banner
banner

14 Dec 2025, 11:52 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 268 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2014, 00:48 
Offline



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/13/07
Posts: 20650
Post Likes: +10805
Location: Seeley Lake, MT (23S)
Aircraft: 1964 Bonanza S35
Username Protected wrote:
Airspace designations alone are more than most people are willing to keep up with. How many different kinds do we have now? 15, 20, 25?


Five.


Quote:
If you live near or in a big city (and most of us do) you are going to have to deal with Class B, or fly ridiculously circuitous routes to get in and out. To a regular flyer these complications are background, a part of the challenge that makes flying interesting. But for most people it's simply too much.


Class B has pretty much the same rules as TCA's did 25 years ago. Same size too.

_________________
Want to go here?:
https://tinyurl.com/FlyMT1

tinyurl.com/35som8p


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2014, 09:07 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/18/11
Posts: 7664
Post Likes: +3697
Location: Lakeland , Ga
Aircraft: H35, T-41B, Aircoupe
Username Protected wrote:
Boy, this thread sounds like the history of the Roman empire, Oh sorry I mean the American Empire. Centralize the masses, that works :thumbup: Overregulation and too many lawyers. That is great. :sad: Dull the masses with FB, instagram, twitter. :crazy:

"Hey guys remember when we used to fly airplanes." You did what? Why?

"Yeah, now we just pretend to fly them on the computer until the computer quits, then we hit CTRL-ALT-Delete and it is all good."

I am a thirty something pilot and I can not believe how the world has changed.

Please remember not all change is good.

BTW great thread. It was getting dull around here.


When I was learning to fly in the 60s in Colorado. there were still a couple of low frequency range stations active. We would tune them in on the T-34s coffee grinder radio
and try to keep a steady tone in the helmet.
They were state of the art before the miracle of VOR. Both the Germans and British did some very accurate bombing (if you considered hitting a zip code to be accurate). Using LFRR.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2014, 09:40 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/22/10
Posts: 1147
Post Likes: +350
Company: Stanford University
Location: Brentwood, CA - C83
Aircraft: RV12, RV10
Username Protected wrote:

That's not GA. Times change Todd. Been changing since the beginning of time.

Nobody lives in the country anymore. You're the oldest young guy I know. Live in the now man.


Define "country". I live in an agricultural area, you would likely call it rural, or country, and fly into "city folk" areas each day. I get to make bank off the city slickers and then go have dinner with my family in an area where I don't have to worry about whether my home security system is on or not.

I'm doing my part to stimulate the economy and increase GA operations at my little, yet very cool, small town airport.

_________________
DISCLAIMER: I'm just a jaded engineer and my advice is worth exactly what you're paying for it...


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2014, 10:36 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/05/11
Posts: 10310
Post Likes: +7389
Company: Hausch LLC, rep. Power/mation
Location: Milwaukee, WI (KMKE)
Aircraft: 1963 Debonair B33
Is there any way to search twins by engine type?

If the prices really have gotten down to "scrap" value, could one buy twins that have the same engine as some popular singles and make any money?

Heck, maybe just pickle and store the engines and use them on your own ship as needed. Disassemble and sell the rest of the airplane. Maybe keep some old avionics to use as needed, too. Sort of like having a "parts car".

If you have the space, does it make any sense?

Also, back to the engine type, maybe it's not a big deal to change between some designations... I don't really know...

_________________
Be Nice


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2014, 10:38 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/26/10
Posts: 4296
Post Likes: +197
Location: West Palm Beach, FL (KLNA)
Aircraft: 1979 Duke B60
Username Protected wrote:
Is there any way to search twins by engine type?

If the prices really have gotten down to "scrap" value, could one buy twins that have the same engine as some popular singles and make any money?

Heck, maybe just pickle and store the engines and use them on your own ship as needed. Disassemble and sell the rest of the airplane. Maybe keep some old avionics to use as needed, too. Sort of like having a "parts car".

If you have the space, does it make any sense?

Also, back to the engine type, maybe it's not a big deal to change between some designations... I don't really know...


If you can store it on the cheap, it's very viable.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2014, 10:57 
Offline



User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/05/11
Posts: 10310
Post Likes: +7389
Company: Hausch LLC, rep. Power/mation
Location: Milwaukee, WI (KMKE)
Aircraft: 1963 Debonair B33
Username Protected wrote:
If you can store it on the cheap, it's very viable.


I would think the smart thing to do would be to get it in pieces ASAP. Engines and Avionics store "easy".

Get the airframe, gear, etc stripped and sold quickly or scrap it out. Storing wings, control surfaces, gear, etc may or may not be practical depending upon the space one has available. After all, if the twin market is crashing, I'd guess the spare parts market ain't doing much better.

_________________
Be Nice


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2014, 11:26 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 03/10/11
Posts: 2052
Post Likes: +715
Location: Allen, TX (based T31)
Aircraft: BE35,CE 500/650/750
Username Protected wrote:
Why types of A/C is it packed with? C172s, SE Pipers, Bo's?

Or Citations, C421Cs, Gulfstreams, and others that are business tools?

What difference does it make? All GA.


