/22/14
Posts: 10315
Post Likes: +20876
Company: Mountain Airframe LLC
Location: Mena, Arkansas
:clap:

_________________
If a diligent man puts his energy into the exclusive effort, a molehill can be made into a mountain


Top

 Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope
PostPosted: 19 Jul 2022, 20:15 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/06/14
Posts: 7264
Post Likes: +8905
Company: The French Tradition
Location: KCRQ - Carlsbad - KTOA
Aircraft: 89 A36 TN, 78 Tiger
It is truly astonishing what they have accomplished with this telescope. The technology that had to be created is incredible. So many innovations.
But for me, I don't see the need for deep space photos... Though they are pretty...
It is my belief that with that much brain power, and budget, if applied on earth, they could do more amazing accomplishments.

_________________
Bonanza 89 A36 Turbo Norm
Grumman Tiger 78


Top

 Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope
PostPosted: 19 Jul 2022, 20:35 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/25/10
Posts: 13186
Post Likes: +21107
Company: Summerland Key Airport
Location: FD51
Aircraft: P35, GC1B
Username Protected wrote:
It is truly astonishing what they have accomplished with this telescope. The technology that had to be created is incredible. So many innovations.
But for me, I don't see the need for deep space photos... Though they are pretty...
It is my belief that with that much brain power, and budget, if applied on earth, they could do more amazing accomplishments.


While I have heard this view often expressed by folks with good intentions, the historical evidence does not support the claim. So, in the spirit of honest discussion, how would you apportion NASA's paltry budget to measurably influence mankind in a positive way? What metric would you use to measure success?

While Nasa has a lengthy list (https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/file ... TAGGED.pdf) of the benefits of space exploration for the people on Earth, a more poignant example is Tesla. The rise of Electric Vehicles is often touted as being incredibly beneficial to both mankind and the planet. The ONLY reason EVs are even remotely viable right now is the drive of one man and his company - whose singular focus (including the reason Tesla exists as a company at all) is conquering Mars.

Additionally, due to that particular man, who has made Starlink and the orbital delivery system that put the satellites in orbit and then procured a gazillion ground stations for the people of Ukraine, the Russians have failed in their insane attempt at conquering their (mostly) peaceful neighbor and rendering yet another nation impoverished both economically and spiritually.

That's just one company. There are a host of others doing amazing work to get humanity into space, and their research is critical to the betterment of the lives of those who remain on Earth.

Microwaves to heat up a mediocre dinner
GPS to follow the magenta line
Weather Satellites for weather prediction
Helios A and B for solar flare prediction
Google Earth for catching your spouse at a strip club
Seafloor mapping satellites for finding underwater mountains that your submarine can run into
Velcro for kids shoes
Space blankets for cold nights
406 ELT for emergencies
Asteroid tracking because its easier to train oil field workers to be astronauts than vice versa

This is just off the top of my head. The space race isn't optional for humanity. It's mandatory.

_________________
Being right too soon is socially unacceptable.
— Heinlein


Top

 Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope
PostPosted: 19 Jul 2022, 22:10 
Offline




User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/10/07
Posts: 35675
Post Likes: +14139
Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
Username Protected wrote:
It is truly astonishing what they have accomplished with this telescope. The technology that had to be created is incredible. So many innovations.
But for me, I don't see the need for deep space photos... Though they are pretty...
It is my belief that with that much brain power, and budget, if applied on earth, they could do more amazing accomplishments.

JWST isn't about pretty pictures from space, that's just what NASA thinks the general public want's to see now. It's really about furthering our understanding of what makes the universe work and how it began. There's a good chance that it will result in a number of significant advancements in physics and astronomy during what is now likely to be a 20 year lifespan. Stay tuned.

_________________
-lance

It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.


Top

 Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope
PostPosted: 19 Jul 2022, 23:02 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/06/14
Posts: 7264
Post Likes: +8905
Company: The French Tradition
Location: KCRQ - Carlsbad - KTOA
Aircraft: 89 A36 TN, 78 Tiger
Username Protected wrote:
The space race isn't optional for humanity. It's mandatory.


That is a philosophical question, and some people have different points of view regarding this.
Yes, the advancement in technology that the various space programs have created is truly incredible. The list is very long.
Would those advancements, inventions, discoveries have happened other ways? Who knows... Probably would have taken longer. Necessity is the mother of inventions.
I have always question the need for deep space exploration. Reason being that it is not accessible to humans, nor verifiable by humans...
Space exploration is important as far as I am concern. The hubble telescope is already extremely powerful. And has brought what so far? How much better than the earth based telescope? I know that I may make some unhappy people with that statement. But I have yet to grasp the need to understand the "Big Bang" and the origin of our existence... More pressing issues at hand. 7 billions and counting. We do have other fishes to fry.
:hide:

_________________
Bonanza 89 A36 Turbo Norm
Grumman Tiger 78


Top

 Post subject: Re: James Web Telescope
PostPosted: 19 Jul 2022, 23:21 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/25/10
Posts: 13186
Post Likes: +21107
Company: Summerland Key Airport
Location: FD51
Aircraft: P35, GC1B
Username Protected wrote:
The space race isn't optional for humanity. It's mandatory.


That is a philosophical question, and some people have different points of view regarding this.
Yes, the advancement in technology that the various space programs have created is truly incredible. The list is very long.
Would those advancements, inventions, discoveries have happened other ways? Who knows... Probably would have taken longer. Necessity is the mother of inventions.
I have always question the need for deep space exploration. Reason being that it is not accessible to humans, nor verifiable by humans...
Space exploration is important as far as I am concern. The hubble telescope is already extremely powerful. And has brought what so far? How much better than the earth based telescope? I know that I may make some unhappy people with that statement. But I have yet to grasp the need to understand the "Big Bang" and the origin of our existence... More pressing issues at hand. 7 billions and counting. We do have other fishes to fry.
:hide:


I asked you a very specific question: how would you apportion NASA’s paltry budget to address these “other fish to fry?”
_________________
Being right too soon is socially unacceptable.
— Heinlein


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 423 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 ... 29  Next



Plane AC

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.sarasota.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.