banner
banner

21 Nov 2025, 11:42 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: CJ2?
PostPosted: 07 Oct 2016, 22:36 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Bruce, we know you are a phenom guy too......opinion on the 300?

My issue with the 300 is Service Centers. I can't get it worked on unless I fly it to Greensboro NC. F that.


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ2?
PostPosted: 07 Oct 2016, 23:21 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/04/10
Posts: 3543
Post Likes: +3246
Aircraft: C55, PC-12
Brought my team to Pinnacle Aviation and sat through a great presentation by my buddy Ken Casey. Everybody sat in one and went back to the office thinking wow!

Thanks so much for the advice here. Those things are on his list and he suggests we buy a plane already on pro parts. Except for cap cost, it looks like it is a much much better choice than the KA for our long trips. It's tempting to go into a V at half the money when jet A is $3 (average). But it's also cool to think about a direct climb to 450 and miserly fuel burnswhen oil eventually goes up. The CJ2 burned even less on my short little trip SDL - MTJ.

_________________
John Lockhart
Phoenix, AZ
Ridgway, CO


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ2?
PostPosted: 07 Oct 2016, 23:23 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/04/10
Posts: 3543
Post Likes: +3246
Aircraft: C55, PC-12
I'm kinda surprised I'm not following Jason on this. Jason, I figured you'd beat me to this by a year or two.

_________________
John Lockhart
Phoenix, AZ
Ridgway, CO


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ2?
PostPosted: 08 Oct 2016, 00:00 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5193
Post Likes: +3038
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:
he suggests we buy a plane already on pro parts.


I suggest you study the terms of Proparts very carefully and understand the costs to you under various scenarios with a positive or negative balance:

- You sell the plane and terminate Proparts before the contract ends.
- You sell the plane and the new owner wants to continue the Proparts contract.
- You own the plane to the end of the Proparts contract and don't renew.
- You own the plane to the end of the Proparts contract and renew

If you buy a plane on Proparts and take the contract understand if you are assuming a negative balance.

Proparts charges you full Cessna retail price for the parts. You have no opportunity to shop for alternative sources at a discount. You also don't have opportunities to save money by repairing instead of replacing parts.

Proparts is not a fixed price maintenance plan. It has reconciliation settlements if you terminate your contract. Only in limited cases will you save money over your total parts cost for the duration of the contract.

Proparts is a good tool for the corporate CFO who wants to smooth the monthly maintenance budget and spending. The surprises come on the back end when you sell the plane and need to settle the accumulated Proparts balance.

_________________
Allen


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ2?
PostPosted: 08 Oct 2016, 00:28 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 11068
Post Likes: +7097
Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
Username Protected wrote:
I'm kinda surprised I'm not following Jason on this. Jason, I figured you'd beat me to this by a year or two.


That's the rub.........you are not.......when you really, really look at the value proposition against the PC12, the CJ's beat the PC12 by about an hour to an hour and a half on a 1000NM trip.......everywhere else the PC12 kicks the living crap outta the CJ (just stirring the pot fellas :D )....

when you factor in the additional cost of running the bird, the landing fees, the unknowns, Pro Parts, Cessna's not so kind parts and maintenance policy etc. etc. the PC12 is still the best value proposition by a New York mile......

if it was not Jason would be in a CJ..........and frankly I'd be right behind him..........

_________________
---Rusty Shoe Keeper---


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ2?
PostPosted: 08 Oct 2016, 00:29 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 11068
Post Likes: +7097
Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
Username Protected wrote:
Bruce, we know you are a phenom guy too......opinion on the 300?

My issue with the 300 is Service Centers. I can't get it worked on unless I fly it to Greensboro NC. F that.


pansy.......
_________________
---Rusty Shoe Keeper---


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ2?
PostPosted: 08 Oct 2016, 00:41 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/09
Posts: 14424
Post Likes: +9557
Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
Username Protected wrote:
It's tempting to go into a V at half the money when jet A is $3 (average).


That's probably what I'd do. The V is really an incredible value.

_________________
http://calipilot.com
atp/cfii


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ2?
PostPosted: 08 Oct 2016, 00:44 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5193
Post Likes: +3038
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:
Cessna's not so kind parts and maintenance policy


There are many independent shops that can be a better value for doing much of the maintenance on older Citations. You are not locked into Cessna maintenance.

_________________
Allen


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ2?
PostPosted: 08 Oct 2016, 07:58 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
I'm kinda surprised I'm not following Jason on this. Jason, I figured you'd beat me to this by a year or two.

I'd have pulled the trigger a year or 2 ago if jets weren't tanking in value so fast. The PC12 will sell for what paid for it. The CJ3 and CJ4 seem to be depreciating about $200K per QUARTER. As soon as the right one falls in my lap I'm going for it.