Objection your honor. The witness did not answer the question.
_________________
Paul Sergeant, ATP/CFI etc, Bonanza pilot.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2014, 11:27 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13086
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:

Define "country". I live in an agricultural area, you would likely call it rural, or country, and fly into "city folk" areas each day. I get to make bank off the city slickers and then go have dinner with my family in an area where I don't have to worry about whether my home security system is on or not.

I'm doing my part to stimulate the economy and increase GA operations at my little, yet very cool, small town airport.

Check out where my home airport is. I'm a farmer.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2014, 11:28 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13086
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:

Objection your honor. The witness did not answer the question.

It was mostly turbines. But all buying gas from an FBO.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2014, 12:48 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/07/12
Posts: 2036
Post Likes: +1221
Location: KIWS Houston, VA, N03 NY
Aircraft: Baron C55
Username Protected wrote:
Airspace designations alone are more than most people are willing to keep up with. How many different kinds do we have now? 15, 20, 25?


Five.


Quote:
If you live near or in a big city (and most of us do) you are going to have to deal with Class B, or fly ridiculously circuitous routes to get in and out. To a regular flyer these complications are background, a part of the challenge that makes flying interesting. But for most people it's simply too much.


Class B has pretty much the same rules as TCA's did 25 years ago. Same size too.


Maybe I'm not using the correct terminology. VFR pilots are expected to know each of the following and the different limitations for each. I'm not positive this list is complete. I think there are some new marine conservation areas in California?
A
B
C
D
E below 10k
E above 10k
G below 1200 day
G below 1200 night
G above 1200 day
G above 1200 night
G below 1200 and above 10k
MOA
Prohib
Restr
Warning
Alert
ADIZ
CFA
NSA
MTR
TFRs
TRSAs
SFRAs
FRZs
Flight Free Zones
Mode C veils
Special Conservation Areas
VFR Flyways
IFR routes (near major airports)
VFR Transition Routes

I get around 30.

Jim
_________________
GAMuseums https://airfactsjournal.com/2023/05/gen ... directory/


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2014, 12:52 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 11068
Post Likes: +7098
Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
Username Protected wrote:

Objection your honor. The witness did not answer the question.

It was mostly turbines. But all buying gas from an FBO.


I try my hardest not to back up Crandall because of his skewed view against twins, which have been proven time and time again to be safer than singles, but......

Jason is a shining example of using an airplane for GA. He's also a huge advocate of GA. He's always flying for either business or pleasure and traverses the country at random without any restriction. I'd say that's as GA as GA gets. He just happens to burn Jet-A. He may one return and burn Avgas if it's still around.

Me personally I would rather have an airport be surrounded by heavy metal 'Business GA airplanes' than have none at all.
_________________
---Rusty Shoe Keeper---


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2014, 12:53 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/16/11
Posts: 11068
Post Likes: +7098
Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
Username Protected wrote:



Maybe I'm not using the correct terminology. VFR pilots are expected to know each of the following and the different limitations for each. I'm not positive this list is complete. I think there are some new marine conservation areas in California?
A
B
C
D
E below 10k
E above 10k
G below 1200 day
G below 1200 night
G above 1200 day
G above 1200 night
G below 1200 and above 10k
MOA
Prohib
Restr
Warning
Alert
ADIZ
CFA
NSA
MTR
TFRs
TRSAs
SFRAs
FRZs
Flight Free Zones
Mode C veils
Special Conservation Areas
VFR Flyways
IFR routes (near major airports)
VFR Transition Routes

I get around 30.

Jim


You need an iPad, just click on the little circle and it tells you what it is. :peace:

Technology is your friend

_________________
---Rusty Shoe Keeper---


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2014, 12:56 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/07/12
Posts: 2036
Post Likes: +1221
Location: KIWS Houston, VA, N03 NY
Aircraft: Baron C55
I do and I know these areas. Not my point though. Flying is becoming very complex - which makes it very daunting for someone who is looking for a part-time recreational pursuit.

_________________
GAMuseums https://airfactsjournal.com/2023/05/gen ... directory/


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2014, 13:27 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13086
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:

I try my hardest not to back up Crandall because of his skewed view against twins, which have been proven time and time again to be safer than singles, but......

Jason is a shining example of using an airplane for GA. He's also a huge advocate of GA. He's always flying for either business or pleasure and traverses the country at random without any restriction. I'd say that's as GA as GA gets. He just happens to burn Jet-A. He may one return and burn Avgas if it's still around.

Me personally I would rather have an airport be surrounded by heavy metal 'Business GA airplanes' than have none at all.

I've burned a ton of Avgas in my life too. I used my Bonanza the same way I use the Pilatus I just fly farther now.

I think the future of GA is JetA. I think efficiencies and the number of simpler turbine airplanes being built now will trickle down and get cheaper.

Old Citations is a good example. Cheap to buy, expensive to fly. Soon I think you'll have cheap to buy and fly when Cirrus Jets and TBMs and PC12s keep trickling down.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Twin Prices Crashing
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2014, 13:38 
Online



 Profile




Joined: 01/24/10
Posts: 7452
Post Likes: +5148
Location: Concord , CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1967 Baron B55
JetA will be the future of GA, that's the problem. Only a very small percentage of the population will be able to afford it. GA will get smaller.


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 268 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next



8Flight Bottom Banner

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.SCA.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.