15 Nov 2025, 06:03 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 21 Jan 2021, 22:18 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/23/18 Posts: 821 Post Likes: +1233
Aircraft: Aerostar
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It’s the little things. Normally I run as hard as I can LOP, limited by TIT. My plugs (fine wire) are clean and my turbos are in good shape so I was running 29” (better bleed heat) x 2300 @ 14gph /side. 14 x 14.7 = 205.8 / 300 = 68.6% The JPI said I was getting better than 12nm/gal so I was loving life. 14gph x 2 x 12mpg = 336 kts. That’s one smoking A*. Or if you are talking about only one engine that’s 168 kts... one really slow A*... something seems amiss here? I typically see 7-8mpg with mine.
Well...
I did have a little tailwind on those legs.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 21 Jan 2021, 22:35 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/09/11 Posts: 2054 Post Likes: +2849 Company: Naples Jet Center Location: KAPF KPIA
Aircraft: EMB500 AC95 AEST
|
|
Username Protected wrote: It’s the little things. Normally I run as hard as I can LOP, limited by TIT. My plugs (fine wire) are clean and my turbos are in good shape so I was running 29” (better bleed heat) x 2300 @ 14gph /side. 14 x 14.7 = 205.8 / 300 = 68.6% The JPI said I was getting better than 12nm/gal so I was loving life. 14gph x 2 x 12mpg = 336 kts. That’s one smoking A*. Or if you are talking about only one engine that’s 168 kts... one really slow A*... something seems amiss here? I typically see 7-8mpg with mine.
You just just missed the “145 knot push.”
Nothing like the above but I finally got a little push this week and made a 4:00 leg, 1000 Knots. No engine monitor so I can’t do what Forrest does.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 25 Jan 2021, 10:03 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/06/10 Posts: 12191 Post Likes: +3075 Company: Looking Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Years ago I attended Aerostar maintenance school in Lock Haven. They stressed the gear should only be extended in straight and level flight due to side loads that could be imposed on the gear leg doors. We have seen many cracked doors so perhaps they were correct. I was taught it must be extended in coordinated flight; which straight and level is the easiest to guarantee you are perfectly coordinated. BWTHDIK Tim
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 25 Jan 2021, 11:19 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 405 Post Likes: +359 Location: Everson, WA
|
|
Rescue flight last week to KBKE. Flew high to catch the tailwinds on the way there,sipping fuel, then low at high throttle to avoid the headwinds on the way home. Love that flexibility. Fostering mom & 9 pups, all doing great. Attachment: KBKE.jpg Attachment: pnp.jpg Attachment: Cascades.jpg
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 25 Jan 2021, 12:55 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/25/16 Posts: 1982 Post Likes: +1589 Location: KSBD
Aircraft: C501
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Nothing like the above but I finally got a little push this week and made a 4:00 leg, 1000 Knots. No engine monitor so I can’t do what Forrest does. 1000mn with no aux tank? You're doing just fine. 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 27 Jan 2021, 22:17 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/09/11 Posts: 2054 Post Likes: +2849 Company: Naples Jet Center Location: KAPF KPIA
Aircraft: EMB500 AC95 AEST
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Nothing like the above but I finally got a little push this week and made a 4:00 leg, 1000 Knots. No engine monitor so I can’t do what Forrest does. 1000mn with no aux tank? You're doing just fine. 
I’d like to do 1000 into a headwind - 5 hours plus reserve. That’s only happening with an aux tank.
Really the plane is fantastic. A couple finishing touches like a G600TXi with EIS, aux tank, STec 3100, 750xi, and maybe a high end interior to match the paint and I’ll have it perfected
How’s yours?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 27 Jan 2021, 23:26 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/23/18 Posts: 821 Post Likes: +1233
Aircraft: Aerostar
|
|
I’d like to do 1000 into a headwind - 5 hours plus reserve. That’s only happening with an aux tank. Really the plane is fantastic. A couple finishing touches like a G600TXi with EIS, aux tank, STec 3100, 750xi, and maybe a high end interior to match the paint and I’ll have it perfected How’s yours?[/quote] Bruce, A Bridges cap or one of the modern equivalent(s) plus a slam full on the wings, will give you 5+ reserve. Aux tanks are for 700s. Just saying.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 27 Jan 2021, 23:43 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 11/25/19 Posts: 235 Post Likes: +125
Aircraft: Aerostar 601P, AS350
|
|
|
Redoing the panel in my Aerostar, getting closer to being finished. Replaced all the plastics and overhauled steam gauges. Put a new vacuum AI on copilots side since the vacuum system isn’t going anywhere thanks to deice boots.
Removed 72lbs of crap, installed 750/650xi, dual GI-275s, GTX345 and GMA350C.
