19 Jan 2026, 12:25 [ UTC - 5; DST ]
|
| Username Protected |
Message |
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 20 Dec 2015, 22:50 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21099 Post Likes: +26537 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: But, since it's for charity, I'm willing to keep the wager the same but specify that they must deliver 75 next year. Wager accepted. My nominated charity is Alzheimer's Association: alz.org. You might as well write the check now and get it on this year's taxes. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 20 Dec 2015, 22:56 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11068 Post Likes: +7099 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: But, since it's for charity, I'm willing to keep the wager the same but specify that they must deliver 75 next year. Wager accepted. My nominated charity is Alzheimer's Association: alz.org. You might as well write the check now and get it on this year's taxes. Mike C.
What did you say again?
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 20 Dec 2015, 22:59 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21099 Post Likes: +26537 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Slightly used Mustang. Which are relatively cheap because, guess what, they are kind of lackluster on speed and range. The production of them basically stopped after the original owners upgraded and flooded the market with used ones. They made 8 new ones in 2014. Allen has it right, the SF50 is the best marketing program for owner flown Citations in history. Anybody who really wants to travel in jet style won't find it with the SF50. It is like having a Yugo as your first car, you will want something else pretty quick. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 20 Dec 2015, 23:08 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 12837 Post Likes: +5281 Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
|
|
Username Protected wrote: You gotta compare new to new.
Sorta ... New mostly sells for tax reasons or for capability (or just availability) not available in the used market. And yes, some people want _NEW_, but most people just are happy with like new. 2-5 years old vs. new isn't a big deal. Textron's efforts to kill the legacy fleet suggests new mfrs. see used as competition. As for tech wizard - that was perhaps shorthand for the guy about to solo with a few million burning a hole in his pocket. Yes, the ones with an Android won't buy an SF50, but the iPhone guys will.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 20 Dec 2015, 23:18 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5193 Post Likes: +3038 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Which are relatively cheap because, guess what, they are kind of lackluster on speed and range. The production of them basically stopped after the original owners upgraded and flooded the market with used ones. They made 8 new ones in 2014.
Allen has it right, the SF50 is the best marketing program for owner flown Citations in history. Anybody who really wants to travel in jet style won't find it with the SF50. It is like having a Yugo as your first car, you will want something else pretty quick.
Mike C. The Mustang achieved Cessna's objective of getting new entry buyers into the bottom of the Citation line. If the SF50 delivers a new wave of buyers then it will drive more demand. If buyers want more Mustangs built then Cessna will build them. We now have around 1000 twin engine turbojets - Mustangs, Phenom 100, Eclipse - between the $1MM to $2.5MM price point that previously didn't exist. We will see how the SF50 fits into that price point.
_________________ Allen
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 20 Dec 2015, 23:21 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5193 Post Likes: +3038 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Textron's efforts to kill the legacy fleet suggests new mfrs. see used as competition.
I have found no one at Textron or who used to be at Textron who confirms that theory. It may look that way but their actions are motivated by other objectives such as profits and liability.
_________________ Allen
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 20 Dec 2015, 23:25 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 12/03/14 Posts: 21099 Post Likes: +26537 Company: Ciholas, Inc Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
|
|
Username Protected wrote: What piston plane produced right now is better than a Cirrus? "Better" depends on the buyer's needs. In 2014, Cirrus shipped 160 SR22T, Cessna shipped 155 172S. Cirrus also shipped 117 SR22, 31 SR20. For some things, a 172 is better. If I was forced to buy a new piston traveling machine, I'd look at a Piper Malibu Mirage (37 shipped in 2014). Pressurization is a game changer for traveling. If I was forced to buy a new unpressurized travel airplane, I'd look at the Corvalis (22 shipped in 2014) and the Cirrus. The higher performance of the Corvalis would be favored all things being equal. If I wanted a new piston twin, Diamond DA40 (136 shipped in 2014) or Baron (40 shipped in 2014). If I was looking for a fun airplane, the Carbon Cub (53 shipped in 2014), or maybe a Decathalon (17 shipped in 2014). BTW, there were 40 Barons and 32 Bonanzas shipped in 2014. That's a new piston Beech every 3 working days, not exactly dead as a product line. Mike C.
_________________ Email mikec (at) ciholas.com
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 20 Dec 2015, 23:29 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 12837 Post Likes: +5281 Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Textron's efforts to kill the legacy fleet suggests new mfrs. see used as competition.
