banner
banner

21 Nov 2025, 23:37 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 3143 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133 ... 210  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 05 Sep 2020, 15:24 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/25/19
Posts: 235
Post Likes: +125
Aircraft: Aerostar 601P, AS350
They haven’t done them in years


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 05 Sep 2020, 19:06 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 11/25/16
Posts: 1982
Post Likes: +1589
Location: KSBD
Aircraft: C501
Username Protected wrote:
Anyone have recommendations on center console overlays?? I desperately need mine replaced.

Here you go Trey.

https://premieraerostore.com/piper/pa-60-aerostar/


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 30 Sep 2020, 10:56 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 11/25/16
Posts: 1982
Post Likes: +1589
Location: KSBD
Aircraft: C501
Username Protected wrote:
Yep, I do know what I’m getting into. Myself and my dad mostly have maintained this airplane for the last 20 years, so we know what to expect.

Did you end up buying it?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 17 Oct 2020, 21:54 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/25/19
Posts: 235
Post Likes: +125
Aircraft: Aerostar 601P, AS350
I used to have a 600A. Recently purchased a 601P. I think a lot of baron/340/310 guys tried an aerostar they would never go back, a true pilots airplane.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 17 Oct 2020, 22:46 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/24/19
Posts: 396
Post Likes: +187
Location: Birmingham
Aircraft: Vans RV-6; Archer II
Username Protected wrote:
I used to have a 600A. Recently purchased a 601P. I think a lot of baron/340/310 guys tried an aerostar they would never go back, a true pilots airplane.


Beautiful!

Love to hear operational costs and insurance requirements. I'm sure they will be different before I could really consider but a data point would be nice as we continue to evaluate for a "family plane" in the next couple of years.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 17 Oct 2020, 23:04 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 405
Post Likes: +359
Location: Everson, WA
Hourly cost is going to be on par with any other pressurized, deiced, turbocharged piston twin. The difference is that you'll cover more miles in those hours and generally have a more comfortable ride through turbulence.

We just moved from CA to WA today. 30+ knot headwinds, and still made it from STS to BLI in 3:19. Two people, two dogs, three chickens (I'm not kidding), and everything we need to live until the moving truck arrives.

BTW, I'm still looking for a hangar in or around Bellingham. I'll even throw in some farm fresh eggs!

Attachment:
IMG_1819.jpg

Attachment:
IMG_1825.jpg


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 17 Oct 2020, 23:59 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/25/19
Posts: 235
Post Likes: +125
Aircraft: Aerostar 601P, AS350
Username Protected wrote:
I used to have a 600A. Recently purchased a 601P. I think a lot of baron/340/310 guys tried an aerostar they would never go back, a true pilots airplane.


Beautiful!

Love to hear operational costs and insurance requirements. I'm sure they will be different before I could really consider but a data point would be nice as we continue to evaluate for a "family plane" in the next couple of years.


If you want a family plane you need a 700, it’s not going to be cheap to fly or insure. But it will be fast and handle better than anything else in its class.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2020, 07:33 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/30/15
Posts: 1821
Post Likes: +1909
Location: Charlotte
Aircraft: Avanti-Citabria
5 or 6 AMU’s for a pressurized piston twin Insurance Is relatively cheap in my book.
I self insured the first 100 hours then got insurance.

2150 useful load on mine with gross weight increase and YES she will still climb on one :bugeye: engine fully loaded

Figure 5NM/gallon for 700

It’s worth it :pilot:

_________________
I wanna go phastR.....and slowR


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2020, 07:33 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/30/15
Posts: 1821
Post Likes: +1909
Location: Charlotte
Aircraft: Avanti-Citabria
Duplicate

_________________
I wanna go phastR.....and slowR


Last edited on 18 Oct 2020, 07:34, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2020, 08:19 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/06/10
Posts: 12191
Post Likes: +3075
Company: Looking
Location: Outside Boston, or some hotel somewhere
Aircraft: None
Username Protected wrote:
If you want a family plane you need a 700, it’s not going to be cheap to fly or insure. But it will be fast and handle better than anything else in its class.


Anytime I flt farther than 20 minutes away, I miss the Aerostar.
Anytime I add gas to the plane or get a bill, I am glad I sold the Aerostar.

Tim


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2020, 09:21 
Offline




User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/09/09
Posts: 6527
Post Likes: +3238
Company: RNP Aviation Services
Location: Owosso, MI (KRNP)
Aircraft: 1969 Bonanza V35A
Username Protected wrote:
I used to have a 600A. Recently purchased a 601P. I think a lot of baron/340/310 guys tried an aerostar they would never go back, a true pilots airplane.


Beautiful!

