23 May 2025, 04:36 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
Username Protected |
Message |
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar lurkers.... Posted: 26 Sep 2012, 09:43 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/16/10 Posts: 2025 Post Likes: +900 Location: Wisconsin
Aircraft: CJ4, AmphibBeaver
|
|
TAS about 380, GS 400. I don't care what you think, that is freaking cool! 
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar lurkers.... Posted: 27 Sep 2012, 15:07 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/22/08 Posts: 3082 Post Likes: +1049 Company: USAF Propulsion Laboratory Location: Dayton, OH
Aircraft: PA24, AEST 680, 421
|
|
Username Protected wrote: That seems overkill, were will you put the fuel?
It felt like overkill on the first few flights but now I am used to it. Like all jets, you have tons of extra power down low so you will have adequate power for cruise at altitude. We can put 269 gal. on board now but will increase that to 300+ pretty soon. Analysis shows we can use 260 knots or mach .72 for max operating speed. Here is a photo of my friend hand flying the jet at FL280 using about 85% max cruise thrust. TAS about 380, GS 400. That is awesome!
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar lurkers.... Posted: 01 Oct 2012, 08:19 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6060 Post Likes: +709 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
260 IAS ? 380 TAS, these are high numbers for a piston twin. Whats VMO on that thing? Whats your fuel burn? I liked the Single engine turbine conversion I have seen at Osh.
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar lurkers.... Posted: 01 Oct 2012, 09:22 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 04/24/10 Posts: 8901 Post Likes: +7317
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Here is a photo of my friend hand flying the jet at FL280 using about 85% max cruise thrust. TAS about 380, GS 400. So that thing where if you put a turbine on a front of a Bo you can't exceed the green arc doesn't apply here?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar lurkers.... Posted: 01 Oct 2012, 13:53 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/18/11 Posts: 321 Post Likes: +290 Company: American Aviation, Inc. Location: Hayden Lake, ID
Aircraft: C90,340,PA31T,PC-12
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 260 IAS ? 380 TAS, these are high numbers for a piston twin. Whats VMO on that thing? Whats your fuel burn? I liked the Single engine turbine conversion I have seen at Osh. When certified, the VMO will be 260 IAS or mach 72 which ever comes first. The Aerostar was designed to be strong enough and ridged enough to go fast. Think of it as a jet with piston engines rather than a piston twin. Fuel flow at FL280 is 80 gph at 380 KTAS. It burns about 60 gph at 300 KTAS. We would get much lower fuel flows at FL350 but that requires RVSM certification and increased pressurization which have not yet been incorporated. The single engine turbine Aerostar at Oshkosh was nicely done. When we find someone to partner with and put the airplane in production, that might be a big seller. In production the twin fanjet would have a 32" longer cabin which is easy to do since it is a constant section fuselage. Jim Christy
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar lurkers.... Posted: 01 Oct 2012, 14:29 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/18/11 Posts: 321 Post Likes: +290 Company: American Aviation, Inc. Location: Hayden Lake, ID
Aircraft: C90,340,PA31T,PC-12
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What's the Pressurization differential on the Aerostar?
The Duke is only 4.6psi for now. There's a STC in development for 5.1psi. Originally it was 4.25 psi but we did an STC to raise it to 5.5
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar lurkers.... Posted: 01 Oct 2012, 14:53 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/18/11 Posts: 321 Post Likes: +290 Company: American Aviation, Inc. Location: Hayden Lake, ID
Aircraft: C90,340,PA31T,PC-12
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Here is a photo of my friend hand flying the jet at FL280 using about 85% max cruise thrust. TAS about 380, GS 400. So that thing where if you put a turbine on a front of a Bo you can't exceed the green arc doesn't apply here?
We will have to substantiate a new max operating speed to get FAA certification. Fortunately we have all of the original load tests that Aerostar used to certify the airplane. Our engineers have looked at the loads and say 260 KIAS is no problem and maybe we could go as high as 300 KIAS. I have been up to 285 knots in the piston airplane doing the required dive tests after modifying the airframe so I am not worried about flutter either, but we do have to do those tests as well.
When an applicant tries to certify a piston airplane with a turboprop and they don't have the load tests to substantiate a higher VMO the FAA has historically allowed them to use the top of the green for a VMO. If you want something higher than that and you don't have the original load tests it would be quite expensive to duplicate them so the applicant "modifier" settles for top of the green.
Jim Christy
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar lurkers.... Posted: 01 Oct 2012, 15:32 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/15/09 Posts: 1856 Post Likes: +1353 Location: Red Deer, Alberta (CRE5/CYQF)
Aircraft: M20E/Bell47
|
|
Username Protected wrote: ... Fortunately we have all of the original load tests that Aerostar used to certify the airplane. Our engineers have looked at the loads and say 260 KIAS is no problem and maybe we could go as high as 300 KIAS. I have been up to 285 knots in the piston airplane doing the required dive tests after modifying the airframe so I am not worried about flutter either, but we do have to do those tests as well.
I'll never fly mine that fast but it is nice to know how strong it is. And THAT is why I got an Aerostar! Glenn
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar lurkers.... Posted: 01 Oct 2012, 19:21 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/13/07 Posts: 803 Post Likes: +117
Aircraft: King Air C90A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 260 IAS ? 380 TAS, these are high numbers for a piston twin. Whats VMO on that thing? Whats your fuel burn? I liked the Single engine turbine conversion I have seen at Osh. Fuel flow at FL280 is 80 gph at 380 KTAS. It burns about 60 gph at 300 KTAS. Jim Christy
That is incredible economy and very good looking too. I thought the photo of the Aerostar with jet engines was photoshopped at first but I did read about this project a few years ago. Just didn't know you were making it happen.
Which engines?
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar lurkers.... Posted: 10 Oct 2012, 13:15 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/22/08 Posts: 3082 Post Likes: +1049 Company: USAF Propulsion Laboratory Location: Dayton, OH
Aircraft: PA24, AEST 680, 421
|
|
I was curious about the Vmc. I figured with all that excess power one would have to throttle back the good motor. Very sporty performance and about the same fuel economy as the piston version.
|
|
Top |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostar lurkers.... Posted: 12 Oct 2012, 14:48 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/18/11 Posts: 321 Post Likes: +290 Company: American Aviation, Inc. Location: Hayden Lake, ID
Aircraft: C90,340,PA31T,PC-12
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I was curious about the Vmc. I figured with all that excess power one would have to throttle back the good motor. Very sporty performance and about the same fuel economy as the piston version. I haven't done full aft GC testing but given what I have done I expect VMC to be less than 90 knots at the full aft limit. It is currently 84 on the piston 350 hp Aerostar and the wing stalls before you lose directional control. I gave some rides during the Aerostar Owner's Association meeting and one of the owners shot this short video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZFw8Pb_f2YJim Christy
|
|
Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|