19 Dec 2025, 19:48 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 14 Nov 2020, 16:57 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/03/08 Posts: 16977 Post Likes: +28877 Location: Peachtree City GA / Stoke-On-Trent UK
Aircraft: A33
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So now that he's in the air, who thinks he's going to get the performance promised 5 years ago? And if not, what climb/cruise/fuel burn do you forecast based on his videos so far? what is the meaning of these words you use "climb" and "cruise" ? And how might they apply to the subject of this thread ?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 14 Nov 2020, 17:02 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/11/17 Posts: 25 Post Likes: +7 Location: KPAO
Aircraft: RV9
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So now that he's in the air, who thinks he's going to get the performance promised 5 years ago? And if not, what climb/cruise/fuel burn do you forecast based on his videos so far? what is the meaning of these words you use "climb" and "cruise" ? And how might they apply to the subject of this thread ? I can't tell if this is intended to be a joke, so I'll answer it literally. I'm asking about rate of climb, cruise speed, and fuel burn compared to what was promised: http://raptor-aircraft.com/specs.html
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 14 Nov 2020, 17:05 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/03/08 Posts: 16977 Post Likes: +28877 Location: Peachtree City GA / Stoke-On-Trent UK
Aircraft: A33
|
|
|
sorry to be so obtuse more clearly - have you seen any indication that the aircraft is capable of climbing to even a cropduster's cruise altitude ?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 14 Nov 2020, 17:14 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/06/14 Posts: 4151 Post Likes: +2861 Location: MA
Aircraft: C340A; TBM850
|
|
Username Protected wrote: sorry to be so obtuse more clearly - have you seen any indication that the aircraft is capable of climbing to even a cropduster's cruise altitude ? Air-to-air refilling with cold coolant every 1000 feet.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 14 Nov 2020, 22:09 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/07/18 Posts: 3722 Post Likes: +2660 Company: Retired Location: Columbus, Ohio
Aircraft: Baron 58, Lear 35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm asking about rate of climb, cruise speed, and fuel burn compared to what was promised: http://raptor-aircraft.com/specs.htmlAs currently configured, a Cessna 152 beats the Great White Whale in take off distance, ROC, cruise speed, fuel burn, full fuel useful load, range, maintainability and acquisition cost. The Cessna does have higher direct operating costs because.....well, you can actually fly it to places other than the second runway at your departure airport.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 14 Nov 2020, 22:24 |
|
 |

|


|
 |
Joined: 12/10/07 Posts: 36198 Post Likes: +14533 Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: On the positive side, you can tell stories to your grandchildren about doing things the hard way. Like walking 3 miles to school uphill both ways... Where I grew up there were no hills but there was always a strong headwind to and from school (just like when I go flying).
_________________ -lance
It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 14 Nov 2020, 22:30 |
|
 |

