25 Dec 2025, 01:01 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aircraft inventory levels are critically low. Posted: 12 Mar 2025, 23:11 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8769 Post Likes: +11335 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: [quote="Chip McClure". What does the Mustang have to do with this convo? I don't think this comment will age well.[/quote] The Mustang would be considered a niche airplane under your definition . It had a low production on its own assembly line and doesn’t have a type rating that is usable on other Citations. The reason you call Piaggios “ niche” is you don’t know a lot about them and disparage anything you can’t make a buck on in my opinion.[/quote] What in the world are you talking about? The Mustang is a bit of a niche market, but it is a very sustainable fleet. Low production? They produced over 450 of them in 10 years! And it was replaced with the M2… and it’s a Citation. To compare the Mustang to the Piaggio is counterproductive, it’s making the Piaggio look bad. There’s a lot of other aircraft that you could have chosen. I have only said nice things and true things about the Piaggio, you’re just defensive. I disparage anything I can’t make a buck on? Where do you get that? First of all we don’t sell airplanes, so I don’t make a buck on anything. We get paid to buy airplanes for people, I buy what people want me to buy. We don’t do Piaggios because in ten years of business I have only had two prospective clients who wanted to buy one. I didn’t make the Piaggio a niche market, Avanti did that. It isn’t the airplane’s fault, it’s the company’s fault. They’ve been a train wreck since day one. I think a lot of it is where they are based. So, the Piaggio is 100% a niche airplane, it just is. That isn’t an insult, if you took it as one, I’m sorry.
_________________ I have the right to remain silent, I just seem to lack the ability.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aircraft inventory levels are critically low. Posted: 12 Mar 2025, 23:45 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/12/10 Posts: 591 Post Likes: +1082 Location: Dallas, Texas
Aircraft: Piaggio P180, T-6
|
|
Username Protected wrote: [quote="Chip McClure". What does the Mustang have to do with this convo? I don't think this comment will age well.
The Mustang would be considered a niche airplane under your definition . It had a low production on its own assembly line and doesn’t have a type rating that is usable on other Citations. The reason you call Piaggios “ niche” is you don’t know a lot about them and disparage anything you can’t make a buck on in my opinion.[/quote]
What in the world are you talking about?
The Mustang is a bit of a niche market, but it is a very sustainable fleet. Low production? They produced over 450 of them in 10 years! And it was replaced with the M2… and it’s a Citation.
To compare the Mustang to the Piaggio is counterproductive, it’s making the Piaggio look bad. There’s a lot of other aircraft that you could have chosen..[/quote]
I sold my Mustang for the Piaggio my friend.
Please tell me the areas of performance that the Mustang beats the Piaggio in o soothsayer…im all ears.
Speed? Nope. Range? Nope. Altitude capability? Nope. Cabin? Double Nope. Type rating requirements? Nope. Passenger comfort? Nope. Fuel economy? Same fuel flows but the Piaggio has 8 seats to the Mustangs 4 in back. Nope.
And don’t tell me about Textron vs Piaggio. Textron rapes people regularly for parts it absolutely insane. The last inspection I had (and no it wasn’t the 5 year one) was 65,000.
Whatever. We will just leave it at that.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aircraft inventory levels are critically low. Posted: 13 Mar 2025, 00:03 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8769 Post Likes: +11335 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I sold my Mustang for the Piaggio my friend.
Please tell me the areas of performance that the Mustang beats the Piaggio in o soothsayer…im all ears.
Speed? Nope. Range? Nope. Altitude capability? Nope. Cabin? Double Nope. Type rating requirements? Nope. Passenger comfort? Nope. Fuel economy? Same fuel flows but the Piaggio has 8 seats to the Mustangs 4 in back. Nope.
And don’t tell me about Textron vs Piaggio. Textron rapes people regularly for parts it absolutely insane. The last inspection I had (and no it wasn’t the 5 year one) was 65,000.
Whatever. We will just leave it at that.
Mark, I have no issue with the airplane or its capabilities. I never said the Mustang was a better airplane. If you want to argue about the capabilities of a Piaggio, you’ll have to find someone who doesn’t like it and pick a fight with them. Now, your inability to properly quote… we may have words over that.
_________________ I have the right to remain silent, I just seem to lack the ability.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aircraft inventory levels are critically low. Posted: 13 Mar 2025, 07:34 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/29/17 Posts: 1951 Post Likes: +4846 Location: Freedom NH
Aircraft: Club Archer
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I don't know why EV haters feel so threatened by them, but EVs are here to stay. I guess people these days define themselves more from what they are against than what they are for. It's not the EVs I hate. It's the government mandating the marketplace and telling me "you'll get an EV and like it or you'll have nothing" that I hate. I could live quite easily with one EV, and there's a good chance when our Volvo hybrid dies that I will, but there is zero chance I could for my pickup truck and how I use it and I don't want to.
