banner
banner

16 Nov 2025, 08:51 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 3143 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163 ... 210  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 16 Feb 2022, 01:40 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/09/11
Posts: 2054
Post Likes: +2850
Company: Naples Jet Center
Location: KAPF KPIA
Aircraft: EMB500 AC95 AEST
Username Protected wrote:
As someone who is in the market for a very expensive to own and operate twin, I will throw in the outrageous insurance cost of the Aerostar.

My insurance rep quoted:
$5,300 for Baron NA
$5,800 for P Baron
$19k for Aerostar

My Aerostar search ended immediately following the phone call.


You need a new agent.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 16 Feb 2022, 08:09 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/05/19
Posts: 28
Post Likes: +11
Company: Bolt Financial Group
Location: KOSU
Aircraft: C-17, C310Q
All insurance rep referrals accepted. Please PM and I will reach out.

Hopefully, it isn't a case of "it's not you, it's me"

Aerostar search renewed. Giddy up...


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 16 Feb 2022, 08:49 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 02/05/15
Posts: 381
Post Likes: +104
Location: KSLC
Aircraft: Divorced: AC690A-10
Username Protected wrote:
All insurance rep referrals accepted. Please PM and I will reach out.

Hopefully, it isn't a case of "it's not you, it's me"

Aerostar search renewed. Giddy up...


Airpower. TJ has an ad here >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 16 Feb 2022, 09:38 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/23/18
Posts: 821
Post Likes: +1233
Aircraft: Aerostar
https://www.chappellsmith.com/aviation/ ... otorcraft/
:thumbup:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 16 Feb 2022, 10:11 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/09/14
Posts: 256
Post Likes: +115
Agreed. A $19K quote is not an Aerostar problem. That's an insurance agent problem.

Speaking of money, I'm not going to say anything to your wife, Josef, but you could have bought two tricked out 600s for what you have invested in Brand B. Did I mention eye-popping Brand B prices?

For a "typical" 600 equipped with A/C, color radar, known ice, and dual everything: 4,060 empty. 5,500 max. 165 useable. 200kts @ 30 GPH. Ted Smith was a genius.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 16 Feb 2022, 11:12 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/18/11
Posts: 1126
Post Likes: +659
Aircraft: Seabee Aerostar 700
Aerostar insurance is definitely going up especially if you are 75 or over as I found. I am paying about $7000 now for 1 million smooth 300K hull It really depends on your total time and twin time. I have been through two cycles on insurance, and we are in a more expensive time right now.

but get training by a good guy and use a broker experienced in insuring Aerostars and you should be able to get it. as your time in type grows it will come down.

also Insurance is not the most expensive part of owing a pressurized, turbocharged, deiced, high performance twin. get a quote for a duke or 421 and see what you are quoted.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 16 Feb 2022, 12:27 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/25/19
Posts: 235
Post Likes: +125
Aircraft: Aerostar 601P, AS350
maybe age helps me (30) but I originally bought a higher time 600, flew it with liability for a year and about 75hrs. Traded off the 600 for a 601P that needed some work, flew it for 75hrs as it was... I really like the 601P and put some real money into it, I ended up insuring it last year at 350K hull 1M smooth through london risk. Premium is $6400 and they require bi-annual training for me because of the pressurization. I only have about 250hrs of twin time. I do also have an AS350B3 insured with london risk as well so maybe that helped?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 16 Feb 2022, 13:06 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/05/11
Posts: 322
Post Likes: +233
Aircraft: 1978 Aerostar 700CR
You can't beat the bang for the buck you get out of a 600. 600's average 400lbs. to 700lbs. lighter than the "P" models and they handle like one that weighs 400lbs. to 700lbs. lighter. They are a joy to fly with pushrod torque tube response. Response is like right there right now. No delay... Nothing with two props handles like an Aerostar.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 16 Feb 2022, 13:39 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/25/16
Posts: 1982
Post Likes: +1589
Location: KSBD
Aircraft: C501
Username Protected wrote:
Love seeing another AEST in Canada.

How does one get the pitot tube cover off and on??


