06 Nov 2025, 16:35 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 11:19 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/16/12 Posts: 88 Post Likes: +73 Location: KHEF & KCPS
Aircraft: C501SP
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Having addressed what has been said so far, my recommendation…
Citation CJ1/2 hands down.
Nice CJ1 for your budget, CJ2 is possible, but tight for budget, if you need more seats / range.
Pilots are abundant.
Op cost is low.
Speed is decent.
Williams TAP is the easy button for engine operations.
Maintenance is reasonable, lots of options and it’s as easy to maintain / manage as a King Air.
Note: I separated this from my previous post to make it easier for what comes next! Lol Pilots are abundant? Ba ha ha ha Go tell that to everyone in the industry right now Not many pilots who have the experience that you’d want for them to fly your family around, who would be willing to fly a old clapped out light jet for low six figures when most every airline would nearly start them at your highest pay, have benefits and a retirement he probably can’t afford and pay, after year 2 or 3 is going to be near 200k with less responsibility, and they can count on it being a career retirement level position
Several hundred C525 typed contract pilots on Bizjetjobs.com, so comparatively abundant. I would also hardly describe a CJ1/2 as clapped out. And to state the obvious, not every pilot in the world wants to work in 121 land.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 11:22 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20732 Post Likes: +26190 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Pilots are abundant? Ba ha ha ha A fair number of the 500 series pilots are older, could fly for the airlines but don't want to, like the corporate pilot lifestyle. That was the case for my mentor. Not everyone wants to fly for the airlines. I think the 525 series demographic might be younger and they may have more trouble finding pilots in some cases. It varies. In any case, it doesn't matter what anyone says, you have to check out your local scene and see what you can find. I'd be really surprised if you can't find pilots around Indy. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 12:49 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/28/21 Posts: 106 Post Likes: +66 Company: Charwood Partners
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It’s so much better than the posts on other boards. “I need to fly my family of six from New York to LA every month. I have $100,000. What should I buy?”  But the answer to that is so easy...American, Delta, and United would all love your business.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 13:13 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/17/21 Posts: 92 Post Likes: +42
Aircraft: C550
|
|
|
If you want to try a Legacy Citation on for size . Steiner Aviation based at CAK does private charter work in a Citation II . Ask for Kevin 330-499-9790.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 14:12 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/17/15 Posts: 562 Post Likes: +553 Location: KSRQ
Aircraft: C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: This screams C510 Citation Mustang to me. Great avionics, great interior, has the range you need. Indy to KSRQ is ~800 nm with routing, and descend moderately early usually happens. Mustang is not particularly fast. 340, 350 knots? That means headwinds hurt more. In a strong headwind, I could see needing a fuel stop. The route is mostly north south which usually avoids being directly into the wind, but it can happen. So I wouldn't assume the Mustang is a 100% non stop on this route. The Mustang is kind of a unicorn airplane. Its own type rating, fewer pilots out there to hire, and it is made from unique parts not shared with the rest of the 500 or 525 series which can lead to some issues. Mike C.
There is absolutely ZERO chance the Mustang does not make this trip……easily. I just flew from SRQ to JVL with serious headwinds…….over 100 knots for a decent portion of the trip. Never had less than 45 knots on the nose, and as usual, an early decent into and around OHARE. Still landed with reserves. The Mustang fits this mission like a glove.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
_________________ Tony
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 14:17 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8503 Post Likes: +11049 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Having addressed what has been said so far, my recommendation…
Citation CJ1/2 hands down.
Nice CJ1 for your budget, CJ2 is possible, but tight for budget, if you need more seats / range.
Pilots are abundant.
Op cost is low.
Speed is decent.
Williams TAP is the easy button for engine operations.
Maintenance is reasonable, lots of options and it’s as easy to maintain / manage as a King Air.
Note: I separated this from my previous post to make it easier for what comes next! Lol Pilots are abundant? Ba ha ha ha Go tell that to everyone in the industry right now Not many pilots who have the experience that you’d want for them to fly your family around, who would be willing to fly a old clapped out light jet for low six figures when most every airline would nearly start them at your highest pay, have benefits and a retirement he probably can’t afford and pay, after year 2 or 3 is going to be near 200k with less responsibility, and they can count on it being a career retirement level position
Pilots are abundant, abundant doesn’t necessarily mean available, the first trick is having a pool of qualified pilots, the second is owning an airplane they WANT to fly, this can be an issue with legacy jets such as the 501.
I would assume that most 500 series typed pilots also have their 525 type because there’s a lot more 525 work.
_________________ We ONLY represent buyers!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 14:27 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/14/13 Posts: 6410 Post Likes: +5147
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It’s so much better than the posts on other boards. “I need to fly my family of six from New York to LA every month. I have $100,000. What should I buy?”  Spirit Airlines tickets
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 14:34 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/29/10 Posts: 2810 Post Likes: +2705 Location: Dallas, TX (KADS & KJWY)
Aircraft: T28B,7GCBC,E90
|
|
Username Protected wrote: [...]the second is owning an airplane they WANT to fly, this can be an issue with legacy jets such as the 501.