|


|
 |
Joined: 12/10/07 Posts: 36198 Post Likes: +14533 Location: Minneapolis, MN (KFCM)
Aircraft: 1970 Baron B55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: The Cessna does have higher direct operating costs because.....well, you can actually fly it to places other than the second runway at your departure airport. I disagree. When the divisor (distance) is near zero the quotient (cost per mile) gets pretty big.
_________________ -lance
It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
Last edited on 15 Nov 2020, 16:37, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 14 Nov 2020, 23:54 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 06/28/14 Posts: 1012 Post Likes: +731 Location: Pleasanton , TX (KPEZ)
Aircraft: 1963 Bonanza P35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So now that he's in the air, who thinks he's going to get the performance promised 5 years ago? And if not, what climb/cruise/fuel burn do you forecast based on his videos so far? Getting this thing in the air might have been the easy part  Keeping it in the air looks like it will be the hard part. Particularly keeping it in the air long enough to verify numbers. The guy has 10 gal of gas, on board and is running at 90+MPH down the runway and the thing looks glued to the ground. The takeoff roll alone is enough to make me go... Also please know that 3 years ago I was seriously considering putting down a deposit. So I am not just trying to run Peter or this project down. Bottom line is he tried to do to much all at once and now he has what he has.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 15 Nov 2020, 17:16 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 01/07/08 Posts: 2864 Post Likes: +455 Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1979 Baron 58P
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm a little surprised he hasn't thought to add a spray bar in front of the heat exchangers to give them a shot of water mist (evaporative cooling!). This wouldn't work any better, but then again it was flying through the rain that kept Louis Blériot out of the English Channel 111 years ago, so why not give that a try...  How about a “boil-off” cooling system like the Galloping Ghost that crashed at Reno? That might be enough to get him around the pattern.....once.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 16 Nov 2020, 02:31 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/15/16 Posts: 441 Post Likes: +349 Location: NC
Aircraft: Looking for one
|
|
|
Isn’t he planning on pulling it back to 50% power once he gets airborne? Assuming it doesn’t oscillate in pitch and roll again. I don’t think he has much time to do much except do a pattern lap. “Performance” will be not falling out of the sky. With him not really wanting to address the cause of the heating issue, it looks like he just wants to get it flying well enough not to scare him and go straight into production out West.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 16 Nov 2020, 10:22 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 04/26/13 Posts: 21966 Post Likes: +22635 Location: Columbus , IN (KBAK)
Aircraft: 1968 Baron D55
|
|
Username Protected wrote: it looks like he just wants to get it flying well enough not to scare him and go straight into production out West. This. Everyone who's using the impracticality of his Rube Goldberg approach are missing the point. He isn't trying to fix this airplane, he's approaching this build as a test bed that he's using to learn what he needs to change for the next build which will be the production prototype. I mean, it works for SpaceX, it should work for the Raptor, right?
_________________ My last name rhymes with 'geese'.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 16 Nov 2020, 10:43 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/07/18 Posts: 3722 Post Likes: +2660 Company: Retired Location: Columbus, Ohio
Aircraft: Baron 58, Lear 35
|
|
Username Protected wrote: it looks like he just wants to get it flying well enough not to scare him and go straight into production out West. This. Everyone who's using the impracticality of his Rube Goldberg approach are missing the point. He isn't trying to fix this airplane, he's approaching this build as a test bed that he's using to learn what he needs to change for the next build which will be the production prototype. I mean, it works for SpaceX, it should work for the Raptor, right? And the cup holders are the cat’s a$$, no redesign required there. So, he already has a big head start on the next prototype. Seriously, how do you build the next one with the needed changes when you didn’t make any meaningful changes to this one to determine what is needed?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 16 Nov 2020, 11:52 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 03/15/16 Posts: 441 Post Likes: +349 Location: NC
Aircraft: Looking for one
|
|
Username Protected wrote: This. Everyone who's using the impracticality of his Rube Goldberg approach are missing the point. He isn't trying to fix this airplane, he's approaching this build as a test bed that he's using to learn what he needs to change for the next build which will be the production prototype. I mean, it works for SpaceX, it should work for the Raptor, right?[/quote] And the cup holders are the cat’s a$$, no redesign required there. So, he already has a big head start on the next prototype. Seriously, how do you build the next one with the needed changes when you didn’t make any meaningful changes to this one to determine what is needed?[/quote] Wrong! If he uses angle iron redesigning them, he can add 3 lbs to the weight.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Raptor Aircraft 5 Seat Pressurized 3,600 NM Range Die Posted: 16 Nov 2020, 12:12 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/03/08 Posts: 16977 Post Likes: +28877 Location: Peachtree City GA / Stoke-On-Trent UK
Aircraft: A33
|
|
|
You can make a lot more power than expected from diesel engines if you know what you are doing. In Europe there is a truck racing league. Earlier in my career I was a bit involved in these engine mods. In America there is a truck pikes peak race, same thing.
It's amazing what you can get out of some of these engines when the manufacturer turns a few engineers loose with no rules. 350HP road engines making 1500HP....for awhile.
It's fun. Fun to build. Fun to run the engine on a dyno. Fun to figure out what caused a failure. Fun to watch the races.
But I would NOT find it fun to fly behind such an engine.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|