05 Nov 2025, 06:14 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 22:35 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/20 Posts: 1717 Post Likes: +1773 Location: Tulsa, OK - KRVS
Aircraft: C501SP
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Show me how a citation is cheaper to own than an Mu2 or twin commander. Or a $1.7M 441 to make things easier. So the 501 is the direct comparison to a 441. I looked hard that them when I was researching my upgrade from the SR22 (I regularly use 8 seats, 4 of them kids now aged 10-15). Yes, they are very fuel efficient but a 441 is a full $1M more than a 501. That killed the deal for me. I can buy a LOT of Jet-A for $1M. Yes, the type rating is a thing but you should be doing annual training anyway. I'm actually doing my 61.58 right now. Cost is $4,015 for the instructor, $3,000 for the DPE, plus fuel. That will probably run me about $3,000 so right at $10,000 for the whole thing. An MU-2 or Commander would be much closer in cost and I looked at them too. The MU-2 more-so because ICJS is local to me so I would have service covered. At the end of the day, 2 things killed the MU-2 for me. One of them was dealing with fueling. Every line person I talked to HATES fueling MU-2s and it felt like you had to supervise fueling. With the Citation I give them my fuel order over the phone and it's done when I get there. During pre-flight I open the 2 fuel caps, verify fuel, re-secure the caps, done. Plus I don't need a ladder to verify the fuel caps are on. The other thing is that jets are simply easier to fly. You have more power that is closer to the centerline and you don't have big whirling paddles out there to catch the wind (that also need maintenance). In my plane you can fail an engine and the autopilot doesn't even kick off. Stalls are as benign as a 172. For me, I decided that the 501 was the safest thing I could fly myself and my family in, bar none. At the end of the day, burning more fuel in order to increase safety was an easy decision. Now as to the subject of the thread.... I don't track my costs because I don't want to know. It's a toy for me and so as long as I can feed it I will fly it. I am heavily involved in my maintenance and actively assist with every inspection and repair. I source used parts whenever I can. I have a lot of fun doing that and I am fortunate that my job allows me to spend parts of my work day at the airport and then I can make up that time on evenings and weekends. I also have an excellent mechanic on-field that not only lets me help he only charges $100/hr. He is mostly supported by a couple of corporate customers who have him on retainer and he does other work when he's not working on their stuff. So he's cheap and good but the corporates come first so sometimes I get pushed. But again, it's a toy so I'm fine to trade fast for cheap and good. I recently wrapped up a Phase 1-4 (3-year inspection) so once my mechanic gets me the paperwork (did I mention he was good and cheap?  ) I will post the cost either here or in Mike C's Citation V expenses thread.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 23:59 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20728 Post Likes: +26158 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I can buy a LOT of Jet-A for $1M. You can buy a lot of fuel with the interest saved on not borrowing $1M, or the income from investing the $1M, particularly under current circumstances. There is a lot of "cost" in hull value, much of it invisible so not properly measured, but it is a cost none the less. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
Last edited on 13 Oct 2023, 01:05, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 13 Oct 2023, 00:11 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 06/17/14 Posts: 6010 Post Likes: +2745 Location: KJYO
Aircraft: C-182, GA-7
|
|
|
I could retire to WV or TX and live off the interest investing $1M! Now, SWMBO would have to work so we still have good health insurance.
It would be interesting to see the numbers that some of the folks flying gently used Citations sub-$1M or Sub-$1.5M versus a $2.7M - $3M B200 or $1.5-$1.9M F90 are seeing.
I am guessing that the operating costs are around $1100-$1500/hr single pilot. KingAir ramp fees seem to be about the same as the smaller CitationJet though some FBOs hear "Jet" and the price goes up another $250 even though the KingAir B200 is a bit chunkier when fully loaded. CJ is 11K pounds and B200 is hovering around 12.5K pounds IIRC.
Where is Crandall and his Pilatypus information? Didn't he switch over from PC-12 to CitationJet recently? I follow his social media and Amberley's social media from time to time but didn't plunk down the AMU Satoshi for CJ Pilots. My favorite picture is Crandall's picture next to 525 Foxtrot Uniform. That N number seems fitting for him but I don't think it's his. I miss his posts and his expertise on here and it certainly would be fitting! ...unless you price in the new hangar he's building.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 13 Oct 2023, 01:00 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6652 Post Likes: +5963 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You'll have to exclude any TPE331 powered aircraft from these little exercises because they'll blow all the others away in cost savings. It's not even close.  A fine opportunity for you to share total expense and total hours flown for your 680V.
Let's not. I bought a flying restoration.
But except for a spray nozzle test (every 400hrs) and a overhauled starter/gen, total engine costs have been about $2800.