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 28 Jan 2021, 00:28 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 08/09/11 Posts: 2054 Post Likes: +2849 Company: Naples Jet Center Location: KAPF KPIA
Aircraft: EMB500 AC95 AEST
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I’d like to do 1000 into a headwind - 5 hours plus reserve. That’s only happening with an aux tank. Really the plane is fantastic. A couple finishing touches like a G600TXi with EIS, aux tank, STec 3100, 750xi, and maybe a high end interior to match the paint and I’ll have it perfected How’s yours? Bruce, A Bridges cap or one of the modern equivalent(s) plus a slam full on the wings, will give you 5+ reserve. Aux tanks are for 700s. Just saying.[/quote] Ha - that was fast Forrest.  I don’t think my cap’s internally machined face works for the latest Parker version and so am looking for one of those other overfill caps. Have asked Jimmy Mullen. Not sure where else to look for one. Which one do you have? I always push up on wings to fill if I need the range. Agreed it seems to hold more like the original spec of what, 175 gallons?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 28 Jan 2021, 04:36 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 12/17/13 Posts: 6652 Post Likes: +5963 Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Ha - that was fast Forrest.  I don’t think my cap’s internally machined face works for the latest Parker version and so am looking for one of those other overfill caps. Have asked Jimmy Mullen. Not sure where else to look for one. Which one do you have? I always push up on wings to fill if I need the range. Agreed it seems to hold more like the original spec of what, 175 gallons? Before the Aux tank STC, there was a top-of-the-tank mod. It was named after the guy who made/invented it. The STC has been rescinded or expired somehow, so can no longer be put in. I can't remember how many gallons it added. But if you had that, and the STC'd Aux tank, you could do like 2000nm in the 601P, easy.
_________________ Without love, where would you be now?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 28 Jan 2021, 08:35 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/23/18 Posts: 821 Post Likes: +1233
Aircraft: Aerostar
|
|
Long follow-up answer to my previous comment. Here is the deal with extra fuel on the Aerostar: 1. Usable fuel is 165.5 used to be more, with the correct rocking (right wing, fuselage tank, left wing, right wing) another 9.5 gallons is possible. BUT legal usable fuel is 165.5. 2. Bill Bridges of the Flight Shop in Brigham City, UT developed a cap for the fuselage tank that allowed another 20 gallons to be added bringing total fuel to 185 gallons, not counting whatever extra can be squeezed into the wings. Using the cap required a FAA field approval, which was no big deal to obtain until someone at the FAA thought about the additional 120# in the fuselage tank that had not been part of the certification process. Existing field approvals were not withdrawn but no new approvals and no transfer to unapproved airplanes was allowed. Installing a Bridges cap required removing the restrictor ring in the neck of the fuel fill. These caps do show up on the used market when planes are scrapped or an aux tank is installed, they are not legal to install without a field approval for that specific airplane. Some years back, an AOA member who owned a machine shop in South America did a run of 20(?) caps that were similar to the Bridges cap in that they allowed an additional 20 gallons to be added to the fuselage tank. I believe, installing the new style caps did not require removal of the restrictor ring, and that the FAA was not involved in the new style over-fill caps. 3. AAC developed an aux tank that goes behind the existing fuselage tank that brings fuel capacity to 210 gallons. It works by feeding fuel into the fuselage tank. Drawbacks to the aux tank are that it takes up space in the baggage compartment and it has to be removed to service the autopilot servos. The AAC tank system is well designed with two pumps for redundancy. Pilots who have the aux tank can pump 20 gallons into the fuselage tank before topping off the aux tank, putting 230 gallons aboard. (Fill fuselage tank, put 20 gallons in the aux, turn on electric aux tank pump(s), when transfer stops, top off aux). 4. Factory Piper 700s have a different aux tank, (maybe it was a Nyack), my memory is that it isn’t as big as the AAC tank, and takes up less room in the baggage compartment. 5. Putting extra fuel in the fuselage tank has a practical challenge; IF you go beyond 20 gallons, due to the design of the tank vent system, you will start a syphon that will dump a couple gallons out the tank vent in the belly, it’s a good practice to keep a bucket handy for the times this will happen. 6. This post was intended to provide some history and background on the options Aerostar owners have (had) to add extra fuel capacity to their airplanes. Be safe. Follow the rules. Don’t be a jerk. 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 28 Jan 2021, 09:39 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/25/16 Posts: 1982 Post Likes: +1589 Location: KSBD
Aircraft: C501
|
|
Username Protected wrote: A couple finishing touches like a G600TXi with EIS, aux tank, STec 3100, 750xi, and maybe a high end interior to match the paint and I’ll have it perfected Right. Just the basics. 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Aerostars Posted: 28 Jan 2021, 09:41 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/25/16 Posts: 1982 Post Likes: +1589 Location: KSBD
Aircraft: C501
|
|
Username Protected wrote: How’s yours? My Aerostar? Oh, we don't talk about that. 
Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025
|
|
|
|