banner
banner

15 Jan 2026, 06:38 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109 ... 512  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2015, 12:12 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/11/10
Posts: 3833
Post Likes: +4140
Location: (KADS) Dallas, TX
Username Protected wrote:
No players going after the piston single market 15 years ago? Like Cessna, Beech, Mooney, Diamond, etc? None of them had any money in 1999? How is that false?

Cessna: just making the old designs, which was reasonably successful.

Beech: ditto, less successful.

Mooney: ditto, even less successful.

Diamond: was successful.

Columbia: was successful, at least initially.

Who put money into piston singles? Not the old guard of Cessna, Beech, Mooney. Diamond and Columbia did manage a reasonable success but didn't have any money advantages over Cirrus.

This idea that Cirrus was this little upstart who beat people with huge cash reserves is totally bogus. Makes for a good fairly tale, but not accurate history.

Mike C.


OK, so my comments are false because Cessna, beech, et all didn't really try? Cessna just recertified their entire piston line during that time frame and acquired Lancair to try and compete directly with Cirrus. Mooney pushed the speed as far as they could in hopes that would make the difference, it didn't. Beech along with everyone else would still be selling us steam if it wasn't for Cirrus. I don't care what industry you're in, but zero to undisputed leader in a very mature market in 15 years is straight kicking ass. Once again what part of that is fantasy and not accurate?

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2015, 20:02 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 10/31/11
Posts: 1241
Post Likes: +815
Company: B777, 767, 757, 727, MD11, S80
Location: Colorado Springs
Aircraft: Thrush S2R, AC500B,
Username Protected wrote:
The only thing cool about the SF50 is you get to say 'Let's take the jet.'

Looks like a V tail Bo with elephant mans disease.

_________________
Dan F
Indecision is the key to flexibility


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 11 Apr 2015, 21:15 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16156
Post Likes: +8873
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
So when are they anticipating the first customer deliveries ?

I may be repeating myself: If the SF50 hits the published numbers, they will eventually darken the sky.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 11 Apr 2015, 23:04 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21070
Post Likes: +26510
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
So when are they anticipating the first customer deliveries ?

Last thing Cirrus said was by end of this year. They won't revise that until absolutely the last minute since they can extract progress payments now based on a false schedule.

I don't think there is any chance they will make it. If any deliveries happen this year, they will be PR shams just to make the date. The industry has a tradition of doing that.

I looked at the positions for sale on controller.com. As the progress payments become due, it is shaking out those who now don't want it. Serial numbers for sale are: 1, 12, 17, 23, 30, 36, 40, 43. So in the first 43, 8 are for sale, so looks like about a 20% drop out rate, and those are the positions that have NOT sold. How many have sold, don't know.

This suggests the order book is really only 400 true sales, maybe less. It seems they aren't darkening the order book, much less the skies.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 12 Apr 2015, 05:42 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/13/10
Posts: 20423
Post Likes: +25603
Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
Username Protected wrote:
false schedule

PR shams

20% drop out rate

only 400 true sales

Mike C.

How's this work? Will the PR shams be real or legal airplanes?

Of previous clean-sheet jets that came to market, how many had 400 true sales prior to the first delivery?

_________________
Arlen
Get your motor runnin'
Head out on the highway
- Mars Bonfire


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 12 Apr 2015, 06:46 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 01/14/12
Posts: 2001
Post Likes: +1494
Location: Hampton, VA
Aircraft: AEST
There are two sales outfits listing the slots on Controller.

No individuals.

http://www.controller.com/list/list.asp ... notfound=1

There are always folks who speculate on early slots for new aircraft, they figure there will be someone willing to pay to avoid waiting in line, or to pay to benefit from pre-production pricing.

Forrest

_________________
Forrest

'---x-O-x---'


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 12 Apr 2015, 09:36 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21070
Post Likes: +26510
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Will the PR shams be real or legal airplanes?

There will be a ceremony where serial #1 airplane will be "delivered" to the customer. Then serial #1 is retained by the company until truly ready. So it is a real airplane, just not quite ready. Eventually, a few months later, that customer gets to really use the airplane.

That's how Eclipse did their 12/31/2006 delivery of EA500 #1. It didn't really start being useful until about 6 months later (when deliveries truly started).

Quote:
Of previous clean-sheet jets that came to market, how many had 400 true sales prior to the first delivery?

Eclipse certainly did based on the number of folks who paid money and got nothing at the end.

Given the 260 EA500s, the 450 Mustangs, and the 250 Phenom 100s that exist, perhaps the owner flown very light jet market is just saturated? If there are 500 SF50s, that would be the most numerous example of VLJ, which seems unlikely given how it is limited compared to the others.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 12 Apr 2015, 09:49 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21070
Post Likes: +26510
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
There are two sales outfits listing the slots on Controller.

No individuals.

How do you know the positions for sale aren't individuals who have hired these two brokers?

Note that both outfits claim to be brokers, not speculators, and list numerous other existing aircraft for sale. It seems clear those existing aircraft are owned by individuals. I expect the same for the SF50 positions.

Quote:
There are always folks who speculate on early slots for new aircraft, they figure there will be someone willing to pay to avoid waiting in line, or to pay to benefit from pre-production pricing.

So the question is, how much of the order book is fluff like that?

