banner
banner

13 Nov 2025, 20:27 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 266 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 18  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: PC24 Now Certified
PostPosted: 20 Mar 2018, 22:34 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 07/23/09
Posts: 1126
Post Likes: +667
Location: KSJT
Aircraft: PC-24 Citabria 7GCBC
Username Protected wrote:
Michael, If your flying 250hr a year in the PC-12 in the PC-24 wouldn’t the hours go down since your getting there faster. Or do you feel you would use the aircraft for more trips so your hours would stay the same.


I flew 473 hrs in the PC12 last year............but I skipped a lot of trips because I could not get above the weather........that's where the Jet is incredible practical ;)


And then there is the additional mission creep hours that goes with new airplane upgrade.

Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 Now Certified
PostPosted: 20 Mar 2018, 22:44 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/09/13
Posts: 929
Post Likes: +472
Location: Byron Bay,NSW Australia
Aircraft: C525,C25A,C25C,CL604
Username Protected wrote:
And then there is the additional mission creep hours that goes with new airplane upgrade.


Exactly!

I was doing about 250 hours in my C340A and assumed in the 525 I'd be half of that, shooting for 150 hours.

Last calender year I was just short of 400 hours.

Andrew


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 Now Certified
PostPosted: 21 Mar 2018, 00:44 
Online


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20743
Post Likes: +26209
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
The PC24 will save you minutes per flight over the PC12.... Not hours or days.

Depends on the weather.

If there's a strong line of thunderstorms, a FL450 jet is far more likely to be able to go than a PC-12. That could save hours or even a day.

On a long trip into a headwind, the jet can save well over an hour. This comes not only from faster speed, but at FL450, the winds tend to die down somewhat.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 Now Certified
PostPosted: 21 Mar 2018, 05:04 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/24/07
Posts: 1244
Post Likes: +154
Location: Akron, Ohio
Aircraft: C550 - C560
Username Protected wrote:
The PC24 will save you minutes per flight over the PC12.... Not hours or days.


Acording to fltplan.com on our typical flight today in our C550 from AKR to PBI is 900nm at FL360 our flight time 2:43 today with 13kt head wind and in a PC12 your time is 3:42 at FL280 so yes you do save hours even in a Citation add that up over the course of a year and for us we’ll gain 46 hours and over 5 years that’s 230 hours.

Gary


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 Now Certified
PostPosted: 21 Mar 2018, 07:28 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:

Acording to fltplan.com on our typical flight today in our C550 from AKR to PBI is 900nm at FL360 our flight time 2:43 today with 13kt head wind and in a PC12 your time is 3:42 at FL280 so yes you do save hours even in a Citation add that up over the course of a year and for us we’ll gain 46 hours and over 5 years that’s 230 hours.

Gary

Sorry Gary. I’m calling bs. In fact, I guarantee you spend more time flying the C550 in a year then you would a Pilatus. After all, if what you say is true, everyone would be flying C550s.

My fltplan.com shows it as a 3:30 flight and burning 1700lbs in the Pilatus today at 9am. Are you flying Akron to PBI 46 times a year?


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 Now Certified
PostPosted: 21 Mar 2018, 08:59 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/24/07
Posts: 1244
Post Likes: +154
Location: Akron, Ohio
Aircraft: C550 - C560
What I was showing was our typical flights and yes 90%+ of our flying is to West Palm and then onto San Salvador which we have been doing for last 20 years.

I find fltplan to be very accurate for flight planning as an example of Aspen to Akron today would be 3:11 flight, with 3340 lbs of fuel plus a 1000 lb reserve would leave us 2135 lbs for bodies and bags loping along at FL370 above all weather. We have a gross weight of 14700 and can carry 5000 lbs of fuel, empty weight 8,225.

Into PDK from ASE is even better at 2:51 flight needing 3045 lbs plus 1000 lb reserves leaves you 2430 lbs for bodies and you wouldn't have to be using your headset in the head. :D

My example of what we do saves us many hours every year but it's more about comfort and safety than it is about saving time, that's just an additional benefit.

