banner
banner

08 May 2025, 17:51 [ UTC - 5; DST ]


Stevens Aerospace (Banner)



Reply to topic  [ 239 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 16  Next
Username Protected Message
 Post subject: Re: Flying the MU2
PostPosted: 06 Jun 2018, 12:00 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19965
Post Likes: +25035
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
I said "mechanically failed" meaning you aren't getting it back.

I can't diagnose that in 30 seconds before MDA.

If I can't get it back, then I'm no worse off.

Quote:
Yeah, it could be worse. In deteriorating or changing conditions, it might be below minimums on your next approach.

Unlikely given that I now have hundreds of runways in range to choose from.

If the weather is changing so rapidly that 8 minutes to come around for another approach puts us below minimums, then that likely means better weather within range. Rapidly changing weather means conditions differ over the area.

Quote:
Then what are you going to do after declaring the emergency you created by missing at 800 when 400 could have got you in the first time possibly?

On this approach, we know 400 wasn't getting us in, so that's one data point.

But in your highly contrived and unlikely case that the only chance I had to get in was the one approach I missed, then you would be right. The odds of that are microscopic. The decision to go around is all about taking the path of least risk, but that's not going to be perfect.

Quote:
The "first thing you do is wind your watch" is in reference to when an engine fails on a jet. If the first thing you do when an engine fails on a propeller airplane is wind your watch, the next thing you do might be finding yourself upside down.

You are missing the point with this literal interpretation. One obviously has to fly the plane first and keep it under control. This is also true for a jet.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the MU2
PostPosted: 06 Jun 2018, 18:08 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/28/17
Posts: 8221
Post Likes: +10387
Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
Username Protected wrote:
Stop & feather...then either land or wind the watch, whichever you prefer. That was the lesson from the Red Lake Metro accident.


The stop and feather was the part I was trying to point out to Mike, before winding any watches, and that's also a part jets don't have to contend with.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the MU2
PostPosted: 06 Jun 2018, 18:12 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/28/17
Posts: 8221
Post Likes: +10387
Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
Username Protected wrote:
I said "mechanically failed" meaning you aren't getting it back.

I can't diagnose that in 30 seconds before MDA.

If I can't get it back, then I'm no worse off.

Quote:
Yeah, it could be worse. In deteriorating or changing conditions, it might be below minimums on your next approach.

Unlikely given that I now have hundreds of runways in range to choose from.

If the weather is changing so rapidly that 8 minutes to come around for another approach puts us below minimums, then that likely means better weather within range. Rapidly changing weather means conditions differ over the area.

Quote:
Then what are you going to do after declaring the emergency you created by missing at 800 when 400 could have got you in the first time possibly?

On this approach, we know 400 wasn't getting us in, so that's one data point.

But in your highly contrived and unlikely case that the only chance I had to get in was the one approach I missed, then you would be right. The odds of that are microscopic. The decision to go around is all about taking the path of least risk, but that's not going to be perfect.

Quote:
The "first thing you do is wind your watch" is in reference to when an engine fails on a jet. If the first thing you do when an engine fails on a propeller airplane is wind your watch, the next thing you do might be finding yourself upside down.

You are missing the point with this literal interpretation. One obviously has to fly the plane first and keep it under control. This is also true for a jet.

Mike C.


In regard to the weather we both see the odds of anything in particular happening differently, and our depth of experience also differs.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the MU2
PostPosted: 06 Jun 2018, 18:17 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19965
Post Likes: +25035
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
The stop and feather was the part I was trying to point out to Mike, before winding any watches, and that's also a part jets don't have to contend with.

Jets do require meaningful control inputs when an engine fails and they have engine failure checklists to be performed, so they are not totally without need for immediate action on engine failure.

The point is to find the time to consider your next decision rather than rush it.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the MU2
PostPosted: 06 Jun 2018, 18:24 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19965
Post Likes: +25035
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
our depth of experience also differs.

If you get some experience in a twin turboprop, it will help you understand what my experience has taught me.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the MU2
PostPosted: 06 Jun 2018, 18:38 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/28/17
Posts: 8221
Post Likes: +10387
Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
Username Protected wrote:
our depth of experience also differs.

If you get some experience in a twin turboprop, it will help you understand what my experience has taught me.

Mike C.


The training syllabus calls for an engine out precision approach to DA followed by a missed approach. For the MU2 400 feet is as low as they want you to execute a missed approach, so that is considered the plane's DA, They chose that altitude because it has an increased margin of safety that would allow for sinking somewhat below 400 in the missed, safely. But you are adding another 400 feet to that.

We say "fly like you train", but you aren't. Aren't you demonstrating single engine approaches and missed approaches from 400 feet on your checkrides? I would think that you are, and also think you probably demonstrated them successfully. But you really don't believe in them? I'm pretty sure that if you missed your approaches at 800 feet, you would have failed your checkrides.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the MU2
PostPosted: 06 Jun 2018, 18:42 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/28/17
Posts: 8221
Post Likes: +10387
Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
Username Protected wrote:
our depth of experience also differs.

