04 Nov 2025, 20:51 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 29 Jan 2021, 14:26 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8503 Post Likes: +11048 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: almost all TBM's are owner flown and....King Airs are much more often corporate aircraft That's the crux of it, isn't it, the difference between spending your own money and spending corporate money. One group cares about value for the price, the other cares about the blame if something goes wrong. It's fine to save the company money, but if anything breaks during the life of the engine it'll be your fault, it'll be assumed it wouldn't have happened if you'd gone with the big name shop. Whereas, if you went with the highest price/big name option, then you did all you could and it must be just one of those things. Easy decision when you're spending someone else's money.
That really is it, the specific issue I brought up here was the inventorying dealers have an aversion to anything without a big name shop overhaul, same logic, those guys have bosses and banks to answer to, if they buy an airplane with Pratt overhauls and it doesn't sell for some reason, no one blames the engines. If it has a set of Prime overhauls on it the halls ring out with "You idiot! You shouldn't have bought that airplane and now we're stuck with it!"
Here's what it means to an owner, you buy a 2012 King Air 350i with 3300 hours from Textron Preowned, you fly it a few years and have X overhaul the engines, you go back to Textron to trade it in on a new 360 and they can't make the deal work because none of their dealers will bid it.
_________________ We ONLY represent buyers!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 29 Jan 2021, 17:02 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 06/16/08 Posts: 3566 Post Likes: +264 Location: San Rafael, CA (KDVO)
Aircraft: 1979 Bonanza A36TC
|
|
Username Protected wrote: One uses a real steak and the other is a PMA part ! 
_________________ Past 12: IPC/BFR, Spins/Upset, WINGSx2, ASFx2
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 29 Jan 2021, 18:10 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11068 Post Likes: +7097 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I'm actually working on that right now to put on our website! Great! That will tell me which shops to avoid that treated you so badly. Mike C.
Exactly!!!
With all the mental capacity of the people in this thread you would think someone would figure out the 'emperor with no clothes'. In practically ever post it points directly to using a shop like Covington. Every other one, as Chip, Auburn, others state, you have to have someone manage the HSI or overhaul so that you don't get screwed, yet the brokers/dealers/maintenance shops explicitly state, that is the way it gets done here.
Very simple thing this. If you don't have to replace the part or it can be repaired to Pratt's tolerances then that is what should be done. Nothing more, nothing less. Those tolerances are very wide IMHO. These are Pratt's tolerances, not Dallas/Standard/Covington.
As for not buying a King Air because it has Covington overhauls vs Dallas/Standard that speaks to a willing participation of every broker/dealer/maintenance facility. They're screwing the buyer. I bet Dallas makes you sign an indemnification clause as part of their overhaul process.
That no one can see this is beyond logical comprehension. Call Paul Jones (the pratt expert) and he'll tell you that verbatim.
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 29 Jan 2021, 21:00 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/01/10 Posts: 3503 Post Likes: +2476 Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It's all about reputation.
This is not unique to aviation.
The attorney that has been in business for decades charges more and has the reputation to justify it.
And sometimes the attorney that has been in business for decades has outlived his usefulness and is just relying on his reputation to carry him through, whereas the younger attorney that has spent only ten years or so sharpening his axe is on top of his game running circles around everyone else. Sometimes those old businesses get lazy. I'm not saying that's the case here, but simply relying on a name is often unproven.
_________________ Previous A36TN owner
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 29 Jan 2021, 21:06 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8503 Post Likes: +11048 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It's all about reputation.
This is not unique to aviation.
The attorney that has been in business for decades charges more and has the reputation to justify it.
And sometimes the attorney that has been in business for decades has outlived his usefulness and is just relying on his reputation to carry him through, whereas the younger attorney that has spent only ten years or so sharpening his axe is on top of his game running circles around everyone else. Sometimes those old businesses get lazy. I'm not saying that's the case here, but simply relying on a name is often unproven.
Very true... we start talking about your options with 610 overhauls and these guys will really think it’s a racket!
Funny, we’re talking about the PT6, one of the few Pratt engines that other shops can overhaul at all.
_________________ We ONLY represent buyers!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 29 Jan 2021, 21:11 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/01/10 Posts: 3503 Post Likes: +2476 Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Aircraft: Citation Mustang
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Very true... we start talking about your options with 610 overhauls and these guys will really think it’s a racket!
Funny, we’re talking about the PT6, one of the few Pratt engines that other shops can overhaul at all. It is a racket, but at least brokers can't arbitrarily discount value because of where the work was done.
_________________ Previous A36TN owner
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 29 Jan 2021, 21:23 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 06/28/09 Posts: 14423 Post Likes: +9555 Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It's all about reputation. I don't believe that you're paying 30k more for reputation, no way. If so, that's insane and I'm 100% with Pennman. Stupid. I suspect there are differences in the work that's being performed. I'm told if I send the engine to Pratt, they're going to replace a bunch of stuff with new, and that those parts account for the vast majority of the cost difference. The reputation comes in because people know they do this, and assign a greater value to the plane that had all the new parts put in by Pratt.
_________________ http://calipilot.com atp/cfii
Last edited on 29 Jan 2021, 21:29, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 29 Jan 2021, 21:23 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8503 Post Likes: +11048 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Very true... we start talking about your options with 610 overhauls and these guys will really think it’s a racket!
Funny, we’re talking about the PT6, one of the few Pratt engines that other shops can overhaul at all. It is a racket, but at least brokers can't arbitrarily discount value because of where the work was done.
That keeps being said, but I never said they discount them, assuming a late model King Air, the inventory dealers I know, won’t buy them at all.
What would they gain by participating in this conspiracy?
At this point are we talking about the big 3 vs Covington or are we talking about the DOF shops vs non DOF shops?
_________________ We ONLY represent buyers!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: New M600 vs used TBM/PC12 Posted: 29 Jan 2021, 21:25 |
|
 |

|

|
Joined: 05/23/13 Posts: 8503 Post Likes: +11048 Company: Jet Acquisitions Location: Franklin, TN 615-739-9091 chip@jetacq.com
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It's all about reputation. I don't believe that you're paying 30k more for reputation, no way. If so, that's insane and I'm 100% with Pennman. Stupid. I suspect there are differences in the work that's being performed. I'm told if I send the engine to Pratt, they're going to replace a bunch of stuff with new, and that those parts account for the vast majority of the cost difference.
Hot Section or Overhaul?
_________________ We ONLY represent buyers!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|