banner
banner

27 Nov 2025, 10:46 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 196 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Operating Costs of C340 vs 414/421?
PostPosted: 23 Aug 2017, 10:11 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 04/28/09
Posts: 199
Post Likes: +125
Aircraft: C-310K
Username Protected wrote:
This stupid thread... :bang:

I was well over my addiction to C421's and had stopped gawking at them on Controller for nearly a year and now this darned thread has me lusting for them again. Man they are awesome birds.

I wish I could buy 25-50 hrs time / yr on a nice one.



Yep,

Sell your 3 planes & buy a C-421. At least now you know you don't need to spend 5 figures on maintenance ad nauseum :hide:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Operating Costs of C340 vs 414/421?
PostPosted: 23 Aug 2017, 10:21 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/29/10
Posts: 2824
Post Likes: +2743
Location: Dallas, TX (KADS & KJWY)
Aircraft: T28B,7GCBC,E90
Username Protected wrote:
Life is short, fly a 421C

Andrew


Says the guy with a CJ!

Robert


Top

 Post subject: Re: Operating Costs of C340 vs 414/421?
PostPosted: 27 Nov 2017, 21:03 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 07/04/11
Posts: 1709
Post Likes: +244
Company: W. John Gadd, Esq.
Location: Florida
Aircraft: C55 Baron
Username Protected wrote:
Does 340 have nose or wing locker baggage? Big knocks on p46t are generally cockpit, range, payload and (to some extent) baggage space. 340 better on all counts I think.


Nose baggage and wing lockers on 340. Actually a very useable cabin.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Operating Costs of C340 vs 414/421?
PostPosted: 28 Nov 2017, 07:14 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/05/09
Posts: 4479
Post Likes: +3365
Location: Raleigh, NC
Aircraft: L-39
340 has lots of storage, but not as much as 414 or 421. In the nose, I usually load a full-size rolling garment bag, 2 roller-board style bags, a duffle (gym-bag) bag, and a beach-style bag. smaller bags help it go in easier.

in the wing locker, I carry a military style helmet-bag that has my wife's espresso machine, grinder, and milk frother (don't even ask). there's also a full set of tools (I guess you need them in a 37 year old twin), window covers (or a Bruce's cover- depends on the mission), spare oil, and a refueling mat. room to spare.

there's also space behind the pilot's seat for at least 2 duffle bags, and an aft-cabin baggage shelf.

space is never an issue.

_________________
"Find worthy causes in your life."


Top

 Post subject: Re: Operating Costs of C340 vs 414/421?
PostPosted: 01 Dec 2017, 23:16 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 07/04/11
Posts: 1709
Post Likes: +244
Company: W. John Gadd, Esq.
Location: Florida
Aircraft: C55 Baron
Username Protected wrote:
340 has lots of storage, but not as much as 414 or 421. In the nose, I usually load a full-size rolling garment bag, 2 roller-board style bags, a duffle (gym-bag) bag, and a beach-style bag. smaller bags help it go in easier.

in the wing locker, I carry a military style helmet-bag that has my wife's espresso machine, grinder, and milk frother (don't even ask). there's also a full set of tools (I guess you need them in a 37 year old twin), window covers (or a Bruce's cover- depends on the mission), spare oil, and a refueling mat. room to spare.

there's also space behind the pilot's seat for at least 2 duffle bags, and an aft-cabin baggage shelf.

space is never an issue.

N

421--Top of food chain indeed.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Operating Costs of C340 vs 414/421?
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2019, 12:35 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 03/22/18
Posts: 3724
Post Likes: +2104
Location: Nashville, TN
Aircraft: Lazarus - a B60 Duke
Username Protected wrote:

Guys like yourself who like to be involved in their own maintenance don't understand people who appreciate quality and on time. You don't mind quality cheap but you don't get on time when you get involved in your own maintenance. You spending time sourcing parts, making decisions, etc. It always delays the final product. When my living depended on flying 3 days a week on tight schedule, all I cared about was quality and on time: annual starts on Monday, get finished by next Monday. I didn't care about overnight charges for shipping. Shops like the one above can deliver that. You cannot do that on the cheap.

Sorry, thread resurrection, because I started one myself not finding this one in a search (although arguably, if I run a couple searches and can't find what I need in the first couple pages of each search, I'll just start a new thread).

I am involved in my own maintenance.

I most certainly understand quality and on time.

For the rest, that's absolutely right, but many of us don't depend on our planes for a living don't care if it takes a little longer.

It doesn't mean we don't understand it. I've been flying for a living for 25 years, licensed for 30, worked Corporate, Charter, now airlines; pistons, turboprops, jets, been there done that. I understand it just fine. I don't NEED it on my personal plane. I'd rather save the AMU's.

My Baron will be in the shop going on 30 days - I presently don't care because I'm nursing a shoulder post-op. But even when I'm flying, I don't mind waiting a week to save $1,000 on a part when it's coming out of my pocket and the plane doesn't generate revenue as it is.

Both my 530w and Trig had to come out for software update to talk to each other for ADS-B. I pulled them myself, drove down to Avionics, had lunch with a buddy. Came back a week later, picked said radios up, put them back in myself, shop charged 0.5 to diagnose issue and check installation of radios and make logbook entry.

Saved 2 hours of labor and shipping charges.

We just found a big hole in the left front induction tube because that's where I told the shop to go look when they wanted to start pulling jugs (thanks to BT!). Now I'm getting a serviceable used induction tube off an identical engine cheap and saving buying a $1,500 part from Beechcraft plus about a couple days of labor.

