banner
banner

08 Dec 2025, 20:45 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 96 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: New Cirrus G5 Announcement Tomorrow
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013, 19:41 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/01/08
Posts: 5029
Post Likes: +1661
Location: KAVQ, Tucson AZ
Aircraft: had-S35 V35b a36 aa5
Username Protected wrote:
I'm not taking anything away from Cirrus. They're the guys that listened to their customer's needs and provided solutions. I'd never blame anyone for choosing a Cirrus. On the other hand, I bought a G36 and I still stand by my decision.

Cirrus only has one horse to ride (maybe jet soon), so they had to be more innovative. Sometimes the curse of the small organization becomes the advantage. HBC made the polar opposite bet. If the economy had held together, HBC might have looked like the smart one. It's all about timing. HBC didn't get blind sighted, the went all in on the jet bet and lost big.

I bought my G36 because it is by far the best NA piston on the market. Beech knows that they have a following of owners that want a great NA platform, and it's not a big volume game. I buy things that have timeless beauty and great quality....then take care of them. I think of my Bonanza like an Aston Martin. It has the best craftsmanship, and it's more exclusive.

Now for the Cirrus downside. How would you feel today if you had just taken delivery of your new Cirrus G3? After today's announcement, there goes another $100,000 in resale. And....Cirrus probably just started on their G5 replacement yesterday!

The blessing can become the curse.


Agree, I would like to see the cirus flying in 50 years. That aside I remember several years ago that the state of minn bought a new g36 over a new cirrus. There was all kind of hell about that, cirus is built in Minnesota. Anyway the state aviation people said they wanted the best quality and went g36. That went over well :)


Top

 Post subject: Re: New Cirrus G5 Announcement Tomorrow
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013, 19:54 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/20/09
Posts: 5260
Post Likes: +246
I spent 2 hours swearing in a cirrus doing something that takes 15 minutes in a beechcraft.


Top

 Post subject: Re: New Cirrus G5 Announcement Tomorrow
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013, 20:20 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/17/08
Posts: 6610
Post Likes: +14798
Location: KMCW
Aircraft: B55 PII,F-1,L-2,OTW,
The big difference between a Cirri and a Beech is that the Cirri is not a 10,000+ hr 50 yr airframe like our Beeches....

_________________
Tailwinds,
Doug Rozendaal
MCW
Be Nice, Kind, I don't care, be something, just don't be a jerk ;-)


Top

 Post subject: Re: New Cirrus G5 Announcement Tomorrow
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013, 20:23 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16153
Post Likes: +8870
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
Username Protected wrote:
I would think so as well, but I hear these stories about Cirri having routine $5,000 annuals because of the various avionics items that need to be tested and batteries replaced. A Bo can have a $5,000 annual here and there as well, of course, but most people seem to budget about $2,000 for those.


Many of these items just 'happen' because it is somewhere in the maintenance manual and the shop tells the owner that they have to be done. On a FAR23 aircraft, certain things HAVE to be done (I believe the things in chapter 4), but that certainly does not include all the stuff listed as periodic maintenance.

If you just park the plane at the HBC service center and drop your checkbook, the bills will be similarly eyewatering.

(I just priced a throttle knob from HBC. $274 for the knob and $204 for the pushbutton :bugeye: , the entire set of 3 from a PMA supplier is $189)


Top

 Post subject: Re: New Cirrus G5 Announcement Tomorrow
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013, 20:24 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/14/09
Posts: 6068
Post Likes: +3329
Company: tomdrew.lawyer
Location: Des Moines, IA (KDSM)
Aircraft: 1973 Baron E55
Username Protected wrote:
Give me the name of one "personality" flying a G36?

Marketing sells.


Jason?


:rofl: I believe he has earned the right to be called Mr. Crandall.
_________________
C340A/8KCAB/T182T
F33C/E55/B58
PA 28/32
Currency 12 M: IPC/BFR, CFII Renewal


Top

 Post subject: Re: New Cirrus G5 Announcement Tomorrow
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013, 20:25 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/19/11
Posts: 3308
Post Likes: +1435
Company: Bottom Line Experts
Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
As a general rule, I don't believe you should comment on the pros/cons of a particular aircraft type unless you've actually flown it. I tend to see many pilots bash the SR-22 although they've never been in one or flown one. Although the SR-22 has far from the capabilities of an A-36, the SR-22 is an absolute dream to fly. The ergonomics are fantastic, the performance is great, the visibility is wonderful. It's a very different flying experience from a 'conventional' aircraft.

If it was just me and my money, I would probably pick the SR-22. That being said, for family missions I think the SR-22 has some very serious limitations, especially in regards to UL.

If you find yourself bashing a Cirrus and have never flown one, go fly one and then come back and give your impressions post-flight. I think very few that have actually flown one would bash it. Just my .02...

_________________
Don Coburn
Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist
2004 SR22 G2


Last edited on 16 Jan 2013, 20:28, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: New Cirrus G5 Announcement Tomorrow
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013, 20:26 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/14/09
Posts: 6068
Post Likes: +3329
Company: tomdrew.lawyer
Location: Des Moines, IA (KDSM)
Aircraft: 1973 Baron E55
Username Protected wrote:
The big difference between a Cirri and a Beech is that the Cirri is not a 10,000+ hr 50 yr airframe like our Beeches....


What are you going to be doing in 50 years? :D

_________________
C340A/8KCAB/T182T
F33C/E55/B58
PA 28/32
Currency 12 M: IPC/BFR, CFII Renewal


Top

 Post subject: Re: New Cirrus G5 Announcement Tomorrow
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013, 20:37 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/19/11
Posts: 3308
Post Likes: +1435
Company: Bottom Line Experts
Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
Username Protected wrote:
... I ignored cost of money and depreciation...

