banner
banner

22 Oct 2025, 19:11 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Mooney
PostPosted: 05 Aug 2025, 19:28 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 05/01/14
Posts: 9667
Post Likes: +16514
Location: Операционный офис КГБ
Aircraft: TU-104
Username Protected wrote:
Unlike Beechcraft, when they stretched it, they moved the fuselage forward on the wing too...


Uh, have you seen a 36 and 33/35 next to each other? The front of the plane is moved forward about 10 inches.

_________________
Be kinder than I am. It’s a low bar.
Flight suits = superior knowledge


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mooney
PostPosted: 05 Aug 2025, 21:26 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 06/30/22
Posts: 2572
Post Likes: +1516
Location: 0W3
Aircraft: Mooney 252/Encore
Username Protected wrote:
The long body Mooney’s were made so in order to have enough arm on the horizontal stab to offset the heavy TIO540 engine in the Bravo and subsequent Ovation and Acclaim Continentals.

For your 2+bags mission, they (mid body) are a great choice, just choose your adventure: turbo or not.
-dan


The first Long Body was the Porsche powered M20L.

I agree that a mid body is great for 2 people and bags.

As has been mentioned, the M20K Encore is the ultimate mid body with speed and UL. The nice thing is, a 252 can be converted to an Encore and gain 230 pound GW increase. My 252/Encore is 1060 UL. I have the Monroy extended tanks, so 104 gallons of fuel. Still enough to fit 2 people and weekend luggage.

So a lot of flexibility as to range and how much you need to carry.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mooney
PostPosted: 05 Aug 2025, 22:55 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/20/09
Posts: 2645
Post Likes: +2214
Company: Jcrane, Inc.
Location: KVES Greenville, OH
Aircraft: C441, RV7A
Those were the days. Hard to beat that Mooney panel.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Jack
N441M N107XX
Bubbles Up


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mooney
PostPosted: 06 Aug 2025, 08:48 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 06/30/22
Posts: 2572
Post Likes: +1516
Location: 0W3
Aircraft: Mooney 252/Encore
Username Protected wrote:
Those were the days. Hard to beat that Mooney panel.


Back in about 1985 or so, I stopped by Freeway Airport in MD. Back when aircraft dealers actually had new aircraft sitting on the ramp.

I sat in a 201 for about an hour, thinking how great it would be to have a plane that well equipped. I mean it had DME, RNAV (rho-theta), an HSI, autopilot. What more could anyone wish for.

Well, now there is the panel in my 252. :D :D


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mooney
PostPosted: 06 Aug 2025, 10:10 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 09/12/11
Posts: 4288
Post Likes: +2296
Company: RPM Aircraft Service
Location: Gaithersburg MD KGAI
Aircraft: Mooney 201, A320
Terry’s plane is the first one ever that they never had to actually make an instrument panel for.. All of the displays fit so tightly together.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mooney
PostPosted: 06 Aug 2025, 10:16 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 05/13/14
Posts: 9104
Post Likes: +7629
Location: Central Texas (KTPL)
Aircraft: PA-46-310P
I think the Ovation/Eagle is one of the best piston planes ever made. There's some primacy bias in that opinion, but I've never felt more confident in an airplane. I've considered getting an Ovation with air conditioning, but now seeing TAS of 200 in the Malibu, the Ovation is no longer coveted as much.

In 1999 I bought a pretty M20C for $32K and flew it for three years. Hard to imagine a more economical certified airplane that still gets you across the country.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mooney
PostPosted: 06 Aug 2025, 12:18 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 06/30/22
Posts: 2572
Post Likes: +1516
Location: 0W3
Aircraft: Mooney 252/Encore
Username Protected wrote:
Terry’s plane is the first one ever that they never had to actually make an instrument panel for.. All of the displays fit so tightly together.


:D :D

You are just jealous. :D


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mooney
PostPosted: 01 Sep 2025, 09:14 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 09/26/14
Posts: 67
Post Likes: +54
Aircraft: 777
Getting closer to the goal. Couple of questions:


A buddy has a 201, said he flight plans 150 its and 10 gals per hr. Then I see ads saying 160 at 10 gals per hr. Any thoughts?

Op difference for a 201 vs a rocket, 231/252, ovation or bravo? Would love a bravo, but that big lycoming scares me if anything breaks. Ovation makes most sense because I think air conditioning is a must have item per the wife and the 550’s are everywhere. Rocket and 252 looks like a blast and the 201 is definitely the most cost effective way to go.

Also, seems like there’s a growing supply in the market for everything single engine (400+ cirrus’s, over 800 Cessna’s, 100+ Mooney’s, 500+ pipers and almost 300 beech’s per trade-a-plane). What are your thoughts on the market and where it will be in 3-6 months? Is 100ll a problem?

Thanks. I really appreciate it.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mooney
PostPosted: 01 Sep 2025, 09:50 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/10/24
Posts: 38
Post Likes: +17
Aircraft: M20J
Username Protected wrote:
Getting closer to the goal. Couple of questions:


A buddy has a 201, said he flight plans 150 its and 10 gals per hr. Then I see ads saying 160 at 10 gals per hr. Any thoughts?

Op difference for a 201 vs a rocket, 231/252, ovation or bravo? Would love a bravo, but that big lycoming scares me if anything breaks. Ovation makes most sense because I think air conditioning is a must have item per the wife and the 550’s are everywhere. Rocket and 252 looks like a blast and the 201 is definitely the most cost effective way to go.

