22 Oct 2025, 18:53 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Boeing Starliner: 80 Problems Posted: 19 Feb 2025, 12:42 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 04/26/13 Posts: 21862 Post Likes: +22498 Location: Columbus , IN (KBAK)
Aircraft: 1968 Baron D55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The point is, how many people got extended visits to the ISS due to Dragon issues?
Those people GOT STRANDED. It is a huge deal? Not really, but not what was planned. If you insist on using that term to heighten the disdain for Boeing, I can’t stop you, but exaggeration compromises honesty and accuracy and diminishes the message. Understand that I hold no love for Boeing at all, on the contrary, I am sickened by what they have become, but that message is not delivered as strongly if my message makes reasonable people’s eyes roll. We can state the actual facts and Boeing will make themselves look bad. You want to go one better? The fact is that Starliner did not strand those astronauts, NASA did. Discuss.
_________________ My last name rhymes with 'geese'.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Boeing Starliner: 80 Problems Posted: 19 Feb 2025, 13:48 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20701 Post Likes: +26138 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: If you insist on using that term to heighten the disdain for Boeing, I can’t stop you, but exaggeration compromises honesty and accuracy and diminishes the message. Seems no worse than using the term "inconvenience" like you do. Indeed, "stranded" more properly conveys the situation. Per Webster: strand: to leave in a strange or an unfavorable place especially without funds or means to depart Space is a strange and often unfavorable place and they don't have the means to depart as of yet. Seems to fit. They can't leave per their expectations which is the root issue here. Being stuck in outer space for an extra 8+ months fails to meet the definition of an "inconvenience" in my book. Quote: The fact is that Starliner did not strand those astronauts, NASA did. Discuss. The only thing NASA did was to set the risk threshold, which was known before the mission. Boeing couldn't meet it with a capsule which had numerous failures on the way up. Boeing's fault for sure on this. The Starliner has flown 3 times, each with fairly serious failures. They don't have the benefit of the SpaceX strategy of testing the capsule first as a cargo ship. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Boeing Starliner: 80 Problems Posted: 19 Feb 2025, 14:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/03/08 Posts: 16859 Post Likes: +28592 Location: Peachtree City GA / Stoke-On-Trent UK
Aircraft: A33
|
|
I love ya Mike, but I have to give you a little ribbing over this:
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Boeing Starliner: 80 Problems Posted: 19 Feb 2025, 17:04 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20701 Post Likes: +26138 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I love ya Mike, but I have to give you a little ribbing over this: Written on June 14, 9 days after the launch, when the plan was still to come back via Starliner in a few days. At that point, it seemed like a short delay over the scheduled return. On June 20, 15 days after launch, NASA said it would be until at least June 26th before they come back. Then time dragged on and on with no decision, always seemingly that the Starliner could take the crew home shortly. On August 24, 80 days after the launch, NASA made the decision to send the capsule back unmanned. Until that date, returning in the Starliner was still potentially an option. When your ride home leaves and there isn't another one, that's "stranded" for sure. That must have been a weird feeling for the crew. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Boeing Starliner: 80 Problems Posted: 22 Feb 2025, 00:10 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/01/15 Posts: 1011 Post Likes: +1069 Location: Hayward, CA
Aircraft: D50E
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Boeing is not North American. They kinda are! North American became North American Rockwell, which became Rockwell, which became Boeing.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Boeing Starliner: 80 Problems Posted: 24 Feb 2025, 01:39 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/30/09 Posts: 3843 Post Likes: +2405 Location: $ilicon Vall€y
Aircraft: Columbia 400
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Nobody on the ISS can come home anytime they want to, they come home when NASA or Roscosmos says to. If NASA wanted them home earlier they’d have a Dragon up there to pick them up. That didn’t make sense and so it didn’t happen.
Nobody is stranded up there any more than the others on the station. Just because you didn’t get the flight you wanted out of EDFF doesn’t mean that you were stranded. There are trains, cars, cruise ships, and your two feet. Inconvenienced ≠ stranded.
