16 Nov 2025, 08:51 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 16 Feb 2022, 01:40 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/09/11 Posts: 2054 Post Likes: +2850 Company: Naples Jet Center Location: KAPF KPIA
Aircraft: EMB500 AC95 AEST
|
|
Username Protected wrote: As someone who is in the market for a very expensive to own and operate twin, I will throw in the outrageous insurance cost of the Aerostar.
My insurance rep quoted: $5,300 for Baron NA $5,800 for P Baron $19k for Aerostar
My Aerostar search ended immediately following the phone call. You need a new agent.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 16 Feb 2022, 08:49 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 02/05/15 Posts: 381 Post Likes: +104 Location: KSLC
Aircraft: Divorced: AC690A-10
|
|
Username Protected wrote: All insurance rep referrals accepted. Please PM and I will reach out.
Hopefully, it isn't a case of "it's not you, it's me"
Aerostar search renewed. Giddy up... Airpower. TJ has an ad here >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 16 Feb 2022, 11:12 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/18/11 Posts: 1126 Post Likes: +659
Aircraft: Seabee Aerostar 700
|
|
|
Aerostar insurance is definitely going up especially if you are 75 or over as I found. I am paying about $7000 now for 1 million smooth 300K hull It really depends on your total time and twin time. I have been through two cycles on insurance, and we are in a more expensive time right now.
but get training by a good guy and use a broker experienced in insuring Aerostars and you should be able to get it. as your time in type grows it will come down.
also Insurance is not the most expensive part of owing a pressurized, turbocharged, deiced, high performance twin. get a quote for a duke or 421 and see what you are quoted.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 16 Feb 2022, 12:27 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/25/19 Posts: 235 Post Likes: +125
Aircraft: Aerostar 601P, AS350
|
|
|
maybe age helps me (30) but I originally bought a higher time 600, flew it with liability for a year and about 75hrs. Traded off the 600 for a 601P that needed some work, flew it for 75hrs as it was... I really like the 601P and put some real money into it, I ended up insuring it last year at 350K hull 1M smooth through london risk. Premium is $6400 and they require bi-annual training for me because of the pressurization. I only have about 250hrs of twin time. I do also have an AS350B3 insured with london risk as well so maybe that helped?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 16 Feb 2022, 13:06 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/05/11 Posts: 322 Post Likes: +233
Aircraft: 1978 Aerostar 700CR
|
|
|
You can't beat the bang for the buck you get out of a 600. 600's average 400lbs. to 700lbs. lighter than the "P" models and they handle like one that weighs 400lbs. to 700lbs. lighter. They are a joy to fly with pushrod torque tube response. Response is like right there right now. No delay... Nothing with two props handles like an Aerostar.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 16 Feb 2022, 13:39 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/25/16 Posts: 1982 Post Likes: +1589 Location: KSBD
Aircraft: C501
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Love seeing another AEST in Canada.
How does one get the pitot tube cover off and on?? The efficacy of that cover and the methods for removing them have been hotly debated on the Aerostar forums. Lol.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 16 Feb 2022, 13:41 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/25/16 Posts: 1982 Post Likes: +1589 Location: KSBD
Aircraft: C501
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Anyway, I miss canpass… long live the truckers. Don't get me started. 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 16 Feb 2022, 14:16 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/06/08 Posts: 5311 Post Likes: +3057
Aircraft: B55 P2
|
|
A man's got to know his own limitations....and his wife's. We've been married for 35 years and she was happy for me to get a P2 Baron and who likes to go flying with me. Not gonna roll those dice again. Username Protected wrote: I saw that but there is almost no information in the add and its in Austrailia
Doesn't really matter - I bought my a baron a year ago and including purchase have >$300K in it. If I suggest getting another plane my wife will kill me, and any reasonable jury would view it as justifiable .
Motors and props (which just did on my baron) is a big chunk of change....
What is a typical useful load on a 600 aerostar?
I think you’re underestimating the value of your relationship. You are the PIC. Wives are smart and any reasonable wife knows you need two piston twins to almost guarantee dispatch. Problem solved. If she really wants to go cross country, she knows, or will learn, it has to be pressurized and fast. Therefore, she will support the twins and the turbine step up. Hopefully at the same time as you have communicated the value of maximum uptime, right? Just sayin.’ 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 16 Feb 2022, 15:06 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/05/11 Posts: 322 Post Likes: +233
Aircraft: 1978 Aerostar 700CR
|
|
Username Protected wrote: This 600 might be just the ticket: https://www.controller.com/listing/for- ... ston-twin- aircraft I believe the it has the longer wings and it might already have the winglets. It would be an adventure bringing it back, and it’s new owner would need to budget for motors and props, but kept fairly light (think 500# below mtow), a long wing 600 ought to do fine into and out of a 2,400’ field. Forrest
GW on a straight 600 without extensions = 5,500 lbs. Useful Load = 1,500 lbs. +-
GW on a 600 with wing extensions = 5,700 lbs. Useful Load = 1,700 lbs. +-
Add winglets and you increase takeoff and landing performance. Wing extensions and winglets are the biggest bang for the buck you can get. One time fixed cost with increase performance on every flight thereafter and no maintenance cost whatsoever.
Add six puck brakes and shorten landing distance even further.
Add auxiliary tank and you have almost eight hours of air time, or, well over 1,200 miles flying distance. Not bad for a fifty year old piston twin. Includes my wife and full luggage. I have 1,800 lbs. useful load.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 16 Feb 2022, 18:18 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/18/11 Posts: 1126 Post Likes: +659
Aircraft: Seabee Aerostar 700
|
|
|
I hear the biggest help from extensions and winglets is the increased performance hot and high 600's do not like going high.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|