16 Nov 2025, 08:19 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 08 Feb 2021, 13:23 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/01/14 Posts: 9745 Post Likes: +16665 Location: Операционный офис КГБ
Aircraft: TU-104
|
|
Username Protected wrote: They were used in the VW Touareg and Porsche Cayenne TDI’s as well as the Audi Q7, and A7. Should be plenty out there. dunno what variant is used here, but the last mods on this page https://www.motorreviewer.com/engine.php?engine_id=91shows - CAP, CCW, CDY, CASA, CARA - 239 hp (176 kW)/4,000 rpm; 369 lb ft (500Nm)/1,500 rpm. Application: Audi A4 (B7, B8), Audi A5, Audi A6 (C6), Audi Q5, Audi Q7, Porsche Cayenne, Volkswagen Touareg.
I don’t think they were all available in the US with the 3.0 TDi which may limit his local availability, but there should be plenty of engines available for all the Rapters. Even if they need a new engine every couple dozen hours.
_________________ Be kinder than I am. It’s a low bar. Flight suits = superior knowledge
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 08 Feb 2021, 13:52 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/15/16 Posts: 441 Post Likes: +349 Location: NC
Aircraft: Looking for one
|
|
|
He did a good job getting it down. Slapped that wing on the runway though. He really doesn't seem concerned about the wing at all. I think I would check a few things to make sure that thing isn't going to fall off.
I don't know if I would trust that engine anymore. I'm no turbo guy, so I don't know how likely the turbos choked it out. At least he plans on running it on the ground to gather data. I think I would make it a test stand engine and put a new one in.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 08 Feb 2021, 13:53 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/19/15 Posts: 1675 Post Likes: +1551 Company: Centurion LV and Eleusis Location: Draper UT KPVU-KVNY
Aircraft: N45AF 501sp Eagle II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Lost the Redrive seal because the keeper ring was left out. Yikes.
[youtube]https://youtu.be/e77CG9HTkLw[/youtube] Makes you wonder what else was left out? LOL what a mess. I do not understand my interest in watching this train wreck. What is wrong with people that we enjoy following such a mess of a project? LOL Mike
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 08 Feb 2021, 14:02 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 07/21/08 Posts: 5834 Post Likes: +7285 Location: Decatur, TX (XA99)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Lost the Redrive seal because the keeper ring was left out. Yikes.
[youtube]https://youtu.be/e77CG9HTkLw[/youtube] after 40+ years of dealing with equipment and all kinds of high performance engines, I can safely say I have never, ever, seen a retaining ring on an oil seal. That goes for every engine I have came in contact with, from aviation, to stationary diesels, to high performance offroad race engines. Most likely he came across the rare undersized seal that did not have a proper press fit. Thread Locker makes a very good product that essentially glues the seal in place, and we have used that on a lot of applications over the years. I would be more concerned with a possible overpressure situation that could blow the seal out. We detonated an LSx engine at King of the Hammers a few years ago, and blew a hole in two pistons. The resultant pressure spike in the crankcase blew the front seal out of the engine and we had a similar event to this one, albeit our resulted in a total rebuild of the engine. But when you are asking an LS to make 850 hp when naturally asperated, things tend to come untogether very quickly! 
_________________ I'm just here for the free snacks
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 08 Feb 2021, 14:39 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/30/08 Posts: 411 Post Likes: +121 Company: PCAeroWerks,llc Location: KFFZ, Fountain Hills, Arizona
Aircraft: '77 V35B
|
|
Username Protected wrote:
Makes you wonder what else was left out? LOL what a mess.
I do not understand my interest in watching this train wreck. What is wrong with people that we enjoy following such a mess of a project? LOL
Mike
An important lesson on how to do something is to first learn how NOT to do it. 
_________________ AeroPulse...LED landing light controller http://www.pcaerowerks.com KJ7KJK
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 08 Feb 2021, 16:38 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/23/13 Posts: 9416 Post Likes: +7098 Company: Kokotele Guitar Works Location: Albany, NY
Aircraft: C-182RG, C-172, PA28
|
|
Username Protected wrote: He did a good job getting it down. Slapped that wing on the runway though. He really doesn't seem concerned about the wing at all. I think I would check a few things to make sure that thing isn't going to fall off. Remember that when the Wasabi guys were out there they found a cracked glue joint along one of the ribs, and it hadn't even flown yet. How do you even check the structural integrity of the rest of the wing? The failure was caused by his own poor practice (which he admits), and then he admits that the ailerons are too sensitive and he knows they need to be changed. It's a miracle that worse things haven't happened already.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 08 Feb 2021, 16:58 |
|
 |

|


|
 |
Joined: 12/10/07 Posts: 35911 Post Likes: +14322 Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Lost the Redrive seal because the keeper ring was left out. Yikes. after 40+ years of dealing with equipment and all kinds of high performance engines, I can safely say I have never, ever, seen a retaining ring on an oil seal. That goes for every engine I have came in contact with, from aviation, to stationary diesels, to high performance offroad race engines. Most likely he came across the rare undersized seal that did not have a proper press fit. Thread Locker makes a very good product that essentially glues the seal in place, and we have used that on a lot of applications over the years. I would be more concerned with a possible overpressure situation that could blow the seal out. We detonated an LSx engine at King of the Hammers a few years ago, and blew a hole in two pistons. The resultant pressure spike in the crankcase blew the front seal out of the engine and we had a similar event to this one, albeit our resulted in a total rebuild of the engine. But when you are asking an LS to make 850 hp when naturally asperated, things tend to come untogether very quickly!  I wonder if the redrive internals are pressurized with the incoming oil? If so that's quite a bit different than the crank seal on an engine which normally doesn't see more than a faction of one PSI from blowby exceeding the crank breather capacity.