ROFLMAO. Well, when trying to get home from Frankfurt, trains, cars, and feet won't make it to SFO and I don't think cruise ships dock in Frankfurt. I was one of the luckier ones on that flight. Since I had documents to let me into Germany, I was able to leave the airport. However, due to a quilting convention (not kidding) there were no hotel rooms in all of Frankfurt. It was late in the evening, and they didn't have anywhere to put us. I wound on a 3 hour bus ride to Bad Kissingen to spend the night at a hotel that was closed (off season). Not by my choice. I had corporate travel working all night to rebook me. I dunno, forced transportation to the remote areas of the Bavarian by the German authorities, feels pretty stranded, especially versus the biz-class ride home I was looking forward to. The worse off ones were people connecting internationally Frankfurt-SFO and beyond who didn't have documents to enter Germany. They could not leave the controlled area of the airport. 747 holds a lot of international travellers. Whole families had no choice but to sleep on the floors of the airport. So, it wasn't the end of the world, but yeah, I was stranded for a while anyway. Thank goodness for corporate travel, who had me rebooked through a different series of flights in the morning. The line at the counter to get rebooked was insane for those who didn't get rebooked overnight. Those astronauts are stranded, period. And I tend to believe Elon Musk's account of what happened with the offer to go get them. Boeing is FUBAR too. Once great company, now a giant mess.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Boeing Starliner: 80 Problems Posted: 24 Feb 2025, 09:38 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/22/07 Posts: 14721 Post Likes: +16852 Company: Midwest Chemtrails, LLC Location: KPTK (SE Michigan)
Aircraft: C205
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Boeing is not North American. They kinda are! North American became North American Rockwell, which became Rockwell, which became Boeing. Yabbut … North American had quite a run of military aviation and space successes … that Boeing has squandered. Ergo my quip that Boeing is not North American.
_________________ Holoholo …
Last edited on 24 Feb 2025, 13:39, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Boeing Starliner: 80 Problems Posted: 24 Feb 2025, 13:38 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/22/07 Posts: 14721 Post Likes: +16852 Company: Midwest Chemtrails, LLC Location: KPTK (SE Michigan)
Aircraft: C205
|
|
Username Protected wrote: If you insist on using that term to heighten the disdain for Boeing, I can’t stop you, but exaggeration compromises honesty and accuracy and diminishes the message. Seems no worse than using the term "inconvenience" like you do. Indeed, "stranded" more properly conveys the situation. Per Webster: strand: to leave in a strange or an unfavorable place especially without funds or means to depart Space is a strange and often unfavorable place and they don't have the means to depart as of yet. Seems to fit. They can't leave per their expectations which is the root issue here. Being stuck in outer space for an extra 8+ months fails to meet the definition of an "inconvenience" in my book. Quote: The fact is that Starliner did not strand those astronauts, NASA did. Discuss. The only thing NASA did was to set the risk threshold, which was known before the mission. Boeing couldn't meet it with a capsule which had numerous failures on the way up. Boeing's fault for sure on this. The Starliner has flown 3 times, each with fairly serious failures. They don't have the benefit of the SpaceX strategy of testing the capsule first as a cargo ship. I invoke the Humpty Dumpty rule:
“When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.”
_________________ Holoholo …
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Boeing Starliner: 80 Problems Posted: 06 Mar 2025, 00:09 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/15/12 Posts: 150 Post Likes: +131
|
|
"The astronauts were only supposed to be up there for 8 days and now have been there for 8 months. SpaceX could have sent up another Dragon and brought them home 6 months ago, but the Biden White House (not NASA) refused to allow it. President Trump asked to bring them back as soon as possible and we are doing so." https://x.com/elonmusk/status/189742050 ... x5Y4w&s=19
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Boeing Starliner: 80 Problems Posted: 06 Mar 2025, 02:01 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20701 Post Likes: +26138 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Quote: "President Trump asked to bring them back as soon as possible and we are doing so." Political propaganda. The astronauts are returning on the capsule that was planned in Aug 2024 with the return of Crew 9. There has been no change in that schedule since Trump took office. They are slated to return March 19th. Musk's post gives the impression that Trump had ask for and arranged something special. That is not the case, and thus very deceptive. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Boeing Starliner: 80 Problems Posted: 07 Mar 2025, 17:22 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/11/08 Posts: 1348 Post Likes: +1266 Location: KLWM, Lawrence Municipal, No. Andover, MA and KCQX, Chatham Municipal, Chatham, MA
Aircraft: 1981 A36, 1946 J-3
|
|
Well, the 'stranded' astronauts seem to believe a return at an earlier date was possible, but rejected by the Biden Admin.... https://www.foxnews.com/politics/strand ... ue-missionI guess they didn't consult with BT before making that statement! 
_________________ John M. ABS Life Member EAA Life Member
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|