If you get some experience in a twin turboprop, it will help you understand what my experience has taught me.

Mike C.


It's your training that should have taught you, and TP has nothing to do with weather experience. You seem to be one of those guys that train one way, then fly another adopting your own warped theories.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the MU2
PostPosted: 06 Jun 2018, 19:05 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 03/28/17
Posts: 8221
Post Likes: +10387
Location: N. California
Aircraft: C-182
Username Protected wrote:
The stop and feather was the part I was trying to point out to Mike, before winding any watches, and that's also a part jets don't have to contend with.

Jets do require meaningful control inputs when an engine fails and they have engine failure checklists to be performed, so they are not totally without need for immediate action on engine failure.

The point is to find the time to consider your next decision rather than rush it.

Mike C.


The difference between your plane and a jet in an engine failure on takeoff is that your plane requires that the failed engine condition lever needs to go to emergency stop to ensure climb performance, therefore creating a distraction and a chance of getting the wrong one. No engine controls need to be touched in a jet to ensure climb performance. The takeoff power setting assures that the jet will make it's climb gradient with an engine out without shutting anything down or adding more power to the other engine, or changing flap settings. After the plane is cleaned up, then the engine out emergency procedures are performed.

Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the MU2
PostPosted: 06 Jun 2018, 21:45 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/03/10
Posts: 1561
Post Likes: +1809
Company: D&M Leasing Houston
Location: Katy, TX (KTME)
Aircraft: CitationV/C180
Username Protected wrote:

The difference between your plane and a jet in an engine failure on takeoff is that your plane requires that the failed engine condition lever needs to go to emergency stop to ensure climb performance, therefore creating a distraction and a chance of getting the wrong one. No engine controls need to be touched in a jet to ensure climb performance. The takeoff power setting assures that the jet will make it's climb gradient with an engine out without shutting anything down or adding more power to the other engine, or changing flap settings. After the plane is cleaned up, then the engine out emergency procedures are performed.


The NTS will reduce 85% of the drag. The MU2 will maintain altitude if not climb easily provided flaps 20 and gear up and not under approach speed of 130 knots. Once you’ve trimmed and gone through the checklist you can feather the failed engine. We are taught specifically to “eat a banana” when an engine fails. It’s misinformation to say there’s immediate, critical need to feather the engine on an MU2 once it’s failed.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the MU2
PostPosted: 06 Jun 2018, 21:59 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19965
Post Likes: +25035
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
The NTS will reduce 85% of the drag. The MU2 will maintain altitude if not climb easily provided flaps 20 and gear up and not under approach speed of 130 knots.

Yes, it will.

Quote:
We are taught specifically to “eat a banana” when an engine fails.

Hmm, my training is inadequate, apparently. Must be using the wrong fruit.

Quote:
It’s misinformation to say there’s immediate, critical need to feather the engine on an MU2 once it’s failed.

I have the opportunity to introduce the MU2 to piston twin pilots in the simulator. Without exception, the piston twin pilots grab and pull levers too damn fast. Often, the pull the wrong one. I've seen it happen.

As an exercise, I take them through a sequence to deprogram that a bit.

Phase 1: engine fails, just fly. Don't feather, don't secure, do nothing but FLY. Get it under control, right amount of rudder, attitude right, etc. The plane WILL climb out in this condition.

Phase 2: only AFTER phase 1 is being handled smoothly, now have the pilot FLY the plane first, then calmly identify and feather. The emphasis is on FLY first. Levers can wait for you to have the plane under control.

Phase 3: now add securing and checklist, speed up, flaps retraction, etc.

Phase 4: put it all together and practice it until you smoothly go through all of it with reasonable speed.

It is amazing how much better the plane is under control once you FLY first. After you do that a few times, the feathering is still happening within 5 seconds or so, but without rush and carefully considered. You cannot stop flying and go for levers as the first thing or the plane is all over the place when you get back to it.

Even though the MU2 is way faster, heavier, and more powerful than the piston twin they had been flying, it doesn't require super fast reflexes, indeed, the opposite, be slow and careful.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the MU2
PostPosted: 06 Jun 2018, 22:04 
Offline


 Profile




Joined: 06/09/09
Posts: 4438
Post Likes: +3303
Aircraft: C182P, Merlin IIIC
You guys are assuming a perfect NTS response. Don’t be left out of the loop that is your airplane.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the MU2
PostPosted: 06 Jun 2018, 22:10 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 08/03/10
Posts: 1561
Post Likes: +1809
Company: D&M Leasing Houston
Location: Katy, TX (KTME)
Aircraft: CitationV/C180
Username Protected wrote:
You guys are assuming a perfect NTS response. Don’t be left out of the loop that is your airplane.