The telling part is that positions for sale above #43 are few because they don't have progress payments to make yet. Now that real money is due, people start to run away.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 12 Apr 2015, 09:59 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21070
Post Likes: +26510
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
The sales contract language for delays:

DELAY IN DELIVERY

6.01 Cirrus shall not be liable to Purchaser for any failure or delay in making Delivery when such failure or delay arises from any cause beyond Cirrus’ control, including, without limitation, acts of God, accidents, strikes, labor causing cessation, slow down, interruption of work, war, insurrections, hostilities, riots, delays or failure in transportation, delay or inability to secure materials, parts or equipment necessary to manufacture or complete the Aircraft, governmental acts of constraint, or any delay of any subcontractor or vendor. In the event that any delay is anticipated, Cirrus’ sole obligation is to notify Purchaser of a new Delivery Date as soon as possible.


There are enough loopholes you can drive a Mack truck through them. For example, I'd say not getting the TC counts as "governmental acts of constraint". Or, they can claim any vendor, subcontractor, material, or equipment is late. To prove the absence of all the possible excuses in court would be impossible.

This makes the termination clause meaningless:

TERMINATION

7.01 Should Cirrus fail to deliver the Aircraft within Thirty [30] days after the Delivery Date, Purchaser may, as its sole remedy, upon ten [10] days written notice and failure by Cirrus to deliver the Aircraft within the ten [10] day period, cancel this Order, and Cirrus shall refund all payments made by Purchaser. This thirty [30] day “grace period” shall be in addition to any period of delay caused by events referenced in Section 6, which are outside of Cirrus’ control.


Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 12 Apr 2015, 10:09 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 01/14/12
Posts: 2001
Post Likes: +1494
Location: Hampton, VA
Aircraft: AEST
Mike,

You are determined to see bad news where there isn't any.

I checked for SF50 slots for sale on ASO and Trade a Plane.

The Ohio outfit showed up both places.

No individuals.

None anywhere.

It is possible that the individuals who decided to purchase early production slots for the Cirrus Jet all decided to list them for sale with these two outfits.

Possible.

Much more likely is that there is someone associated with each of these outfits who decided to speculate on delivery slots, and is now attempting to cash in.

It will be interesting to see if these positions turn over.

If slot holders were running for the hills, we should be seeing more individual offers instead of a couple brokers marketing multiple listings.

Cheap fuel, recovering economy, an Asian market making ready for a General Aviation Boom.

A pessimist always assumes there is bad news around the corner, an optimist assumes there isn't.

Both turn out to be right, sometimes.

Forrest

_________________
Forrest

'---x-O-x---'


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 12 Apr 2015, 10:12 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
The For Sale ads on Controller could be as simple as brokers listing planes that are not for sale. Get a buyer willing to pay up then you go to someone with a delivery slot and make them an offer they can't refuse.

I see it all the time on Controller. Many PC12's listed aren't really for sale or don't exist at all. Start working the phones and you realize how many there really aren't.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 12 Apr 2015, 10:27 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 01/14/12
Posts: 2001
Post Likes: +1494
Location: Hampton, VA
Aircraft: AEST
Jason's point is an interesting one.

Has anyone on BT done business with either of these outfits?

One more thought:

There is a value for a pre-production slot.

Part of it is the ability to get a plane early - I can't figure out a value on that (I'm sure there is a BT'r who can)

Part is going to be the lower price that comes with an early commitment (Early Eclipse buyers got a better deal than later buyers, the latest folks got the worse deal of all - NO Plane)

That number is real and knowable.

A seller wishing to dump a slot would reasonably advertise this value and his discount to that value.

That doesn't seem to be happening.

My guess, the early adopters, plus the speculators have all bought, the folks who are going to wait for a certified airplane, are sitting on their wallets.

Forrest

_________________
Forrest

'---x-O-x---'


Last edited on 12 Apr 2015, 11:06, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 12 Apr 2015, 10:29 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/31/10
Posts: 13678
Post Likes: +7841
Company: 320 Fam
Aircraft: 58TC
Lone mountain is a big Cirrus dealer.

_________________
Views are my own and don’t represent employers or clients
My 58TC https://tinyurl.com/mry9f8f6


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 12 Apr 2015, 10:42 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 08/03/08
Posts: 16156
Post Likes: +8873
Location: 2W5
Aircraft: A36
Username Protected wrote:
There are two sales outfits listing the slots on Controller.
t


They may well be individually owned slots listed by a broker.
The cirrus owners who bought slots and are now selling probably fall into three groups:
-those who did well and already have their CJ3.
-those who now live in their parents basement and hope to make some money back on the slots
-those who realized that they dont need that particular plane or any plane at all


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 12 Apr 2015, 13:12 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21070
Post Likes: +26510
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
No individuals.

Selling positions is a special thing, individuals don't do it directly and only certain brokers do it.

Thus it is not at all surprising that position sales are handled by a small number of brokers and no individuals are direct listing.

Quote:
A pessimist always assumes there is bad news around the corner, an optimist assumes there isn't.

A realist knows which way it will go.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109 ... 512  Next



PlaneAC

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026

.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.Plane Salon Beechtalk.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.dbm.jpg.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.daytona.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.SCA.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.BT Ad.png.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.ElectroairTile.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.