banner
banner

14 Jan 2026, 23:21 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Garmin International (Banner)



This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104 ... 512  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 13:59 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
You went to Cancun around Xmas New Years. I've done that trip at that time. I think your ATC delay was due to flow control into Cancun and not ATL traffic saturation. Once you were in the air it was hard for ATC to hold you for flow control so you just slipped into the system.

Many 135 operators are required in their OPSPECS to be IFR with passengers and can't use that dodge. Also you can burn into your fuel reserve quicker in a jet VFR low. Heading into Cancun is not when I want to be getting low on fuel because I was low for a while picking up my clearance into the FLs.

I agree. But Cancun, Atlanta, tomato, tomato. Doesn't really matter why. It was a zoo out there. That said, once I got over Florida everyone was bitching about ATL ATC and the "supposed" delay. Miami center said "I don't know why they're claiming a delay... there's no delay, I'm climbing everyone". ATC is another cog in Murphy's Law. It's just another thing to go wrong

Even at 15k' the whole way I would land with 1200lbs on board.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 14:06 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/09/13
Posts: 1910
Post Likes: +927
Location: KCMA
Aircraft: Aero Commander 980
Username Protected wrote:
If I lived in NYC, I'd have a jet like you. The main reason I bought PC12 is Atlanta. I'm close to everything except the ski slopes.


Sitting at the Ritz in SOBE writing this. Flew down to FXE on Friday. Bit of icing departing the NY area that the hot wings handled easily. 3:14 flight. 150+ headwinds in the lower FLs from NY to NC. Went up to FL450 for about an 80kt headwind. Put a raft in the back and went down AR21 overwater. Used a lot of the capabilities of the CJ2+ to make it a nice relaxing flight.


This illustrates the one disadvantage of a TP. Jets can't get above winds and pistons can get below. TP speed offsets the advantage of the pistons but I wanted to get my plug in for piston twins.

They have their place but I strongly consider winds before blasting off long distance during winter in my piston twin.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 14:38 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 08/25/13
Posts: 615
Post Likes: +128
Username Protected wrote:

This illustrates the one disadvantage of a TP. Jets can't get above winds and pistons can get below. TP speed offsets the advantage of the pistons but I wanted to get my plug in for piston twins.

They have their place but I strongly consider winds before blasting off long distance during winter in my piston twin.


This actually illustrates the advantage of SETP. Penalty to stay at FL180 in a TBM is 25knots and 25gph. You can do 290knots at 85gph all day long. I still think TBM/Pilatus are impossible to beat time and/or economy wise on any trip under 600nm. But to some, including me, pumping that extra 40gph is worth the piece of mind of knowing I won't become a glider. Been there, done that, don't want to do it anymore.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 15:03 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21067
Post Likes: +26508
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Out of Atlanta, a jet will NOT beat me to NYC, Chicago or S. Florida.

Show us an example of an SP jet being beat by a PC12 flown on the above trips within a few hours of each other.

Be patient, it will take you some time to find it.

Quote:
Who cares if it's "owner flown"?

The owner.

It is misleading to suggest the PC12 is popular with owner operators when most of them do something else.

Quote:
"Simpler"? How?

No prop, no prop deice, no prop governor. These are all added items over a jet, including the failures and emergency procedures associated with them.

A twin jet is simpler when an engine fails.

A jet is simpler to fly over weather the PC12 can't top.

A jet is simpler to fly over turbulence.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 15:06 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 01/31/09
Posts: 5193
Post Likes: +3038
Location: Northern NJ
Aircraft: SR22;CJ2+;C510
Username Protected wrote:
Even at 15k' the whole way I would land with 1200lbs on board.


When you get irrational and buy your jet you will like SE a lot of that flexibility.

I seem to have no reason to go around ATL. Last time I flew into the area was when NVAA was there.

_________________
Allen


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 15:08 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21067
Post Likes: +26508
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Stay with your PC12.

If I owned a jet, I would say the same thing to Jason.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 15:25 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
I seem to have no reason to go around ATL. Last time I flew into the area was when NVAA was there.

Nobody has a reason to come to Atlanta. I'm only here because this is where business and family are. Otherwise I'd be in NYC..... with a jet. :D


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 15:27 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Show us an example of an SP jet being beat by a PC12 flown on the above trips within a few hours of each other.


Mike C.

I never said anything about a PC12 "beating" a jet. I'm fine with being slower than a jet Atlanta to NYC. "How much slower" is the question. 1 minute? 3 minutes? 15 minutes? Single Pilots PDK to TEB it's not up to "US". It's up to ATC.

