08 Jun 2025, 21:46 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II Posted: 09 Mar 2018, 12:40 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/11/09 Posts: 5918 Post Likes: +5178 Company: Middle of the country company Location: Tulsa, Ok
Aircraft: Rebooting.......
|
|
Con-Air?
_________________ Three things tell the truth: Little kids Drunks Yoga pants
Actually, four things..... Cycling kit..
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II Posted: 09 Mar 2018, 21:35 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/29/13 Posts: 14337 Post Likes: +12075 Company: Easy Ice, LLC Location: Marquette, Michigan; Scottsdale, AZ, Telluride
Aircraft: C510,C185,C310,R66
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Con-Air? No.. funny cause they were there too. They fly a pure white SAAB340. This was Customs and Immigration. Deporting illegals.
_________________ Mark Hangen Deputy Minister of Ice (aka FlyingIceperson) Power of the Turbine "Jet Elite"
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II Posted: 09 Mar 2018, 22:25 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/28/11 Posts: 1367 Post Likes: +600
Aircraft: V35A, B300
|
|
We set 7,000. FMS goes direct at 2682 to FIXIX
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II Posted: 09 Mar 2018, 23:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/29/13 Posts: 14337 Post Likes: +12075 Company: Easy Ice, LLC Location: Marquette, Michigan; Scottsdale, AZ, Telluride
Aircraft: C510,C185,C310,R66
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Agreed. 2682 isn’t a level-off. It’s a turning point in the climb. Turn direct and continue climb to no higher than 7000. No. It’s not a level off but you still have to recognize it. It takes processing power. Reminds me of a neighborhood that has speed limit signs with of numbers. 22,23, 27 etc. just a bit of an attention grabber.
_________________ Mark Hangen Deputy Minister of Ice (aka FlyingIceperson) Power of the Turbine "Jet Elite"
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II Posted: 10 Mar 2018, 00:01 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/28/11 Posts: 1367 Post Likes: +600
Aircraft: V35A, B300
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Agreed. 2682 isn’t a level-off. It’s a turning point in the climb. Turn direct and continue climb to no higher than 7000. No. It’s not a level off but you still have to recognize it. It takes processing power. Reminds me of a neighborhood that has speed limit signs with of numbers. 22,23, 27 etc. just a bit of an attention grabber.
The Garmin 750 not have this built into to the departure? Takeoff in Nav
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II Posted: 10 Mar 2018, 09:54 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11068 Post Likes: +7095 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Dang. I guess I’m too spoiled with the Mustang. Flight director will que the turn for you. Mark and John still want to be pilots 
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II Posted: 10 Mar 2018, 10:42 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/10 Posts: 13473 Post Likes: +7561 Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC, E-55, 195
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Looking for SIC's in Citation Ultra out of KADS. mikeobarr@hotmail.comCurious what your insurance requires for SIC. Our requirements are pretty tough IMO.
_________________ Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients My E55 : https://tinyurl.com/4dvxhwxu
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II Posted: 10 Mar 2018, 13:06 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/09/13 Posts: 1910 Post Likes: +927 Location: KCMA
Aircraft: Aero Commander 980
|
|
FL190 with a FMC, 7000 with less capable set up.
Unless of of course you are given a altitude in your departure clearance.
I thought the government vehicles might be there for Stormy Daniels!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the Citation II Posted: 10 Mar 2018, 14:52 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/18/13 Posts: 15415 Post Likes: +9121 Company: Retired Location: San Clemente, CA
Aircraft: Link Trainer
|
|
Username Protected wrote: John...section 5-4-20 of the AIM. There are old and new criteria and the radi varies based on the new or old standards.
The old way (not all circling approaches are updated) has Category C (what we use in the C90) at 1.7 miles. New/updated radii varies on the MSL and Category.
It will take something on the order of 10 years to see all circle to land (CTL) protected airspace converted to the new criteria. An airport in Nevada that recently became an IFR airport is at Hawthorne. The terrain is challenging in all directions, but particularly on the west side of the airport, where it rises to over 8,000 feet within 5 miles and ultimately to over 11,000 feet. Being a recent design, the new CTL radii were evaluated (TERPs map attached): CAT A: 1.37 NM CAT B: 1.96 NM CAT C 3.14 NM CAT D was excluded because of the final segment descent angle of 3.6 degrees. Under the old criteria, A,B, and C CTL would have been 1.3, 1.5, and 1.7 respectively. The big increase is to CAT C, which was the industry/FAA accord reached to impact light GA the least, and jets the most. Although the CAT C area is much larger, it results in the terrain to the west having more effect. Note that the CAT C CTL MDA is much higher than A and B. Even flying the CTL to 3 miles, the resulting decent angle to Runway 10 is approximately 4.5 degrees, and without a VGSI. Note also, CTL is restricted to one side of the airport and excludes Runway 15 because it is not paved. The terrain is sufficiently complex to prevent the issuance of standard takeoff minimums. IFR takeoff is permitted only on Runway 10 and then only with Visual Climb Over Airport (VOCA). A small aside: the FAA chart has an incorrect VGSI angle. The correct angle is 3.00 degrees. The VGSI is unusable (read: unsafe) beyond 5 miles. FAA chart users have to ferret out the VGSI info from the Digital Chart Supplement. Jepp users have it at hand on the 10-9 page. The Jepp user also has the VOCA info on the 10-9 page. The FAA chart user has to go to the “T” pages. On the CTL TERPs map I have placed a pink dot at the earliest point at which each approach category can elect to depart the electronic guidance for CTL, provided the visual reference requirements are met. Because CAT A and B have the same CTL MDA, the CAT A operator could elect to use the CAT B CTL area without any penalty. In summary, this is the kind of airport that requires a good desk study before heading there IFR.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|