I have found no one at Textron or who used to be at Textron who confirms that theory. It may look that way but their actions are motivated by other objectives such as profits and liability.
I have a hard time seeing how $15,000 182RG gear pivots can result from profit or liability concerns. $3,000 would surely cover it.
Likewise the SID program - pretty much exclusively applied to airframes over 18 years old - doesn't generate much profit or reduce much liability.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 20 Dec 2015, 23:31 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 12837 Post Likes: +5281 Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
|
|
Username Protected wrote: If I wanted a new piston twin, Diamond DA40 40 or 42?
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 20 Dec 2015, 23:34 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 01/16/11 Posts: 11068 Post Likes: +7099 Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Aircraft: PC12NG, G3Tat
|
|
Username Protected wrote: If I wanted a new piston twin, Diamond DA40 40 or 42? 62
_________________ ---Rusty Shoe Keeper---
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 20 Dec 2015, 23:38 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5193 Post Likes: +3038 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I have a hard time seeing how $15,000 182RG gear pivots can result from profit or liability concerns. $3,000 would surely cover it.
Likewise the SID program - pretty much exclusively applied to airframes over 18 years old - doesn't generate much profit or reduce much liability. I speculate the gear pivot pricing is to make the parts sale profitable on a stand alone basis. Many legacy Cessna parts are manufactured by others in small batches. So you have multiple layers of profits and liability costs. Cessna does have a process for a customer to request a review of a parts price. And there have been times when such a review has lead them to adjust the price down significantly. SID Program was clearly liability driven. Cessna got scared by some of the things they were hearing. Their engineers and lawyers felt they had to do something and we got typical corporate bureaucracy over reaction. It will play well in court in their defense.
_________________ Allen
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 20 Dec 2015, 23:44 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/08/12 Posts: 12837 Post Likes: +5281 Location: Jackson, MS (KHKS)
Aircraft: 1961 Cessna 172
|
|
Username Protected wrote: I speculate the gear pivot pricing is to make the parts sale profitable on a stand alone basis. Many legacy Cessna parts are manufactured by others in small batches. So you have multiple layers of profits and liability costs.
Beech still manages to sell a few dozen bonanzas a year at $700K - all those parts are low volume too. No way any single part of a landing gear has to cost anywhere near $15k.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 20 Dec 2015, 23:49 |
|
 |

|
|
Joined: 01/31/09 Posts: 5193 Post Likes: +3038 Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
|
|
Username Protected wrote: Beech still manages to sell a few dozen bonanzas a year at $700K - all those parts are low volume too. No way any single part of a landing gear has to cost anywhere near $15k.
If you buy all the parts for a $30,000 Chevy it will cost something like $200,000. You get the package discount when you buy them all in one assembled bundle. Parts distribution has its own inflated cost structure.
_________________ Allen
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 20 Dec 2015, 23:58 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 11/21/09 Posts: 12572 Post Likes: +17359 Location: Albany, TX
Aircraft: Prior SR22T,V35B,182
|
|
Username Protected wrote: We should keep a running total of the SEJ projects:
Gulfstream Peregrine.
Eclipse EA400.
Piper PiperJet.
Diamond DiamondJet.
CenturyJet.
Stratus 714.
Visionaire Vantage.
Flaris LAR-01.
Excel-Jet Sport-Jet.
Comp Air Jet.
Cirrus SF50.
Any more?
Number of certified SEJs: Zero. ... Cirrus is following a well known and worn path to failure. I don't know why they should be applauded for that. There's nothing they are doing that several other companies haven't already failed at.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Username Protected
|
Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50 Posted: 21 Dec 2015, 00:15 |
|
 |

|
|
 |
Joined: 09/02/09 Posts: 8737 Post Likes: +9466 Company: OAA Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
|
|
Username Protected wrote: But, since it's for charity, I'm willing to keep the wager the same but specify that they must deliver 75 next year. Wager accepted. My nominated charity is Alzheimer's Association: alz.org. You might as well write the check now and get it on this year's taxes. posting.php?mode=quote&f=49&p=1561670#Mike C.
Nah. I'll need deductions next year too…I've put a note on calendar for the end of next year so I won't forget.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us
BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a
forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include
the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner,
Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.
BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates.
Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.
Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026
|
|
|
|