Also, seems like there’s a growing supply in the market for everything single engine (400+ cirrus’s, over 800 Cessna’s, 100+ Mooney’s, 500+ pipers and almost 300 beech’s per trade-a-plane). What are your thoughts on the market and where it will be in 3-6 months? Is 100ll a problem?

Thanks. I really appreciate it.

Airplanes that are set up correctly will do 160/10, Byron being one of them.

I have a J and I've never seen 160 but I don't have the lower gear doors which are worth about 5 knots. (I need to flight a right lower gear door; I think I have two left ones). People say 150/10 because it's easy math and there is a safety margin in there.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mooney
PostPosted: 01 Sep 2025, 20:54 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 2075
Post Likes: +1463
Company: Capitalist
Location: CYKF Kitchener, Ontario
Aircraft: Mooney M20K 231+
I had a J for 10 years and I would see 158 KTAS on 10 GPH at 7K. It's a very dependable aircraft.
The Bravo is completely a different machine. Relatively speeder with the ability to climb into the flight levels and go fast however the fuel cost is 70-80% + more expensive. And the engine is $100K to replace where the J Lycoming is under $50K.
Ovations should be an option too. Cruise 170 to 190 on between 12 to 17 GPH.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mooney
PostPosted: 01 Sep 2025, 21:11 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/07/21
Posts: 421
Post Likes: +411
Aircraft: M20J/R, Sr22, SR20
Username Protected wrote:
I really want a Mooney. Use to fly an F model a long time ago, but I have a need now for a good 2 person (wife, me and 2 small dogs) and economical plane and I think a Mooney would be perfect. Main mission is from Sarasota area to Tallahassee and Charlotte.

Been looking at 201's as they seem in the price range. There's a local 231 for sale or partnership, but I can't really use the turbo due to the dogs. Would love an acclaim, but thats not as economical as a 201.

Is there much of a difference cabin wise between an acclaim or 201? Is the 231 comparable maintenance wise to the 201? Are there any other differences between the 201 and 231 (Mx, etc)?

Thanks


I've owned both a 201J and an Ovation. Ovation was a great XCtry airplane, fast, economoical, could climb high if needed and just a solid flying airplane.

The 201J was great, slower but more economical. Flew mostly just two of us and once you knew how to climb in, was actually very comfortable in both airplanes. I would buy another 201 in a second as a good local and XCtry machine. I flew that 201 to Texas and Iowa/Chicago from NY enough to know that it's a very good airplane.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mooney
PostPosted: 01 Sep 2025, 21:15 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/07/21
Posts: 421
Post Likes: +411
Aircraft: M20J/R, Sr22, SR20
Username Protected wrote:
Getting closer to the goal. Couple of questions:


A buddy has a 201, said he flight plans 150 its and 10 gals per hr. Then I see ads saying 160 at 10 gals per hr. Any thoughts?

Op difference for a 201 vs a rocket, 231/252, ovation or bravo? Would love a bravo, but that big lycoming scares me if anything breaks. Ovation makes most sense because I think air conditioning is a must have item per the wife and the 550’s are everywhere. Rocket and 252 looks like a blast and the 201 is definitely the most cost effective way to go.

Also, seems like there’s a growing supply in the market for everything single engine (400+ cirrus’s, over 800 Cessna’s, 100+ Mooney’s, 500+ pipers and almost 300 beech’s per trade-a-plane). What are your thoughts on the market and where it will be in 3-6 months? Is 100ll a problem?

Thanks. I really appreciate it.


I used to get 155Kts TAS at about 10.3 (avg) day in day out.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mooney
PostPosted: 01 Sep 2025, 23:16 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/30/17
Posts: 1404
Post Likes: +1612
Location: KARR
Aircraft: J3, Twin Commander
Flew all over the country in a 79 J model. I always figured 153/12, unless I was at or above 9,000. If I end up with another one it will have the split rear seat, and will not have a dual mag.

_________________
What are you optimizing for?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mooney
PostPosted: 02 Sep 2025, 08:36 
Online


 Profile




Joined: 01/09/11
Posts: 195
Post Likes: +204
Location: KBKT
Aircraft: Mooney, T-Bone
Flew an F with the J-210 windshield and front end for many years. Great useful load, 64 gallons of fuel, and 146-148 kts on 8.8 GPH LOP all day long. Never should of sold it.

My current ride is a Bravo. 175 kts at 10K 17-18 GPH. An additional 2 kts per thousand up into the teens.

_________________
joe
A&P IA
I can't but I know a guy.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Mooney
PostPosted: 02 Sep 2025, 09:12 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 05/13/14
Posts: 9104
Post Likes: +7629
Location: Central Texas (KTPL)
Aircraft: PA-46-310P
Username Protected wrote:
A buddy has a 201, said he flight plans 150 its and 10 gals per hr. Then I see ads saying 160 at 10 gals per hr. Any thoughts?

That's a slow 201. 160@10 should be possible with the majority of properly rigged 201s.
Quote:
Op difference for a 201 vs a rocket, 231/252, ovation or bravo? Would love a bravo, but that big lycoming scares me if anything breaks. Ovation makes most sense because I think air conditioning is a must have item per the wife and the 550’s are everywhere. Rocket and 252 looks like a blast and the 201 is definitely the most cost effective way to go.

I have a lot of hours in the long body Ovation (Eagle) with air conditioning. It's fast, comfortable, and very capable. It's a definite performance upgrade from the 201 and if you can swing an ovation, skip the 201.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next



Plane AC

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.v2x.85x100.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.daytona.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.BT Ad.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.