banner
banner

28 Jan 2026, 13:27 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Greenwich AeroGroup (banner)



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127 ... 512  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2015, 13:10 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/21/09
Posts: 12591
Post Likes: +17384
Location: Albany, TX
Aircraft: Prior SR22T,V35B,182
After 123 pages, is there really anything new being said, or to say, other than MC is no longer saying it will never make it to market?

Edit: 124 pages :D


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2015, 13:12 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:

This theory that SR22 pilots are major metro hoppers like they own a jet is just false.

Mike C.

My only comment on the route was the altitude planes fly between those airports. I never said anything about the SR22 and that route.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2015, 13:12 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/08/12
Posts: 7889
Post Likes: +5222
Location: Live in San Carlos, CA - based Hayward, CA KHWD
Aircraft: Piaggio Avanti
Username Protected wrote:
Eclipse "sold" 260 500 series jets. They've "sold" a small handful of 550's. Not exactly a barn burner success story. Cirrus hasn't "sold" any SF50's yet because its not yet certified. However, there are over 500 position holders and so its unlikely that they won't eclipse the Eclipse sales record rather quickly (sorry, couldn't resist…).

I believe Eclipse had more than 2500 position holders. So if you compare apples to apples, Cirrus is not yet even close to Eclipse's "success".

_________________
-Jon C.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2015, 13:14 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Sales is not success. Staying in business making a profit is success.

Mike C.


You don't get paid if you don't deliver.

With HondaJet now certified and soon the SF50 as well as the Embraers and PC12, TBM I think the window for Eclipse is closing. If Eclipse had Garmin I think it would be a good alternative. It just has to much proprietary gear own board.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2015, 13:18 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 09/02/09
Posts: 8738
Post Likes: +9477
Company: OAA
Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
Username Protected wrote:
They haven't delivered any, but a claimed 500 people have "bought" one with a deposit that obligates them to complete the sale.

Mike C.


2016 is going to an interesting year for Cirrus and its supporters as well as its detractors. If Cirrus doesn't get the jet certified and delivered next year I suspect that they will lose tremendous credibility and many of the 500+ deposits will evaporate. On the other hand, if they do get certified and deliver 20-30 aircraft in 2016 as I've been told they expect to, they will be a major aviation success story. Lots of "crippled" jets flown by raving fans all over the country will probably not convince any detractors, but will more than likely stimulate additional deposits and future sales.

We'll see shortly.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2015, 13:21 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 09/02/09
Posts: 8738
Post Likes: +9477
Company: OAA
Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
Username Protected wrote:
After 123 pages, is there really anything new being said, or to say, other than MC is no longer saying it will never make it to market?

Edit: 124 pages :D


Not really! :lol:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2015, 13:21 
Online



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/09
Posts: 14462
Post Likes: +9584
Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
http://www.boldmethod.com/blog/video/20 ... ision-jet/
:thumbup:

_________________
http://calipilot.com
atp/cfii


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2015, 13:29 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21165
Post Likes: +26651
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
On the other hand, if they do get certified and deliver 20-30 aircraft in 2016 as I've been told they expect to

Who told you that? Curious if they have already started on the backpedaling.

The latest schedule I have is 1 delivery in 2015 (in 10 days?) and 75 deliveries in 2016.

Quote:
We'll see shortly.

I doubt it. The dreamers will hang on to the dream for MANY years! Witness how the Eclipse faithful held on for almost 10 years before first delivery!

To put that in perspective, my MU2 is 40 years old this year. It was 23 years old when Eclipse was founded in 1998. Think about that...

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2015, 13:34 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 09/02/09
Posts: 8738
Post Likes: +9477
Company: OAA
Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
I don't expect they will deliver any in 2015. I don't know exactly how many they plan to deliver next year but based on conversations with one of their sales people about 1st quarter 2017 delivery it doesn't sound like it will be 75.

I'm willing to wager that they will certify and deliver a minimum of 25 units next year. Care to take a $500 wager on that with the winning bet paid to the charity of the winner's choice?

Dreamer dream. And critics criticize. Prophets put money up. Which are you?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2015, 13:51 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21165
Post Likes: +26651
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
I don't expect they will deliver any in 2015. I don't know exactly how many they plan to deliver next year but based on conversations with one of their sales people about 1st quarter 2017 delivery it doesn't sound like it will be 75.

1 year ago, one of their sales people posted this delivery schedule:
Attachment:
image001.png

And they wrote this when I questioned how reliable this will be:

The production numbers are based on realistic assessments that combine market demand/backlog as well as manufacturing capability.
...
I will add though that you have an entire team of dedicated professionals who have been and continue to work toward and have confidence in delivering on this schedule.


So it seems you are willing to say they will "succeed" if they only fail by about 75% in 2016. Hmmm.

Mike C.


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2015, 13:54 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
WHEN it gets certified does NOT dictate wether it will be a success or not. Granted, if it takes 10 more years it probably won't make it. But IF it gets certified in 2016......

Are we saying it won't get certified in 2016?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2015, 13:55 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 11/21/09
Posts: 12591
Post Likes: +17384
Location: Albany, TX
Aircraft: Prior SR22T,V35B,182
You're busting their chops for missing it by potentially a year when you said they would never get it certified.

While they haven't, they're likely to be closer than you were.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2015, 13:57 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
You're busting their chops for missing it by potentially a year when you said they would never get it certified.

While they haven't, they're likely to be closer than you were.

+1

He also said it would never be faster that 220 knots.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2015, 13:57 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 09/02/09
Posts: 8738
Post Likes: +9477
Company: OAA
Location: Oklahoma City - PWA/Calistoga KSTS
Aircraft: UMF3, UBF 2, P180 II
Username Protected wrote:
So it seems you are willing to say they will "succeed" if they only fail by about 75% in 2016. Hmmm.

Mike C.


Not at all. I'm just willing to bet you $500 bucks they will deliver 25 next year. But, since it's for charity, I'm willing to keep the wager the same but specify that they must deliver 75 next year.

I'll even specify where you're money will be going if you like:

http://www.keithsicecoldbeverages.com

(he has a foundation raising money to purchase TOBI machines, a technology I'll bet we can both agree is outstanding).

What say you?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 20 Dec 2015, 14:15 
Online



User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 06/28/09
Posts: 14462
Post Likes: +9584
Location: Walnut Creek, CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1962 Twin Bonanza
Username Protected wrote:
Not at all. I'm just willing to bet you $500 bucks they will deliver 25 next year. But, since it's for charity, I'm willing to keep the wager the same but specify that they must deliver 75 next year.


There is zero chance they deliver 75 next year.

_________________
http://calipilot.com
atp/cfii


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127 ... 512  Next



Electroair (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026

.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.Plane Salon Beechtalk.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.AAI.jpg.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.ElectroairTile.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.