The efficacy of that cover and the methods for removing them have been hotly debated on the Aerostar forums. Lol.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 16 Feb 2022, 13:41 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/25/16
Posts: 1982
Post Likes: +1589
Location: KSBD
Aircraft: C501
Username Protected wrote:
Anyway, I miss canpass… long live the truckers.

Don't get me started. :sad:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 16 Feb 2022, 14:16 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/06/08
Posts: 5311
Post Likes: +3057
Aircraft: B55 P2
A man's got to know his own limitations....and his wife's. :D

We've been married for 35 years and she was happy for me to get a P2 Baron and who likes to go flying with me. Not gonna roll those dice again. :D




Username Protected wrote:
I saw that but there is almost no information in the add and its in Austrailia

Doesn't really matter - I bought my a baron a year ago and including purchase have >$300K in it. If I suggest getting another plane my wife will kill me, and any reasonable jury would view it as justifiable .


Motors and props (which just did on my baron) is a big chunk of change....

What is a typical useful load on a 600 aerostar?



I think you’re underestimating the value of your relationship. You are the PIC. Wives are smart and any reasonable wife knows you need two piston twins to almost guarantee dispatch. Problem solved.

If she really wants to go cross country, she knows, or will learn, it has to be pressurized and fast. Therefore, she will support the twins and the turbine step up. Hopefully at the same time as you have communicated the value of maximum uptime, right?

Just sayin.’ :cheers:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 16 Feb 2022, 15:06 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/05/11
Posts: 322
Post Likes: +233
Aircraft: 1978 Aerostar 700CR
Username Protected wrote:
This 600 might be just the ticket:

https://www.controller.com/listing/for- ... ston-twin- aircraft

I believe the it has the longer wings and it might already have the winglets.

It would be an adventure bringing it back, and it’s new owner would need to budget for motors and props, but kept fairly light (think 500# below mtow), a long wing 600 ought to do fine into and out of a 2,400’ field.

:thumbup:

Forrest


GW on a straight 600 without extensions = 5,500 lbs.
Useful Load = 1,500 lbs. +-

GW on a 600 with wing extensions = 5,700 lbs.
Useful Load = 1,700 lbs. +-

Add winglets and you increase takeoff and landing performance. Wing extensions and winglets are the biggest bang for the buck you can get. One time fixed cost with increase performance on every flight thereafter and no maintenance cost whatsoever.

Add six puck brakes and shorten landing distance even further.

Add auxiliary tank and you have almost eight hours of air time, or, well over 1,200 miles flying distance. Not bad for a fifty year old piston twin. Includes my wife and full luggage. I have 1,800 lbs. useful load.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 16 Feb 2022, 17:02 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/09/14
Posts: 256
Post Likes: +115
$24,300 for the wing extensions, Tom. And another $28,000 for the winglets.

I won't say that they don't look sharp. But in decades of ownership I've never had to scratch a flight because there was 200 more pounds on the ramp than I could stuff in the airplane.

Yes, you do get a boost in gas mileage / efficiency with winglets. But it would take several lifetimes and most of the eternal hereafter to get those things to pay off financially. I missed my big chance when we didn't grab a pair wingtips off a junked 601 and apply for a 337. Those days are long gone...


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 16 Feb 2022, 18:18 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/18/11
Posts: 1126
Post Likes: +659
Aircraft: Seabee Aerostar 700
I hear the biggest help from extensions and winglets is the increased performance hot and high 600's do not like going high.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 16 Feb 2022, 19:05 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/09/14
Posts: 256
Post Likes: +115
But that's the whole point of a 600. If you're going to routinely fly in the teens or low flight levels, get a P model. They come standard with the extended wings so it's half the cost to add winglets

I've had the 600 up to FL180 a few times. 17,500 to be exact since I use a canula. It's a useful capability on the homeward leg after a trip to the west coast. But being based in the northeast, I get along along just fine flying below FL120. And most of the time below FL100. If you want to fly higher all the time then go buy a pressurized Aerostar to begin with rather than cobbling the 600 into something it's not.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 3143 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163 ... 210  Next



Postflight (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.