_________________ “A vote is like a rifle: its usefulness depends upon the character of the user.” Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aircraft inventory levels are critically low. Posted: 13 Mar 2025, 16:38 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 10/06/17 Posts: 3209 Post Likes: +2703 Location: san diego
Aircraft: G35 / Acroduster
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It's not the EVs I hate. It's the government mandating the marketplace and telling me "you'll get an EV and like it or you'll have nothing" that I hate.
You should move to the Live Free or Die state. Oh, wait…. 
_________________ A&P / IA G-35
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aircraft inventory levels are critically low. Posted: 13 Mar 2025, 18:01 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 07/29/17 Posts: 1951 Post Likes: +4846 Location: Freedom NH
Aircraft: Club Archer
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It's not the EVs I hate. It's the government mandating the marketplace and telling me "you'll get an EV and like it or you'll have nothing" that I hate.
You should move to the Live Free or Die state. Oh, wait…. 
I’m still suffering a Maryland hangover
_________________ “A vote is like a rifle: its usefulness depends upon the character of the user.” Theodore Roosevelt
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aircraft inventory levels are critically low. Posted: 13 Mar 2025, 20:24 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/12/11 Posts: 4398 Post Likes: +2435 Company: RPM Aircraft Service Location: Gaithersburg MD KGAI
Aircraft: Mooney 201, A320
|
|
Username Protected wrote: We are considering an EV because we do live downtown and we do have charging stations in our building and we do take short trips around town almost every day.
I'm probably not getting a Rivian because of the price tag (this will be a third vehicle) so I'm guessing it will be a Tesla.
I wouldn't think of taking one on a long trip. We love the Tesla, but we rented one in Florida to drive to Kennedy from Orlando for a launch, that isn't very far, we almost missed our flight on the way back because we couldn't find a charging station on the way, went 15 minutes out of the way and all chargers were in use. We had to wait and then leave with just enough juice to get us back.
Jim is right, urban commuter, great! Road trip... nah. That Tesla must not have even been half charged when you left Orlando to go see the launch. You can’t just run it till E and then look for the next exit for a gas station like you do a gas car. But a car with 300 mile range and a 200 mile trip should be a no-brainer every day. If it was halfway charged up when you picked it up, a good strategy is supercharge it there or stop at someplace just outside of the airport and give it a 15 minute splash. Then you have the round-trip range to get back to the airport and not worry about it. It’s like forgetting to iron your uniform until 10 minutes before the van and then you find out the iron doesn’t work.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aircraft inventory levels are critically low. Posted: 13 Mar 2025, 22:17 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8769 Post Likes: +11335 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: We are considering an EV because we do live downtown and we do have charging stations in our building and we do take short trips around town almost every day.
I'm probably not getting a Rivian because of the price tag (this will be a third vehicle) so I'm guessing it will be a Tesla.
I wouldn't think of taking one on a long trip. We love the Tesla, but we rented one in Florida to drive to Kennedy from Orlando for a launch, that isn't very far, we almost missed our flight on the way back because we couldn't find a charging station on the way, went 15 minutes out of the way and all chargers were in use. We had to wait and then leave with just enough juice to get us back.
Jim is right, urban commuter, great! Road trip... nah. That Tesla must not have even been half charged when you left Orlando to go see the launch. You can’t just run it till E and then look for the next exit for a gas station like you do a gas car. But a car with 300 mile range and a 200 mile trip should be a no-brainer every day. If it was halfway charged up when you picked it up, a good strategy is supercharge it there or stop at someplace just outside of the airport and give it a 15 minute splash. Then you have the round-trip range to get back to the airport and not worry about it. It’s like forgetting to iron your uniform until 10 minutes before the van and then you find out the iron doesn’t work.
Thankfully I have never worn a uniform in my life.
I don't remember the charge level when we picked it up, my plan was to charge it while we were in Cocoa, to be clear we didn't go over and watch the launch and come back. We were there to see a friend launch and spent a couple of days hanging with her husband and some other friends. We were focused on friendship and cocktails not charging cars.
Did I mention this was a rental and I was not experienced in planning for such things. I think when you own one you figure out real quick how to keep from getting in a bind.