NTS works or it doesn’t for the most part. The NTS gear twists when negative torque is present and the gear moves the beta tube and dumps the oil pressure to the hub. A clogged tube perhaps could inhibit effectiveness but IF you have an engine failure on a super reliable TPE331 AND you have an NTS system not working properly, perhaps it’s just not your day.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the MU2
PostPosted: 06 Jun 2018, 22:14 
Offline


User avatar
 Profile




Joined: 01/29/09
Posts: 4744
Post Likes: +2463
Company: retired corporate mostly
Location: Chico,California KCIC/CL56
Aircraft: 1956 Champion 7EC
Quote:
You guys are assuming a perfect NTS response. Don’t be left out of the loop that is your airplane.

It will be recognized immediately. ( As you know)
I tested the NTS on a Merlin IIb and it failed, there was no doubt that it had failed. Until I feathered we were turning and descending.

_________________
Jeff

soloed in a land of Superhomers/1959 Cessna 150, retired with Proline 21/ CJ4.


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the MU2
PostPosted: 06 Jun 2018, 23:05 
Offline


 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/03/14
Posts: 19965
Post Likes: +25035
Company: Ciholas, Inc
Location: KEHR
Aircraft: C560V
Username Protected wrote:
It will be recognized immediately. ( As you know)
I tested the NTS on a Merlin IIb and it failed, there was no doubt that it had failed. Until I feathered we were turning and descending.

An engine failure with inoperative NTS is definitely attention getting. Requires quick feathering.

If it happens below 400 AGL on takeoff, may not survive it.

To my knowledge, never been an engine failure and NTS failure at the same time in the MU2. Been a few cases the inflight NTS test failed, however, like the one you described, so it is possible.

If the NTS test fails at start, I ain't flying. Period.

Mike C.

_________________
Email mikec (at) ciholas.com


Top

 Post subject: Re: Flying the MU2
PostPosted: 06 Jun 2018, 23:21 
Offline


User avatar
 WWW  Profile




Joined: 12/17/13
Posts: 6652
Post Likes: +5957
Location: Hollywood, Los Angeles, CA
Aircraft: Aerostar Superstar 2
My old girl has NTS, but there's no way of testing it on the ground or in the air except shutting it down. But I've stopped worrying about it now, if it happens I just need to be on my A game.

_________________
Without love, where would you be now?


Top

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 239 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 16  Next



B-Kool

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  

Terms of Service | Forum FAQ | Contact Us

BeechTalk, LLC is the quintessential Beechcraft Owners & Pilots Group providing a forum for the discussion of technical, practical, and entertaining issues relating to all Beech aircraft. These include the Bonanza (both V-tail and straight-tail models), Baron, Debonair, Duke, Twin Bonanza, King Air, Sierra, Skipper, Sport, Sundowner, Musketeer, Travel Air, Starship, Queen Air, BeechJet, and Premier lines of airplanes, turboprops, and turbojets.

BeechTalk, LLC is not affiliated or endorsed by the Beechcraft Corporation, its subsidiaries, or affiliates. Beechcraft™, King Air™, and Travel Air™ are the registered trademarks of the Beechcraft Corporation.

Copyright© BeechTalk, LLC 2007-2025

.ocraviation-85x50.png.
.KalAir_Black.jpg.
.SCA.jpg.
.Wentworth_85x100.JPG.
.traceaviation-85x150.png.
.mcfarlane-85x50.png.
.jetacq-85x50.jpg.
.gallagher_85x50.jpg.
.kingairnation-85x50.png.
.concorde.jpg.
.centex-85x50.jpg.
.planelogix-85x100-2015-04-15.jpg.
.camguard.jpg.
.headsetsetc_Small_85x50.jpg.
.sierratrax-85x50.png.
.performanceaero-85x50.jpg.
.jandsaviation-85x50.jpg.
.shortnnumbers-85x100.png.
.tat-85x100.png.
.garmin-85x200-2021-11-22.jpg.
.holymicro-85x50.jpg.
.Elite-85x50.png.
.pdi-85x50.jpg.
.Wingman 85x50.png.
.ssv-85x50-2023-12-17.jpg.
.tempest.jpg.
.puremedical-85x200.jpg.
.midwest2.jpg.
.aerox_85x100.png.
.boomerang-85x50-2023-12-17.png.
.Rocky-Mountain-Turbine-85x100.jpg.
.kadex-85x50.jpg.
.stanmusikame-85x50.jpg.
.dbm.jpg.
.aviationdesigndouble.jpg.
.MountainAirframe.jpg.
.blackwell-85x50.png.
.lucysaviation-85x50.png.
.wat-85x50.jpg.
.bullardaviation-85x50-2.jpg.
.daytona.jpg.
.temple-85x100-2015-02-23.jpg.
.geebee-85x50.jpg.
.ABS-85x100.jpg.
.bpt-85x50-2019-07-27.jpg.
.saint-85x50.jpg.
.KingAirMaint85_50.png.
.airmart-85x150.png.
.CiESVer2.jpg.
.blackhawk-85x100-2019-09-25.jpg.
.Latitude.jpg.
.wilco-85x100.png.