Also, I still do a lot of 250NM flights.


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ2?
PostPosted: 08 Oct 2016, 08:01 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
That's the rub.........you are not.......when you really, really look at the value proposition against the PC12, the CJ's beat the PC12 by about an hour to an hour and a half on a 1000NM trip.......everywhere else the PC12 kicks the living crap outta the CJ (just stirring the pot fellas :D )....

when you factor in the additional cost of running the bird, the landing fees, the unknowns, Pro Parts, Cessna's not so kind parts and maintenance policy etc. etc. the PC12 is still the best value proposition by a New York mile......

if it was not Jason would be in a CJ..........and frankly I'd be right behind him..........

It's true. My motivation to move to jet is very very low. The ONLY time the PC12 sucks compared to the jet is 1000nm westbound in winter.

2 weeks for type rating...... ugh


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ2?
PostPosted: 08 Oct 2016, 08:20 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/05/11
Posts: 5248
Post Likes: +2426
Aircraft: BE-55
Username Protected wrote:
That's the rub.........you are not.......when you really, really look at the value proposition against the PC12, the CJ's beat the PC12 by about an hour to an hour and a half on a 1000NM trip.......everywhere else the PC12 kicks the living crap outta the CJ (just stirring the pot fellas :D )....

when you factor in the additional cost of running the bird, the landing fees, the unknowns, Pro Parts, Cessna's not so kind parts and maintenance policy etc. etc. the PC12 is still the best value proposition by a New York mile......

if it was not Jason would be in a CJ..........and frankly I'd be right behind him..........

It's true. My motivation to move to jet is very very low. The ONLY time the PC12 sucks compared to the jet is 1000nm westbound in winter.

2 weeks for type rating...... ugh


You can get it done in 4-5 days
_________________
“ Embrace the Suck”


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ2?
PostPosted: 08 Oct 2016, 08:28 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:

You can get it done in 4-5 days

Where? Aloft is the quickest I've found at 10 days.


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ2?
PostPosted: 08 Oct 2016, 08:39 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/05/11
Posts: 5248
Post Likes: +2426
Aircraft: BE-55
Username Protected wrote:

You can get it done in 4-5 days

Where? Aloft is the quickest I've found at 10 days.


PM sent
_________________
“ Embrace the Suck”


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ2?
PostPosted: 08 Oct 2016, 11:32 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/04/10
Posts: 3543
Post Likes: +3246
Aircraft: C55, PC-12
Username Protected wrote:
That's the rub.........you are not.......when you really, really look at the value proposition against the PC12, the CJ's beat the PC12 by about an hour to an hour and a half on a 1000NM trip.......everywhere else the PC12 kicks the living crap outta the CJ (just stirring the pot fellas :D )....

when you factor in the additional cost of running the bird, the landing fees, the unknowns, Pro Parts, Cessna's not so kind parts and maintenance policy etc. etc. the PC12 is still the best value proposition by a New York mile......

if it was not Jason would be in a CJ..........and frankly I'd be right behind him..........

It's true. My motivation to move to jet is very very low. The ONLY time the PC12 sucks compared to the jet is 1000nm westbound in winter.

2 weeks for type rating...... ugh


The B200 is the same speed as the PC12 so I understand the suck. I think the PC12 will stay in the air longer but I can stay up for 5+ hours and that's already more than I prefer. I was into 85KTS last last week heading back from Dallas and it killed me seeing less than 200 across the ground.... This was fine because I rarely did it but its looking like its going to be a regular thing next year.

The thing I like about the V is the ability to put GTN's and G600's in them. I LOVE those boxes and I know my way around them pretty well. I'm also a fan of the GWX 70 so I'd plan to do that too.

So what's the big difference between the V and the CJ2 besides fuel burn?
_________________
John Lockhart
Phoenix, AZ
Ridgway, CO


Top

 Post subject: Re: CJ2?
PostPosted: 08 Oct 2016, 15:33 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8554
Post Likes: +11092
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
CJ2 and Citation V... everything.

The CJ2 is small, efficient, next to latest design. It's simple to fly, work on and own. It's slow and limited weight / range wise.

The V is a older more complex design, a tad more work to fly, and a lot more to maintain. It is fast, has a bigger cabin, carries quite a bit more a lot farther.

Owner flown... a CJ2 is hard to beat. Crew flown, buy an Ultra.

_________________
Recent acquisitions - 2004 King Air B200 - 2013 Citation Mustang - 2022 M2Gen2!


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next



PWI, Inc. (Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.camguard.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.BT Ad.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.