Love to hear operational costs and insurance requirements. I'm sure they will be different before I could really consider but a data point would be nice as we continue to evaluate for a "family plane" in the next couple of years.


I own a SS700 (for the time being), have managed a 421C, and semi-manage and have been intimately involved in a straight 414 for many years.

The maintenance cost between the three airplane are very close.... Close enough you would not notice a difference between them.

The 414 and me Aerostar are insured by the same agent, same value, same limits, I'm the only pilot on both. Last year, the 414 was $200 more than the Aerostar. They have different underwriters, but the 414 requires me to have an IPC annually. The Aerostar requires formal training every 24 months.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again, the Aerostar will put a Baron to shame for economy, or put a King Air 90 to shame for speed, depending on how you want to run it. I can fly my 209+ gallon Aerostar from Michigan to Florida (KRNP-KLAL) non-stop in the Aerostar in four hours with no wind, and have multiple times. You can't do that in a Baron, Twin Cessna, etc.

Unfortunately for me, I own the airplane for flying charity flights. The Aerostar is a great four to five person airplane. I need to carry six on a fairly normal basis and will be moving to a 414 in the very near future for the seats only. It's going to be tough seeing a "1" as the first number of the ground speed!

Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2020, 09:30 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 405
Post Likes: +359
Location: Everson, WA
Pick a different charity. Kids, dogs, whatever it takes.
Seriously, though, that's commendable :clap:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 18 Oct 2020, 12:11 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6653
Post Likes: +5963
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
I'd go back to an Aerostar if someone would just certify a set of diesel engines for it. EPS was the closest to making that a reality, but went bust (of course). It's just a joy that aircraft.

One bizarre thing I didn't like was that the curved windscreen at night was like a fish bowl and caught the reflections of all the instruments in it. It was always a little bit distracting when flying the Aerostar at night, especially in low viz. But that's really my only complaint.

_________________
Without love, where would you be now?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 19 Oct 2020, 08:45 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 10/06/16
Posts: 116
Post Likes: +185
Location: Tucson, AZ (winter) & Brunswick, ME (summer)
Aircraft: T210, Aerostar 702P
This has been a hugely useful thread for me. I just finished re-reading it (which took almost an entire weekend) and I'm blown away by the depth & breadth of the knowledge here, and the passion so many have for Aerostars, even folks who are former owners.

A quick aside about Internet Experts: When I was shopping for my 210, people told me the airplanes were maintenance pigs, and the retractable gear system would put me into the poorhouse -- or worse, put me on the belly. It was nonsense, of course, mostly people retelling other people's stories until critical mass is reached. Such is the nature of reputation, it is sometimes divorced from reality. I learned to ask "how many hours do you have in 210s?" which, although it comes across as quite dismissive, let me evaluate the knowledge base of the person who was offering supposedly sound advice. I'm glad I learned to calibrate pireps to differentiate the Old Wives Tales from actual user experience.

Recently I've had a similar experience in getting info about Aerostars. I was advised by multiple folks that an Aerostar will put me into the poorhouse, that it's a dangerous airplane and I'll surely kill myself in one, that they are maintenance nightmares and to run for safety to the nearest Baron or 310 or Aztec. This thread, more than any other (on any forum) has informed me of the realities of owning and flying an Aerostar.

So I'm posting to give my sincere thanks to all who have contributed.

Mark


Top

 Post subject: Re: Aerostars
PostPosted: 19 Oct 2020, 09:08 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/30/15
Posts: 1821
Post Likes: +1909
Location: Charlotte
Aircraft: Avanti-Citabria
Username Protected wrote:
I'd go back to an Aerostar if someone would just certify a set of diesel engines for it. EPS was the closest to making that a reality, but went bust (of course). It's just a joy that aircraft.

One bizarre thing I didn't like was that the curved windscreen at night was like a fish bowl and caught the reflections of all the instruments in it. It was always a little bit distracting when flying the Aerostar at night, especially in low viz. But that's really my only complaint.


When I purchased mine 3 years ago with about 1300 hours on engines (U2A!!! Engines). I was thinking the same about EPS diesels at overhaul time.
EPS engines did not happen. Even if they did get certified I could not possibly justify 600 AMU’s when 150-200 will get me Powermaster engines and a enough dough leftover to buy the gas until next overhaul time.

My U2A engines start like a car engine and I have FINALLY learned my engine hot start clues (no boost pump until engine running- mixture about half)

I flew just over an hour of night flight last night coming back from Louisiana. I have never noticed the reflection. I turn interior lights down little by little as it gets darker and darker until there is very little light emitted by panel instruments.

_________________
I wanna go phastR.....and slowR


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 3143 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133 ... 210  Next



PWI, Inc. (Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.concorde.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.avnav.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.sarasota.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.