banner
banner

04 Nov 2025, 20:51 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



Reply to topic  [ 285 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2021, 14:26 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8503
Post Likes: +11048
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
almost all TBM's are owner flown and....King Airs are much more often corporate aircraft
That's the crux of it, isn't it, the difference between spending your own money and spending corporate money. One group cares about value for the price, the other cares about the blame if something goes wrong. It's fine to save the company money, but if anything breaks during the life of the engine it'll be your fault, it'll be assumed it wouldn't have happened if you'd gone with the big name shop. Whereas, if you went with the highest price/big name option, then you did all you could and it must be just one of those things. Easy decision when you're spending someone else's money.


That really is it, the specific issue I brought up here was the inventorying dealers have an aversion to anything without a big name shop overhaul, same logic, those guys have bosses and banks to answer to, if they buy an airplane with Pratt overhauls and it doesn't sell for some reason, no one blames the engines. If it has a set of Prime overhauls on it the halls ring out with "You idiot! You shouldn't have bought that airplane and now we're stuck with it!"

Here's what it means to an owner, you buy a 2012 King Air 350i with 3300 hours from Textron Preowned, you fly it a few years and have X overhaul the engines, you go back to Textron to trade it in on a new 360 and they can't make the deal work because none of their dealers will bid it.
_________________
We ONLY represent buyers!


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2021, 14:28 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 01/07/13
Posts: 1209
Post Likes: +1201
Company: Tupelo Aero, Inc
Location: Pontotoc , MS (22M)
Aircraft: 1959 Twin Beech 18
You can get a steak at Waffle House(read awful house) or you can get a steak Ruth Chris ...They are the same but one only costs more :eek: :eek: :eek: :bugeye:

_________________
I shop at Lane Bryant....Because that’s where they sell “Big Girl Panties” !


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2021, 17:02 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 06/16/08
Posts: 3566
Post Likes: +264
Location: San Rafael, CA (KDVO)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36TC
Username Protected wrote:
You can get a steak at Waffle House(read awful house) or you can get a steak Ruth Chris ...They are the same but one only costs more :eek: :eek: :eek: :bugeye:


One uses a real steak
and the other is a PMA part !
:lol:

_________________
Past 12: IPC/BFR, Spins/Upset, WINGSx2, ASFx2


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2021, 17:07 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/05/09
Posts: 4462
Post Likes: +3353
Location: Raleigh, NC
Aircraft: L-39
I'm not so sure.

You shouldn't go to Waffle House for a steak. But the pecan waffle is fantastic.

_________________
"Find worthy causes in your life."


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2021, 18:10 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 11068
Post Likes: +7097
Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
Username Protected wrote:
I'm actually working on that right now to put on our website!

Great! That will tell me which shops to avoid that treated you so badly.

Mike C.


Exactly!!!

With all the mental capacity of the people in this thread you would think someone would figure out the 'emperor with no clothes'. In practically ever post it points directly to using a shop like Covington. Every other one, as Chip, Auburn, others state, you have to have someone manage the HSI or overhaul so that you don't get screwed, yet the brokers/dealers/maintenance shops explicitly state, that is the way it gets done here.

Very simple thing this. If you don't have to replace the part or it can be repaired to Pratt's tolerances then that is what should be done. Nothing more, nothing less. Those tolerances are very wide IMHO. These are Pratt's tolerances, not Dallas/Standard/Covington.

As for not buying a King Air because it has Covington overhauls vs Dallas/Standard that speaks to a willing participation of every broker/dealer/maintenance facility. They're screwing the buyer. I bet Dallas makes you sign an indemnification clause as part of their overhaul process.

That no one can see this is beyond logical comprehension. Call Paul Jones (the pratt expert) and he'll tell you that verbatim.
_________________
---Rusty Shoe Keeper---


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2021, 18:17 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/09
Posts: 14423
Post Likes: +9555
Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
I just hear a lot of arm chair psychologists speculating about market values and what other people *might* perceive... and no real data other than the one datapoint from Pennman where he was charged 6k for an engine in good shape that basically didn’t need anything. Surely more folks have gotten a hot section recently?

_________________
http://calipilot.com
atp/cfii


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2021, 19:44 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8503
Post Likes: +11048
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
It's all about reputation.

This is not unique to aviation.

The attorney that has been in business for decades charges more and has the reputation to justify it.

There are shops that charge $80 an hour and others charge $106

My Lexus cost more than the Toyota version of the same vehicle and cost a lot more than a Nissan, Hyundai or KIA... but less than a Mercedes even though it's probably a better vehicle.

It's all about a brand built over decades.