Tim



I've been running a lot of scenarios recently looking at various aircraft options and considering TCO (Total Cost of Ownership). I have been absolutely amazed at how the purchase cost has an effect on the overall equation.

When you consider the cost of capital (interest cost or opportunity cost of a potential investment) as well as depreciation costs, it has an ENORMOUS effect on the TCO. If you poop money and have no concern for such things then disregard this message. However, if TCO is of concern to you, then ignoring cost of depreciation and the cost of money while evaluating options is a HUGE mistake...

_________________
Don Coburn
Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist
2004 SR22 G2


Top

 Post subject: Re: New Cirrus G5 Announcement Tomorrow
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013, 20:39 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/12/07
Posts: 23833
Post Likes: +7696
Location: Columbia, SC (KCUB)
Aircraft: 2003 Bonanza A36
There is a lot I can say about Cirrus but I'll only say this. They have the most uncomfortable seats of any airplane I've ever flown. One and half hours in that seat and I'm ready to pull the chute!

_________________
Minister of Ice
Family Motto: If you aren't scared, you're not having fun!


Top

 Post subject: Re: New Cirrus G5 Announcement Tomorrow
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013, 20:40 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16153
Post Likes: +8870
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
Looking at TCO takes all the fun out of flying.


Top

 Post subject: Re: New Cirrus G5 Announcement Tomorrow
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013, 20:51 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/06/10
Posts: 12194
Post Likes: +3077
Company: Looking
Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
Username Protected wrote:
The big difference between a Cirri and a Beech is that the Cirri is not a 10,000+ hr 50 yr airframe like our Beeches....


Doug,

Be accurate. The Cirrus is limited to 12000 hours. Older Beech are not life limited. I do not know the answer on the G36 or beyond (yes, I know the 58P is life limited). But if I fly 200hrs a year theCirrus would last me till I am 101. :D Kinda old to be climbing over the wing I think....

Tim


Top

 Post subject: Re: New Cirrus G5 Announcement Tomorrow
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013, 20:59 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/19/11
Posts: 3308
Post Likes: +1435
Company: Bottom Line Experts
Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
Username Protected wrote:
There is a lot I can say about Cirrus but I'll only say this. They have the most uncomfortable seats of any airplane I've ever flown. One and half hours in that seat and I'm ready to pull the chute!


I'll admit that I haven't yet flown in an A36, so I cannot fairly compare Cirrus vs. Bo on a 1.5 hr flight comparison. It sure would be helpful for an experienced BT member to show me what BO's are all about... :D

_________________
Don Coburn
Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist
2004 SR22 G2


Top

 Post subject: Re: New Cirrus G5 Announcement Tomorrow
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013, 21:02 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/06/10
Posts: 12194
Post Likes: +3077
Company: Looking
Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
Username Protected wrote:
I've been running a lot of scenarios recently looking at various aircraft options and considering TCO (Total Cost of Ownership). I have been absolutely amazed at how the purchase cost has an effect on the overall equation.

When you consider the cost of capital (interest cost or opportunity cost of a potential investment) as well as depreciation costs, it has an ENORMOUS effect on the TCO. If you poop money and have no concern for such things then disregard this message. However, if TCO is of concern to you, then ignoring cost of depreciation and the cost of money while evaluating options is a HUGE mistake...


Don,

Yes, when considering the purchase costs it can have a dramatic effect on the total cost of ownership. Especially when considering new planes. I kept that separate because the primary purpose of my plane is related to work and investments I have made and it would have made the spreadsheet crazy and provided little additional value to me. Based on comments from many others they have a fixed budget and therefore again the purchase price provides little value for many.

Tim


Top

 Post subject: Re: New Cirrus G5 Announcement Tomorrow
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013, 21:14 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/01/08
Posts: 5029
Post Likes: +1661
Location: KAVQ, Tucson AZ
Aircraft: had-S35 V35b a36 aa5
Username Protected wrote:
Looking at TCO takes all the fun out of flying.

:lol: I couldn't have said it better. Ain't that the truth!!!!!


Top

 Post subject: Re: New Cirrus G5 Announcement Tomorrow
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2013, 21:24 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/01/08
Posts: 5029
Post Likes: +1661
Location: KAVQ, Tucson AZ
Aircraft: had-S35 V35b a36 aa5
Username Protected wrote:
There is a lot I can say about Cirrus but I'll only say this. They have the most uncomfortable seats of any airplane I've ever flown. One and half hours in that seat and I'm ready to pull the chute!


I'll admit that I haven't yet flown in an A36, so I cannot fairly compare Cirrus vs. Bo on a 1.5 hr flight comparison. It sure would be helpful for an experienced BT member to show me what BO's are all about... :D


Don, two things, one you know and the other might be helpful. I spent the last fifteen years doing TCO best practices assessments for fourtune 500 companies and I clearly learned that I can make numbers say what ever I want them to say when the issues of depreciation, cost of capital are in scope. Even worse is when one considers the cost of a number of people to do a task vs a different number doing the task differently. I would say this I think you are making this airplane acquisition thing too hard. You either want it or you don't and will be running figures forever. That's my honest opinion that I'd tell you sittin at a bar. It's worth what you paid to get it, I know.

Item two that might actually be helpful is go to the American bonanza society website, look around and find what they call their ambassadors, find one close to you and call them they are there to introduce you to Beechcraft and give you a ride or two and answer all questions. Im one and if you were in Tucson I'd do it.

Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 96 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next



8Flight Bottom Banner

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.tat-85x100.png.