_________________ Without love, where would you be now?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 13 Oct 2023, 01:04 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20728 Post Likes: +26158 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: KingAir ramp fees seem to be about the same as the smaller CitationJet though some FBOs hear "Jet" and the price goes up another $250 even though the KingAir B200 is a bit chunkier when fully loaded. I have seen more than a few situations where the turboprops are charged more for ramp and parking than light jets. If you think about it, it makes sense. The jet is going to buy more fuel so you will make more money from them in total, and they are less dangerous on the ramp. For example, at KSAT Millionaire, Beechjet 400 is $120 per day, King Air 200 is $150 per day. Even weirder, the Beechjet minimum to waive a ramp fee is 120 gallons, King Air 200 is 150 gallons. Go figure. Quote: Where is Crandall and his Pilatypus information? Didn't he switch over from PC-12 to CitationJet recently? He bought a CJ4 around 2020. N941KD. Quote: didn't plunk down the AMU Satoshi for CJ Pilots. He joined CJP in 2020 and then left less than 2 years later. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 13 Oct 2023, 09:21 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/05/09 Posts: 5299 Post Likes: +5292
Aircraft: C501, R66, A36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Show me how a citation is cheaper to own than an Mu2 or twin commander. Or a $1.7M 441 to make things easier. So the 501 is the direct comparison to a 441. I looked hard that them when I was researching my upgrade from the SR22 (I regularly use 8 seats, 4 of them kids now aged 10-15). Yes, they are very fuel efficient but a 441 is a full $1M more than a 501. That killed the deal for me. I can buy a LOT of Jet-A for $1M. Yes, the type rating is a thing but you should be doing annual training anyway. I'm actually doing my 61.58 right now. Cost is $4,015 for the instructor, $3,000 for the DPE, plus fuel. That will probably run me about $3,000 so right at $10,000 for the whole thing. An MU-2 or Commander would be much closer in cost and I looked at them too. The MU-2 more-so because ICJS is local to me so I would have service covered. At the end of the day, 2 things killed the MU-2 for me. One of them was dealing with fueling. Every line person I talked to HATES fueling MU-2s and it felt like you had to supervise fueling. With the Citation I give them my fuel order over the phone and it's done when I get there. During pre-flight I open the 2 fuel caps, verify fuel, re-secure the caps, done. Plus I don't need a ladder to verify the fuel caps are on. The other thing is that jets are simply easier to fly. You have more power that is closer to the centerline and you don't have big whirling paddles out there to catch the wind (that also need maintenance). In my plane you can fail an engine and the autopilot doesn't even kick off. Stalls are as benign as a 172. For me, I decided that the 501 was the safest thing I could fly myself and my family in, bar none. At the end of the day, burning more fuel in order to increase safety was an easy decision. Now as to the subject of the thread.... I don't track my costs because I don't want to know. It's a toy for me and so as long as I can feed it I will fly it. I am heavily involved in my maintenance and actively assist with every inspection and repair. I source used parts whenever I can. I have a lot of fun doing that and I am fortunate that my job allows me to spend parts of my work day at the airport and then I can make up that time on evenings and weekends. I also have an excellent mechanic on-field that not only lets me help he only charges $100/hr. He is mostly supported by a couple of corporate customers who have him on retainer and he does other work when he's not working on their stuff. So he's cheap and good but the corporates come first so sometimes I get pushed. But again, it's a toy so I'm fine to trade fast for cheap and good. I recently wrapped up a Phase 1-4 (3-year inspection) so once my mechanic gets me the paperwork (did I mention he was good and cheap?  ) I will post the cost either here or in Mike C's Citation V expenses thread.
Hey Chris, You need to find a new training operation, my guy is $2K all in for a 61.58 including DPE.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 13 Oct 2023, 11:07 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/14/13 Posts: 6410 Post Likes: +5147
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The ability to lease a jet opens up an entire new world. Wouldn’t happen with a Turboprop or at least not as easy.
Mike
Could you share the delta in insurance premiums before and after adding the lease option?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Legacy Citation vs Turboprop Posted: 13 Oct 2023, 12:46 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8503 Post Likes: +11048 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
|
I haven't forgotten, just busy, I've run the numbers and I just need to set down and type it all out.
I'll start off with the King Air B200 vs Citation V
I'm quite sure there will be a ton of "but this one is better" and "your numbers are BS"
I'm just making a direct comparison of two airplanes, both built in 1990 and of similar value. The V cost more to maintain, the engine reserves are higher and it burns a lot more fuel... but when you factor in the extra speed most of the difference goes away, the Citation does in 140 hours what it takes the King Air 200 miles to do, the annual numbers for the same number of miles flown get pretty close, but when you factor in that the Citation V has one more seat and you look at cost per seat mile, it wins. AND... that's without fancy math, leaving engine reserves out or owner involved maintenance. It doesn't factor in the LUMP program either.
It's also important to note that things like engine HSI / TBO are further out because of the speed, and airframe hours don't accumulate as fast. The Citation is over 25% faster, so if you flew 3 million miles in both, the Citation would have 7800TT and two engine overhauls... the King Air would have 10,800TT and THREE engine overhauls!
Note- I am doing fast math here, I'm going for speed not accuracy, so I apologize in advance for any mistakes!
_________________ We ONLY represent buyers!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|