04 Dec 2025, 20:59 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Meridian Posted: 19 Aug 2013, 07:11 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Why does everyone complain about how hard it is to get into the pilots seat of a PA46? Flew one last week and it was easy to get in and out of. I also found the rear cabin to be much more comfortable than a Baron or Bo. Especially if you have 3 people back there. I can't get into a Meridien. It's my number one complaint about the airplane.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Meridian Posted: 19 Aug 2013, 07:17 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 12835 Post Likes: +5276 Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
|
|
Username Protected wrote: G1000 has been out since 2005 and it's still mainstream with many software updates. Garmin is the future. They don't make planes with round dials anymore ya know. Haven't in years. Is anyone even making round dials anymore?
The future of aviation is efficiency and automation. It will be mainstream until the next big thing or until Garmin goes the way of Bendix King or until display technology advances and no one makes replacement screens for it. Electronics have a functional life ... that ends one day. And there's no going back to get replacement chips that haven't been made for 8 years. Round dials are, of course, still made. Ever seen an aircraft spruce catalog? The replacement market is still far larger than new market. Round dials are also - very importantly - supportable by anyone with a little ingenuity. You can make your own parts for round dials if required. Try making a new screen for an MX20.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Meridian Posted: 19 Aug 2013, 08:05 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 04/06/08 Posts: 2718 Post Likes: +100 Location: Palm Beach, Florida F45
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I always find it interesting how some people buy new, others buy used. And neither side can really understand the other and think the other side is crazy.
Tim I know what you mean, but that's not my case. I am a new buyer. Everything I own is new. But, I'm buying used this time. My gut isn't happy because everything is a compromise. I want something that will work for my current mission, and something that has a decent exit strategy if I choose to step up my mission. Until I get me toe wet, I won't know how much of a commitment I am wiling to make. A G1000 Meridian is too early in the depreciation cycle (also too few on the market), and a round gauge TBM is too dated for me. I've studied it hard, I don't like compromises, and it's time to pull out my plan "B".
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Meridian Posted: 19 Aug 2013, 11:30 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Regarding entry - I am 6'0 170. It didn't seem any harder to me than a twin Cessna that I sat in recently. I don't know what a twin cessna is.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Meridian Posted: 19 Aug 2013, 13:26 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/29/10 Posts: 2824 Post Likes: +2746 Location: Dallas, TX (KADS & KJWY)
Aircraft: T28B,7GCBC,E90
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Regarding entry - I am 6'0 170. It didn't seem any harder to me than a twin Cessna that I sat in recently. I'm 6'3" and 210lbs - I flat don't fit into the Meridian or Cessna 340 cockpits. The 421 and King Airs fit me fine though. The 400 series Cessnas have a LOT more room up front than the PA46 line! Robert
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Meridian Posted: 19 Aug 2013, 14:25 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12192 Post Likes: +3076 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
|
John,
Congrats on being almost debt free. Something to think about, we have started to see the point where more and more planes have "zero" value after sitting for just a few years. That is, the planes are not even worth scrap. I know of a few situations where the owner's estate had to pay a scrap yard to take the plane. Then look at the market that this applies too. Piston planes, especially twin piston planes and old jets which do not pass stage 2 noise requirements. For me, I think the shrinking pilot population and the increasing age of pilots are a major contribution why there is a decreasing demand for piston aircraft. With some pilots always wanting new aircraft, there is more and more of the fleet which not be supported and will end up in the junk yard.
As you look toward the future, implicit or not most of us want to recover something from the plane or pass the torch on to another generation. Since you want a turbine, and so does everyone else; this market will not have the same level of collapse. Therefore, jumping to an entry level turbine that meets enough of the mission will give you a plane that allows for the exit to provide something; even if only physiological.
Tim
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper Meridian Posted: 19 Aug 2013, 19:35 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 10/27/10 Posts: 10790 Post Likes: +6894 Location: Cambridge, MA (KLWM)
Aircraft: 1997 A36TN
|
|
Username Protected wrote: My buddy bought a 2005 PC12 a couple years ago. Did all his training and a couple hundred hours and sold it for a $200K profit. If he'd invested that same amount (or a proportional amount representing the difference between the PA46/TBM and a PC-12) in housing or the stock market over that same time period, how'd he have done? (Housing or stocks are surely no worse than airplanes on a risk-adjustment basis.) I completely agree that a high-demand aircraft will be quicker to sell (that's almost definitionally true), but it's not clear that an expensive, high-demand aircraft will be a better "investment" (or even "lose less") than a wildly less expensive, but lower-demand aircraft.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|