27 Oct 2025, 03:17 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 12 Jan 2018, 11:12 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11068 Post Likes: +7097 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Me too. That's another little "oddity" but at the same time I'm glad you have the option to start up with a lighter load on the system. It's not supposed to come online until above 65% NG I believe, but I need to review that to be 100% certain. Brent will be able to explain 100%, he's smarter than me.
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 12 Jan 2018, 11:34 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/16/10 Posts: 9041 Post Likes: +2084
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So a BBJ is less susceptible to turbulence than a 737? How about for a Challenger 604 versus a CRJ or Embraer Legacy 600 versus ERJ?  All kidding aside, what is your basis for the statement above? I would guess the BBJ could be lower wing loading than a 737. 604 could be less than the CRJ. Legacy 600 could be less than the ERJ. The wing loading number (not wing surface area) reflects the actual weight of the aircraft. Comparing a corporate version to an airliner; in practice the airliner is most often going to be near max gross. Giving a higher wing loading than the lightly loaded executive version. Your examples seem to be comparing the executive version to an airline version 
_________________ Education cuts, don't heal.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 12 Jan 2018, 11:54 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yesterday though, it was taking a long time for the dirt come up, longer than normal Yeah I'm not sure what would cause that. Not sure I've seen it before but like I said..... I turn my plane on stupid slow. Having to turn everyone off and back on again takes longer.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 12 Jan 2018, 11:57 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8496 Post Likes: +11044 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Yesterday though, it was taking a long time for the dirt come up, longer than normal Yeah I'm not sure what would cause that. Not sure I've seen it before but like I said..... I turn my plane on stupid slow. Having to turn everyone off and back on again takes longer.
Very similar to the Premier, you have to get out of the "jump in and go" mindset and let the system do it's thing.
_________________ We ONLY represent buyers!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 12 Jan 2018, 12:06 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11068 Post Likes: +7097 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Reset the whole system fixes it. How did you do that inflight?
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 12 Jan 2018, 12:26 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 06/28/09 Posts: 14412 Post Likes: +9550 Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Reset the whole system fixes it. How did you do that inflight?
Standby bus off, batt1 off, batt2 off, keep the plane upright with the eps and standby efis... OR, fly without the YD, land and do a normal shutdown. I chose the latter.
_________________ http://calipilot.com atp/cfii
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 12 Jan 2018, 12:39 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/22/12 Posts: 2910 Post Likes: +2883 Company: Retired Location: Lynnwood, WA (KPAE)
Aircraft: Lancair Evolution
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I turn on StandBy Bus then I go take the covers off the plane and get a cup of coffee.... I go get a refill of coffee. No wonder you need a PTT in your potty.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 12 Jan 2018, 12:45 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/29/08 Posts: 26338 Post Likes: +13085 Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I turn on StandBy Bus then I go take the covers off the plane and get a cup of coffee.... I go get a refill of coffee. No wonder you need a PTT in your potty. Well..... no point in having a lav if you're not gonna use it.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 12 Jan 2018, 14:56 |
|
 |

|


|
 |
Joined: 06/25/08 Posts: 5792 Post Likes: +596 Company: Latitude Aviation Location: Los Angeles, CA (KTOA)
Aircraft: 2007 Bonanza G36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I would guess the BBJ could be lower wing loading than a 737. 604 could be less than the CRJ. Legacy 600 could be less than the ERJ. The wing loading number (not wing surface area) reflects the actual weight of the aircraft. Comparing a corporate version to an airliner; in practice the airliner is most often going to be near max gross. Giving a higher wing loading than the lightly loaded executive version. Your examples seem to be comparing the executive version to an airline version  John, I was hoping that the  that I used would convey my sarcasm and "tongue in cheek" nature of my post. It wasn't serious at all and was a response to Chip's comment that private jets have smoother rides than airliners so I purposely picked those aircraft models since they have both corporate and airline versions. For what it is worth though, the BBJ has a MGTOW of 171,000 pounds and the 737-700 has a MGTOW of 154,500 pounds (and the ZFW of the BBJ is 126,000 pounds versus 121,700 pounds in the 737-700). -Neal
_________________ Latitude Aviation Specializing in sales/acquisitions services for Bonanzas, Barons, and TBM's
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 12 Jan 2018, 15:24 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/16/10 Posts: 9041 Post Likes: +2084
|
|
Username Protected wrote: John, I was hoping that the  that I used would convey my sarcasm and "tongue in cheek" nature of my post. It wasn't serious at all Sorry, my bad....
_________________ Education cuts, don't heal.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 12 Jan 2018, 15:28 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/14/08 Posts: 42 Post Likes: +23
Aircraft: PIlatus PC-12/47
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Zero YD issues on legacies (Series 9/10) so far. Ditto here too.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 12 Jan 2018, 15:37 |
|
 |

|


|
 |
Joined: 06/25/08 Posts: 5792 Post Likes: +596 Company: Latitude Aviation Location: Los Angeles, CA (KTOA)
Aircraft: 2007 Bonanza G36
|
|
Username Protected wrote: John, I was hoping that the  that I used would convey my sarcasm and "tongue in cheek" nature of my post. It wasn't serious at all Sorry, my bad....
No worries! Next time I will use the green font - that was my fault! 
-Neal
_________________ Latitude Aviation Specializing in sales/acquisitions services for Bonanzas, Barons, and TBM's
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: The Ultimate Pilatus PC12 Thread! Posted: 12 Jan 2018, 16:11 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6061 Post Likes: +713 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
That's not what you were saying before, you hated the Honeywell and wonder why Pilatus didn't put a G1000 in or any jet that didn't have Garmin stuff will never sell in the future. Username Protected wrote: Curious, if available, would you guys upgrade to the G1000NXi for $400k and what do you think of the IS&S panel in the legacy airplanes? Hell no. I like the Honeywell. The boot-up procedure is just a little slow. Denali will have Garmin so Honeywell is going to need to up their game. The question is.... can they? I think avionics are the number 1 selling point on airplanes. But no.... I wouldn't spend a penny to rip out all the Honeywell. I don't even think about avionics anymore. All I need is a glide slope. The whole airplane is Honeywell.... It's not just the panel.
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|