When it comes time to annual I'll spend a day of my time pulling all the panels and putting them back on when done and helping set up jacks, etc, because it's my day off and I like doing it. I'll also save $1,000 on the annual doing it.

Owner involved maintenance can save thousands of dollars for people who aren't needing an asset to generate revenue. I get where you're coming from, but don't knock the people who are in a different boat.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Operating Costs of C340 vs 414/421?
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2019, 12:57 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 10/27/10
Posts: 10790
Post Likes: +6894
Location: Cambridge, MA (KLWM)
Aircraft: 1997 A36TN
There's also the tax difference between working and leisure airplanes that favors trading money for lower downtime on working airplanes.

If I spend an extra (pre-tax) $1000 on maintenance on a working airplane, that is deductible against profits in that endeavor, meaning it cost me $500 or so out of pocket after tax.

If I spend an extra (post-tax) $1000 on maintenance on a leisure airplane, I had to earn an extra $2000 pre-tax to leave me with the $1000 post-tax to pay the bill. (Same factor of 2, just working in the other direction.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Operating Costs of C340 vs 414/421?
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2019, 13:05 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 01/24/10
Posts: 7444
Post Likes: +5133
Location: Concord , CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1967 Baron B55
The 340, 414, and 421 have the same systems and MX. The overall cost is slightly more for the 421.

My Ram VII “direct operating cost” was 500 and hour based on 100 hours per year.
My 421C direct operating cost is 600 per hour based on 100 hours per year.

My 421 annuals including parts average 12,000 per year. A VERY EXPERIENCED owner can perform a lot MX on a 340, 414 and 421.

I just replaced everything FF with factory new engines, turbo system, engine mounts,
Exhaust, props , hoses etc.
17,000 at 75% TAS 220kts.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Operating Costs of C340 vs 414/421?
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2019, 16:14 
Online


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/20/09
Posts: 2663
Post Likes: +2242
Company: Jcrane, Inc.
Location: KVES Greenville, OH
Aircraft: C441, RV7A
Username Protected wrote:
I just replaced everything FF with factory new engines, turbo system, engine mounts,
Exhaust, props , hoses etc.
17,000 at 75% TAS 220kts.

We're likely doing one side this year, leaning towards factory new.
If you don't mind sharing, what are we looking at, ballpark?

_________________
Jack
N441M N107XX


Top

 Post subject: Re: Operating Costs of C340 vs 414/421?
PostPosted: 02 Mar 2019, 16:21 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/19/11
Posts: 3308
Post Likes: +1434
Company: Bottom Line Experts
Location: KTOL - Toledo, OH
Aircraft: 2004 SR22 G2
one arm + 1/2 leg...

_________________
Don Coburn
Corporate Expense Reduction Specialist
2004 SR22 G2


Top

 Post subject: Re: Operating Costs of C340 vs 414/421?
PostPosted: 26 Mar 2019, 20:34 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 12/14/15
Posts: 332
Post Likes: +296
Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta CYMM
Aircraft: 76 B58
I have flown my children often in the Baron 58. This past weekend my daughters and I checked out a 414A. Dam...........no comparison....we all love the cabin size.

of course the devil is in the details and costs to operate..........

and in the end it will come down to "dam it, i want one. or maybe a 340.... lol

and anyway still too much to learn..............and I love my Baron

Brenda


Please login or Register for a free account via the link in the red bar above to download files.

_________________
We do what we do best. We fly!


Top

 Post subject: Re: Operating Costs of C340 vs 414/421?
PostPosted: 26 Mar 2019, 21:32 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/29/14
Posts: 206
Post Likes: +73
Username Protected wrote:
I just replaced everything FF with factory new engines, turbo system, engine mounts,
Exhaust, props , hoses etc.
17,000 at 75% TAS 220kts.

We're likely doing one side this year, leaning towards factory new.
If you don't mind sharing, what are we looking at, ballpark?


I’d be interested too - I’m getting closer also.

What’s your thinking for factory new? Guaranteed new cases or more than that?

Cheers, brad.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Operating Costs of C340 vs 414/421?
PostPosted: 26 Mar 2019, 22:01 
Offline



 Profile




Joined: 01/24/10
Posts: 7444
Post Likes: +5133
Location: Concord , CA (KCCR)
Aircraft: 1967 Baron B55
Factory New is Factory New.
Factory Rebuilt is approximately 90% new parts
And a good choice. Call Air Power and talk to Joe Artiles he can tell you about all the new parts in the Rebuilt engines.

I bought Factory New engines and replaced every nut bolt screw, engine mounts, exhaust, props, gov., turbos etc firewall forward. Everything replaced to factory new condition.
Cost was 110,000 per side.

It’s not necessary to do as much as I did and you can spend a lot less.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Operating Costs of C340 vs 414/421?
PostPosted: 27 Mar 2019, 04:03 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/29/14
Posts: 206
Post Likes: +73
That’s 155k Aus - plus freight. :eek:

Thanks for letting me know. Does that include installation costs?


Top

 Post subject: Re: Operating Costs of C340 vs 414/421?
PostPosted: 27 Mar 2019, 08:45 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 09/05/09
Posts: 4479
Post Likes: +3365
Location: Raleigh, NC
Aircraft: L-39
My 340 is for sale here:
viewtopic.php?f=43&t=165070&view=unread#unread

And on controller. Not as large as a 414, but it’s faster. And less costly than a 421.

_________________
"Find worthy causes in your life."


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 196 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next



Postflight (Bottom Banner)

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.saint-85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.8flight logo.jpeg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.camguard.jpg.
.tat-85x100.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.midwest2.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.sarasota.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.