20 Dec 2025, 13:29 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 12 Dec 2020, 14:31 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/06/14 Posts: 4151 Post Likes: +2862 Location: MA
Aircraft: C340A; TBM850
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have no idea how he "fixed" his stability issue. I think there's a chance it may have been PIO. Was the broken trim spring before or after the first flight? I don't recall.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 13 Dec 2020, 09:53 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 04/26/13 Posts: 21967 Post Likes: +22635 Location: Columbus , IN (KBAK)
Aircraft: 1968 Baron D55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I sent that screenshot to Elliot and he just said, "Yeah." lol. I can't imagine how it feel for him to sit back and watch I can ... relieved. Dealing with Peter looks like a real slog. Yeah, I’m pretty sure that’s a large part of why you always see him working alone.
_________________ My last name rhymes with 'geese'.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 14 Dec 2020, 10:29 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/18/11 Posts: 7664 Post Likes: +3697 Location: Lakeland , Ga
Aircraft: H35, T-41B, Aircoupe
|
|
|
He may be nuts, but he has nuts
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 14 Dec 2020, 10:30 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/18/11 Posts: 7664 Post Likes: +3697 Location: Lakeland , Ga
Aircraft: H35, T-41B, Aircoupe
|
|
|
He may be nuts, but he has nuts
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 14 Dec 2020, 15:31 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/24/11 Posts: 663 Post Likes: +707
Aircraft: PA31, PA32R
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I agree it seems like it will keep dragging on.
But what happens when he gets in cruise at 75% power and cant beat Bonanza performance numbers? I feel like that has to be a pivotal point. It will be clear his power plant has major issues and he will need to pull back and make massive design changes. Will his followers believe the next round of optimism? I think his credibility has suffered greatly.
But then I read his YouTube comments and 90% of them are positive and supportive. They seem to still believe the hype. Or maybe they are just impressed with his efforts.
It's really sad to see this is who we have become as a society, a bunch of misguided cheerleaders looking to give trophy's for effort and ignoring results.
Really shows the current state of the world. Feelings are more important than results, science, and reality.
Mike No different than Jerry W's videos. No matter what bonehead move he films and uploads, his followers think he's a god of aviation.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 14 Dec 2020, 19:00 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/10/14 Posts: 1807 Post Likes: +881 Location: Northwest Arkansas (KVBT)
Aircraft: TBM850
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It looks like the last flight was 1000ft and 136kt max ground speed.
Not the flight that he was looking for with gear up. At this point I don't see how he does not take responsibility for the miss on the performance claims. I think thats my biggest problem with the project, the claims. When does he say OK it's not going to do 300 knots on 20gph?
Mike To be fair, he never said it would do those things at pattern altitude. And if he did try to achieve max performance (which he expects at FL250) on the 5th test flight he would be ridiculed for it.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 14 Dec 2020, 19:09 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 05/01/14 Posts: 9811 Post Likes: +16780 Location: Операционный офис КГБ
Aircraft: TU-104
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It looks like the last flight was 1000ft and 136kt max ground speed.
Not the flight that he was looking for with gear up. At this point I don't see how he does not take responsibility for the miss on the performance claims. I think thats my biggest problem with the project, the claims. When does he say OK it's not going to do 300 knots on 20gph?
Mike To be fair, he never said it would do those things at pattern altitude. And if he did try to achieve max performance (which he expects at FL250) on the 5th test flight he would be ridiculed for it.
It’s not that hard to do the math and figure it out it that an airplane that gets less than 140 knots at pattern altitude, won’t get 300 at FL250. We’d see a lot of 300 knot turbo charged and TN Bonanzas if that were possible under the current laws of physics.
The main caveat being how much power is he really using? In the last video he seemed to be at full power and still accelerating when he pulled the power back at around 133 knots. Maybe if he left the power in longer the speed would have crept up to 200 knots at pattern altitude but I highly doubt it.
_________________ Be kinder than I am. It’s a low bar. Flight suits = superior knowledge
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 14 Dec 2020, 21:02 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/23/13 Posts: 9481 Post Likes: +7154 Company: Kokotele Guitar Works Location: Albany, NY
Aircraft: C-182RG, C-172, PA28
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It looks like the last flight was 1000ft and 136kt max ground speed.
Not the flight that he was looking for with gear up. At this point I don't see how he does not take responsibility for the miss on the performance claims. I think thats my biggest problem with the project, the claims. When does he say OK it's not going to do 300 knots on 20gph?
Mike To be fair, he never said it would do those things at pattern altitude. And if he did try to achieve max performance (which he expects at FL250) on the 5th test flight he would be ridiculed for it.
He's 5 test flights in and hasn't left the pattern yet. His design goal was high speed at high altitude, but that comes with reasonably high speed at low altitude as well. So far it doesn't look faster than a straight-legged 182.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|