I'm also puzzled by Peter's comment that putting the prop in fine pitch stops the oil flow to the redrive. Seems like that would be hard on the redrive bearings.
_________________ -lance
It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 08 Feb 2021, 16:59 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/13/14 Posts: 9130 Post Likes: +7652 Location: Central Texas (KTPL)
Aircraft: PA-46-310P
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Good reminder for us all. Dead stick landings you gotta nail airspeed and not pitch up when the ground gets close. Surprisingly, Peter did a good job here. Hindsight he should have cut the corner a little more and done some power off gliding before the inevitable failure. I thought he did a pretty good job too, right up to the point of making contact with the runway. Didn't expect such a rough finish. I'm beating a dead horse, but his test flights appear to be without a plan and without documentation. Perhaps he considers the videos to be his documentation.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 08 Feb 2021, 17:46 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/17/10 Posts: 4020 Post Likes: +2048 Location: canuck
Aircraft: x23mouse
|
|
|
Shutdown info starts ~ 14:00 mnts..
Apparently, a few folks came up with..
from 26-28psi readings & within a few secs, oil pressure went to ~ 5psi, with a corresponding rpm drop from 2,000, starving the turbo bearings, which may have ..ahem, "coked 'em up", causing them to wind down, chocking off the intake.
The turbo bearings seem (quick feel) to be spinning ok now, or at least to try ground engine runs.
I know at least some modern diesel engines will auto shutdown with low (doesn't take much either) or coolant loss, dunno if there is a low oil pressure auto shutoff feature.
_________________ nightwatch...
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 08 Feb 2021, 18:27 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/01/14 Posts: 9745 Post Likes: +16665 Location: Операционный офис КГБ
Aircraft: TU-104
|
|
Hitting the wing tip like that should be a big area of concern, not just because of potential damage, but why? It looks like once he was over the runway he got slow, much slower than his lift off speed, and then the wing appears to drop. Was that a main wing stall? If so, it should be rather concerning if one wing can stall before the other and before the canard and drop like that with no engine torque. 
_________________ Be kinder than I am. It’s a low bar. Flight suits = superior knowledge
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 08 Feb 2021, 18:48 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 03/05/14 Posts: 2951 Post Likes: +3132 Company: WA Aircraft Location: Fort Worth, TX (T67)
Aircraft: 1969 Bonanza E33C
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Hitting the wing tip like that should be a big area of concern, not just because of potential damage, but why? It looks like once he was over the runway he got slow, much slower than his lift off speed, and then the wing appears to drop. Was that a main wing stall? If so, it should be rather concerning if one wing can stall before the other and before the canard and drop like that with no engine torque.  A failure to do power off landings. Should have been done very early in testing. Glides, stalls, steep turns, power off 180s. Banging the wingtip is a direct result of his lack of testing program. Ground got bigger, he got slower, he didn’t know what airspeed to hold until the round out and he banged it in.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 08 Feb 2021, 19:01 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 04/01/13 Posts: 6260 Post Likes: +6971 Location: Overland Park, KS (KOJC)
Aircraft: 1975 Bonanza F33A
|
|
One thing that strikes me is that the left-wing just does not seem that low, not nearly low enough hit the runway. If that's enough to hit the runway, how is this thing ever going to handle a moderate crosswind landing? This is the instant the left tire hit the ground. Attachment: Screen Shot 2021-02-08 at 5.03.29 PM.png How far is the right tire from the ground, maybe 18"? The other thing is that the airplane was still doing 80+ knots when the wind dropped during the landing. What is the stall speed? is it possibly as high as 80Kts? It's possible the wing dropped because of something else like the pilot. But if the stall speed is 80Kts; Yikes. I don't recall where Peter had done any stall testing to find the airspeed. But if it's 80Kts it's way too fast for any certified single. That's something like a Lancair 4P which is a frightening airplane IMHO. Jack
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|