_________________ I have the right to remain silent, I just seem to lack the ability.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aircraft inventory levels are critically low. Posted: 13 Mar 2025, 22:53 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 20978 Post Likes: +26453 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Did I mention this was a rental and I was not experienced in planning for such things. I think when you own one you figure out real quick how to keep from getting in a bind. Hertz figured this out the hard way. In theory, a fleet of rental EVs makes sense. There are a lot of renters who won't drive 100 mikes total, like airport to a business meeting. My car rentals are almost always local airport to site and back, hardly can put a gallon in the car. So an EV given to them fully charged makes sense, then return it, hertz tops it off, then everybody is happy. But no, Hertz tried to treat EVs like gas cars and make renters return it charged or be dinged a huge penalty for not doing so. This had predictable results, angry renters who didn't know how to find or operate chargers, and they and got frustrated with the penalties, or renters who avoided the car altogether. So the EV rental program was a fiasco. It would have been a success if Hertz simply took them back at any charge level and they topped it off for the next customer, *and* they made it clear that the ideal renter is someone using for less than, say, 200 miles total. Then the EV would be awesome and a lot nicer than having to gas up a rental. But no, they tried to apply gas car thinking to EVs and that just doesn't work. They are losing more money on selling the cars than all the free charging they would have done otherwise. Penny wise, pound foolish. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aircraft inventory levels are critically low. Posted: 13 Mar 2025, 23:52 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/12/11 Posts: 4398 Post Likes: +2435 Company: RPM Aircraft Service Location: Gaithersburg MD KGAI
Aircraft: Mooney 201, A320
|
|
Username Protected wrote: [quote="Chip McClure"We are considering an EV because we do live downtown and we do have charging stations in our building and we do take short trips around town almost every day.
I'm probably not getting a Rivian because of the price tag (this will be a third vehicle) so I'm guessing it will be a Tesla.
I wouldn't think of taking one on a long trip. We love the Tesla, but we rented one in Florida to drive to Kennedy from Orlando for a launch, that isn't very far, we almost missed our flight on the way back because we couldn't find a charging station on the way, went 15 minutes out of the way and all chargers were in use. We had to wait and then leave with just enough juice to get us back.
Jim is right, urban commuter, great! Road trip... nah.[/quote That Tesla must not have even been half charged when you left Orlando to go see the launch. You can’t just run it till E and then look for the next exit for a gas station like you do a gas car. But a car with 300 mile range and a 200 mile trip should be a no-brainer every day. If it was halfway charged up when you picked it up, a good strategy is supercharge it there or stop at someplace just outside of the airport and give it a 15 minute splash. Then you have the round-trip range to get back to the airport and not worry about it. It’s like forgetting to iron your uniform until 10 minutes before the van and then you find out the iron doesn’t work. Thankfully I have never worn a uniform in my life. I don't remember the charge level when we picked it up, my plan was to charge it while we were in Cocoa, to be clear we didn't go over and watch the launch and come back. We were there to see a friend launch and spent a couple of days hanging with her husband and some other friends. We were focused on friendship and cocktails not charging cars. Did I mention this was a rental and I was not experienced in planning for such things. I think when you own one you figure out real quick how to keep from getting in a bind. It requires about 5% more thought than a gas car. I mean if you ran the gas car out of gas and you had to stop and get gas at airport exit at Orlando, you would find out that it was 8 dollars a gallon outside the airport gate from the two gas stations across from each other, and the nearest gas station was 15 minutes further away. In the case of a Tesla, 15 minutes of supercharger, would’ve given you 175 more miles of range and it would’ve been fine. But anyway, it’s not as easy as a gas car, but it ain’t hard either. If you put in the address of where you’re going, Tesla actually tells you where to stop and charge it and for how long. If anybody has this figured out, it’s Tesla. A Bolt you gotta figure that part out yourself too. What I figured out was the car is so much quieter and less stressful, You could drive an extra hour a day, and if you put that hour a day towards charging and driving the car, you can cover just about as many miles a day as a gasser, about 650 or 700. If you need 1000 that could be done too, in a car that can charge at 150 kW or better. Not a Bolt. The best use of a Bolt is driving around town and taking parking spaces that other cars can’t fit into which there are plenty.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aircraft inventory levels are critically low.un Posted: 14 Mar 2025, 11:06 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/20 Posts: 1723 Post Likes: +1779 Location: Tulsa, OK - KRVS
Aircraft: C501SP
|
|
Username Protected wrote: And yeah sorry I think EVs are…destined for the dustbin of history just like the were at the turn beginning of LAST century.not because they are bad cars….because they have bad infrastructure, and that’s not changing .. You do realize that EVs are the only true multi-fuel vehicle and that there are orders of magnitude more electrical outlets than there are gas stations? My car can run on hydro, nuclear, natural gas, coal, oil, you name it. As for the Avanti. I looked hard at them. They are better than a Citation in a lot of ways. My wife preferred the cabin and the optics of having a "propeller plane." Being local to IJS helped a lot. But there are still concerns about parts and the longevity of the company. Just now we are waiting to see if the new owners will continue to build and support the civilian version or if they will go purely military. I'm not at your level where I can afford to lose most of my investment if the company changes direction. Textron has its challenges but they are doing a great job supporting these old birds. Now when it comes to P&W not so much, but we're doing our best.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aircraft inventory levels are critically low. Posted: 14 Mar 2025, 14:21 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/11/22 Posts: 1242 Post Likes: +1673 Location: KOZW - Southeast Michigan
Aircraft: C24R
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I need to go to quoting school for sure .  See my post in babble talk: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=235380
_________________ “Remember, right-handed people commit 90% of all base rate errors.” - Randall Munroe
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|