banner
banner

11 Jun 2025, 12:12 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 135 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 9  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: real world Phenom 300 vs CJ2/3 operating costs
PostPosted: 30 Jul 2023, 22:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/03/11
Posts: 2006
Post Likes: +2049
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
I agree 100% Mike - local Maint changes the game. Unfortunately those options continue to drop at home base.


Top

 Post subject: Re: real world Phenom 300 vs CJ2/3 operating costs
PostPosted: 30 Jul 2023, 23:29 
Online



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8022
Post Likes: +10337
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
There’s a lot more that goes into the cost of buying an airplane than just the higher cost of the money and that is why it is in a separate category.

Engine reserves are also a capital cost for most owners. Your engine times determine what the market will pay for your airplane when you sell it.

So, a separate category, then, per your guidance.

It is all in how you tilt the scales to make it come out how you want it.

The only true measure is all money in, all money out, what did it cost. Anything else is being delusional.

For me, my V has cost me negative dollars to operate it since I could sell it now for more than all the money I have put into it, including fuel.

And that brings me to another point, depreciation. Buy a newer plane, you suffer that more. Buy a more expensive airplane and you have far more downside risk. With high interest rates, all money is losing value if sunk into an airplane versus in investments (or not being used to pay interest).

Newer being cheaper to operate only works when you are purposefully blind to the other costs involved. This is why people are not lining up to buy new 172s and older ones are cheaper to operate all in. Same applies to jets, just bigger numbers.

Mike C.


You do realize that people are selling their CJ3’s today and making enough money off the transaction to buy a V?

So depreciation isn’t the given it once was.

You said it all when you said you can’t afford a CJ3… those who can often choose the CJ3. It’s not just about how much it cost you, most people flying around in jets care less about the money it cost than you.

I respect the fact that you do it, even though it hurts.

Top

 Post subject: Re: real world Phenom 300 vs CJ2/3 operating costs
PostPosted: 30 Jul 2023, 23:38 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20314
Post Likes: +25453
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
most people flying around in jets care less about the money it cost than you.

I've always been able to fly an airplane one or two classes higher than others of similar means by being frugal and careful. I trade my time in carefully managing my airplane for my lack of excessive wealth.

Maybe your customers are the frivolous rich, but most people of means I know are careful with their money, too. That's how they got where they are.

I'd also expect people of the implied means you speak of to buy frax cards and not bother with all that icky stuff that comes with owning an actual airplane.

The owner operated, owner flown culture is just different from the "jet set" crowd.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: real world Phenom 300 vs CJ2/3 operating costs
PostPosted: 30 Jul 2023, 23:54 
Online



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8022
Post Likes: +10337
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
most people flying around in jets care less about the money it cost than you.

I've always been able to fly an airplane one or two classes higher than others of similar means by being frugal and careful. I trade my time in carefully managing my airplane for my lack of excessive wealth.

Maybe your customers are the frivolous rich, but most people of means I know are careful with their money, too. That's how they got where they are.

I'd also expect people of the implied means you speak of to buy frax cards and not bother with all that icky stuff that comes with owning an actual airplane.

The owner operated, owner flown culture is just different from the "jet set" crowd.

Mike C.


You do realize that most of our clients are more like you, than the frivolous rich you speak of, that many are right here on Beechtalk. You think they’re frivolous because they hire me to do what you think you can do on your own, funny thing is I have all of the numbers, the market research and I know exactly how good of a buy we make for our clients, I also know what people do on their own, how many dealers an airplane went through before making it to an end user… things like that.

I said it in year 1, and I can say it in year 8, we have saved our clients more than our fee on every single acquisition we’ve done.

You’ll never acknowledge that you bought a V because I recommended it and you’ll never acknowledge that I am better at buying airplanes than you. (Not because I’m smarter than you, but because I have more time, more help and most importantly… I have all the tools)

Top

 Post subject: Re: real world Phenom 300 vs CJ2/3 operating costs
PostPosted: 31 Jul 2023, 04:57 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/02/16
Posts: 577
Post Likes: +458
Aircraft: D55, C172
So Mike C. What are your 200 hr figures? And how many man hours are you contributing?

_________________
Embrace The Suck


Top

 Post subject: Re: real world Phenom 300 vs CJ2/3 operating costs
PostPosted: 31 Jul 2023, 08:57 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20314
Post Likes: +25453
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
So Mike C. What are your 200 hr figures?

Not sure what you are asking for.

Quote:
And how many man hours are you contributing?

Hard to measure, it was significant at the beginning when that was a lot for me to learn, tapering off as my knowledge increases and the plane is in better shape. At the start, every issue was a new thing to learn. The first 12 months saw so many things fixed, I've lost count.

