17 Dec 2025, 12:49 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options Posted: 04 Dec 2025, 18:41 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20840 Post Likes: +26315 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I would love a 501, but for me it would cost more. Individual circumstances can greatly affect results. At KSMQ, the runway is 2739 ft and makes a jet less practical. It should be noted that jet runway numbers include engine failure on takeoff and 50 ft TCH on landing, so they are conservative. Ground run is typically about 1000 ft shorter than the book numbers. The TBM numbers do not include engine failure, of course. The numbers are thus apples to oranges in some ways. Quote: Add in additional training every year and it costs quite a bit more. How much do you spend on training for the TBM? Do you use a sim? My upcoming 61.58 + SPE is $9K at Flightsafety, the SPE adds about $3K to the price, so a 501 would be less. Quote: My maint experience has been very different than others. I maintain it myself and have averaged maybe $4K a year in parts. 7 weeks total man hours spent in the last 3 years doing maint, and that includes 10 year gear inspection. I did spend $5k the first year for special tooling. You are doing far more on your TBM than I do on my Citation. You could, of course, apply a similar level of involvement on a Citation. If you get on a LUMP, then you basically go 3 years between inspections, and there is no 10 year gear inspection, either, so a lot less time in the shop. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options Posted: 04 Dec 2025, 18:45 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/10/14 Posts: 1807 Post Likes: +881 Location: Northwest Arkansas (KVBT)
Aircraft: TBM850
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Quote: Add in additional training every year and it costs quite a bit more. How much do you spend on training for the TBM? Do you use a sim? My upcoming 61.58 + SPE is $9K at Flightsafety, the SPE adds about $3K to the price, so a 501 would be less. Typical is about $4000-4500 for an annual recurrent, same whether at SimCom or in aircraft (though the latter adds fuel/op costs).
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options Posted: 04 Dec 2025, 19:04 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8699 Post Likes: +11290 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Chip what’s the acquisition cost of a Mustang? $1.5-2.5M. It is a lot of money for an airplane isolated in its own small ecosystem, shares virtually nothing with 500 or 525 series. Mike C.
There are 453 Mustangs… far more than Citation V / Ultra
Who cares if they don’t share anything with other types, we simply don’t have any issues getting them economically maintained.
You think this way because you are use to old / complex airplanes that need lots of parts!
_________________ Recent acquisitions - 2021 TBM 910 - 2013 Citation Mustang - 2022 Citation M2Gen2
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options Posted: 04 Dec 2025, 19:37 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/24/13 Posts: 10327 Post Likes: +4951 Company: Aviation Tools / CCX Location: KSMQ New Jersey
Aircraft: TBM700C2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: How much do you spend on training for the TBM? Do you use a sim I've been doing in plane recurrents in FL, about $3k including fuel
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options Posted: 04 Dec 2025, 20:37 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20840 Post Likes: +26315 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: There are 453 Mustangs… far more than Citation V / Ultra Of the 540 V and Ultra made, I expect at least 400 are still flying, so your statement that the Mustang is "far more" seems misleading. The parts commonality among 500 and 525 series is quite high, and there are many thousands of those. I've used parts from a 500, a 550, a Bravo, an Ultra, and a CJ on my plane. Ample supply. Quote: Who cares if they don’t share anything with other types, we simply don’t have any issues getting them economically maintained. Being a unicorn among Citations makes them vulnerable to unique part problems. The lack of part commonality with the other small cabin Citations is one of the reasons Cessna stopped making them. Quote: You think this way because you are use to old / complex airplanes that need lots of parts! All planes need parts. The new and used parts inventory for Mustangs is limited. My plane is simpler than newer ones. I'll never be AOG for a FADEC fault, for example. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options Posted: 04 Dec 2025, 20:38 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20840 Post Likes: +26315 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I've been doing in plane recurrents in FL, about $3k including fuel I take it the travel cost from NJ to FL is not considered in that figure? Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options Posted: 04 Dec 2025, 22:19 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 5316 Post Likes: +5302
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
|
|
|
You just do a hot section and keep going to answer your question. There's no debate here. PM me and I'll give you an introduction. As long as nothing is trashed in your engine, you'll get out of this for Bonanza overhaul costs.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options Posted: 04 Dec 2025, 22:38 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/24/13 Posts: 10327 Post Likes: +4951 Company: Aviation Tools / CCX Location: KSMQ New Jersey
Aircraft: TBM700C2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I've been doing in plane recurrents in FL, about $3k including fuel I take it the travel cost from NJ to FL is not considered in that figure? Mike C.
It's not
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options Posted: 05 Dec 2025, 01:55 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 06/28/09 Posts: 14440 Post Likes: +9564 Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Typical is about $4000-4500 for an annual recurrent, same whether at SimCom or in aircraft (though the latter adds fuel/op costs). SimCom just got bought by CAE and the prices have gone up a lot. PC12 recurrent this year for me is $6700. I think the TBM is the same.
_________________ http://calipilot.com atp/cfii
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options Posted: 05 Dec 2025, 07:15 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/24/13 Posts: 10327 Post Likes: +4951 Company: Aviation Tools / CCX Location: KSMQ New Jersey
Aircraft: TBM700C2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Typical is about $4000-4500 for an annual recurrent, same whether at SimCom or in aircraft (though the latter adds fuel/op costs). SimCom just got bought by CAE and the prices have gone up a lot. PC12 recurrent this year for me is $6700. I think the TBM is the same.
Yikes. It was $4140 3 years ago
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options Posted: 05 Dec 2025, 09:33 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20840 Post Likes: +26315 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yikes. It was $4140 3 years ago Is Simcom the only TBM sim choice? Lack of competition can lead to high prices. Simcom is the only choice for MU2 (and that's fixed base FTDs, not sims). CE-500 choices are more numerous, Flightsafety, Simcom, CAE, Loft, RTC, etc. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options Posted: 05 Dec 2025, 10:12 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/06/14 Posts: 4143 Post Likes: +2857 Location: MA
Aircraft: C340A; TBM850
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Is Simcom the only TBM sim choice?
Lack of competition can lead to high prices.
Simcom is the only choice for MU2 (and that's fixed base FTDs, not sims).
No. Simcom is the manufacturer anointed official sim trainer. I did my initial at EFT in SC. Underwriter accepted it. I don't recall the prices, but I think it was half the price or less, with fewer days. Not sure if there are any other sources for sim training, but there are plenty of different ways to get in-aircraft training. EFT was also a fixed FTD, SimCom's may be as well, not sure. I wouldn't have been prepared to fly the plane without the 25 hours of dual that I did after the sim initial. We did plenty of emergency procedures and approaches, but not so much on the basic operation of the turbine, which was the new part for me. Or if we did, it didn't really stick until I flew the actual plane.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options Posted: 05 Dec 2025, 10:52 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/07/11 Posts: 866 Post Likes: +489 Location: KBED, KCRE
Aircraft: Phenom 100
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yikes. It was $4140 3 years ago CE-500 choices are more numerous, Flightsafety, Simcom, CAE, Loft, RTC, etc. Do you happen to know if any of them have sims with panels that swap out so you can train with glass panels and not just the OEM setup? I'm pretty sure Redbird has panels you can load in and out to match what you have, but wasn't sure if that's also possible for Turbine sims?
Chip-
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: TBM PT6A-64 engine approaching TBO (3300 hours) options Posted: 05 Dec 2025, 11:02 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 7764 Post Likes: +5125 Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My strong suspicion is monopoly pricing… they control the overhaul ecosystem. And you have two of them on the Piaggio. Yes, not super stoked about that! Got an STC’d replacement you can suggest?
_________________ -Jon C.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|