14 Nov 2025, 01:22 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best t-prop or jet for $1.3m? Posted: 08 Dec 2017, 15:52 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8521 Post Likes: +11077 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 0. I don't do 150 hour inspections. Just annual. Ok, what's your maintenance cost for a year?
_________________ We ONLY represent buyers!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best t-prop or jet for $1.3m? Posted: 08 Dec 2017, 15:55 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm not trying to talk you into anything... just sharing knowledge. You can debate all day... but my point is the CJ3 does better than you might think in comparison to the PC12 and does it faster.
If it is just .15 or .25 off a leg... that adds up to hours. It may not be 200 instead of 300... and you very well may have crunched the numbers and figured it out where it works best for you, I'm just saying we went through this with a CJ4 and it was a lot closer than I would have thought. They went with the CJ4 because they could do a bunch of short hops and be back to the barn the same day, or do in two days when the t-prop took three.
Saving .15 in time is not saving money. That flight in the CJ3 will burn 2X the gas. I've flown Atlanta to California in 6 hours and I've flown California back to Atlanta in 6 hours. It doesn't take 3 days. You gotta stop with the "a PC12 can fit inside a KA350" comments. You're way off. Wanting to believe and reality are not the same thing. Can't you just post legit numbers and not have such and agenda?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best t-prop or jet for $1.3m? Posted: 08 Dec 2017, 15:58 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: 0. I don't do 150 hour inspections. Just annual. Ok, what's your maintenance cost for a year? This year was no good as my plane is now 10 years old so dumb stuff is breaking. Before this year I had almost no MX except my prop overhaul and my pitch trim overhaul. My Bonanza had higher MX bills than the PC12.
A new PC12 has 4 year warranty.
I have my 10 year wing removal next year. That'll be $10K
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best t-prop or jet for $1.3m? Posted: 08 Dec 2017, 16:01 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: When did you become so confrontational?
What agenda do I have? I did one PC12 this year and NO CJ3's... what would be my motivation or agenda? The numbers you posted are way off. You know they're way off. Why even post them?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best t-prop or jet for $1.3m? Posted: 08 Dec 2017, 16:05 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8521 Post Likes: +11077 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: When did you become so confrontational?
What agenda do I have? I did one PC12 this year and NO CJ3's... what would be my motivation or agenda? The numbers you posted are way off. You know they're way off. Why even post them?
Help me then... I'm using info supplied by ACC... they are getting it from numerous operators. The annual maintenance is based on what I'm hearing from CJ3 operators and PC12 operators... help us all out and share your data.
_________________ We ONLY represent buyers!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best t-prop or jet for $1.3m? Posted: 08 Dec 2017, 16:28 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8521 Post Likes: +11077 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: PC12 operators are paying more for JetA than CJ3 operators?
No PC12 operator is paying $35K a year in insurance as I think I may be paying more than any other PC12 operator for insurance. There's only 1 company that will insure me at $25MM and I pay $24K for that.
Happ/Mapp warranty is $19K per year and it covers a tremendous amount of stuff that breaks. I've had issues this year with VNAV, pressurization valves and radar this year.... all covered.
Hangar is $1400 a month
Simcom is about $3K as I go with a buddy and we get a 2 person discount
JetA is averaging about $3.20 a gallon
What did I miss? Annual Maintenance for 300 hours a year of flying. I corrected the fuel cost mistake. They use $4.25 and I use $3.65 (seems to be a good average) I thought the insurance looked high.
_________________ We ONLY represent buyers!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best t-prop or jet for $1.3m? Posted: 08 Dec 2017, 17:03 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8521 Post Likes: +11077 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You still have airframe MX at $75K a year.
You still have "engine and APU MX" at $39K and mine is 0.
You still have insurance at $34K and mine is $24K. My insurance could be $15K if I accepted $10MM in liability. I'm told by multiple sources that EPPS or Banyan it'll be $75k... you haven't given us anything to the contrary. What does it cost to do a HOT and Overhaul... divide that buy 3500 and that's your hourly engine cost. No such thing as 0 engine MX. I'll change the insurance when I have time.
_________________ We ONLY represent buyers!
Last edited on 08 Dec 2017, 17:04, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best t-prop or jet for $1.3m? Posted: 08 Dec 2017, 17:04 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/11/11 Posts: 2413 Post Likes: +2772 Location: Woodlands TX
Aircraft: C525 D1K Waco PT17
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You still have airframe MX at $75K a year.
You still have "engine and APU MX" at $39K and mine is 0.
You still have insurance at $34K and mine is $24K. My insurance could be $15K if I accepted $10MM in liability. APU on a CJ3?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best t-prop or jet for $1.3m? Posted: 08 Dec 2017, 17:06 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8521 Post Likes: +11077 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You still have airframe MX at $75K a year.
You still have "engine and APU MX" at $39K and mine is 0.
You still have insurance at $34K and mine is $24K. My insurance could be $15K if I accepted $10MM in liability. APU on a CJ3?
That's just how ACC list it on all models no matter if they have an APU or not.
_________________ We ONLY represent buyers!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Best t-prop or jet for $1.3m? Posted: 08 Dec 2017, 17:17 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/14/08 Posts: 42 Post Likes: +23
Aircraft: PIlatus PC-12/47
|
|
|
I've got a 2006 PC-12/47. I love it but, from my experience, it's a myth that it's substantally less expensive to run (on a per mile basis) than a Cessna branded jet in any class from CJ3 on down.
I run the Pilatus about 325 hrs/year. Do the annual and 150 hour.
MX has averaged (with no corner cutting) between $50-60k annually.
I have self insured on the HAPP stuff (and gotten lucky so far). Otherwise, add about $20k.
My insurance is similar to Jason's because I also run with very high smooth liability limits.
The engine reserve/cost is actually quite high - even though there's only one, it's an expensive hot section and overhaul cost and TBO is a relatively short 3500 hours (remember there's fewer miles per hour compared to a jet so, on a per mile basis, you hit these costs sooner).
With Pilatus you ARE getting all your service at an authorized Pilatus service center. I use EPPS. Great service that comes at great cost. With a Cessna product, you can do much of the work at independents at 2/3 the hourly charge.
There's also a number of expensive mandatory inspections and overhauls. The trim actuator is one. In February, I'll be doing the $10k wing pull (which, I have been told has NEVER resulted in any needed repairs). That's the Swiss way and, I suppose, from one perspective that's a good thing.
The PC-12 has many great attributes. Love the cargo door, the big cabin (compared to the Citation "tube"), airstair, airfield flexibility and resale value (I've been offered more than I paid four years ago).
But, it ain't cheap to operate compared to most of the legacy Cessna brand jets all the way up to the CJ3.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|