Whatever my time investment was, the money I saved easily pays me a good return per hour. For example, I probably spent 6-8 hours on the RH hydraulic pump issue but that saved about $32K over doing what Textron suggested, which would involve a trip to a service center and thus might have been more time in the end. That's a $4K/hour wage, if you think of it that way. Other issues are may pay less, though. Sometimes it isn't about the money, but about fixing it the proper way.

I spend more time on BT than managing the plane, so I guess that proves I have the time.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: real world Phenom 300 vs CJ2/3 operating costs
PostPosted: 31 Jul 2023, 10:57 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/02/16
Posts: 577
Post Likes: +458
Aircraft: D55, C172
So by 200 hr I ment your 200hr/yr costs like Cory put up. And if not used that much an estimate.

I really don’t have, or even want, the time. After crawling under 2 different VW bugs every 3000 miles for about 200,000 miles I’ve had enough. But being an engineer I would think this stuff gets you excited. I understand that. Get Tarver to sell one with a service contract and I get all in. After that 200 40 yr old actuators scare me pretty good.

_________________
Embrace The Suck


Top

 Post subject: Re: real world Phenom 300 vs CJ2/3 operating costs
PostPosted: 31 Jul 2023, 11:33 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20314
Post Likes: +25453
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
After that 200 40 yr old actuators scare me pretty good.

So you'd rather be debugging things like FADECs, digital pressurization controllers, and other nasty digital doohickeys?

My plane is before all that stuff started coming online. The systems are straightforward and simple mechanically.

Quote:
I really don’t have, or even want, the time.

Then you need to have more money than time. You need to hire someone to manage the plane, and a pilot to ferry to/from maintenance, and send the plane to a high dollar shop. When that's all said and done, you would have been better off chartering or frax.

I'm committed to being my company's corporate pilot and aircraft manager. Without doing that, I would be relegated to travel by airlines, so I am motivated to make it happen.

Someday I'll add up my 2022 numbers. That was still in the start up phase, but will get some information. Maintenance has NOT been a major cost even so. Fuel dominates my expenses.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: real world Phenom 300 vs CJ2/3 operating costs
PostPosted: 31 Jul 2023, 11:54 
Online



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8022
Post Likes: +10337
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
I really don’t have, or even want, the time.

Then you need to have more money than time. You need to hire someone to manage the plane, and a pilot to ferry to/from maintenance, and send the plane to a high dollar shop. When that's all said and done, you would have been better off chartering or frax.

Mike C.


Mike,

This is simply not true, yes by "poor boying" a Legacy Citation you can save money (no offense, I've been calling it that for over 20 years) but it's tens of thousands of dollars a year, not hundreds of thousands.

Have you looked at the cost of fractional or charter lately? It makes a lot more sense to own... IF you are flying 150 hours a year or more. Heck, right now it probably makes sense at 100 hours.

You are the niche operator, you are not the standard.

There are more than TWICE as many Citations flying that are 1999 YOM or newer than 1999 and older. By my math, there might be a little over 1900 Legacy Citations, compare that to over 5000 late model Citations. Of the Legacy airplanes, I'd guess that a few hundred of them are being operated by involved owners like you who are sourcing used parts and shaving that extra $30k a year.

What you're doing is great, if I had jet money, I'd probably be doing the same. (I'd rather have an older V for speed and capability than a newer CJ) but that doesn't mean it is the gold standard of how to operate a Citation, nor does it mean that anyone that doesn't have the extra $30k a year should just charter.

I learned a really long time ago that the aircraft market is self balancing, if most operators of a certain airframe are on an engine program, you should be too... if most operators are paying more to get X over Y... you should too...

Why? Because REALLY smart people are making these decisions and we get to see the trend.

You're a smart guy Mike... just not the only smart guy.

Top

 Post subject: Re: real world Phenom 300 vs CJ2/3 operating costs
PostPosted: 31 Jul 2023, 12:13 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20314
Post Likes: +25453
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
This is simply not true, yes by "poor boying" a Legacy Citation you can save money (no offense, I've been calling it that for over 20 years) but it's tens of thousands of dollars, not hundreds of thousands.

I am sure I am at least $200K ahead of taking the plane to a service center in the short time I have owned it.

Quote:
You are the niche operator, you are not the standard.

Being different has never bothered me considering what passes for "standard" these days.

Quote:
What you're doing is great, if I had jet money, I'd probably be doing the same.

I don't have jet money, but I have jet time to make it work none the less. It seems odd to me that you can't do the same given this sort of thing is your business and you would have lots of travel involved.

Quote:
I learned a really long time ago that the aircraft market is self balancing, if most operators of a certain airframe are on an engine program, you should be too... if most operators are paying more to get X over Y... you should too...

