banner
banner

28 May 2025, 13:14 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 460 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 ... 31  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Bravo SpaceX
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2021, 11:55 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 07/19/10
Posts: 3166
Post Likes: +1539
Company: Keller Williams Realty
Location: Madison, WI (91C)
Aircraft: 1967 Bonanza V35
I bet the contingent part is 'SpaceX may not proceed with flight operations until receiving written correspondence from the FAA' and somebody up there acting up and sitting on the 'written response' to be delivered


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bravo SpaceX
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2021, 11:59 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 03/23/08
Posts: 7357
Post Likes: +4086
Company: AssuredPartners Aerospace Phx.
Location: KDVT, 46U
Aircraft: IAR823, LrJet, 240Z
Username Protected wrote:
I bet the contingent part is 'SpaceX may not proceed with flight operations until receiving written correspondence from the FAA' and somebody up there acting up and sitting on the 'written response' to be delivered


Attachment:
TPS.jpg


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Tom Johnson-Az/Wy
AssuredPartners Aerospace Insurance
Tj.Johnson@AssuredPartners.com
C: 602-628-2701


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bravo SpaceX
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2021, 12:15 
Online


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20186
Post Likes: +25309
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Since there is no “ prior flight of the vehicle “ (SN9): no action required.

Generally speaking, when an anomaly occurs, there are no subsequent flights of the vehicle because, generally, there is no vehicle any more.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bravo SpaceX
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2021, 15:20 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 04/26/13
Posts: 21663
Post Likes: +22220
Location: Columbus , IN (KBAK)
Aircraft: 1968 Baron D55
I don't think the issue is with SN9.

Nobody is willing to say what the issue is, but as usual I'm willing to take a guess.

The license refers to Starship as "the prototype" and "Starship prototype", always in the singular. This is either intentional to indicate that only one vehicle (now disassembled) was authorized by that license, or that they consider all Starship prototypes to be covered under the license.

In the case of the former interpretation, then a new license would have to be obtained for SN9 before it could fly. Assuming SpaceX knew the requirements and had made the application, then the delay may be due to FAA concerns in the wake of SN8's hard landing. OTOH, if they were required to, but failed to apply for a second license, then that would bring things to a halt as well.

On the other hand, if the latter interpretation is correct, then Paragraph 4 (i) must be met:
"4. Special Reporting Requirements: In addition to all applicable reporting requirements under 14 C.F.R. Ch. III:
(i) SpaceX must identify and report any anomaly to the FAA occurring on a prior flight of the vehicle or during any pre-flight processing of the vehicle that could be material to public safety.
SpaceX may not proceed with flight operations until receiving written correspondence from the FAA that the identified anomalies have been adequately addressed."

In this interpretation, "the vehicle" is any "Starship prototype", and if this is the issue, then the failure of SN8 to land successfully was required to be reported to OKC, which I would assume it was. However they would then have to wait for "written correspondence... that the identified anomalies have been adequately addressed." which would require a FAA safety review (words that have been tossed around) and that may well be what's holding the process up.

I have no idea which of these, if either, is correct, but I'd bet it's one or a combination of the two.

_________________
My last name rhymes with 'geese'.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bravo SpaceX
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2021, 16:14 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 03/23/08
Posts: 7357
Post Likes: +4086
Company: AssuredPartners Aerospace Phx.
Location: KDVT, 46U
Aircraft: IAR823, LrJet, 240Z
https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2021/02 ... fzFrwXd5Jc

Attachment:
LesDuexFusee.jpg

What a picture.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Tom Johnson-Az/Wy
AssuredPartners Aerospace Insurance
Tj.Johnson@AssuredPartners.com
C: 602-628-2701


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bravo SpaceX
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2021, 17:59 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/03/08
Posts: 16171
Post Likes: +27147
Location: Peachtree City GA / Stoke-On-Trent UK
Aircraft: A33
Username Protected wrote:
What a picture.

Can't have that sort of thing going on. Especially in a privately owned shed in nowhere texas. Bring on the government to save us from this madness.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bravo SpaceX
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2021, 19:16 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/30/10
Posts: 4403
Post Likes: +3975
Username Protected wrote:
I bet the contingent part is 'SpaceX may not proceed with flight operations until receiving written correspondence from the FAA' and somebody up there acting up and sitting on the 'written response' to be delivered


It used to be the purview of NASA to oversee and approve space flight operations. Since, NASA isnt in the picture, it fell to the FAA to create the liaison position and oversee flight ops. The same wold apply to any 'non-NASA' organization.

