15 Nov 2025, 06:25 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper announces the new M600 and improvements to the M35 Posted: 07 Aug 2016, 16:01 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12191 Post Likes: +3075 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Not sure how you would know this Marc without knowing the weight of the people or distance of the trip to see if it can be done. Because, it is a P46 and Marc does not like them.  Tim (could not resist)
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper announces the new M600 and improvements to the M35 Posted: 07 Aug 2016, 18:09 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 03/12/11 Posts: 117 Post Likes: +32 Location: Kentfield, CA (KDVO)
Aircraft: PA46 Mirage
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So far I really like it. No SVT but those GTN's add a lot to the setup. I like the chart view (CMAX) on the MFD and, to me, the MFD looks huge. I had a GTN650 in my Bo so I was used to them and really, really like them. V5 of the software is better with user defined holds. Not like I use that much though.  I think with a Flight Stream 210 you could get Syn Vis on either Garmin Pilot or Foreflight, and put an iPad mini on the yoke. And now the same Jepp charts on the EX5000 MFD are available and geo-referenced on Garmin Pilot.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper announces the new M600 and improvements to the M35 Posted: 07 Aug 2016, 19:23 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6062 Post Likes: +715 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
Adam said 4 ppl plus bags and full fuel. He didnt talk about distance. Hom much payload you have with full fuel in the M600 ? Username Protected wrote: Also wondering about 4 ppl plus bags. Yesterday in the Baron we had 4 people, two suitcases, 3 boogie boards, 3 beach chairs, and numerous small bags and backpacks. Full fuel and 250 lbs under max gross. How does that work in the Meridian or m350.?
[/quote] Not sure how you would know this Marc without knowing the weight of the people or distance of the trip to see if it can be done.[/quote]
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper announces the new M600 and improvements to the M35 Posted: 07 Aug 2016, 19:57 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/14/09 Posts: 825 Post Likes: +313 Location: Boise, ID
Aircraft: 06 Meridian, C180
|
|
Username Protected wrote: So far I really like it. No SVT but those GTN's add a lot to the setup. I like the chart view (CMAX) on the MFD and, to me, the MFD looks huge. I had a GTN650 in my Bo so I was used to them and really, really like them. V5 of the software is better with user defined holds. Not like I use that much though.  I think with a Flight Stream 210 you could get Syn Vis on either Garmin Pilot or Foreflight, and put an iPad mini on the yoke. And now the same Jepp charts on the EX5000 MFD are available and geo-referenced on Garmin Pilot.
I actually have Flightstream 210 in the plane. I also have Foreflight. I'll have to check it out.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper announces the new M600 and improvements to the M35 Posted: 07 Aug 2016, 20:03 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/14/09 Posts: 825 Post Likes: +313 Location: Boise, ID
Aircraft: 06 Meridian, C180
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Distance for this trip was 400 NM, call it 450 with IFR routing. I agree TBM is an ideal personal aircraft. Greg's talking about 890k though in a plane less than 10 years old. What does that get you in a TBM? I could take 4 adults with baggage on a trip like this easily in the Meridian. My plane cost $50k more than $890k but still, for a plane that you maintain like a Bonanza (no phase inspections), burns 40 GPH, and flies at the same altitude and slightly slower than a TBM, it is a wonderful entry level SETP. No, it won't haul what a TBM will but I could almost buy 2 Meridians for the price and operating costs of a same year TBM. Flame away.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper announces the new M600 and improvements to the M35 Posted: 07 Aug 2016, 20:12 |
|
 |

|

|
 |
Joined: 06/28/09 Posts: 14424 Post Likes: +9556 Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I could take 4 adults with baggage on a trip like this easily in the Meridian. My plane cost $50k more than $890k but still, for a plane that you maintain like a Bonanza (no phase inspections), burns 40 GPH, and flies at the same altitude and slightly slower than a TBM, it is a wonderful entry level SETP. No, it won't haul what a TBM will but I could almost buy 2 Meridians for the price and operating costs of a same year TBM. Flame away. How would the loading work? Would you put the luggage, boogie boards and bags on the rear most two seats and then passenger 3 and 4 sit facing backwards and passenger 2 up front? Could you do it with four 200 lb guys?