The rest of your post is :hammer:


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 16:11 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 21067
Post Likes: +26508
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
Out of Atlanta, a jet will NOT beat me to NYC
...
I'm fine with being slower than a jet Atlanta to NYC.

Good thing your are consistent otherwise nobody would know what you are saying.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 16:46 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/09/09
Posts: 4438
Post Likes: +3306
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
Jason,

When did you file your flight plan for your delayed trip to cancun?

A two hour delay sounds to me like you may have tried to file just before departure as is the norm in the US or Canada but not when leaving to many other countries.

Two hours is the required advance filing for many Central American and South American countries.

I always go IFR and have never been delayed. I always file the night before.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 17:55 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Jason,

When did you file your flight plan for your delayed trip to cancun?

A two hour delay sounds to me like you may have tried to file just before departure as is the norm in the US or Canada but not when leaving to many other countries.

Two hours is the required advance filing for many Central American and South American countries.

I always go IFR and have never been delayed. I always file the night before.

Just the opposite. I was anticipating the rush and filed 24 hours prior. Wasn't til I tried to pick up my clearance that I was told about the delay. Then I refiled on my phone and boom.

I've flown/filed international for years last minute. That's the first time anything like this has happened. It's really just due to holiday rush and mass confusion in the government.


Last edited on 14 Jan 2015, 17:57, edited 1 time in total.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 17:56 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/08
Posts: 26338
Post Likes: +13087
Location: Walterboro, SC. KRBW
Aircraft: PC12NG
Username Protected wrote:
Out of Atlanta, a jet will NOT beat me to NYC
...
I'm fine with being slower than a jet Atlanta to NYC.

Good thing your are consistent otherwise nobody would know what you are saying.

Mike C.

You said "faster". I never said "faster". Nor don't I care if I'm 10 minutes faster or they're 10 minuets faster. The difference in time would be due to ATC and not to the performance of the airplane. That's all I'm trying to say.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 18:13 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/03/10
Posts: 1561
Post Likes: +1810
Company: D&M Leasing Houston
Location: Katy, TX (KTME)
Aircraft: CitationV/C180
Let's do a raffle-
I will reserve the wine cellar at Pappas or Del's in Houston (central and I live here)
8 highest bidders and me
Dinner with Mike and Jason
Jason flies in his PC-12 and fills the seats with his ahem...top 8 "friends"
Mike flies in his MU-2 and puts a big white board in it to bring to dinner
The 8 highest bidders get to have dinner with Mike, Jason and his special guests as they DUKE out the single twin debate. Upon completion of that topic, we will move on to the merits of the SF50 and its imminent failure or success in the market.

we will post pictures and the FINAL results of both topics the following day or whenever we are able....
:cheers: :D


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 18:22 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 02/13/10
Posts: 20423
Post Likes: +25603
Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Aircraft: Prior C310,BE33,SR22
Virtual (Internet) gonads are always more substantial than real life. :eek:
:D

_________________
Arlen
Get your motor runnin'
Head out on the highway
- Mars Bonfire


Top

 Post subject: Re: Cirrus SF50
PostPosted: 14 Jan 2015, 18:32 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 11/09/13
Posts: 1910
Post Likes: +927
Location: KCMA
Aircraft: Aero Commander 980
Username Protected wrote:

This illustrates the one disadvantage of a TP. Jets can't get above winds and pistons can get below. TP speed offsets the advantage of the pistons but I wanted to get my plug in for piston twins.

They have their place but I strongly consider winds before blasting off long distance during winter in my piston twin.


This actually illustrates the advantage of SETP. Penalty to stay at FL180 in a TBM is 25knots and 25gph. You can do 290knots at 85gph all day long. I still think TBM/Pilatus are impossible to beat time and/or economy wise on any trip under 600nm. But to some, including me, pumping that extra 40gph is worth the piece of mind of knowing I won't become a glider. Been there, done that, don't want to do it anymore.


What's the advantage?

Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 7667 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104 ... 512  Next



PlaneAC

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2026

.camguard.jpg.
.b-kool-85x50.png.
.Latitude.jpg.
.AeroMach85x100.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.Plane AC Tile.png.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.concorde.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.rnp.85x50.png.
.BT Ad.png.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.suttoncreativ85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.LogAirLower85x50.png.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.Aircraft Associates.85x50.png.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.Plane Salon Beechtalk.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.v2x.85x100.png.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.AAI.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.ElectroairTile.png.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.tempest.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.avnav.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.