I wonder if any of the operations in Mojave (Virgin Atlanic??) were overseen by FAA. I would think they may have.

_________________
An Engineer's job is to say No. Until the check clears, then make a mountain from a molehill.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bravo SpaceX
PostPosted: 01 Feb 2021, 22:32 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/13
Posts: 2101
Post Likes: +1404
Location: KCRQ
Aircraft: Breeezy, 172,601P
All non-military, commercial space is overseen by FAA/AST.

I believe that SNx are all flying under an "Experimental" permit.
This allows multiple vehicles of the same design to be flown.


I'm 90% sure this issue is the Mishap part of 4.i

I've also see what I rate as a 10% possibility that non-involved parties were inside the exclusion zone.

I've personally written and submitted a AST experimental permit application.
My application had been deemed substantially complete (basically shorthand for approved, but still reviewing your numbers).
I never used it because they changed the amateur rules to allow my operations under that rule , before the experimental permit was needed.


Paul


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bravo SpaceX
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2021, 00:44 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 03/23/08
Posts: 7357
Post Likes: +4086
Company: AssuredPartners Aerospace Phx.
Location: KDVT, 46U
Aircraft: IAR823, LrJet, 240Z
NET Wednesday at this point.
Evidently Boca Chica residents dont have the evacuation order yet.

I don’t hate the waiting. It will be amazing.

_________________
Tom Johnson-Az/Wy
AssuredPartners Aerospace Insurance
Tj.Johnson@AssuredPartners.com
C: 602-628-2701


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bravo SpaceX
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2021, 08:56 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 03/23/08
Posts: 7357
Post Likes: +4086
Company: AssuredPartners Aerospace Phx.
Location: KDVT, 46U
Aircraft: IAR823, LrJet, 240Z
Now they say today Tuesday February 2nd

_________________
Tom Johnson-Az/Wy
AssuredPartners Aerospace Insurance
Tj.Johnson@AssuredPartners.com
C: 602-628-2701


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bravo SpaceX
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2021, 08:58 
Offline




User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/18/12
Posts: 9280
Post Likes: +7447
Company: Gallagher Aviation LLC
Location: Cincinnati, OH (I69)
Aircraft: 1960 Bonanza M35
My old boss is going to space! He bought the entire shuttle, is commanding it, and is committing $100MM to St Judes :bugeye:

https://apnews.com/article/jared-isaacm ... ff71705ecb

_________________
Sales: 833-425-5288
gallagheraviationllc@gmail.com
www.gallagheraviationllc.com - WAT Dealer


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bravo SpaceX
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2021, 10:07 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/22/07
Posts: 14289
Post Likes: +16225
Company: Midwest Chemtrails, LLC
Location: KPTK (SE Michigan)
Aircraft: C205
SpaceX has received their FAA letter approving the launch of SN9.

_________________
Holoholo …


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bravo SpaceX
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2021, 12:35 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 04/26/13
Posts: 21663
Post Likes: +22220
Location: Columbus , IN (KBAK)
Aircraft: 1968 Baron D55
Username Protected wrote:
My old boss is going to space! He bought the entire shuttle, is commanding it, and is committing $100MM to St Judes :bugeye:

https://apnews.com/article/jared-isaacm ... ff71705ecb

That’s pretty freakin’ outstanding.
:clap:

_________________
My last name rhymes with 'geese'.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bravo SpaceX
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2021, 14:07 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 06/23/09
Posts: 6999
Post Likes: +3033
Company: Dermatology
Location: ChattanoogaDayton, TN (2A0)
Aircraft: 1969 Bonanza V35A
Live stream of launch. Here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4-PwxnJimg

_________________
Jay P.
Having COVID over Christmas SUCKS!!!!!


Top

 Post subject: Re: Bravo SpaceX
PostPosted: 02 Feb 2021, 16:27 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/24/13
Posts: 9706
Post Likes: +4535
Company: Aviation Tools / CCX
Location: KSMQ New Jersey
Aircraft: TBM700C2
What an awesome sound it makes!


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 460 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 ... 31  Next



B-Kool (Top/Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.CiESVer2.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.