I would assume that most 500 series typed pilots also have their 525 type because there’s a lot more 525 work. Chip, this is not my experience at all. Any CE500 typed pilot can fly a 501 and the pay is generally the same for a 500/550/560. Most contract pilots don't really care if it's a 501 or 560 - The money is all the same. Also, it's not that common for a pilot to be typed and current in both a 500/525. It's kinda a pain to be "insurance qualified" on two jets simultaneously since insurance wants annual school (vs the FAA which lets you alternate annual 61.58s). I also don't think there's more contract work in the 525 world, but that may vary market to market. Robert
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 14:57 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/04/13 Posts: 4716 Post Likes: +3722 Location: Hampton, VA
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Pilots are abundant? Ba ha ha ha A fair number of the 500 series pilots are older, could fly for the airlines but don't want to, like the corporate pilot lifestyle. That was the case for my mentor. Not everyone wants to fly for the airlines. I think the 525 series demographic might be younger and they may have more trouble finding pilots in some cases. It varies. In any case, it doesn't matter what anyone says, you have to check out your local scene and see what you can find. I'd be really surprised if you can't find pilots around Indy. Mike C.
The guys who aged out of the airlines or don’t want airline, I’d wager if they were spending their time contracting would ether fly something that commands more of a daily rate, or something more fun
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 15:18 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/30/12 Posts: 4892 Post Likes: +5569 Location: Santa Fe, NM (KSAF)
Aircraft: B200, 500B
|
|
Username Protected wrote: There is absolutely ZERO chance the Mustang does not make this trip……easily. I just flew from SRQ to JVL with serious headwinds…….over 100 knots for a decent portion of the trip. Never had less than 45 knots on the nose, and as usual, an early decent into and around OHARE. Still landed with reserves. The Mustang fits this mission like a glove. It’s always nice to hear real world experience from owners.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 15:33 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8503 Post Likes: +11049 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: [...]the second is owning an airplane they WANT to fly, this can be an issue with legacy jets such as the 501.
I would assume that most 500 series typed pilots also have their 525 type because there’s a lot more 525 work. Chip, this is not my experience at all. Any CE500 typed pilot can fly a 501 and the pay is generally the same for a 500/550/560. Most contract pilots don't really care if it's a 501 or 560 - The money is all the same. Also, it's not that common for a pilot to be typed and current in both a 500/525. It's kinda a pain to be "insurance qualified" on two jets simultaneously since insurance wants annual school (vs the FAA which lets you alternate annual 61.58s). I also don't think there's more contract work in the 525 world, but that may vary market to market. Robert
Man, if you can get them to fly for the money I am impressed!
Does it have Garmin? Does it look nice? Is it a beater? These are the questions I get!
_________________ We ONLY represent buyers!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 16:14 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 07/16/11 Posts: 168 Post Likes: +70 Location: KPTK Michigan
Aircraft: Baron E55, CJ
|
|
|
I'd suggest a CJ/CJ1/CJ2, based on personal experience. Obviously, I want to fly mine, which you may not want. But they easily fit your mission & budget, are ubiquitous for parts, planes and pilots, and are (or will soon be) available to upgrade to the latest in avionics.
I considered a King Air, which would have a been an easy'ish step up from my Baron E55. However, at the end of the day it's too loud, doesn't fly high enough to top all the weather, and it's too slow.
I considered legacy Citations (501, 650 etc) but in the end I wanted something newer, and I wanted to easily be able to find pilots. You know how many 525-typed pilots there are? A lot.
I never really considered a PC 12. I hear they are great planes, but I don't need the seating capacity, I prefer a twin, and it's too slow. I just did KPTK-KCRW-KPTK, arrived at the airport at 7:30am, in the air by 8:00, back by 10:15am and I was in my office working by 10:40am. Time is money.
_________________ Nicholas Conner Baron E55, CJ PTK, Michigan
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 16:33 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 08/05/16 Posts: 3151 Post Likes: +2294 Company: Tack Mobile Location: KBJC
Aircraft: C441
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I've been reading quite a bit on here and wanted to get some feedback on what plane might be the best for my mission profile. There are a few pilots I know well who have provided some input, but I'm leaving their thoughts out for the moment. So here goes.
1. I'm not a pilot. That might be in the cards for me, but it's a very low consideration right now. Obviously I will be hiring pilots.
2. CapEx up to $2.5M (ish)
3. Primary mission - Family of 4 (550-600 lbs) from Indianapolis > Sarasota or Venice
4. Secondary mission(s) - Regional travel from Indy > Chicago, Milwaukee, Columbus, OH, Detroit, etc.
5. Room beyond 4 is a plus but not a requirement
6. Bathroom is a plus but not a requirement
7. Business expense, so Opex isn't as painful
8. Generally not a lot of payload needed (right now).
Thank you all in advance for the information. I'll be the 441 advocate here, there aren't many of us so it's often left out of the conversation. Range and opex are non-issues. It has a nice enclosed potty area in the back, and it approaches slow jet speeds. It has a very roomy single club plus 2 extra seats in the back when you need them. There is no type rating needed, and it's single pilot. You have a good specialist maintenance facility nearby (Kubik @ KIMT). The biggest ding against it is a very nice one can bump up against $2M, which in your case is not an obstacle. There are several nice examples on the market. Fringe benefits for you are it can make the rare 1,800nm trip if you need it to, and it has an enormous nose baggage area which can be convenient and make the cabin feel bigger than it is since you'll never have oversized bags in there. Like other turboprops it's also happy down low on short trips.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best plane for mission profile Posted: 13 Dec 2023, 17:06 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 09/02/08 Posts: 478 Post Likes: +384
Aircraft: B58
|
|
|
A Blackhawk C90B would be great, and I wish I could own one, but in a perfect world I would try to find a KA200 with -52 engines. Higher purchase price, but not much more operating expenses than a C90B and hard to beat the additional room.
My business partner has a Mustang and he loves it, but his wife cried when they sold the C90B, so nice and comfortable. Plane was solid and great for passengers. I think it once flew a water heater to Colorado.
If the 425s, 441s and MU2s were any good, they would still be making them.
If faster was always better, we would all drive Mustang GTs.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|