_________________ http://calipilot.com atp/cfii
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper announces the new M600 and improvements to the M35 Posted: 07 Aug 2016, 20:28 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/14/09 Posts: 825 Post Likes: +313 Location: Boise, ID
Aircraft: 06 Meridian, C180
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I could take 4 adults with baggage on a trip like this easily in the Meridian. My plane cost $50k more than $890k but still, for a plane that you maintain like a Bonanza (no phase inspections), burns 40 GPH, and flies at the same altitude and slightly slower than a TBM, it is a wonderful entry level SETP. No, it won't haul what a TBM will but I could almost buy 2 Meridians for the price and operating costs of a same year TBM. Flame away. How would the loading work? Would you put the luggage, boogie boards and bags on the rear most two seats and then passenger 3 and 4 sit facing backwards and passenger 2 up front? Could you do it with four 200 lb guys? There is a niced sized baggage area behind the last row of seats. You can put 100 pounds there. I would put one passage aft behind the co-pilot and one forward facing in the rear on the pilot side by the entry door. This would give them lots of leg room. Boogie boards would fit on the floor between the between the aft facing seats and the back bench seats. I would need 115 gallons or so of fuel for the trip and reserves for a 450 mile trip. Four fat guys like that would put me right at max gross, before bags. You'd each have to lose about 25 pounds.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper announces the new M600 and improvements to the M35 Posted: 07 Aug 2016, 21:26 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 05/23/08 Posts: 6062 Post Likes: +715 Location: CMB7, Ottawa, Canada
Aircraft: TBM - C185 - T206
|
|
Probably a 2000-2002 TBM 700B model for around $1m. Nothing wrong with a Meridian if you know its limitation. On a 1000 nm trip, a TBM 850 will take less fuel than a Meridian to do the trip and you will get there 2 hours faster. Username Protected wrote: Distance for this trip was 400 NM, call it 450 with IFR routing. I agree TBM is an ideal personal aircraft. Greg's talking about 890k though in a plane less than 10 years old. What does that get you in a TBM?
_________________ Former Baron 58 owner. Pistons engines are for tractors.
Marc Bourdon
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper announces the new M600 and improvements to the M35 Posted: 07 Aug 2016, 21:57 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/14/09 Posts: 825 Post Likes: +313 Location: Boise, ID
Aircraft: 06 Meridian, C180
|
|
|
I call BS Marc. You burn 65 gallons an hour at max cruise. I burn 40. At 262 kts and 40 GPH that is 6.5 MPG. Your 320 kts (maybe) and 65 gallons per hour. That is 4.9 MPG. You think you'll get there in less fuel and 2 hour saving? Do the math. The fuel stop won't eat the time and fuel you are implying here. I also said price compare TBM with a same year Meridian, in this case a 2006. You might be lucky to get a 2006 TBM850 for $1.6M, almost $700k more than my Meridian, and that is acquisition cost only. No one disputes the TBM has longer legs. But you pay dearly for that in acquisition cost, operating cost, and maintenance costs. Try your math on an 800 mile trip and see what you come up with. I sure didn't want to pay $700k more for 1000NM trips that I never take and, even if I did, I wouldn't mind a stop every 3 hours so the Meridian is perfect for me. Your butt would be in your seat for almost 4 hours to do 1000+NM.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Piper announces the new M600 and improvements to the M35 Posted: 07 Aug 2016, 22:28 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/20/09 Posts: 2660 Post Likes: +2234 Company: Jcrane, Inc. Location: KVES Greenville, OH
Aircraft: C441, RV7A
|
|
Username Protected wrote: On a 1000 nm trip, a TBM 850 will take less fuel than a Meridian to do the trip and you will get there 2 hours faster. Two hours is a pretty big margin in 1000 nm...  Speed difference is mere minutes...fuel stop is less than an hour.
_________________ Jack N441M N107XX
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|