Your job is a lot simpler than I thought it was, just follow the herd.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: real world Phenom 300 vs CJ2/3 operating costs
PostPosted: 31 Jul 2023, 12:24 
Online



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8022
Post Likes: +10337
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
This is simply not true, yes by "poor boying" a Legacy Citation you can save money (no offense, I've been calling it that for over 20 years) but it's tens of thousands of dollars, not hundreds of thousands.

I am sure I am at least $200K ahead of taking the plane to a service center in the short time I have owned it.

Mike C.


Maybe, it sounds like you purchased an airplane that had some issues. I don't think any of our clients have been out $200k in the same time period, even maintained at a service center.

Who did your prebuy?

Top

 Post subject: Re: real world Phenom 300 vs CJ2/3 operating costs
PostPosted: 31 Jul 2023, 12:28 
Online



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8022
Post Likes: +10337
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
Your job is a lot simpler than I thought it was...

Mike C.


It really is simple.

1. Find off market airplanes.
2. Make sure our clients don't get screwed.

Everything else we do is customer service.


Top

 Post subject: Re: real world Phenom 300 vs CJ2/3 operating costs
PostPosted: 31 Jul 2023, 12:48 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/14/13
Posts: 6410
Post Likes: +5145
Username Protected wrote:
This is simply not true, yes by "poor boying" a Legacy Citation you can save money (no offense, I've been calling it that for over 20 years) but it's tens of thousands of dollars a year, not hundreds of thousands.


Chip, have you received an invoice that you've had to pay with your money to any of the large shops? It's important to keep in mind you are conversing with people who have-

Peeking at client's invoices during a pre-buy event isn't going to be a representative example of an involved owner/operators savings over a multi year period


Top

 Post subject: Re: real world Phenom 300 vs CJ2/3 operating costs
PostPosted: 31 Jul 2023, 13:13 
Online



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8022
Post Likes: +10337
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
This is simply not true, yes by "poor boying" a Legacy Citation you can save money (no offense, I've been calling it that for over 20 years) but it's tens of thousands of dollars a year, not hundreds of thousands.


Chip, have you received an invoice that you've had to pay with your money to any of the large shops? It's important to keep in mind you are conversing with people who have-

Peeking at client's invoices during a pre-buy event isn't going to be a representative example of an involved owner/operators savings over a multi year period


Why?

I've managed more maintenance events on Citations, reviewed more invoices from shops small and large than any individual aircraft operator, and I'm not even the main person on our team who does this.

In my past life, I worked for stocking aircraft dealers, that owned and operated multiple aircraft including Citations, so I've been on all sides of this equation.

If the invoice we're talking about is my client's responsibility, I treat their money like it is my own.

Top

 Post subject: Re: real world Phenom 300 vs CJ2/3 operating costs
PostPosted: 31 Jul 2023, 14:01 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/06/20
Posts: 1632
Post Likes: +1695
Location: Tulsa, OK - KRVS
Aircraft: C501SP
Username Protected wrote:
I've always been able to fly an airplane one or two classes higher than others of similar means by being frugal and careful. I trade my time in carefully managing my airplane for my lack of excessive wealth.

Maybe your customers are the frivolous rich, but most people of means I know are careful with their money, too. That's how they got where they are.

I'd also expect people of the implied means you speak of to buy frax cards and not bother with all that icky stuff that comes with owning an actual airplane.

The owner operated, owner flown culture is just different from the "jet set" crowd.

I think the last sentence is key. I also think there is yet a smaller subset of owner operated that is owner involved maintenance. It's definitely not for everyone. Personally, helping out with the maintenance of my plane is really fun (yes, even when it's over 100 degrees). I also have the luxury of a job that allows me to work from anywhere and also to time shift my working hours. During maintenance I can work from the airport and then also catch up the time I missed during the day by working in the evening. So being involved in my maintenance doesn't involve downtime or lost income for me as it would other people. Yes, it involves missed time from my family when I have to work in the evenings but taking care of the plane has effectively become one of my hobbies and I treat it as such.

I have an experienced mechanic on field who lets me help. I also like being there as it is my and my family's lives that are on the line. When my mechanic finds corrosion we talk through the options. There is no cutting corners to get something out the door. For example, in Mike's case of the RTV being applied to pressurization control by Textron, if my mechanic tried that I would ask that it be replaced (then I would source the fittings and help with the repair). I also have the luxury that this is a recreational use plane so I can stand some downtime to make sure things are done correctly and as inexpensively as possible.

But again, it's not for everybody. It will really only work if you can turn it into a hobby that you enjoy.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 135 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 9  Next



B-Kool (Top/Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.tat-85x100.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.