No worries JC I am not saying that the PC12 is not a great plane it's just not for us. :D

Gary


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 Now Certified
PostPosted: 21 Mar 2018, 09:11 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
What I was showing was our typical flights and yes 90%+ of our flying is to West Palm and then onto San Salvador which we have been doing for last 20 years.
Gary

If you're doing this 46 times a year you need to move.

Who is "our".

Like I said..... if what you say is true..... why isn't everyone flying C550's?


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 Now Certified
PostPosted: 21 Mar 2018, 09:19 
Online


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 20743
Post Likes: +26209
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Like I said..... if what you say is true..... why isn't everyone flying C550's?

Some don't have jet money.

Some don't have jet skill/talent.

Some don't have jet mission.

Despite the number of PC-12s sold, there are WAY more Citations and CJs out there than PC-12s.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 Now Certified
PostPosted: 21 Mar 2018, 09:21 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/24/07
Posts: 1244
Post Likes: +154
Location: Akron, Ohio
Aircraft: C550 - C560
JC I figured three legs each round trip each saving an hour so for simple math, AKR to PBI then PBI to MYSM and back, then PBI to AKR. Each leg saving an hour, 15 trips a year or so is 45 hours in time savings. Using the PC12 vs C550 in fltplan is still an hour savings on each leg no matter what altitude you or I are flying at.

Gary


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 Now Certified
PostPosted: 21 Mar 2018, 09:24 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Some don't have jet money.

Some don't have jet skill/talent.

Some don't have jet mission.

Despite the number of PC-12s sold, there are WAY more Citations and CJs out there than PC-12s.

Mike C.

I can buy several C550's for the price of a used PC12. Don't bring other Citations into the mix as those have different numbers.

Flying right now:
56 PC12
0 C550
1 MU2

24 C56X is the most common flying Citation and that's 2 pilots etc. It drops like a cliff after that.


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 Now Certified
PostPosted: 21 Mar 2018, 09:27 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
JC I figured three legs each round trip each saving an hour so for simple math, AKR to PBI then PBI to MYSM and back, then PBI to AKR. Each leg saving an hour, 15 trips a year or so is 45 hours in time savings. Using the PC12 vs C550 in fltplan is still an hour savings on each leg no matter what altitude you or I are flying at.

Gary

Like I said..... My Fltplan.com numbers are 3:30.... not 3:45.

I'll ask again....
who is "our"?
If what you say is true, how come there are so few C550's flying?

That said.... no doubt you have a highly unique mission. Are you a charter operation? I fly for myself. That factor alone changes things drastically.


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 Now Certified
PostPosted: 21 Mar 2018, 09:27 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/24/07
Posts: 1244
Post Likes: +154
Location: Akron, Ohio
Aircraft: C550 - C560
Username Protected wrote:
Who is "our


The most important thing I learned in business many years ago is the use of we and us not me and I.

Gary


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 Now Certified
PostPosted: 21 Mar 2018, 09:28 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Who is "our


The most important thing I learned in business many years ago is the use of we and us not me and I.

Gary

That's funny... I never heard that before. Hasn't affected me.

Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 Now Certified
PostPosted: 21 Mar 2018, 09:32 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/24/07
Posts: 1244
Post Likes: +154
Location: Akron, Ohio
Aircraft: C550 - C560
Username Protected wrote:
I'll ask again....
who is "our"?
If what you say is true, how come there are so few C550's flying?

That said.... no doubt you have a highly unique mission. Are you a charter operation? I fly for myself. That factor alone changes things drastically.


No buddy the primary reason I own planes is to go fishing.

We fly ourselves, customers and friends.

Gary


Top

 Post subject: Re: PC24 Now Certified
PostPosted: 21 Mar 2018, 09:39 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13085
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:

No buddy the primary reason I own planes is to go fishing.

We fly ourselves, customers and friends.

Gary

Like I said.... sounds like Akron isn't for you.

Why not buy an airplane that can do Akron to San Salvador non stop?


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 266 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 18  Next



Postflight (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.sarasota.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.