07 Nov 2025, 07:59 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the 421 today. Posted: 18 Nov 2014, 15:50 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 12833 Post Likes: +5275 Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
|
|
Username Protected wrote: roger, so approximations per Conklin & D
The C&D numbers are suspect, and are mostly geared toward a professionally crewed corporate airplane maintained at a factory service center with a throw them the keys type oversight. No one in the (very small) MU2 community has ever been surveyed by them. It's unclear where the data is coming from. I don't know if better data would narrow or widen the spread, but I'm pretty sure the C&D numbers are, at best, sort of like EPA mileage numbers.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the 421 today. Posted: 18 Nov 2014, 15:58 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11068 Post Likes: +7097 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: roger, so approximations per Conklin & D
The C&D numbers are suspect, and are mostly geared toward a professionally crewed corporate airplane maintained at a factory service center with a throw them the keys type oversight. No one in the (very small) MU2 community has ever been surveyed by them. It's unclear where the data is coming from. I don't know if better data would narrow or widen the spread, but I'm pretty sure the C&D numbers are, at best, sort of like EPA mileage numbers.
Roger, they were the only standard numbers I could quote. I took high book cruise numbers. That being said, no matter how I look at twin turbines, the cost is always at least three to four times the operating cost of our Baron.
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the 421 today. Posted: 18 Nov 2014, 19:54 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/03/08 Posts: 16153 Post Likes: +8870 Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I've been through this. If you are comparing planes across bariers such as single/twin/turbine you have to look at variable cost per mile. Then add in fixed cost. They do not change per mile or hour of flight. Then you can get an idea of what it will cost. Throw in an unexpected $50,000-$100,000 surprise. If you are OK with the numbers then and only then should you move forward. You can't say it cost $xyc per hour to run a plane. That is not an effiencent way to look at it. If you fly less you pay less per year and more per hour. If you fly more you pay more per year and less per hour. The whole hourly cost thing is nuts. one number to hold the keys one number to fly 'one more mile' Counting operating cost by the hour is like allocating the cost of a powerboat to the pound of fish caught.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the 421 today. Posted: 18 Nov 2014, 22:06 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/02/09 Posts: 8726 Post Likes: +9456 Company: OAA Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: roger, so approximations per Conklin & D
The C&D numbers are suspect, and are mostly geared toward a professionally crewed corporate airplane maintained at a factory service center with a throw them the keys type oversight. No one in the (very small) MU2 community has ever been surveyed by them. It's unclear where the data is coming from. I don't know if better data would narrow or widen the spread, but I'm pretty sure the C&D numbers are, at best, sort of like EPA mileage numbers.
Don't know about the MU2 numbers but the 421 number is about what the Twin Cessna Owners owner survey showed as the average 421 cost a couple of years ago. FWIW.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the 421 today. Posted: 18 Nov 2014, 22:13 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/06/11 Posts: 465 Post Likes: +132 Company: Southwest Airlines Location: KGEU
Aircraft: Baron E-55
|
|
Hello Charles, Username Protected wrote: Hard to know. The 421 shares a lot of parts with the 310/340/401/404/414/421
I think the graying of maintenance expertise and gradual worsening of parts prices/availability will be a slow process that moves people toward ever more affordable turbine options. Nobody would have ever bought a new 421 if they could've gotten a 20-year-old E90 in great shape. That process is going to play out in the used market over the next 20 years I did not even consider the other airframes. That could really help with parts supplies. I think the Duke would suffer in this department. My understanding is that the Duke is unique in the Beechcraft lineup. Thanks. 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the 421 today. Posted: 19 Nov 2014, 15:29 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/06/11 Posts: 465 Post Likes: +132 Company: Southwest Airlines Location: KGEU
Aircraft: Baron E-55
|
|
Hello Adam, Username Protected wrote: That might be true for running a part 135 op or if you have a business with a travel schedule, but for guys like me that just love flying and want to fly 100-150 hrs a year for proficiency sake, and use the plane for fun trips and stuff, I think a 421 is going to be less than half the cost. I really care about cost per year to do the stuff I want to do with it. Cost per mile is not all that relevant. The B55 is ideal for me because my trips are typically <400 miles and I like the big windows and the view and the flying is part of the experience. If I was regularly going 800+ I think the 421 would be a good option. Spot on. This is the exact situation I find my self in at this time in my life. I wrote in a post a few pages back, I will keep my baron for both short flights (500 nm), or flights with 4 or less people. As I will be making occasional longer trips, like to Mexico (800-1000 nm) I will desire a cabin class aircraft. On these flights I will frequently want to take more than 4 people. These cabin class twins, the 421 and the Duke, are becoming very attractive at these prices that seem to still be falling. The future will be very enteresting for us indeed. 
Last edited on 19 Nov 2014, 19:13, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the 421 today. Posted: 19 Nov 2014, 17:24 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/19/11 Posts: 3308 Post Likes: +1434 Company: Bottom Line Experts Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It is curtained and far enough away from the cabin that I think with cabin noise it's functionally private. I line mine (which no one has used yet) with wal-mart camp toilet bags that zip up after use. Thanks Charles. Does the curtain run the full width of the cabin or does it just 'box' around the toilet? Good idea with the toilet bags.
_________________ Don Coburn Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist 2004 SR22 G2
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the 421 today. Posted: 19 Nov 2014, 17:32 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/31/10 Posts: 13626 Post Likes: +7757 Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
|
|
There are different pottys depending on the year model. The early 421Cs had a seat, with a bucket underneat (I actually prefer this). The later models have a flushing potty which is heavier, fancier, and you get to carry in the tank and clean it out after use (no thanks). The curtain runs the full width of the cabin. Great for #1, workable for #2 in an emergency. I set mine up with individual bags and powder that turns liquids into a gel while releasing air freshener. Passengers could clean it all up very easily and reset it for the next victim. The pilot only had to take a ziplock bag, with the other bags inside, to the trash upon landing. http://www.biffybag.com/I ordered individual bags of this "biffy" powder from the owner of biffybag.
_________________ Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the 421 today. Posted: 19 Nov 2014, 18:20 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/29/10 Posts: 2810 Post Likes: +2705 Location: Dallas, TX (KADS & KJWY)
Aircraft: T28B,7GCBC,E90
|
|
The toilet seat is a legal, belted, seat that someone can sit on, but they will be facing sideways. If a passenger needs to use it as a toilet, the padded seat portion lifts up to reveal a traditional toilet seat over a plastic bucket. A mentioned, it's usually lined with a plastic bag of some sort and kitty litter or equivalent. Username Protected wrote: Great for #1, workable for #2 in an emergency.
Also worth noting is that there's a relief tube back there as well. In my airplane, no one has ever actually raised the padded seat portion and used the bucket, but lots of people have used the relief tube. I carry a "lady J" adapter in the rear cabinetry for women and it seems to work. I also stock wet wipes for hands and for the tube itself. Most airplanes are set up with a curtain that goes the full width and does a pretty good job at privacy. However, it's still close quarters and not something a shy person would appreciate with a plane full of strangers. Robert
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Flying the 421 today. Posted: 23 Nov 2014, 08:57 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/09/09 Posts: 4438 Post Likes: +3305
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
|
|
For anyone whose potty is actually going to be used. http://noodor.com/p/urine-travel-john-t ... bsorb.htmlGet a smaller high quality garbage bag and place it in a tray where the electric flusher belongs (put the electric flusher away where you can find it and pass it on to the next owner for him to store when you sell the aircraft) Sprinkle in a bunch of the smelleze powder and let the kids fill er up! Works like a charm.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|