_________________
We ONLY represent buyers!


Last edited on 29 Jan 2021, 19:51, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2021, 19:50 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8503
Post Likes: +11048
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Because of all of these discussions I reached out to the guy I recommend to manage engine events, he said that both Dallas Airmotive and Covington refused to let him in the building because of Covid.

He has a blown up -64 at Dallas right now and they finally agreed to send him photos, no video, of the engine as they disassemble it.

Just wanted to advise, several of us have recommended you use an expert who is physically there watching the engine being torn down, but it sounds like that may not be possible right now.

_________________
We ONLY represent buyers!


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2021, 21:00 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/01/10
Posts: 3503
Post Likes: +2476
Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
Username Protected wrote:
It's all about reputation.

This is not unique to aviation.

The attorney that has been in business for decades charges more and has the reputation to justify it.

And sometimes the attorney that has been in business for decades has outlived his usefulness and is just relying on his reputation to carry him through, whereas the younger attorney that has spent only ten years or so sharpening his axe is on top of his game running circles around everyone else.

Sometimes those old businesses get lazy. I'm not saying that's the case here, but simply relying on a name is often unproven.

_________________
Previous A36TN owner


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2021, 21:06 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8503
Post Likes: +11048
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
It's all about reputation.

This is not unique to aviation.

The attorney that has been in business for decades charges more and has the reputation to justify it.

And sometimes the attorney that has been in business for decades has outlived his usefulness and is just relying on his reputation to carry him through, whereas the younger attorney that has spent only ten years or so sharpening his axe is on top of his game running circles around everyone else.

Sometimes those old businesses get lazy. I'm not saying that's the case here, but simply relying on a name is often unproven.


Very true... we start talking about your options with 610 overhauls and these guys will really think it’s a racket!

Funny, we’re talking about the PT6, one of the few Pratt engines that other shops can overhaul at all.
_________________
We ONLY represent buyers!


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2021, 21:11 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/01/10
Posts: 3503
Post Likes: +2476
Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
Username Protected wrote:
Very true... we start talking about your options with 610 overhauls and these guys will really think it’s a racket!

Funny, we’re talking about the PT6, one of the few Pratt engines that other shops can overhaul at all.

It is a racket, but at least brokers can't arbitrarily discount value because of where the work was done.

_________________
Previous A36TN owner


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2021, 21:23 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/09
Posts: 14423
Post Likes: +9555
Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
Username Protected wrote:
It's all about reputation.


I don't believe that you're paying 30k more for reputation, no way. If so, that's insane and I'm 100% with Pennman. Stupid.

I suspect there are differences in the work that's being performed. I'm told if I send the engine to Pratt, they're going to replace a bunch of stuff with new, and that those parts account for the vast majority of the cost difference. The reputation comes in because people know they do this, and assign a greater value to the plane that had all the new parts put in by Pratt.

_________________
http://calipilot.com
atp/cfii


Last edited on 29 Jan 2021, 21:29, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2021, 21:23 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8503
Post Likes: +11048
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
Very true... we start talking about your options with 610 overhauls and these guys will really think it’s a racket!

Funny, we’re talking about the PT6, one of the few Pratt engines that other shops can overhaul at all.

It is a racket, but at least brokers can't arbitrarily discount value because of where the work was done.


That keeps being said, but I never said they discount them, assuming a late model King Air, the inventory dealers I know, won’t buy them at all.

What would they gain by participating in this conspiracy?

At this point are we talking about the big 3 vs Covington or are we talking about the DOF shops vs non DOF shops?
_________________
We ONLY represent buyers!


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2021, 21:25 
Offline



 WWW  Profile




Joined: 05/23/13
Posts: 8503
Post Likes: +11048
Company: Jet Acquisitions
Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
Username Protected wrote:
It's all about reputation.


I don't believe that you're paying 30k more for reputation, no way. If so, that's insane and I'm 100% with Pennman. Stupid.

I suspect there are differences in the work that's being performed. I'm told if I send the engine to Pratt, they're going to replace a bunch of stuff with new, and that those parts account for the vast majority of the cost difference.


Hot Section or Overhaul?
_________________
We ONLY represent buyers!


Top

 Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12
PostPosted: 29 Jan 2021, 21:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/30/15
Posts: 1815
Post Likes: +1902
Location: Charlotte
Aircraft: Avanti-Citabria
my PT6A-66B's pushed me to 390 knotz true today

Hot sections, vibration analysis...at Covington's...thanks Mike!

My engines are at 2600 hours...I certainly understand I could spent a cool mil on them in next 3 months to 15 years....not the plan though....fly...fly..fly

Lord willing in 12-15 years when I LOOSE insurance and/or my marbles I will sell for 150 grand and celebrate being worn out in old folkz home

_________________
I wanna go phastR.....and slowR


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 285 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next



Postflight (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.BT Ad.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.camguard.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.